Skip to main content
Corruption cases with social impact in the Western Balkans and Turkey

The Titanik Case: Systemic Corruption and Electoral Fraud in North Macedonia

Back to Case Index
  • North Macedonia

The Titanik Case: Systemic Corruption and Electoral Fraud in North Macedonia

Case Date(s)
02/2016
Case Updated
06/2024

Case Summary

Phase

1st instance procedure

Offence

  • Abuse of functions

Sector

  • Public administration and defense; compulsory social security

Involved people

Allegedly involved people Nikola Gruevski Ex-Prime Minister
Nikola Gruevski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Misuse of funds for financing the election campaign
  • Violation of electoral rights
Allegedly involved people Martin Protogjer Ex-Secretary General of the Government
Martin Protogjer
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Misuse of funds for financing the election campaign
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Kiril Bozinovski Ex-Secretary General of the political party VMRO-DPMNE
Kiril Bozinovski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Misuse of funds for financing the election campaign
Allegedly involved people Mile Janakievski Ex-Minister of transport and communication
Mile Janakievski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Misuse of funds for financing the election campaign
  • Violation of electoral rights
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
  • Destruction of election material
Allegedly involved people Gorda Jankulovska Ex-Minister of Interior
Gorda Jankulovska
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of electoral rights
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Ilija Dimovski Member of Parliament from the political party VMRO-DPMNE
Ilija Dimovski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Misuse of funds for financing the election campaign
Allegedly involved people Biljana Brishkoska Boshkoski Deputy Minister of Justice and President of the Legal Commission of the VMRO-DPMNE political party
Biljana Brishkoska Boshkoski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Forgery of a document
Allegedly involved people Leko Ristoski Involved in organizing election irregularities
Leko Ristoski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Misuse of funds for financing the election campaign
Allegedly involved people Dalibor Aleshkovikj Employee in the Government of RNM involved in organizing election irregularities
Dalibor Aleshkovikj
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Misuse of funds for financing the election campaign
Allegedly involved people Katerina Velovska Former Deputy Minister of Economy involved in organizing election irregularities
Katerina Velovska
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Stanko Korunovski Employee at the Central Registry involved in organizing election irregularities
Stanko Korunovski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Kiril Todorovski Chief of staff of the Minister of Internal Affairs
Kiril Todorovski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Munir Pepikj Employed in the Intelligence Agency
Munir Pepikj
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Edmond Temelko Macedonian Politician in Albania
Edmond Temelko
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of electoral rights
  • Vote-buying
Allegedly involved people Dragche Dragcheski Employed in the Ministry of Interior involved in organizing election irregularities
Dragche Dragcheski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Marjan Nakevski Employed in the Ministry of Interior involved in organizing election irregularities
Marjan Nakevski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Goce Janevski Employed in the Ministry of Interior involved in organizing election irregularities
Goce Janevski
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Dzezmi Ahmet Employed in the Ministry of Interior involved in organizing election irregularities
Dzezmi Ahmet
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Robert Davitkov Employed in the Ministry of Interior involved in organizing election irregularities
Robert Davitkov
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Criminal association
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice
Allegedly involved people Lenka Rashajkovska Employee at the Central Registry involved in organizing election irregularities
Lenka Rashajkovska
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Violation of voters' freedom of choice

Initiated by North Macedonia’s former Special Prosecutor’s Office in response to the wiretapping scandal that rocked the country in 2015, the "Titanik" case stands as the first and largest investigation into electoral irregularities in the country’s history. The case implicated high-ranking officials, including former Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski and prominent members of the VMRO-DPMNE party, accusing them of orchestrating large-scale electoral fraud across multiple election cycles. Despite initial hopes for justice and accountability, several major setbacks during the proceedings, increasingly disillusioned the Macedonian public.

The “Titanik” case stands as one of the most complex cases in North Macedonia’s judicial history, symbolizing the country's struggle against corruption and abuse of power. Conducted by North Macedonia’s former Special Prosecutor’s Office (SPO), the case involved senior officials of the then-ruling VMRO-DPMNE party, who allegedly manipulated several electoral processes. Former Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski was identified as the mastermind behind the operation, encompassing ministers and prominent party officials. The "Titanik" case was part of a series of corruption probes conducted by the Special Prosecutor’s Office and prompted by the wiretapping scandal.

In February 2015, the opposition SDSM party began releasing secretly recorded tapes, exposing alleged mass illegal wiretapping operation and various forms of state abuse by the officials of the VMRO DPMNE-led government, including Gurevski´s involvement in electoral fraud. The scandal caused a major political crisis in North Macedonia, prompting the EU to broker a deal between the parties to resolve the instability.

Gruevski, who resigned under the EU-brokered agreement, dismissed the tapes as 'fabricated' by unnamed foreign intelligence agencies to destabilize the country.

One of the outcomes of that agreement was the creation of the Special Prosecution to investigate the alleged illegal surveillance and other abuses. In September 2015, Katica Janeva was appointed as the Special Prosecutor.

On 12 February 2016, the SPO launched the first and largest investigation about electoral, codenamed "Titanik". Former VMRO-DPMNE ministers and officials, judges, and members of the state electoral commission were implicated. They were accused of using their influence and official positions at both local and state levels to form a group that committed electoral crimes to keep the VMRO-DPMNE party in power and gain personal privileges. The investigation examined various offenses allegedly committed in past election cycles, including criminal association, violence, bribery, destruction of election materials, media manipulation and misuse of campaign funds. Additional irregularities involved issuing 15,000 fabricated birth certificates, printing 35,000 unused ID cards, and granting over 60,000 citizenships to ineligible voters.

Besides Gruevski, key figures implicated in the case included former Minister of Internal Affairs Gordana Jankuloska, former Minister of Transport and Communications Mile Janakieski, Government Secretary Kiril Bozinovski, former Government Secretary General Martin Protogjer, former Head of the Intelligence Agency Sasho Mijalkov and others.

On 29 June 2017, the SPO filed indictments in 17 cases, including for the "Titanik" case, requesting the detention of Nikola Gruevski and 17 others. The "Titanik" indictment charged the defendants with multiple offenses related to electoral irregularities under the framework of a criminal association. These charges included misuse of campaign funds, violation of electoral rights, violation of voters' freedom of choice, destruction of election material, forgery of a document, and vote-buying.

Due to the scale of the offenses and the number of defendants, the “Titanik” case was split into three parts: the "Titanik" case was the most high-profile, involving senior party officials, "Titanik 2" focused on a narrower scope of irregularities, mainly charges related to the abuse of official position, and the "Titanik 3" targeted the destruction of election materials during the 2013 local elections.

The trial phase of "Titanik" began in April 2018, with Gruevski and other defendants pleading not guilty. The proceedings were delayed due to the volume of evidence presented, including testimony from around 200 witnesses and extensive documentation. The trial in the "Titanik 3" case began already in March 2018 April 2018, followed by "Titanik 2" trial, that started in April. Later that fall, Gruevski fled to Hungary, evading the SPO’s efforts to bring him to justice.

In March 2019, a first-instance verdict in the "Titanik 2" case sentenced Saso Mijalkov and Menduh Thaci to prison for abuse of office. Similarly, in March 2020, two DUI officials were convicted in the "Titanik 3" case, although the Court of Appeal annulled those verdicts in July 2021.

Meanwhile, in March 2020, the SPO was dissolved amid a scandal involving its chief prosecutor, Katica Janeva. This severely damaged the public's trust in North Macedonia's judicial credibility. The SPO’s ongoing cases, including “Titanik,” were transferred to the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office for Prosecuting Organized Crime and Corruption.

In 2021, some charges were dismissed against fourteen defendants, due to the expiration of the statute of limitations. In February 2022, several defendants in the "Titanik" case, including former ministers Gordana Jankuloska and Mile Janakieski, pleaded guilty to some of the charges. The two ministers alongside two other defendants were sentenced to prison by the Skopje Basic Criminal Court, while others received suspended sentences. The Court of Appeal adjusted those sentences in July 2023, offering probation to Jankuloska and a reduced sentence to Janakieski. North Macedonia's Supreme Court subsequently upheld these convictions.

On 07 April 2022, the "Titanik" trial had to restart from scratch due to the retirement of a jury member. This meant forcing the reintroduction of previously examined evidence and testimony from dozens of witnesses. This major setback effectively wasted four years of proceedings, further increasing the threat of reaching the statute of limitations.

By 2023, legislative amendments to the Criminal Code reduced penalties for abuses of official position, which accelerated the expiration of statutes of limitations for certain offenses. In November 2023, based on these amendments, the Skopje Court of Appeal dismissed the indictment against Sasho Mijalkov in the "Titanik 2" case, due to the expiry period for prosecution, raising concerns about the effectiveness of judicial reforms.

The "Titanik" case unveiled deep-rooted corruption within North Macedonia’s government, severely damaging public trust in the country's institutions. The six-year proceedings have been characterized by overturned verdicts, retrials, reduced sentences, and unresolved charges. Of the 17 indictments filed against 94 individuals by the SPO in 2017, few served prison sentences, while several evaded justice entirely. Originally meant to bolster transparency and accountability, the investigations, marred by setbacks and the dissolution of the SPO, left the Macedonian public disillusioned. Many charges remain currently unresolved, threatened by dismissal under the statute of limitations.

Further details

JURISDICTION/COURT

Special Prosecutor’s Office (SPO) of the Republic of North Macedonia

Council for Criminal Offenses at the Supreme Court of the Republic of North Macedonia

Basic Criminal Court Skopje

Skopje Court of Appeals

Prosecutor’s Office for Prosecuting Organized Crime and Corruption

State Electoral Commission

LAWS (ALLEGEDLY) BREACHED

Criminal Code of North Macedonia: (Criminal association, Article 394; Abuse of funds for financing the election campaign, Article 165a; Violation of the right to vote, Article 159; Violation of the freedom of choice of voters, Article 160; Destruction of election material, Article 164; Forgery of a document, Article 378; Bribery during elections and voting, Article 162)

FINAL SANCTION OR MEASURE

Following the guilty plea of 8 defendants in the Titanik 1 case, the following sanctions were determined:

Gordana Jankuloska (former minister): sentenced to 2 years and 6 months in prison in the first verdict, converted to a suspended prison sentence of 1 year and 8 months on appeal.
Mile Janakieski (former minister): sentenced to 4 years and 6 months in prison, reduced to 3 years and 6 months on appeal. In June 2024 he was released from prison on parole.
Martin Protugjer (former general secretary of VMRO-DPMNE): sentenced to a suspended prison sentence of 2 years, reduced to a suspended prison sentence of 1 year and 6 months on appeal.

Biljana Brishkovska-Boškovski (former deputy minister): sentenced to a suspended prison sentence.

Kiro Todorovski (former chief of staff): sentenced to a suspended prison sentence.

Katerina Velovska was sentenced to a suspended prison sentence.

Munir Pepic: sentenced to 1 year in prison by the first-instance verdict, replaced with a suspended sentence on appeal.

Kosta Mitrovski: sentenced to 3 years in prison by the first-instance verdict, but the charges were dropped on appeal.

Other defendants were sentenced or acquitted in Titanik 2 and Titanik 3.

UNCOVERING METHOD

The wiretapped materials obtained and released by the opposition party SDSM from the illegal wiretapping scandal

PROSECUTOR

Prosecutor Lile Stefanova (after the case was transferred to the regular Prosecution)

When the case was under the jurisdiction of the Special Prosecutor’s Office (SPO), the main Prosecutors were:

Katica Janeva (Chief Special Prosecutor)

Fatime Fetai (Deputy Special Prosecutor)

Lence Ristoska (Deputy Special Prosecutor)

JUDGE

Judge Osman Shabani

Judge Vaska Nikolovska Masevska

DEFENCE COUNSEL

Lawyer Elenko Milanov

Lawyer Donche Nakov

Lawyer Sanja Aleksich

Lawyer Vlatko Ilievski

SOCIAL HARM ON SDGs

16 Peace, justice and strong institutions

8 Decent work and economic growth

10 Reduced Inequality

When high-ranking officials are involved in corruption activities the trust in the democratic processes is reduced, as well as the credibility of government institutions. In this case, election irregularities can leads to illicit electoral outcomes and thus reduce the willingness of the citizen to take part in the electoral processes in the future. During the reported period the country faced severe brain drain from the younger population of the country as they lost hope that something will change for the better in the future. The damage on the State Budget was enormous.

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this database. All information is believed to be correct as of 06/2024. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts.

Contribute to this case

Do you have additional information, updates or relevant insights about this case? You can help by sharing new developments or legal updates on the case, providing verified sources that offer more context or evidence or highlighting public reactions or advocacy efforts related to the case.

Do you know of a corruption case that has been reported in the media or by civil society, or is already in the judicial process but is not receiving enough attention? Help us put a spotlight on key corruption cases in your country, and we will review your suggestion and consider adding it to the corruption database.

Please only suggest cases that have already been reported by the media or civil society or cases that are in some stage of the law enforcement or judicial process. If you would like to report a new corruption case, please reach out to our Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres in your country or email us.

Contribute