Corruption Perceptions Index 2018

Rank

38 / 180

i
A country's rank indicates its position relative to the other countries in the index. Learn more.

Score

59 / 100

i
A country or territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). Learn more.

Contact our chapter

Why corruption matters in the EU elections

What voters should know as they head to the polls.

Helpdesk Answer

Best practices in collective action for business integrity

Historic day for whistleblowers as EU agrees pathbreaking legislation

Troika Laundromat signals a different kind of financial crisis

The Troika Laundromat investigation shines a spotlight on a cast of new and familiar characters in the ongoing saga surrounding flows of dirty money through the world’s financial system.

Troika Laundromat revelations make the case for tougher supervision of Europe’s banking sector

Western Europe and EU: stagnating anti-corruption efforts and weakening democratic institutions

With an average regional score of 66 out of 100, Western Europe and the EU are doing far better than other parts of the globe. However, for a region that prides itself on some of the most robust integrity systems in the world, the patchwork of partially overlapping national and EU-level integrity systems presents its own problems and still has a long way to go to tackle corruption effectively.

Golden Visa programmes in Europe pose major corruption risk

Europe and Central Asia: More civil engagement needed (Part II)

As follow-up to the regional analysis of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, additional examples from Albania, Kosovo and Georgia highlight the need for more progress in anti-corruption efforts in these countries and across the region.

Europe and Central Asia: more civil engagement needed (Part I)

In 2017, authoritarianism rose across Eastern and South East Europe, hindering anti-corruption efforts and threatening civil liberties. Across the region, civil society organisations and independent media experienced challenges in their ability to monitor and criticise decision-makers

Clean contracting at work: an example from Vilnius

The Neris Riverside development is part of a wider initiative to promote clean contracting across Europe – all told, we're monitoring 17 major public contracts worth nearly €1 billion.

Open data to fight corruption – Case study: Lithuania’s judiciary

Chapter Info

Transparency International Lithuania

Didžioji 5
01128 Vilnius
Lithuania

T: +370-5-212 6951
F: +370-5-212 1687
E: sergejus@transparency.lt
Website: http://www.transparency.lt

Mr Sergej Muravjov
Executive Director

Follow us on Social Media