Corruption Perceptions Index 2018

Rank

11 / 180

i
A country's rank indicates its position relative to the other countries in the index. Learn more.

Score

80 / 100

i
A country or territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). Learn more.

Contact our chapter

Why corruption matters in the EU elections

What voters should know as they head to the polls.

Helpdesk Answer

Best practices for whistleblowing in sport

German authorities asked to investigate elected officials over Azerbaijani Laundromat bribery scandal

Historic day for whistleblowers as EU agrees pathbreaking legislation

Helpdesk Answer

Overview of oversight mechanisms of parliamentary budgets in Europe

Western Europe and EU: stagnating anti-corruption efforts and weakening democratic institutions

With an average regional score of 66 out of 100, Western Europe and the EU are doing far better than other parts of the globe. However, for a region that prides itself on some of the most robust integrity systems in the world, the patchwork of partially overlapping national and EU-level integrity systems presents its own problems and still has a long way to go to tackle corruption effectively.

Deutsche Bank raid underscores need for coordinated global leadership against financial secrecy

Helpdesk Answer

Ineligibilities for elected office arising from criminal law decisions

Alarm over increasing signs of state capture and pressure on civil society in Georgia

Media Advisory: Report on ‘Golden Visas’ corruption risks to EU published 10 October

The Azerbaijani Laundromat one year on: has justice been served?

In September last year, a massive leak of bank records from 2012 to 2014 showed that the ruling elite of Azerbaijan ran a $3 billion slush fund and an international money laundering scheme. One year on, has enough been done to hold those involved to account?

Corruption, human rights, civil society should be on Chancellor Merkel’s agenda in Azerbaijan

Europe and Central Asia: More civil engagement needed (Part II)

As follow-up to the regional analysis of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, additional examples from Albania, Kosovo and Georgia highlight the need for more progress in anti-corruption efforts in these countries and across the region.

Chapter Info

Transparency International Germany

Alte Schönhauser Str. 44
D- 10119 Berlin
Deutschland

T: +49 30 549 898 0
F: +49 30 5498 9822
E: office@transparency.de
Website: http://www.transparency.de/

Dr. Anna-Maija Mertens
Managing Director

Follow us on Social Media