Corruption Perceptions Index 2018

Rank

18 / 180

i
A country's rank indicates its position relative to the other countries in the index. Learn more.

Score

73 / 100

i
A country or territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). Learn more.

Contact our chapter

Historic day for whistleblowers as EU agrees pathbreaking legislation

Helpdesk Answer

How to reduce levels of corruption at country level: Lessons learned

Danske Bank scandal needs full accountability, not scapegoating

Trouble at the top: why high-scoring countries aren’t corruption-free

For the third year running, the top seven countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2018 consist of the four Nordic nations – Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway – plus New Zealand, Singapore and Switzerland. Yet that doesn’t mean that these countries are corruption-free.

Western Europe and EU: stagnating anti-corruption efforts and weakening democratic institutions

With an average regional score of 66 out of 100, Western Europe and the EU are doing far better than other parts of the globe. However, for a region that prides itself on some of the most robust integrity systems in the world, the patchwork of partially overlapping national and EU-level integrity systems presents its own problems and still has a long way to go to tackle corruption effectively.

Europe and Central Asia: More civil engagement needed (Part II)

As follow-up to the regional analysis of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, additional examples from Albania, Kosovo and Georgia highlight the need for more progress in anti-corruption efforts in these countries and across the region.

Europe and Central Asia: more civil engagement needed (Part I)

In 2017, authoritarianism rose across Eastern and South East Europe, hindering anti-corruption efforts and threatening civil liberties. Across the region, civil society organisations and independent media experienced challenges in their ability to monitor and criticise decision-makers

Council of Europe must act on Azerbaijan reputational laundering, including sanctioning the corrupt

Azerbaijani Laundromat: grand corruption and how to buy influence

New investigation into a shady financial network that appears to have funnelled money from a US$2.9 billion Azeri slush fund to pay decision-makers and prominent individuals across Europe.

Exporting corruption, progress report 2015: assessing enforcement of the OECD Convention

Exportar corrupción: reporte de avance 2015: evaluación de la aplicación de la Convención OCDE

Chapter Info

Transparency International Estonia

Korruptsioonivaba Eesti
Telliskivi 60a, Tallinn 10412
Estonia

T: +372 562 44 960
E: info@transparency.ee
Website: http://www.transparency.ee/

Erkka Jaakkola
Chair

Follow us on Social Media