Transparency International

Corruption Perceptions Index 2019

Rank

44 / 180

A country's rank indicates its position relative to the other countries in the index. Learn more.

Score

56 / 100

A country or territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). Learn more.

Contact our chapter

Swedbank’s dirty money dealings should trigger fundamental changes in anti-money laundering supervision

Helpdesk Answer

Overview of countries’ supreme audit institutions with surcharging powers

EU countries’ chance to lead on whistleblower protection

Why corruption matters in the EU elections

What voters should know as they head to the polls.

Historic day for whistleblowers as EU agrees pathbreaking legislation

Western Europe and EU: stagnating anti-corruption efforts and weakening democratic institutions

With an average regional score of 66 out of 100, Western Europe and the EU are doing far better than other parts of the globe. However, for a region that prides itself on some of the most robust integrity systems in the world, the patchwork of partially overlapping national and EU-level integrity systems presents its own problems and still has a long way to go to tackle corruption effectively.

Risky business: Europe’s golden visa programmes

Are EU Member States accepting too much risk in their investor migration schemes?

EU member states in race to the bottom to sell Golden Visas to the super-rich

Golden Visa programmes in Europe pose major corruption risk

Europe and Central Asia: More civil engagement needed (Part II)

As follow-up to the regional analysis of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, additional examples from Albania, Kosovo and Georgia highlight the need for more progress in anti-corruption efforts in these countries and across the region.

Europe and Central Asia: more civil engagement needed (Part I)

In 2017, authoritarianism rose across Eastern and South East Europe, hindering anti-corruption efforts and threatening civil liberties. Across the region, civil society organisations and independent media experienced challenges in their ability to monitor and criticise decision-makers