Skip to main content
Tracking Implementation of NIS recommendations

North Macedonia

Back to NIS Index

North Macedonia

This report constitutes the third national integrity system (NIS) assessment for the Republic of North Macedonia, following previous evaluations in 2002[1] and 2016.[2] At the time of the latter report, Macedonia was at a critical juncture. A series of scandals alleging that the executive had illegally wiretapped more than 20,000 telephone numbers[3] of political and state actors across Macedonia revealed, according to EU Commissioner Johannes Hahn, “serious concerns about political interference and high-level corruption” and tipped the country into a crisis in 2015. The 2015 EC progress report noted that “no progress has been achieved in the past year on the outstanding issues identified. Corruption remains widespread”.[4] The report also stated that a lack of political will, together with political interference in the work of the relevant bodies, undermined the capacity to effectively address corruption and hampered the ability of institutions to act proactively and non-selectively, especially in high-level cases.[5] After the 2015 scandal, the European Commission (DG Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations) recruited a group of independent, senior rule of law experts to conduct a rapid analysis of the situation and provide recommendations to address these issues.[6] As a result, a political agreement was signed,[7] and the special prosecutor’s office was established.[8] However, after the change of the government, the conclusion of the Second Priebe Report (Second SGE’s Report)[9] two years later indicated that “the failure to implement most of the recommendations is a cause for serious concern”.[10] In 2017, the reports indicated state capture by analysing the specifics of the state[11] and corruption-related cases.[12] This third NIS assessment had a challenge in establishing if there had been any progress five years after the change of government.

The assessment was conducted between January 2022 and December 2023. In general, there was no significant change. The Macedonian national integrity system continues to be characterised by the dominance of the executive branch and the weakness of other key institutions. The executive and the legislature are particularly strong in terms of their capacity, but weak on anti-corruption and the need to improve their internal governance. The State Audit Office is the standout institution, with a very high overall score of 87.6, a score of 92 for governance and 87.5 in the fight against corruption. This is followed by the other two independent institutions, the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (SCPC), with an overall score of 72.9, which is mainly based on a high score of 83.3 for governance. The newly selected commissioners and president of the SCPC managed to obtain additional resources for the institution, but there could have been better cooperation from other government bodies that, in the majority of the cases, were not responsive to SCPC initiatives and did not address the activities indicated in the national strategy for the prevention of corruption that remains at only 10 per cent implementation. The third high-scoring pillar is the ombudsman office, with an average score of 70.84.

The executive continues to be highly independent, although indicators demonstrate that the executive’s internal governance structures, which ought to promote transparency, accountability and integrity, are very weak. The executive has been dominant in legislating, as the majority of the adopted laws have been sent to the Assembly by the government. Half of the laws were passed in fast-track procedures, avoiding public debates and discussion in the Assembly. Also, the Assembly has been exposed to blocks due to the opposition’s refusal to participate in discussions to amend the constitution to change the name of the country and for accession to the EU. The political parties have the same average score (60.42) as the Assembly. Political parties are weakest in anti-corruption and in their accountability when it comes to political financing. The assessment found the need to strengthen the legal framework related to the financing of political parties and the role of the oversight bodies.

The weakest pillars in the Macedonian integrity system are the ones that are expected to be the leading institutions. The role of the public prosecutor’s office (PPO) in the fight against corruption was assessed with a score of 25. It remains the bottleneck in the whole anti-corruption system, which is coupled with the very low score for the law enforcement representative, the Ministry of Interior, which has a score of 25 for its role but 75 for capacity and governance. This is because, in the Macedonian criminal law system, the PPO leads pre-investigation and investigation, and decides on the cases that will be indicted.

Another very important pillar is the judiciary. Its average score is lower than the other two branches of power (legislature and executive), with only 50.68, and the second-lowest score (after the PPO), with only 33.3, for its role in the fight against corruption. Both the judiciary and the PPO have weak governance scores (50 and 41.7). The difference of 11 points in the average scores of the judiciary and the PPO is mainly due to better capacity in the judiciary. However, the fact that only 4 per cent of citizens have stated they trust the judiciary and the fact that a significant amount of international funding has been directed to strengthen capacity in PPO has again demonstrated that personal integrity is much more important than resources.

The business sector has no role in anti-corruption despite its solid governance structure and capacity. Two other sectors assessed that are not branches of power are the media, with an average score of 58.98 and civil society organisations (CSOs) with an average score of 62.5. The capacity of the CSOs is 75, while the capacity of the media scored 56.25. In addition, international funding for the media has been very limited compared to CSOs, a sector that has received similar support to that of the PPO, which is the third-most supported by international funds. This may be why the media scores significantly lower in the fight against corruption (41.6) than CSOs (62.5), while the latter have a significantly lower score of 50 for governance, while the media scores 79.1. In general, the role and independence of the media are dependent on financing.

Both the Corruption Perception Index published by Transparency International[13] and the European Commission’s 2023 report on North Macedonia[14] indicate that additional efforts are needed to fight corruption and that the institutions are still insufficiently prepared to respond effectively to the challenges that this fight brings.

The newly introduced gender indicators in this NIS assessment have shown that, in spite of the legal framework that guarantees gender equality in the country[15] (such as the national strategy that defines the strategic priorities of the state in terms of gender equality plus the establishment of equal opportunities and other laws and regulations),[16], [17] complaint mechanisms in the public sector and informing mechanisms in independent oversight bodies and law enforcement are not gender-sensitive, meaning that this area needs addressing and improvement.

---

[1] Transparency International Macedonia. 2002. “National Integrity System of Republic of Macedonia: Country Study Report”, September 2002

[2] National integrity system assessment Macedonia. May 2016 nis_eng.pdf (transparency.mk)

[3] In February 2015, the opposition leader Zoran Zaev released a series of audio excerpts – which he called “bombs” – from 670,000 secretly recorded conversations of more than 20,000 telephone numbers

[4] European Commission. 2015. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Report 2015, p.15, https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/b161a0a4-ffa9-464a-b4ba-554794f046b7_en?filename=20151110_report_the_former_yugoslav_republic_of_macedonia.pdf&prefLang=el

[5] Ibid

[6] The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Recommendations of the senior experts' group on systemic rule of law issues relating to the communications interception revealed in Spring 2015

[7] Following the Priebe Report, May 2015, the three largest political parties signed the Pržino Agreement

[8] Parliament established the Special Public Prosecutor’s Office (SPO) in September 2015 with a special Law, 3 Law on Public Prosecutor’s Office for Prosecuting Cases Related to and Arising from the Content of the Unauthorized Interception of Communications. Official Gazette of the RM, No 159/15 No.196/2015

[9] Brussels, 14 September 2017 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Assessment and recommendations of the senior experts' group on systemic rule of law issues 2017 (Second Priebe Report) 2017.09.14_seg_report_on_systemic_rol_issues_for_publication.pdf (europa.eu)

[10] Ibid

[11] Katerina Kolozova. 2017. Short Policy Essay: the Specificity of the Macedonian Example of "State Capture": Ruminations following the Second Priebe Report 27. Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities – Skopje September 2017, (13) the Specificity of the Macedonian Example of “State Capture”: Ruminations Following the Second Priebe Report | Katerina Kolozova - Academia.Edu

[12] Dr. Slagjana Taseva. Examining State Capture: Undue Influence on Law-Making and the Judiciary in the Western Balkans and Turkey examining_state_capture.pdf (transparency.mk)

[13] Corruption Perception Index North Macedonia. 2022. https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/north-macedonia and https://transparency.mk/?s=%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BA&lang=mk

[14] European Commission. 2023. The report on North Macedonia 2023 https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-11/SWD_2023_693%20North%20Macedonia%20report.pdf

[15] After the first national strategy for gender equality 2013-2020 Official V. of R.M. no: 27/2013 of 22 February 2013. In 2022, the Assembly of the RSM adopted the second national strategy for gender equality 2022-2027, Official Gazette of RM no. 170/2020

[16] Law on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men. Official Gazette of RM, No. 6/12, 30/13, 166/14 and 150/15 and Official Gazette of RM No. 53/21

[17] Law on Prevention and Protection from Discrimination, Official Gazette of RSM No. 258/2020, Law on Labour Relations, the Law on Budgets

National Integrity System

  • Capacity
  • Governance
  • Role

Overview recommendations (72)

NIS Pillars

  • 0
    Fully implemented
  • 2
    Partly implemented
  • 1
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The Assembly of North Macedonia is the country’s legislative body, composed of 120 MPs elected at general elections. Its work is supported by a professional civil service and is regulated by a specific law for the Assembly.[1]

The Assembly has sufficient financial resources. However, there is a lack of human resources, with almost half of the professional staff positions not being filled and a dependency on international donor programmes for building staff capacity.

The Assembly has a regularly updated website where the agenda for the Assembly and its committees’ sessions are regularly published, and transparency is further supported by the Assembly TV channel, which is broadcast on national TV. With regards to lobbying, there is no information recorded in the lobby register; this action still has to be implemented.

As for MPs compliance with the integrity and ethical principles and regulations, there have been issues with their travel and accommodation allowances,[2] undue influence on voting,[3] not respecting the Assembly’s rules of procedure[4] and others.

One of the biggest issues for the legislature is to ensure the separation of legislative and executive powers. This is evidenced by the fact that the executive proposes the majority of laws while the Assembly is ineffective in its oversight role.

There is also a lack of qualitative discussion on the implementation of anti-corruption laws and policies. Reviews of reports submitted by the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (SCPC) are often delayed. This late review of SCPC reports and a lack of implementation of its anti-corruption recommendations contribute significantly to the inefficiency in the implementation of anti-corruption laws.[5] Further, the SCPC reported that only 10 per cent in 2022 of the national anti-corruption strategy has been implemented.[6]

---

[1] Law on the Assembly of Republic of Macedonia, Official Gazette, Consolidated version (Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia no. 104/2009, 14/2020, 174/2021, 298/2021, 67/2022 and 65/2023), https://www.sobranie.mk/content/Zakon za Sobranie/ZAKON ZA SOBRANIETO NA RM.pdf

[2] Srgjan Stojancov, Slobodna Evropa: “On my way, asking for travel expenses”. www.slobodnaevropa.mk/a/по-пат-одам-за-патни-трошоци-прашам/32274301.html. Accessed: 15 June 2023

[3] Transparency International Macedonia. 2021. Grand corruption and tailor-made laws in Republic of Macedonia: https://transparency.mk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/grand_corruption_and_tailor_made_laws_in_republic_of_north_macedonia.pdf

[4] 360 Degree: VMRO-DPMNE left the Assembly session. https://360stepeni.mk/vmro-dpmne-ja-napushti-sednitsata-za-interpelatsija-na-spasovski-a-mu-najavi-interpelatsija-na-dhaferi/, Accessed: 15 June 2023

[5] SCPC (2021), Annual report on the work of the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption for 2020. https://www.sobranie.mk/detali-na-materijal.nspx?param=72e6ec55-7583-40c4-ae20-bc1a54bb501a

[6] SCPC, Annual report on the implementation of the National Strategy for Prevention of Corruption and Conflict of Interests 2021- 2025, for the period: 01.01.2022-31.12.2022, Published in March 2023. p.9, https://dksk.mk/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Годишен-извештај-НССКСИ_финален.pdf

  • Partly implemented

    The Assembly should conduct debates on and scrutinize public expenditure through public contracting at least once a year.

    The Assembly conducts debates on public expenditures while reviewing the Proposal for the Budget of the Republic of North Macedonia, the Proposal for amendments and additions to the Budget, the Proposal for a decision on the redistribution of funds between the budget users of the central government and between the funds, and the Proposal for the Final Account of the Budget of the Republic of North Macedonia.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Assembly should review and debate the findings and recommendations of the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption, state auditor and other specialized agencies’ reports. The Assembly should establish deadlines for adopting the annual reports submitted by the institutions that are accountable to the Assembly, such as the SCPC, PPO, and SAO (for example, within three months of the submission of the report).

    No actions were carry out in order to enable implementation of the given recommendation. According to the Law on State Audit and the Law on Preventing Corruption and Conflict of Interest, deadlines are prescribed for the State Audit Office and the State Commission for Preventing Corruption to submit their annual reports as stipulated in both laws, but no deadlines are established for the determination of the reports. From this, it can be concluded that due to the lack of obligation, there is a legal gap that allows the postponement of the adoption of the annual reports.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The Assembly should implement all GRECO recommendations regarding integrity as well as the integrity policy developed by the SCPC, such as the adoption of new code of ethics for MPs and of related new guidelines.

    Progress has been made regarding the recommendation to undertake activities for the implementation of GRECO recommendations. The Committee for Rules of Procedure and Mandate-Immunity Issues held a coordination meeting on 18.02.2025 in the Assembly to organize a session for the establishment of a working group for an Ethical Code. The General Secretary of the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia on 29 January 2025 adopted the Ethical Code for the Assembly Service of the Republic of North Macedonia. This Code defines the basic ethical rules and behaviour standards for employees in the Assembly Service of the Republic of North Macedonia. The State Commission for Preventing Corruption on 29.01.2025 sent a letter to the President of the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, calling on the Assembly to engage in the process of introducing an integrity system by signing the Integrity Policies of the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia. In line with this, activities are ongoing to sign the Integrity Policy of the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia. https://www.sobranie.mk/eticki-kodeks-na-sluzbata-na-sobranieto.nspx

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 0
    Fully implemented
  • 6
    Partly implemented
  • 0
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The government is composed of the president, four deputy presidents[1] and 16 ministers.[2] The current government of the Republic of North Macedonia (GRNM) was voted into the Assembly on 16 January 2022. The new ruling coalition is composed of SDSM (Social Democratic Union of Macedonia) together with coalition partners from smaller parties: DUI (Democratic Union for Integration), Alternativa and DPA (Democratic Party of Albanians).[3] There were changes in 2023, according to which the current composition includes representatives of SDSM, DUI, AA (Alliance for Albanians, LDP (Liberal Democratic Party).[4]

The president establishes an office to assist in exercising the rights and duties stated in the constitution, the law and the rules of procedure.[5] The general secretariat is the government’s expert service.[6] The government also has two secretariats to provide professional support and coordinate the work of the state administration and other bodies and institutions. These are the Secretariat for European Affairs[7] and the Secretariat for Legislation.[8] The General and Common Affairs Service performs duties of general affairs and services for the president, the government, the ministries and other bodies, secretariats and other professional services of the government and the constitutional court of RNM.[9] In addition to ministries, there are organs of state administration according to the Law on Organisation and Operation of State Administration Bodies (LOOSAB) that are independent organs of the state administration[10] and other government bodies,[11] as well as three administrative organisations[12].

The government determines the economic and development policy of the state, determines measures for its implementation and proposes measures to the Assembly for the implementation of the policy that are within its competence; it determines the policy of execution of laws and other regulations of the Assembly, monitors their execution and performs other tasks established by law.[13] Within the framework of their rights and duties determined by the constitution and by law, the government and each of its members are accountable to the Assembly for their work.[14]

The government of RNM has sufficient capacity to carry out its responsibilities, there is a good legal framework that regulates responsibility and transparency in its operations, but still more transparency is needed in the decisions it makes, as well as in carrying out its responsibilities. In particular, there should be a more transparent way of choosing government functionaries chosen.

At the same time, in practice, there are no examples of specific political responsibility of a holder of a public function, for example, a voted interpellation or distrust of the government, which is primarily due to the fact that, in the Assembly, the ruling majority decides.[15] Hence, greater moral responsibility of functionaries (holders of a public function) is needed, along with greater interoperability between institutions In terms of cooperation and communication between authorities.

---

[1] First deputy prime minister and minister for political system and inter-community relations, deputy prime minister in charge of economic issues, coordination of economic departments and investments, deputy prime minister for European affairs, deputy prime minister in charge of policies for good governance, https://vlada.mk/sostav-na-vladata

[2] Composition of the government: https://vlada.mk/sostav-na-vla...

[3] EC Progress Report on North Macedonia. 2022. p.1, https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-10/North%20Macedonia%20Report%202022.pdf

[4] EC Progress Report on North Macedonia. 2022. p.12, https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-11/SWD_2023_693%20North%20Macedonia%20report.pdf

[5] Law on the Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Official Gazette of RM Article 11, no. 59/00, 26/01, 13/03, 55/05, 37/06, 115/07, 19/08, 82/ 08, 10/10, 51/11, 15/13, 139/14, 196/15, 142/16, 140/18 and Official Gazette of RM No. 98/19)

[6] Law on the Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Official Gazette of RM. Article 40- a and Article 39 no. 59/00, 26/01, 13/03, 55/05, 37/06, 115/07, 19/08, 82/ 08, 10/10, 51/11, 15/13, 139/14, 196/15, 142/16, 140/18 and "Official Gazette of RM No. 98/19

[7] Law on the Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Official Gazette of RM. Article 40b no. 59/00, 26/01, 13/03, 55/05, 37/06, 115/07, 19/08, 82/ 08, 10/10, 51/11, 15/13, 139/14, 196/15, 142/16, 140/18 and "Official Gazette of RM No. 98/19

[8] Law on the Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Official Gazette of RM. Article 40 no. 59/00, 26/01, 13/03, 55/05, 37/06, 115/07, 19/08, 82/ 08, 10/10, 51/11, 15/13, 139/14, 196/15, 142/16, 140/18 and "Official Gazette of RM No. 98/19

[9] Service for general and common works, https://vlada.mk/vlada-ministerstva; https://vlada.mk/sozr.

[10] Law on the Organisation and Operation of State Administration Bodies Official Gazette of RM Article 12, paragraph 1, no. 58/00, 44/02, 82/08, 167/10, 51/11 and Official Gazette of RM no. 96/19 and 110/19, Commission for relations with religious communities and religious groups; Youth and Sports Agency; Agency for Emigration and Agency for Food and Veterinary of the Republic of Macedonia.

[11] Law on the Organization and Operation of State Administration Bodies Official Gazette of RM Article 5 paragraph 3 and 4, no. 58/00, 44/02, 82/08, 167/10, 51/11 and "Official Gazette of the Republic of North Macedonia" no. 96/19 and 110/19), bodies within the ministries (administration, bureau, service, inspectorate and captaincy). Also see:Organs in the composition of the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia, a total of 40, http://vlada.mk/organi-vo-sost...

[12] Article 12, paragraph 2, of the Law on the Organization and Work of State Administration Bodies Official Gazette of RM no. 58/00, 44/02, 82/08, 167/10, 51/11 and Official Gazette of RM no. 96/19 and 110/19), State Archive of the Republic of Macedonia, State Office for Geodetic Works and State Office for Statistics.

[13] Article 91 from the constitution, https://www.sobranie.mk/content/Odluki%20USTAV/UstavSRSM.pdf. The responsibilities of the government is also determined in Article 4 and Article 8 of the Law on the Government of the Republic of Macedonia Official Gazette of RM no. 59/00, 26/01, 13/03, 55/05, 37/06, 115/07, 19/08, 82/08, 10/10, 51/11, 15/13, 139/14, 196/15, 142/16, 140/18 and Official Gazette of RM No. 98/19)

[14] Article 4 of the Law on the Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Official Gazette of RM no. 59/00, 26/01, 13/03, 55/05, 37/06, 115/07, 19/08, 82/ 08, 10/10, 51/11, 15/13, 139/14, 196/15, 142/16, 140/18 and Official Gazette of RM No. 98/19)

[15] Report for our work Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia for the period 1.1.2022 - 31.12.2022, https://www.sobranie.mk/content/izvestai/IZVESTAJ%202022.pdf, p.14-16; Report on the work of the Assembly of North Macedonia for the period 1.1.2021 - 31.12.2021, https://www.sobranie.mk/content/izvestai/IZVESTAJ%202021.pdf, p.16, accessed on 10.11.2023

  • Partly implemented

    The government should strengthen its transparency by publishing government decisions in a separate tab on its website, categorised by different areas, and include the reasons for each decision.

    There have been certain improvements in the area of transparency by the executive branch. The government regularly publishes decisions, programmes, and conclusions made during sessions on the Open Government section of its website. This helps increase transparency and makes the content publicly accessible. A new government website is currently under development to further improve accessibility and user experience. URL: https://vlada.mk/vladini-sednici

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should publish, in one place and in a timely manner, all reports for which it is responsible. This should include updates on the reports submitted by the State Audit Office (SAO), information on actions taken following audit findings, and the consequences of not acting on those findings. This obligation should apply to both the government and the SAO.

    The national programme for the government’s work for 2024–2028 includes strengthening internal audit processes and forming an Audit Committee as a central body to monitor the implementation of SAO recommendations. The programme also foresees systematic collaboration with the Public Prosecutor’s Office, which will review SAO reports. These steps are aimed at improving follow-up on audit findings and increasing accountability. URL: https://vlada.mk/revizija

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should publish all reports on the work of ministries in one centralised location on its website.

    There have been improvements in publishing government reports, with efforts to consolidate and regularly update documents, decisions, and information. A new website is underway to enhance the transparency and organisation of content from all ministries.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should publish state data related to measures taken to prevent corruption and strengthen integrity. This should include data on decisions, training, inter-institutional cooperation, adopted plans and programmes, sanctioned irregularities, and implemented activities, along with their achieved effects.

    A Coordinating Body for the Fight Against Corruption is being established to unify anti-corruption efforts across institutions. The government is also committed to increasing the transparency of integrity-related activities, and shares project implementation details and decisions via ministry websites.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should publish information on court decisions related to disputed government decisions.

    Although not explicitly detailed in the current initiatives, transparency in court-related outcomes is implied under broader transparency reforms. This is an area for further development within the context of Open Government and inter-institutional cooperation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should regularly publish information on the execution of government projects, including status updates and outcomes, to ensure full transparency on implementation.

    The government provides updates on completed projects, including those linked to capital grants for municipal investment. These updates are published, for example, on the website of the Ministry of Local Self-Government, enhancing transparency around public spending and local development outcomes.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 1
    Fully implemented
  • 3
    Partly implemented
  • 1
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The judicial system in North Macedonia is composed of 25 basic courts of general jurisdiction; 3 specialised courts: the administrative court, basic court Skopje 1 (criminal law court), basic courts Skopje 2 (civil law court); 4 Appellate level courts, 1 higher administrative court, Supreme Court and the constitutional court. Several separate laws regulate the work of the judiciary, such as the Law for the Courts, Law for the Salaries of Judges,[1] Law for the Judicial Budget[2] and the Law for the Judicial Council.

The judiciary’s budget is insufficient for its needs, not even reaching the legally prescribed minimum allocation. Also, the human and infrastructural capacity is insufficient and underdeveloped.

The judiciary's commitment to combating corruption can be questioned due to the low number of successfully completed cases. Reports suggest systemic problems within the judiciary and prosecution services, where there is influence from the ruling parties and a lack of proper accountability and integrity mechanisms.

Even though North Macedonia's constitution and laws emphasise a high level of independence of jthe udiciary, surveys indicate judges' scepticism about transparent promotion processes, and tensions within the judicial council have led to illegitimate dismissals.

While the judiciary maintains active and transparent websites, consolidated information about the judicial budget is challenging to obtain, and key information, as well as consolidated data and case statistics, are missing from the MoJ website.

The practice of holding members of the judiciary accountable is deemed insufficient and ineffective due to mistrust, a high number of complaints and a low number of cases reviewed.

Mechanisms to ensure the integrity of judiciary members exist, but are also considered insufficient and lack provisions for post-judiciary employment restrictions. Advisory bodies provide advice on integrity/ethical issues upon judges' request, but receive few inquiries. The SCPC lacks the capacity to fully validate asset declarations.

The judiciary's mechanisms also lack gender sensitivity. While data is collected on gender equality within the judiciary, gender-sensitive protocols and guidelines are absent. Training and awareness raising for gender-sensitive mechanisms are also lacking.

---

[1] Law for the Salaries of the Judges, Official Gazette of the RM No. 110/2007, 103/2008, 161/2008, 153/2009, 67/10, 97/10, 135/11 и 231/15 and 248/18 Закон за платите на судиите.pdf (pravda.gov.mk

[2] Law for the Judicial Budget, cleared version, contains the basic text of the law for the judicial budget published in the Official Gazette No. 60/03, and laws for amending the Law No 37/06, No 103/08 and No.145/10

  • Partly implemented

    The Supreme Court needs to revise the code of ethics to include a sustainable and permanent body for its implementation.

    The Supreme Court of the Republic of North Macedonia, during its General Session in September 2019, adopted the Code of Ethics for Judges and Lay Judges. "In accordance with the Code of Ethics for Judges and Lay Judges, for the consistent application of the Judicial Ethics Code, the Association of Judges of the Republic of North Macedonia establishes an Advisory Body, which, upon request from a judge, lay judge, president of a court, a court session, or the Association of Judges of the Republic of North Macedonia, provides advisory opinions and advice on one or more issues related to the ethical behaviour of judges/lay judges, the proper execution of judicial duties, and avoiding conflicts of interest in the private lives of judges and lay judges in relation to their judicial functions. These opinions and advice have a preventive and advisory significance. They highlight behaviours that violate the principles of the Judicial Code.”http://www.vsrm.mk/wps/wcm/connect/vsrm/10ae444c-09fd-4cbd-9fa6-ed45ae4ad13b/Кодекс+за+етика+на+судиите+и+судиите+поротници.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=mSBbAAH

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The Supreme Court needs to strengthen the mechanism for its implementation and accountability, and ensure more effective monitoring of the implementation of the code of ethics

    For unethical behaviour of judges and the consistent application of the Judicial Ethics Code, the Association of Judges of the Republic of North Macedonia has established an advisory body. Upon request from judges or the Association of Judges, the body provides advisory opinions to judges in North Macedonia regarding one or more issues related to ethical behaviour, the advisory execution of judicial duties, and avoiding conflicts of interest between judges' private lives and their judicial functions. If there are such complaints, the Judicial Council forwards them to the Association of Judges and the State Commission for Preventing Corruption (SCPC).

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The judicial council needs to adopt new procedures for receiving citizen reports related to conflicts of interest and other inappropriate and unethical behaviour in judges, and to establish a whistleblower’s protection and reporting channel to enable judges with integrity or other interested parties to report on cases of influence over the judges and their decisions

    The Judicial Council has implemented the recommendation for establishing a channel for receiving reports from whistleblowers and has developed a procedure for receiving, separating, and processing data from whistleblower reports.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to ensure sufficient financial and human resources for the judiciary

    The state budget for 2025 is not in line with the foreseen percentage that the judiciary should receive in accordance with the laws.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The Supreme Court and Judicial Council need to 1. publish consolidated information on the judicial budget 2. ensure that decisions and annual reports published on the judicial council’s website are in a user-friendly format

    The Supreme Court regularly reports on decisions and publishes them on its official website. Consolidated information about the judicial budget, as well as decisions and annual reports, are published on the Judicial Council's website in a format accessible to users. http://www.vsrm.mk/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 2
    Fully implemented
  • 1
    Partly implemented
  • 2
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The public prosecutor’s office (PPO) is the core institution in the criminal justice system in the Republic of North Macedonia.

The PPO is defined as a unique and independent state institution that prosecutes perpetrators of crimes and other punishable acts sanctioned by law and performs other duties as stipulated by law. It is organised in accordance with the principles of hierarchy and subordination, and was established and can be abolished by law. The PPO can act before the Supreme Court. The head of the office is the Public Prosecutor’s of the Republic of North Macedonia. There are four higher public prosecutor’s offices (HPPO’S) that act before the four appellate courts.

The Basic Public Prosecutor's Office for Organised Crime and Corruption (BPPOOCC) is responsible for the investigation of corruption and organised crime cases and is part of the judicial system that represents the state in criminal courts. The BPPOOCC acts in the whole territory of the Republic of North Macedonia with its headquarters in Skopje. The head is the chief prosecutor of the BPPOOCC. There are 22 basic public prosecutor’s offices (BPPOs), of which 10 have basic competence (acting on criminal cases punishable with imprisonment of up to five years as a main sentence) and 12 with expanded competence (acting on criminal acts punishable with imprisonment of over five years as a main sentence). Specialised departments with a professional service can be set up in the BPPOOCC and in any public prosecutor’s office for a court with expanded jurisdiction.

The legal framework provides appropriate salaries. However, there are significant resource gaps in the prosecution, with the budget not meeting the legally required minimum percentage. There is also a shortage of human resources, with many positions remaining unfilled.

There are comprehensive laws to ensure the independence of the prosecution. However, the public prosecutor is appointed by the Assembly, potentially subjecting that person to political influence. The prosecutorial council is an independent body that appoints and dismisses public prosecutors. In practice, prosecutors are often removed from their positions before their term ends, and appointments have been criticised for non-transparency and political influence. Citizen trust in the public prosecution is exceptionally low, with only 3 per cent of citizens trusting the institution “a great deal”.

The legal framework for the governance mechanisms needs improvement, as the prosecutorial council is dependent on the decisions of the public prosecutor. The law and the code of ethics for public prosecutors, in combination with the Law for the Prevention of Corruption, provide mechanisms to ensure integrity. However, they do not cover hospitality or reimbursements for privately sponsored trips, and the ethics council's activities are not transparent or well-documented. There is no public information about the initiatives and opinions of the ethics council, and no information on whether the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (SCPC) receives reports on post-government private sector employment from prosecutors. The PPO is not transparent as it does not provide information and statistics about cases. It does not respond to requests from other institutions and does not provide timely information about the reports sent from other agencies.

The achievements of the prosecution in corruption cases are limited, and convictions in high-profile corruption cases are rare. The special prosecutor’s office (SPO), established in 2015 to investigate corruption cases, did not preserve its integrity and was dissolved in 2020. The return of cases to the public prosecutor's office has not resulted in significant progress. Corruption cases often face obsolescence due to lengthy legal processes. Investigations and charges related to corruption are ongoing, but few high-value assets have been seized.

  • Partly implemented

    The BPPOOCC and the SCPC need to establish everyday communication and cooperation on corruption related offences by signing a memorandum.

    The State Commission and the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia concluded a Memorandum of Cooperation for a period of two years on 20.02.2023. According to the memorandum, both institutions appointed persons to establish efficient and effective communication and established cooperation and exchange of information with full respect for the constitutional and legal status of the Public Prosecutor's Office as a sole and independent state body that prosecutes perpetrators of criminal offenses and other offenses punishable by law, as well as the legal competencies of the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia and the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption. According to Article 8 of the Memorandum, both parties, upon the expiration of its validity, have an obligation to assess its effects on strengthening cooperation and, if necessary, to extend its validity. In order to ensure enhanced cooperation between the SCPC and the Public Prosecutor's Office, the EU IPA 2020 Rule of Law (RoL) project, Component 1, focused its activities on drafting a new Memorandum of Cooperation. As part of this process, an analysis of the current Memorandum was conducted, gathering conclusions from workshops organized by the USAID Anti-Corruption Partnership Project and meetings were held with focal points from both institutions to explore ways to advance cooperation in the upcoming period. In October 2024, the first draft of the new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia and the State Commission was completed and shared first with the contact persons of both institutions, and after its approval with the institutions themselves. The signing process is currently in its final phase. Following the signing of the new memorandum, standard operating procedures for both institutions will be developed. https://dksk.mk/mk/потпишан-меморандум-за-соработка-со-ј/; https://dksk.mk/mk/работилница-за-користење-на-платформ/; https://dksk.mk/mk/тркалезна-маса-соработка-на-институ/; https://dksk.mk/mk/работилница-на-дкск-и-јавното-обвинит/; https://dksk.mk/mk/одржана-работна-средба-на-претседате/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to provide financial resources for additional human resources to the public prosecutor’s office and investigative centres in charge of investigating corruption.

    Regarding the financial aspect, the Public Prosecutor's Office still faces obstacles, as only 0.2% of the legally required 0.4% of the budget has been approved. No new hires have been approved for 2025.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The chief prosecutor of the BPPOOCC needs to regularly report to the Assembly on the implementation of accountability mechanisms, such as disciplinary cases, citizen complaints and dismissals due to the violation of official duties.

    The Public Prosecutor does not inform the Assembly about accountability mechanisms, such as disciplinary cases, citizen complaints, and dismissals due to violations of official duties.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    An independent disciplinary commission needs to be established to create an independent body to investigate complaints against public prosecutors and to ensure accountability. The government needs adopt regulatory provisions to protect a person who files a complaint against a public prosecutor.

    The Public Prosecutor's Office has informed that an Ethics Council has been established and is functioning within its jurisdiction. This council deals with cases where public prosecutors fail to adhere to specific ethical principles outlined in the Ethics Code, both in their relationships with other authorities, parties, and citizens, in the public eye, and in their internal relations. In cases provided by the Law on the Public Prosecutor's Office for disciplinary violations, the Commission for Determining the Disciplinary Responsibility of Public Prosecutors takes action. Additionally, the Council of Public Prosecutors handles complaints and grievances from citizens and legal entities regarding the work of public prosecutors. Citizens can file a complaint about the behaviour of public prosecutors, which can be reviewed by the Ethics Council, an oversight body for ensuring compliance with the Ethics Code of Public Prosecutors in North Macedonia.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The public prosecutor’s office needs to provide a protected reporting channel for whistleblowers based on the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers.

    The Public Prosecutor's Office is one of the institutions where protected whistleblowing can be carried out under the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers. In this case, the submitted report is treated as a criminal report. The right to procedural protection of whistleblowers is regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code. All obligations related to the protection of whistleblower data and identity are fully respected, as failure to do so is subject to criminal, not misdemeanour, responsibility, as provided in the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers. However, information about the protected whistleblowing channel cannot yet be found on the official website of the Prosecutor's Office.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 0
    Fully implemented
  • 0
    Partly implemented
  • 3
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

In the Republic of North Macedonia, the public sector is extensive both in terms of the number of institutions and the number of employees in these bodies. The public sector includes a wide range of bodies, governed by the Law on Organization and Operation of State Administration Bodies (LOOSAB) and other special laws.[1] The bodies of the state administration include ministries, other bodies of the state administration and administrative organisations.[2] The public sector has 1,354 institutions[3] in which 129,374 people are employed.[4]

In terms of integrity, responsibility and transparency in the operation of public bodies, there is a good and comprehensive legal framework that regulates the responsibility of administrative servants and the responsibility of holders of public functions. Additionally, more attention is being paid to legal texts, codes of ethics and other documents. Transparency in the operation of the institutions is greater, and increasingly individuals and legal persons use the mechanisms for obtaining public information. What is missing is greater visibility of the results of applying control mechanisms, such as reasoned decisions on the election of holders of public functions, publication of court decisions in one place that refer to the work of an official or administrative servants, as well as effective political control over elected persons.

The legal framework that regulates the status of employees in the public sector (administrative servants) primarily consists of the Law on Public Sector Employees (LPSE) and the Law on Administrative Servants (LAS). There is no special law for senior management of the service, which determines the criteria and selection procedures for candidates for management positions (although notice for the preparation of a draft law on senior management service was published in May 2022).[5] The process and conditions for the selection of the directors of certain institutions according to the applicable legal framework are regulated by the Law on Public Enterprises[6] and special material laws that regulate the relevant area.[7]

---

[1] For example, bodies established by special laws include: the Administration for the Protection of Cultural Heritage (Law on the Protection of Cultural Heritage, Art. 144, Official Gazette No. 20/04 et seq.); the Bureau for Representation before the European Court of Human Rights (Law on Representation before the ECHR, Arts. 3 and 22, Official Gazette No. 67/09 et seq.); the Inspectorate for the Use of Languages (Law on the Inspectorate for the Use of Languages, Official Gazette No. 220/19 and 42/20); the Inspection Council; the Energy Agency; the Agency for Mandatory Oil Reserves; the Real Estate Cadastre Agency, and other bodies established by sector-specific legislation.

[2] Article 5, Law on Organization and Operation of State Administration Bodies, Official Gazette of RM, no. 58/00, 44/02, 82/08, 167/10, 51/11, 96/19 and 110/19)

[3] The figure includes: 920 public institutions, 155 public enterprises, 81 municipalities, 36 independent state administration bodies, 34 courts, 30 bodies within ministries, 28 prosecution offices, 16 ministries, and other institutions such as the National Bank, Ombudsperson, and Constitutional Court (Register of Public Sector Employees 2022, pp. 11–12, accessed 15 November 2023: https://www.mioa.gov.mk/sites/default/files/pbl_files/documents/reports/finalen_izveshtaj_za_2022_godina_30.03.2022_godina.pdf

[4] MISA. 2023. Report from the Register of Public Sector Employees for 2022, https://mioa.gov.mk/sites/default/files/pbl_files/documents/reports/finalen_izveshtaj_za_2022_godina_30.03.2022_godina.pdf, accessed 12 August 2023.

[5] Draft Law for High Management Service: https://ener.gov.mk/default.aspx?item=pub_regulation&subitem=view_reg_detail&itemid=74070

[6] Article 23 of the Law on Public Enterprises, Official Gazette of RM No. 38/96, 9/97, 6/02, 40/03, 49/06, 22/07, 83/09, 97/10, 6/12, 119/13, 41/14, 138/14, 25/15, 61/15, 39/16, 64/18 and 35/19 and Official Gazette of RM No. 275/19, 89/22 and 274/22)

[7] For example, Article 29 of the Law on Culture, Official Gazette of RM, No. 31/98, 49/03, 82/05, 24/07, 116/10, 47/11, 51/11, 136/12, 23/13, 187/13, 44/14, 61/15, 154/15, 39/16, 11/18 and 11/18)

  • Not implemented

    Data on the execution of control mechanisms (imposed measures, recommendations, decisions, judgements, and soon on) should be published in the annual reports of public sector institutions. Namely, all annual reports from public bodies should contain data on their actions and the execution of their decisions in order to ensure the effective application of the control mechanisms. For example, how many of their decisions have been implemented, how many were contested by appeal or lawsuit, and what was the decision of the second-instance authority or court?

    The Agency for Administration has noted for several years in a row that it has not been able to conduct a qualitative analysis of the decisions made on the appeals/complaints of administrative officials who have initiated proceedings before the competent courts for the protection of their employment rights, because the State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Macedonia does not regularly submit the final decisions of the competent courts on the filed court cases against the aforementioned decisions, with a recommendation that they be submitted regularly.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    MISA and AA should publish an annual report on imposed measures for disciplinary and material responsibility in all institutions, including data on the type of violation for which the measure was imposed, whether the measure was implemented, against how many decisions legal protection has been requested, the type of decisions from the second-level authority and how that decision was implemented.

    The Agency does not have a legally established control mechanism to check how and in what manner the first-instance authorities act on the decisions of the Commission for Deciding on Appeals and Complaints of Administrative Officials in Second Instance, nor to conduct an analysis of the decisions on appeals/complaints of administrative officials who initiated proceedings before the competent courts for the protection of their employment rights. This is because the State Attorney's Office does not regularly submit the final decisions of the competent courts on the filed court cases.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Public Institutions should make their functional analysis publicly available on their website and the website of the Ministry of Information Society and Administration, to allow for the analysis of the data and, based on that, to take measures that lead to a more efficient public administration.

    The Ministry of Public Administration does not publish data from those described in point 1 because there is no legal obligation. Institutions are obliged to submit to the MPA an annual report on the measures imposed for determining disciplinary and material liability of administrative officials, and accordingly, it follows that the ministry will be able to summarize, process and publish data on the measures imposed for disciplinary and material liability. The recommendation will be considered within the framework of the working group for the preparation of the new Law on Administrative Officials. The ministry does not publish the functional analyses of other ministries except for their own.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 0
    Fully implemented
  • 3
    Partly implemented
  • 0
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

This chapter assesses the Ministry of Interior (MoI) as it is responsible for law enforcement agencies, such as the criminal police and uniformed police officers. Other law enforcement agencies are the customs and the financial police, who are not part of the MoI. The customs administration, the financial intelligence unit, and the financial police department are affiliated with the Ministry of Finance.[1]

The MoI is one of the three largest ministries in the Republic of North Macedonia in terms of employees. The legal basis for the mandate, organisation and operation of the MoI is the Law on Internal Affairs[2] and the Law on Police.[3] The Law on Internal Affairs regulates the relations between the different units in the Ministry of Interior as well as the status of police officers and other employees. It also outlines the responsibilities of the Bureau for Public Security, which is responsible for the police. However, there are other laws relevant to the police in their activities related to preventing and investigating corruption, including the use of investigative means and methods,[4] and the Law for the National Criminal Intelligence Database.[5]

The Ministry of Interior has the capacity and a solid legal framework that enables its function and role in the fight against corruption. Law enforcement agencies (LEAs) are legally independent, but professional criteria for employment are not explicitly specified in the law. Concerns have been raised about potential political influence in specific employment procedures, particularly for civilian roles within the MoI. The regulatory measures to depoliticise the police, such as the provisions for amendments in the Law on Internal Affairs based on GRECO recommendations[6] or the Law on Police,[7] still have to be fully implemented, as also concluded by GRECO in its latest 2023 report.[8]

The integrity of law enforcement agencies is partly ensured by the law, primarily through the code of ethics. However, there are notable gaps in the law, such as the absence of post-employment restrictions and measures for holding officials accountable for not accurately disclosing their assets and interests. There is a lack of information regarding the enforcement of the code of ethics, control of gifts and hospitalities and the use of dissuasive sanctions.

Law enforcement agencies primarily detect and investigate corruption cases upon the guidance and request of public prosecutors. The number of cases and the use of investigative means for corruption detection are deemed insufficient. Special investigative measures are outlined in the law but are used sparingly. In the reported data, these measures have been applied in only a few corruption related cases. Further, law enforcement often fails to cooperate with the SCPC on corruption related cases.

Law enforcement mechanisms lack gender sensitivity, and there is a lack of gender-disaggregated data in official statistics. Although there is a national strategy for gender equality,[9] but it does not contain specific measures for the LEAs. In the MoI, there are plans for gender equality training and mentoring programmes, although their implementation has yet to occur.

---

[1] Customs administration, public revenue office, OPMLFT (FIU), financial police office, public procurement bureau, property and legal affairs office and state foreign exchange inspectorate Affiliated Institutions - Министерство за финансии (finance.gov.mk)

[2] Clear version of the Law for the Internal Affairs published contains: Law on Internal Affairs, Official Gazette of the RM, No 92/2009, 35/2010, 36/11, 158/11 as well as the Correction of the Law for the Internal Affairs, Official Gazette of the RM No. 118/2009 https://ener.gov.mk/files/propisi_files/plan/219_Закон за внатрешни работи - неофицијален пречистен.pdf

[3] Law on Police, Official Gazette of the RM, No. 114/2006, 6/2009, 45/2012, 41/2014, 33/2015, 31/16,106/16, 120/16, 21/18,.64/18, 294/21, 89/22 and the Constitutional Court Decision published in the Official Gazette No 148/8

[4] Special investigative measures, their type and number, are prescribed in Law for the Criminal Procedure, special investigative measures, their type and number are prescribed in Article 252 of the CPA

[5] Law for the National Criminal Intelligence Database Official Gazette No 120/09

[6] Law for Amendment of the Law for the Internal Affairs Official Gazette No 89/22 articles 66, 73, 168 and 188

[7] Law on Police, Article 105, Official Gazette of the RM, No. 114/2006, 6/2009, 45/2012, 41/2014, 33/2015, 31/16,106/16, 120/16, 21/18,.64/18, 294/21, 89/22 and Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Macedonia, published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia No. 148/08)

[8] Recommendation x, p.11, Paragraph 65; Fifth Evaluation Round Preventing Corruption and Promoting Integrity in Central Governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies; Second Compliance Report, North Macedonia, Adopted by GRECO at its 94th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 5-9 June 2023) GRECO (coe.int).

[9] Strategy for Gender Equality, adopted by the Assembly and published in the Official Gazette Official Gazette of the RNM No. 170/22. Стратегија_за_родова_еднаквост_2022_2027.pdf (mvr.gov.mk)

  • Partly implemented

    The MoI needs to establish effective implementation of the adopted code of ethics by establishing effective vetting of reported cases of conflict of interest and asset declaration, as well as regular reporting of the gifts and hospitality for police officials.

    The Ministry of Interior has adopted a Code of Ethics, and revised according to GRECO guidelines in 2021. It has appointed a person for integrity, receiving gifts and conflict of interest in the Ministry and has adopted an Integrity Plan 2023-2025. A new Law on Interior is in the preparation phase, where the Department for Internal Control, Criminal Investigations and Professional Standards has proposed an amendment that will provide for the submission of a statement of assets and interests. https://mvr.gov.mk/Upload/Editor_Upload/ETICKI KODEKS.pdf https://mvr.gov.mk/page/integritet?fbclid=IwAR0z_Ra6a458jgr3v5zksHR2WX8qiRn-917pNSBuhaMMr0pa_cLi2SoOd5w; https://mvr.gov.mk/Upload/Editor_Upload/Plan za integritet 2023-2025/Plan za integritet MVR 2023-25_04_06_2023_MKD_web.pdf; https://ener.gov.mk/Default.aspx?item=pub_regulation&subitem=view_reg_detail&itemid=88217

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The MoI needs to publish information on the number of cases and results related to integrity tests of police officials.

    Every three months, the Department for Internal Control, Criminal Investigations and Professional Standards publishes on its website a Report on implemented measures and activities within its scope of work, which also includes investigations conducted into information received about committed corruption crimes. Due to the lack of technical and personnel capacities, special equipment, appropriate training of the workers who are supposed to implement it, etc., a test to check the professional integrity of workers in the Ministry of Interior has not been conducted so far. https://mvr.gov.mk/page/sektor-za-vnatreshna-kontrola

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The MoI needs to establish cooperation with the SCPC for proactive investigations of corruption related cases. As a result, the MoI and SCPC need to publish separate statistical data for corruption related cases on their websites.

    In 2024 was signed a Memorandum between SCPC and MoI: https://dksk.mk/mk/потпишан-меморандум-за-соработка-пом/. However there is still needed information on the cases that they have worked on together and information on the results of their cooperation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 2
    Fully implemented
  • 1
    Partly implemented
  • 3
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The State electoral commission (SEC) is the highest electoral authority. With regulatory, monitoring and oversight powers, the SEC is responsible for organising and supervising parliamentary and local elections and referenda. The electoral code[1] regulates the SEC work and composition, including the appointment of SEC members, of which a total of seven are appointed by the Assembly. The work of the SEC members is supported by the professional service, the secretariat.[2]

The SEC has insufficient human resources and an inadequate budget for the employment of permanent staff. The lack of sufficient financial resources and professional staff may also affect its independence and accountability.

There are laws aimed at safeguarding the SEC's independence, but its independence is not ensured in the constitution. However, the election procedure for SEC members by political parties introduces political influences. Also, the selection of secretariat staff faces transparency issues and alleged nepotism, potentially affecting independence. Public attacks on the election process, like accusing the winning party of election irregularities, incorrect voting lists and technical issues on vote counting, erode trust in the SEC's independence and effectiveness. Also, incoherent and non-transparent complaint handling procedures during the 2021 local elections have raised concerns among international organisations.

The SEC has its own website with information on the electoral process and has educational content for voters and participants in the elections. However, the SEC only submits reports on the conduct of elections to the Assembly and does not publish an annual report, also due to a gap in legal obligations. This leads to a lack of transparency in SEC activities and hinders the watchdog role of civil society.

Тhe SEC has a policy of integrity and a code of ethics for SEC members and a code of ethics for the electoral administration. However, recent cases opened against the president of the SEC as well as a lack of cases where misbehaviour of staff has been sanctioned by the SEC has called the implementation of such policies into question

The cooperation between the SEC, SCPC and SAO, although strengthened with the signing of an MOU, still fails to produce visible results in the sanctioning of irregularities during elections.

---

[1] Electoral Code, consolidated version, Official Gazette of RM, no. 40/06, 136/08, 148/08, 155/08, 163/08, 44/11, 51/11, 54/11, 142/12, 31/13, 34/13, 14/14, 30/14, 196/15, 35/16, 97/16, 99/16, 136/16, 142/16, 67/17,125/17,35/18, 99/18,140/18, 208/18, 27/19, 98/19, 42/20,

74/21 и 215/21): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Sa9L6emhxwI2VaV_8d7oK3hJ6r1usnuY/view

[2] Ibid, Article 30

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to increase the budget of the SEC to enable it to carry out its regular activities in non-election years properly.

    The State Election Commission (SEC) adopted the budget for 2025 at a public session, and despite the fact that more funds were foreseen, less were approved by the Ministry of Finance.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The SEC needs to conduct a functional analysis of staff and skill needs for the functioning of the SEC.

    In the upcoming period, given the needs for new employment and additional equipment of the SEC, which was also noted in the reports of the OSCE and ODIHR, it is undertaking activities to secure consent for new employment or takeover of administrative officials from other institutions.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The SEC should publish an annual report, with details on financial and human resources as well as a comprehensive overview of its activities and statistics on previous elections as well as complaints received.

    The SEC, in accordance with the Electoral Code, publishes a Report on the conducted elections and submits it to the Parliament within the legally established deadline.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The SEC and SCPC need to ensure the proper implementation of the SEC’s integrity plan.

    In 2023, the SEC adopted the Integrity Policy and several by-laws were adopted and activities were carried out for its implementation. According to the SCPC report on the monitoring of the implementation of the integrity system for 2023, the SEC received a "good" rating according to the level of fulfilment of obligations. In December 2024, the Questionnaire for Monitoring the Implementation of the Integrity System posted on the SCPC e-portal was completed. The following steps were taken to improve the integrity system: amendments to the regulation, implementation of survey questionnaires for officials regarding knowledge of the integrity system, holding a training/workshop for SEC officials on the integrity system. During the vote counting in 2024, the SEC did not face any technical problems and the voting results were announced in a timely and accurate manner.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The SEC needs to amend the existing code of ethics for the SEC’s members and the electoral administration with specific reprimand provisions in the case of established unethical behaviour of staff and members of the central and local electoral bodies.

    During the 2024 Parliamentary and Presidential elections, after the adoption of the Code of Ethics for Election Administration, the provisions of the Guidelines for the work of municipal election commissions were amended, which provided for ethical standards and rules of conduct for members of the Municipal Election Commission, a section was introduced in the SEC manuals intended for election bodies that referred to ethical standards and rules of conduct for election administration, and mandatory education on ethical conduct of election bodies was carried out during the trainings held for elected bodies (MECs and EBs). The Code of Ethics, as well as the Guidelines, contain provisions for punishment in case of non-compliance with the prescribed rules of ethical conduct. In order to comply with the Code of Ethics for members of the SEC, an Ethics Commission for Monitoring and Compliance with the EC was established, which is obliged to monitor the implementation and compliance with the provisions of the code. The EC contains a sanction in the form of a warning that can be pronounced orally or in writing. The members of the SEC signed statements that they will comply with the provisions of the code. The process for acting on reports from whistleblowers is also being continuously regulated and the necessary reports are submitted to the SCPC. In the second half of 2024, the SEC began preparing and adopting a new . Strategic priority number 10 is “Strengthening the integrity of the election administration, building a culture of intolerance towards corruption, assessing and recognizing corruption risks”, which will be achieved through the following strategic objectives: improving the system for strengthening the integrity of elections and election administration and establishing a system for managing corruption risks and developing a plan with measures for dealing with risks. https://www.sec.mk/upatstvo-za-rabota-na-opshtinskite-izborni-komisii-i-izbornata-komisija-na-grad-skopje/; https://www.sec.mk/drzhavnata-izborna-komisija-ja-odrzha-117-ta-sednica/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Assembly needs to amend the electoral code to reduce the number of signatures from 10,000 to 5,000 signatures for independent candidates for president of the country; and the number of signatures from 1,000 to 500 to submit to the list of independent candidates for members of the parliament; and decrease by 50 per cent the necessary signatures for independent candidates for mayors to enable more independent candidates to meet the threshold.

    With the changes of the Electoral Code in 2024 additionally contributed towards decreasing of the possibility for more independent candidates to meet the threshold.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 0
    Fully implemented
  • 0
    Partly implemented
  • 9
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The Ombudsperson’s office is an independent national institution with the authority to protect the human rights and freedoms of individuals or groups of citizens when these are violated by the state. Its competencies do not apply to the private sector or the judiciary, except in cases of an unjustified delay in court proceedings or irresponsible court services. The ombudsperson has no legislative, executive or judicial powers, and is neither a prosecuting organ nor an inspection authority. It is an oversight mechanism that intervenes with proposals, suggestions, recommendations and the like. Its role is ethical and moral in terms of respect and exercise of human rights and freedoms. Therefore, the ombuds’ actions are aimed primarily at promoting and improving the efficient and effective performance of public administration as a service to citizens to exercise their right and as an educational and advisory role in access and communication with citizens.[1]

The Ombudsperson’s budget does not cover the scope of work, especially resources for building the capacities of the institutional and human resources. Specifically, there is a lack of resources for sub-programmes such as the national preventive mechanism for torture, and a lack of integrity and whistleblowing training.

The legal framework secures the independence of the ombudsperson. However, the selection and appointment procedure lacks transparency, which could be misused to limit the independence of the office. The inclusion of the public in the election of the ombudsperson, as with the election of the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption, can strengthen both the independence and the role of the ombudsperson. Also, the possibility of re-appointment is not the preferred option according to the Venice Commission.

The website of the ombudsperson contains useful information and links related to the work of the institution. However, information is not always published in a timely manner and sometimes lacks details, such as the reporting of regular activities or special reports on discrimination.

The Ombudsperson is accountable to the Assembly via an annual report, but this report is often not reviewed on time, perhaps due to the lack of a legal deadline. The institution currently does not have its own codes of conduct, ethics or political integrity.

The Ombudsperson is very active in providing recommendations to the government and other institutions, but these are often not implemented, which limits the ombudsperson's effectiveness. Also, even though the ombudsperson deals with complaints from the public effectively, the complaints procedure and assessment tools of the ombudsperson lack gender-sensitive mechanisms and they might not be accessible enough for the wider public because of a lack of visibility of the ombudsperson.

---

[1] European Network of National Human Rights Institutions, Members:https://ennhri.org/our-members/north-macedonia/

  • Not implemented

    The Ombudsperson institution The Ombudsperson needs to draft and adopt a code of ethics and integrity policy in accordance with the directions from the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption.

    The Office of the Ombudsperson reported that it is preparing a Code of Ethics and Integrity Policy in accordance with the guidelines of the SCPC.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ombudsperson's office needs to hire more staff to be able to implement sub-programmes properly.

    When preparing the state budget for 2025, for the first time, the procedure provided for in Article 48 of the Law on the Ombudsman was not respected, neither by the Ministry of Finance nor by the Government. Specifically, in the budget proposal that was under parliamentary debate, the Ombudsperson was not invited and was approved for fewer funds than requested. Thus, the approved budget for 2025 is almost 25,000,000 denars less than the proposed one.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ombudsperson needs to increase visibility by developing and implementing a communication strategy that will also promote the ombudsperson’s competences as a point for external disclosure and the protection of whistleblowers.

    No action was undertaken related to these recommendations.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The ombudsperson needs to provide the possibility for integrity and whistleblowing training for staff.

    Due to lack of funds in 2024, trainings for staff on integrity and whistleblowing were not conducted.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ombudsperson should actively promote the implementation of the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers by preparing campaigns, conducting training with the people responsible for external and internal disclosure and closer communication with the other institutions responsible for external disclosure: SCPC, public prosecutor’s office and the Ministry of Interior. Their representatives were part of the working group for the Law on protection of whistleblowers and part of the events organized by TI-Macedonia related to protection of whistleblowers.

    No visible events, campaigns or other activities were conducted in this period which increased the visibility of the Ombudsperson as an external channel for receiving reports of whistleblowers. For the government

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government should provide additional budget for the ombudsperson office to better implement sub-programmes, and hire more staff and deliver integrity and whistleblowing training.

    When preparing the state budget for 2025, for the first time, the procedure provided for in Article 48 of the Law on the Ombudsman was not respected, neither by the Ministry of Finance nor by the Government. Specifically, in the budget proposal that was under parliamentary debate, the Ombudsperson was not invited and was approved for less funds than requested. Thus, the approved budget for 2025 is almost 25,000,000 denars less than the proposed one. In the professional service, the National Preventive Mechanism Team, the special departments of the offices of the Ombudsman, new employments are planned for 2025.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Amend the Law on the Ombudsperson, other legal acts and internal procedures in line with the Paris Principle, so the institution can receive the statutes as a national human rights institution.

    On 7.02.2025, a new proposal for amending and supplementing the law was submitted to the Parliament by a group of MPs through an abbreviated procedure. This proposal was placed on the agenda of the 34th session of the Parliament and the discussion on it has been completed in the meantime.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Establish effective and time-determined procedures that will ensure efficiency in the monitoring and implementation of the ombudsperson’s recommendations. Ombuds staff should be responsible for monitoring the implementation of the recommendations with a publicly available report.

    No actions was undertaken related to this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Establish a more transparent and open procedure for the election and appointment of the ombudsperson and its deputies, similar to the one for the election and appointment of the president and the members of the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption.

    No such change was initiated.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 0
    Fully implemented
  • 2
    Partly implemented
  • 2
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The State Audit Office (SAO) is an independent institution led by the auditor general, appointed by and accountable to the Assembly, whose conduct is regulated by the state audit law (SAL).

The SAO has financial and operational independence that enables the smooth conduct of its work. In the last five years, the SAO’s annual budget continuously increased, and retained stable human resources and established a strategy for the continuous professional development of its staff. However, there is a significant gap between the systematised and filled staff positions, even though the SAO has sufficient human resources to conduct its work.

The SAL provides the legal basis for the independence of the SAO; however, its independence is not included within the constitution.

The SAO is transparent, regularly publishing relevant information in a timely manner on its website, even though there is no legal deadline for the publication of these details. The information is also published on Facebook and LinkedIn, and sent to all relevant stakeholders via email. The SAO has developed its own integrity policy and code of ethics. The SAO is continuously working on the integrity of the institution and its employees by implementing the relevant domestic legal acts and applying international standards of integrity in the state audit institutions. The SAO is accountable to the Assembly, submitting an annual report on audits and operation. However, timely review of the annual reports has been lacking because there is no legal deadline for reviews.

The SAO provides effective financial audits, but their impact is limited by auditees failing to implement its recommendations in a timely manner. There is also no mechanism or webtool for the Assembly or the public to monitor the implementation of recommendations in a timely and user-friendly way.

The SAO cooperates with the Assembly, the public prosecutor’s office, the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption and the Ministry of Finance to increase their capacity in reading and using the SAO reports in their work of oversight and investigations into the expenditure of public funds. However, when it comes to sanctioning misbehaviour detected in audit reports, the PPO often fails to initiate investigations, due to a lack of capacity and external interference.

  • Partly implemented

    The government should follow the request of the SAO to include the independence of the SAO in the constitution.

    A new law on state audit is currently being drafted, which plans to improve the institutional and financial independence of the State Audit Office. https://ener.gov.mk/default.aspx?item=pub_regulation&subitem=view_reg_detail&itemid=78583

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government should introduce legal deadlines for the timely review and publication of SAO annual reports.

    No actions were undertaken related to this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The SAO should fulfil the systematised working places.

    The institution has not yet made any progress in filling systematized positions

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The SAO should make publicly available the follow-up mechanism for the implementation of the recommendations given by the SAO.

    The new software is in preparation process.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 5
    Fully implemented
  • 1
    Partly implemented
  • 1
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (SCPC) is an independent institution whose function is regulated by the 2019 Law on the Prevention of Corruption and Conflict of Interest (LPCCI). The SCPC consists of 7 members, and one is the president of the commission. Their work is supported by the SCPC secretariat, which is a professional service composed of civil servants, led by the secretary general.

The institution is financed by the state budget, but the legal provisions are missing objective indicators for budget changes and the option to acquire further funds. The independence of the institution and the financial and human resources for its functioning were increased in line with its new competencies, such as the anti-corruption check of the legal acts, financing of political parties and improvement of the integrity at an institutional level under the LPCCI. However, 25 per cent of systematised staff positions remain unfilled and there is a high dependency on donor funds for staff training.

The 2019 LPCCI introduced a new and transparent procedure for the selection of the president and members of SCPC via an election by members through an open procedure and including external experts, and aired on the Assembly TV channel.

The SPSC conducts its work transparently and informs the public of its activities through various means (website, briefings for the media, regular communication with CSOs and other institutions, and so on).

The SCPC is accountable to the Assembly through the submission of an annual report and other thematic reports, such as special reports after the elections, plus annual reports for the implementation of the law for access to information.[1] All these reports and other details relevant to the work of SCPC are published on its website (dksk.mk)in a timely manner.

In the last four years, the SCPC took a more proactive role in the fight against corruption. Its openness and transparency have contributed towards an increased number of reports submitted by the citizens and the media. However, there is no follow-up action by the other relevant authorities, such as the public prosecutor’s office, the government and the judiciary, who do not always take the necessary measures when irregularities are confirmed.

---

[1] SCPC. 2022. Yearly report for received requests for access to information in the public interest for 2021: https://dksk.mk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Годишен-извештај-за-спроведување-на-ЗСПИЈК-за-2021-година.pdf

  • Partly implemented

    SCPC should hire more staff to fill the current human resource gaps.

    Although throughout the years the number of employees is increasing there is still need of hiring professional staff for execution of the competences of the commission.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    SCPC should improve the capacity for research and analysis of asset and interest declarations, as well as other corruption risk assessments

    The State Commission for prevention of corruption reports that it is continuously working to improve the capacity for research and analysis of declarations of assets and interests, as well as other areas with a risk of corruption. In the last quarter of 2024, two management positions were filled in the Secretariat of the State Commission through a promotion procedure, namely: Head of the Department for Monitoring Assets and Interests and Head of the Sector for Preventing Conflicts of Interest, Monitoring Assets and Interests and Lobbying. However, there remains a need to increase the number of systematized positions and then fill them, in order to achieve full operational capacity in the listed areas. The working group, with expert support from the USAID Partnership Against Corruption project, developed a proposal for a functional analysis. The working group determined the structure of the organizational units that should be covered by the new acts on internal organization and systematisation of positions in the Secretariat. The State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption conducts annual monitoring of the level of implementation of the integrity system in public sector institutions that have signed an Integrity Policy. Regarding the implementation of the integrity system in the State Election Commission, according to the report for 2023. Additionally, a new system for the register of elected and appointed persons, declaration of assets and interests and their monitoring has been developed and established, which, among other things, allows for the electronic submission of a declaration of assets and interests, as a functionality that began to be applied from 01.01.2024. The State Commission continuously processes and updates newly submitted questionnaires on its website. In 2024, 3,620 declarations of assets and interests were submitted through the new electronic system on the website. https://dksk.mk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Извештај-за-имплементација-на-интегритет-2023-година.pdf

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    SCPC should implement missing mechanisms to handle risks of conflict of interest identified in the SCPC’s internal assessment

    To overcome the above risks, two mechanisms have been envisaged, namely: adopting an internal act on conflict of interest and organizing training to inform employees about the content and purpose of the internal act, i.e. the existing regulation, the manner of operation and conduct and its essence. Both mechanisms have been implemented. On 13.02.2023, the State Commission adopted the Rulebook on Conflict of Interest Management and Reporting of Additional Engagement for Officials in the SCPC, thus fulfilling one of the two control mechanisms. Regarding the second control mechanism, i.e. training for employees in the Secretariat, it is planned to be implemented continuously. After adopting the Rulebook on Conflict of Interest Management and Reporting of Additional Engagement for Officials in the SCPC, on 13.04.2023, the State Commission conducted internal training on the implementation of the integrity system for all employees in the Secretariat.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    SCPC should establish a mechanism for citizens to file a complaint against the SCPC and introduce citizen oversight committees for greater accountability of the institution.

    The SCPC considers that a mechanism for citizens to file complaints already exists, as individuals can submit complaints about the Commission’s work to the Parliament of the Republic of North Macedonia, the State Administrative Inspectorate, or the competent courts (such as the Administrative Court, Higher Administrative Court, or Basic Civil Court).

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    SCPC should implement gender-sensitive protocols and guidelines for internal and external complaints mechanisms and produce gender-disaggregated data on such complaints

    The State Commission appointed a coordinator and a deputy coordinator for equal opportunities and, with the support of the OSCE Mission in Skopje, provided equal opportunities training for them. Within the framework of the aforementioned support, the State Commission conducted an assessment of its work from a work perspective, which focuses on the gender perspective in the work and functioning of the State Commission in terms of organizational structures, workplace policies, technical capacity, as well as the gender perspective in the programs and activities of the Commission. A report entitled "Performance Assessment of the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption" was prepared for the conducted assessment. The final version of the report will be published on the State Commission's website. https://dksk.mk/mk/извештај-за-проценка-на-работењето-н/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    Public prosecutor’s office should establish working relations with the SCPC to increase understanding of their procedures when working on corruption related cases and to develop capacity for supporting the investigations.

    The State Commission and the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia concluded a Memorandum of Cooperation for a period of two years on 20.02.2023 (https://dksk.mk/mk/потпишан-меморандум-за-соработка-со-ј/). According to the memorandum, both institutions appointed persons to establish efficient and effective communication and established cooperation and exchange of information with full respect for the constitutional and legal status of the Public Prosecutor's Office as a sole and independent state body that prosecutes perpetrators of criminal offenses and other offenses punishable by law, as well as the legal competencies of the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia and the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption. According to Article 8 of the Memorandum, both parties, upon the expiration of its validity, have an obligation to assess its effects on strengthening cooperation and, if necessary, to extend its validity. In order to ensure enhanced cooperation between the SCPC and the Public Prosecutor's Office, the EU IPA 2020 Rule of Law (RoL) project, Component 1, focused its activities on drafting a new Memorandum of Cooperation. As part of this process, an analysis of the current Memorandum was conducted, gathering conclusions from workshops organized by the USAID Anti-Corruption Partnership Project and meetings were held with focal points from both institutions to explore ways to advance cooperation in the upcoming period. In October 2024, the first draft of the new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia and the State Commission was completed and shared first with the contact persons of both institutions, and after its approval with the institutions themselves. The signing process is currently in its final phase. Following the signing of the new memorandum, standard operating procedures for both institutions will be developed.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Government should establish a mechanism in the general secretariat of the government to follow up on the findings and recommendations of the SCPC in cases of established conflict of interest, non-reported assets or asset declarations that were not submitted, and to call high-level officials accountable

    No action was undertaken related to this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 0
    Fully implemented
  • 0
    Partly implemented
  • 5
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

In December 2022, North Macedonia had a total of 62 registered political parties. This pillar of the NIS report analyses only those represented in parliament, including: SDSM (largest ruling party), VMRO-DPMNE (largest opposition party), DUI (ruling coalition partner), BESA, DPA, Alliance of Albanians, Alternative, Levica, Union of Roma, GROM, Liberal Democratic Party, VMRO – People’s Party, Democratic Renewal of Macedonia, Democratic Party of Serbs in Macedonia, Democratic Party of Turks in Macedonia, Democratic Alliance, Democratic Movement, European Democratic Party, New Social Democratic Party, Socialist Party of Macedonia, Serbian Party of Macedonia, Party of Pensioners, and the Party for Movement of the Turks in Macedonia.

The independence of the parties is guaranteed in the constitution and regulated by several laws, such as the Law on Political Parties and the Law on Financing of Political Parties. In practice, political parties face occasional interference via influence-trading for tailored-made laws. Also, public procurement processes are influenced by political ties between businesses and political parties.

Parties are entitled to receive public funding for the regular functioning and for the electoral activities; however, they are still dependent on private donations that can influence the policies pursued by the parties.

The reporting system is quite complex, with various reports that must be submitted to different institutions at different times (for example, two reports on donations during the election campaigns and one financial report at the end of the elections). Also, there is no public online platform for the submission and publication of reports. Not all parties make their financial information publicly available on their website and, when they do, it is often not in an open or searchable format. Тhe template for reporting developed by the Ministry of Finance also lacks a separate item/category for funds spent on political advertisements on social media.

The State Audit Office (SAO) and State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (SCPC) effectively oversee party financing and provide annual reports to the Assembly. However, there is a lack of execution of misdemeanour provisions by the Ministry of Justice.

Factionalism and power struggles within parties are common, affecting internal democracy. Most parties are strongly influenced by their political leader, which in most parties is elected indirectly by the party congress. Only SDSM have held direct elections for a party leader, so far. Leadership positions in parties are primarily held by men.

All major parties have anti-corruption policies in their party programmes, but their commitment to these issues wanes once they are in power. Hence, it is imperative to strengthen political parties' dedication to anti-corruption policies and intra-party transparency. Their active involvement holds significant potential in the battle against corruption, potentially helping to eradicate impunity associated with grand corruption and corruption at all levels within the country.

  • Not implemented

    The Law for the Financing of Political Parties should establish a more balanced model of public financing of parties between the larger and smaller ones by sharing the percentages of funding more equally among participants in parliamentary elections.

    No action was undertaken for implementation of this activity.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ministry of Finance needs to establish an online platform for political parties to submit their financial reports. This platform should provide a public database with all the financial reports available in a searchable format, this would reduce the burden of reporting and make the data useful for other institutions and transparent for the media and citizens.

    No action was undertaken for the implementation of this activity.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ministry of Finance needs to improve the financial reporting template by adding a separate item on political advertisement on social media and enabling online reporting with the possibility of a comparison of the data.

    No action was undertaken for the implementation of this activity.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ministry of Justice in cooperation with the SCPC, the SAO and the SEC, as well as other bodies related to the oversight of political financing, need to establish a mechanism for the proper application of legal obligations and apply misdemeanour provisions for violations by political parties in their political finance obligations, in particular for not submitting their financial reports.

    Regarding the establishment of a mechanism for the proper application of legal obligations and to apply the misdemeanour provisions for non-compliance by political parties with their obligations for political financing, especially failure to submit financial reports, it is taken into account to be incorporated into the analysis that will precede the process of preparing the next amendments to the Law on Financing of Political Parties. The recommendation has been submitted to be considered in the working group for the preparation of amendments and supplements to the Law on Prevention of Corruption and Conflict of Interest

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government and the Assembly need to work together with media associations to find a solution to include regulation of campaigns on social media within the electoral code.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 1
    Fully implemented
  • 1
    Partly implemented
  • 1
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The legal framework[1] related to media is not restrictive in terms of licensing and setting up broadcasting entities; however, online media – for example, online news portals and social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, and so on) – is not sufficiently regulated by law, and disinformation is prolific in internet media reporting along with a lack of professional standards, also noted in the EC report on North Macedonia.[2] Since the country is striving for EU membership, the authorities have made efforts to reduce this gap in legislation by regulating online news portals, as well as video-sharing platforms such as YouTube.

There have also been changes in the financing of media from the state budget. The 2018 amendment to the law[3] established a ban for state institutions, the public sector, local governments, state-owned enterprises and companies with state ownership to advertise in the media. However, on 2 November 2023, parliament passed a decision to adopt a new amendment to the law that will bring back the possibility for government advertising on commercial channels.[4]

The dominating media landscape in North Macedonia is more traditional and depicts programmes and channels that the general public wants to see – sensational news that presents opposing statements by the ruling versus opposition parties on daily events and challenges in the country, entertainment programmes that generally consist of regional music shows, Turkish TV series, morning call-in programmes, among others. There is a lack of an alternative media scene and independent media outlets, and the most popular media are the national state media channels (Kanal5, Sitel, Alfa, Alsat).

Political and business elites in the country have a large influence on the media, which has decreased media integrity, professionalism[5] and quality reporting. Journalists also face verbal attacks and legal pressures, often involving defamation lawsuits. Parallel media systems have been established by political parties in power, and journalists, especially female ones, are targeted. Although attacks are reported to authorities, investigations are rarely initiated.

---

[1] EC Report. 2020. North Macedonia. https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-10/north_macedonia_report_2020.pdf.

[2] EU. 2018. Directive 2018/1808 of the European Parliament and of the Council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/1808/oj.

[3] Law Amending the Law on Audio and Audiovisual Media Services. Official Gazette of RM, no. 248/2018, Article 102. https://ldbis.pravda.gov.mk/PregledNaZakon.aspx?id=43213.

[4] SDK. “SDSM and VMRO-DPMNE together to pass a law on bribing TV channels with at least €2.3 million annually from the state budget,” https://sdk.mk/index.php/makedonija/sdsm-i-vmro-dpmne-se-zdruzhija-da-donesat-zakon-za-potkup-na-televiziite-so-najmalku-2-3-milioni-evra-godishno-od-drzhavniot-budhet/, [accessed on 14 November 2023].

[5] Law on Media. Official Gazette of RM, No. 184, 26 December 2013. Law Amending the Law on Media. Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, No. 13, 23 January 2014, https://avmu.mk/закон-за-медиуми/.

  • Not implemented

    The Academy for judges and prosecutors along with the Council of Media Ethics of Macedonia and the Agency for Audio and Audiovisual Media Services needs to provide training to judges for the correct application of the Law on Defamation and Insult in accordance with international standards and practices, guaranteeing that state and party officials refrain from lawsuits against investigative journalists and the media for revealing information of public interest.

    No action was undertaken for the implementation of this action. Agency for Audio and Audiovisual Media Services: There are no legal competencies for the implementation of the Law on Civil Liability for Insult and Defamation, as well as for conducting training for judges, i.e. the Academy for Judges and Public Prosecutors has the competence to conduct such training.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    Media owners need to give full legal protection to their journalists in court processes conducted against them after publishing articles on corruption. That way, journalists will feel encouraged to investigate and report on corruption in the knowledge that the media is behind them.

    Mainly, the journalist are supported by their media when they publish investigative stories. Also the Council of ethics in the media and the Association of journalists are providing protection, however additional mechanisms for protection should be established in place.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    Journalists should use more sources of information about corruption and not rely only on state institutions’ sources. Moreover, they can research the systemic problems uncovered by their findings, which allow for corruption.

    The media are also financed by international funds, and professionalism is being strengthened among many media outlets. Investigative journalism is showing a positive trend, and an increase in the preparation of quality articles that will contribute to the fight against corruption is expected in the future. The investigative media were strengthened in the previous period.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 0
    Fully implemented
  • 3
    Partly implemented
  • 1
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

By June 2023, a total of 11,134 organisations were registered in North Macedonia and 7,957 of them were active, according to data provided by the Central Registry of North Macedonia (CRNM).[1] However, the 2021 CSO Sustainability Index report for North Macedonia notes that the data publicly listed by CRNM lacks precision and should be considered with caution.[2]

There is a variety of advocacy and service delivery CSOs. In terms of anti-corruption work, in 2014, 15 CSOs, growing to 18 CSOs in 2023, joined forces to build the Platform of Civic Organisations for the Fight against Corruption.[3] The platform is active in joint activities for legislative anti-corruption reforms, is involved in working groups for legislative changes in the area of anti-corruption and good governance, and some member organisations also collaborate with the SCPC in this regard.

Name of organisation

Description

Association for Democratic Initiatives

ADI aims toward inclusion, based on equality and non-discrimination, for any individual or group to freely participate in the democratic process.

Institute for Democracy/Societas Civilis Skopje

IDSCS is working towards promoting the active engagement of citizens to balance social and economic development.

Coalition for a Fair Trial for All

The coalition monitors court cases in the basic court of Skopje in the area of ​​organised crime and corruption.

Macedonian Center for International Cooperation

In 2013, MCMS began an active contribution to the fight against corruption through USAID's anti-corruption programme. MCMS initiated the Platform of Civil Society Organisations for the Fight against Corruption and implements a project to monitor the implementation of anti-corruption legal obligations, transparency and accountability by the SCPC.

MOST

MOST works on mobilising citizens to use their democratic rights, and on increasing the democratic capacity of CSOs, institutions and political actors.

Metamorphosis

Metamorphosis works on the transparency, accountability and political responsibility of public officeholders and politicians.

OHRID Institute

The OHRID Institute for Economic Strategies and International Relations provides research and analysis in the political sphere as well as policy-making.

Transparencies International Macedonia

TI-M monitors the implementation of anti-corruption laws, strategies and international standards, as well as advocacy and the creation of policies for greater transparency and accountability in public institutions.

Transparency Macedonia

TM aims to strengthen good governance at the national and local levels, improve standards and anti-corruption practices in the state sector, promote anti-corruption standards among political parties, business and civil society and raise public awareness of anti-corruption measures.

Open Society Foundation Macedonia

OSF Macedonia implemented numerous projects in the fight against corruption in the country.

Center for Strategic Research and Documentation

The CSRD works on the inclusion of citizens in processes of participatory democracy, educating hundreds of citizens and civil activists on how to influence decision-makers.

Center for Civic Communication

The Center for Civic Communications has focused its work on two groups of mutually related activities: (1) monitoring of state institutions, and on the basis of this, recommending measures and policies for enhancing their work and for narrowing the room for corruption, and (2) enhancing the abilities of the journalists and the special role of the media and the nongovernmental organizations in the fight against corruption.

Center for Research and Policy Making

Center for Research and Policy Making analyses of policies to improve laws, assesses the institutional capacities for their implementation, contributes to increased accountability and transparency of public institutions, and monitors and evaluates how much these policies create a public value and/or are aimed at the "Europeanisation" of the Republic of Macedonia.

EUROTINK – Center for European Strategies

EUROTINK supports Republic of North Macedonia's accession to the EU and the Europeanisation of society through professional training and counselling, evidence based public policy development, regional cooperation and advocacy for change.

Helsinki Committee for Human Rights

The Helsinki Committee for Human Rights monitors the state of human rights, provides legal assistance, cooperates with other organisations and state authorities to increase the promotion, respect and protection of human rights and freedoms.

Scoop – Center for Investigative Journalism

Scoop provides support to journalists to help them financially or professionally in promoting investigative journalism in the country and the region, as well as at the world level.

The legal framework in North Macedonia allows for the easy establishment and operation of CSOs with some reasonable constraints to protect constitutional freedoms. However, certain laws, such as the 2021 Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, have increased administrative burdens for CSOs, and the Law on Protection of Personal Data imposes disproportionate costs, particularly on smaller CSOs.

Also, comprehensive legal safeguards exist to prevent unwarranted external interference in CSOs' activities. CSOs operate relatively freely since the change in government in 2017, but there are cases of political actors verbally attacking CSOs. CSOs are further limited through a large dependency on foreign donors. State funding for CSOs is relatively low, and larger CSOs tend to have more stable funding compared to smaller ones.

In terms of their governance, larger CSOs tend to disclose annual and financial reports, while smaller CSOs struggle with transparency due to limited resources. Oversight, primarily in smaller CSOs, is limited due to overlapping structures between executive and governing bodies. About half of CSOs have a code of conduct or adhere to the sector-wide code from MCIC. Smaller organisations show less adherence to integrity policies. Gender CSO programmes funded by international donors often consider gender, but written gender equality policies are present in only 21 per cent of CSOs.

Some CSOs actively and successfully hold the government accountable, but the proactive public watchdog role of CSOs is not well developed. CSOs are actively engaged in advocating for anti-corruption reforms, but the government sometimes lacks collaborative consultations with them in legislative processes.

---

[1] Central Registry of North Macedonia (CRNM). List of Civil Society Organisations, https://www.crm.com.mk/en/open-data/civil-society-organizations

[2] USAID. 2021. Civil Society Organisation Sustainability Index: North Macedonia, p.1, https://www.balkancsd.net/novo/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/24-7-North-Macedonia_final.pdf

[3] The Platform of CSOs for the Fight against Corruption was established on 9 December 2014 by 15 organisations, https://www.antikorupcija.mk/en/%d0%b8%d1%81%d1%82%d0%be%d1%80%d0%b8%d1%98%d0%b0

  • Partly implemented

    The government needs to increase state funding for CSOs in 2024 to MKD 2 million (approx. €32,500), so it can meet its goals in the strategy for cooperation with and development of CSOs of providing 30 per cent of CSOs’ total revenue. The CRNM should provide capacity support to CSOs to comply with the Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism and the Law on Protection of Personal Data before issuing fines, such as training and educational materials.

    Civil organizations with the Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, i.e. the section on their obligation to register in the register of beneficial owners: According to the latest report on the Civil Organization Sustainability Index from 2021, the Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism has increased the administrative burden for civil organizations, including high fines for untimely registration of the "beneficial owner". Also, the Law on Protection of Personal Data potentially leads to disproportionate costs, especially for smaller civil organizations. The amendments to the law of 2022 provided for the extension of the deadline for registration in the register, from the existing 8 days from the date of registration of the entity in the trade register and the register of other legal entities, i.e. from the change of the beneficial owner, the deadline was increased to 15 days from the date of registration of the entity in the trade register and the register of other legal entities, i.e. from the change of the beneficial owner. However, the obligation to register within the given deadline remains for all entities, regardless of the organizational form and size of the entity. Citizen associations and foundations are informed of this obligation, as well as all other entities, when submitting an application for registration in the register, as well as through various media since the establishment of the register. The fee is activated only in the case when the entity fails to fulfil the legal obligation within the deadline, and it increases proportionally with the number of days of delay and has a preventive role - to exert pressure for timely fulfilment of legal obligations.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government and public institutions need to involve CSOs more in consultative processes and working groups for legislation changes and other policy-making processes.

    In accordance with the recommendation that the Government should include civil society organizations in consultative processes, a Council for Cooperation between the Government and Civil Society has been established, which is expected to start operating in the coming period. The CSOs are actively involved in working groups and other consultation processes related to developing and improvement of the legislative framework. However what is lacking is real inclusion of their opinions, recommendations and other support they are giving.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government should amend the law on defamation to impose restrictions and sanctions on government officials or political party members who engage in public defamation of CSOs.

    The Ministry has not currently undertaken any activities to amend the Law on Defamation. The Journalists' Association has submitted an analysis on the protection of journalists from so-called SLAPP lawsuits. The Ministry of Justice will consider the findings stated in the analysis and the appropriate recommendations at the first subsequent opening of amendments and supplements to the Law on Civil Liability and on Insult and Defamation and other relevant laws.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    CSOs that have overlapping functions between executive and oversight structures need to restructure their functions so accountability and oversight through independent bodies can be ensured.

    A good basis for strengthening civil society organizations that have functions that overlap between executive and control structures should restructure their functions in a way that ensures accountability and control through independent bodies is the signing of the Code of Ethics for Civil Society Organizations, to which we as an organization are also signatories. https://mcms.mk/mk/kodeks-za-go

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 2
    Fully implemented
  • 1
    Partly implemented
  • 1
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

There is a total of 72,922 business entities in North Macedonia. Most (47,074) of these are micro-business entities, the remaining are small (24,199), medium (1,010) and large (639) businesses.[1] More than three-quarters of all companies are limited liability companies (LLCs).[2] At the end of 2022, 96 companies were listed on the Macedonian stock exchange, with a capital of about €3,470,000,000.[3]

Most of the smaller companies act in the areas of trade, construction and manufacturing, and the larger companies are in the areas of trade, services, industry and financial operation, insurance and telecommunication. Company registration is done at the central register. The national bank supervises the financial sector, including saving and e-money issuers. The securities exchange commission supervises the Macedonian stock exchange and the companies listed on it. The business sector is supported by chambers of commerce that support private sector development.

Legislation in the business sector is mostly favourable to businesses. Registration is quick and cheap. However, closing down a business is particularly challenging and costly, and delays in VAT returns and government payments affect business liquidity. A number of laws ensure the independence of private companies, but the laws have changed often, and they are unnecessarily prescriptive, which creates uncertainty for the business sector.

The central register is responsible for maintaining data on registered companies, and information is readily accessible to the public. There is usually transparency, with financial accounts made publicly available and relevant authorities reporting required information. However, there is a lack of information on state aid to the business sector and no national certification system for internal auditors.

The legislation provides a good foundation for effective corporate governance in practice, particularly for banks and larger companies. However, there is no agency that oversees the implementation of relevant regulations.

While larger companies tend to adopt their own codes of conduct, sector-wide codes are often missing, except for the banking sector. In the realm of public procurement, the law bans conflicts of interest, but there is no requirement for bidders on public contracts to have ethics codes. There is also no official statistic on the prevalence of bribery in the private sector.

While there are legal safeguards against external interference, weak judiciary and administrative irregularities hinder the business sector's effectiveness. Corruption remains a concern, affecting the economy's informal sector.

There is dialogue between the government and business associations, but the business sector tends to complain that few of their initiatives get adopted. The business sector shows little interest in pushing anti-corruption issues associated when meeting with the government and there are no links between business and civil society.

---

[1] State Statistical Office, https://www.stat.gov.mk/PublikaciiPoOblasti.aspx, p.1-3.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Macedonian Stock Exchange, Annual Statistical Newsletter, https://www.mse.mk/Repository/Reports/Билтени 2018/Bilteni 2022/Bilten Godisen 2022.pdf, p.1.

  • Fully implemented

    The chambers of commerce (all existing chambers) should insist on dialogue with the government in the area of transparency and anti-corruption activities, and the government should put this dialogue on its agenda.

    The Chamber of Commerce of the Republic of Macedonia fulfils the recommendation that they should insist on a dialogue with the Government in the area of transparency and anti-corruption activities It is quite active in organizing lectures and trainings, and TI Macedonia has continuous cooperation on the topic of anti-corruption with the Chamber. https://transparency.mk/2024/11/14/stopanskata-komora-i-transparensi-interneshnl-potpishaa-dogovor-za-sorabotka-koj-predviduva-zaednichka-borba-za-namaluvanje-na-korupcijata/; https://transparency.mk/2024/12/13/partnerstvoto-pomegju-biznis-sektorot-instituciite-i-gragjanskite-organizacii-vo-borbata-protiv-korupcijata/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The parliament needs to adopt the draft legislation on accounting in consultation with the relevant chamber of commerce and association of accountants and establish a national certification system for internal auditors.

    This recommendation that the Parliament should adopt the draft legislation on accounting in consultation with the relevant chamber and association of accountants and establish a national certification system for internal auditors has also been fulfilled. Amendments were made to the Law on Accounting in February 2025.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government should introduce a public state aid register on the internet to transparently show which businesses received how much state aid, when and for what.

    Regarding the recommendation that the Government should introduce a state aid registry on the Internet to transparently show which business entities receive state aid and the amount they receive, when and for what, the Government reported: It is planned that the procedure and conditions for obtaining financial support will be revised in the direction of a larger amount of support for domestic companies that export and companies with a competitive advantage. A single registry of granted state aid will also be introduced in order to prevent abuse of financial support instruments and their double use.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The business sector should establish cooperation with the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption, via the chambers of commerce, to increase transparency, prevent of corruption and encourage the business sector to report the involvement of officials in cases of corruption, through organising annual meetings.

    The business sector should establish cooperation with the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption through the Chamber of Commerce is a recommendation that has been implemented and a memorandum of cooperation has been concluded between the Chamber of Commerce of the Republic of Macedonia and the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption and Conflict of Interest.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • 0
    Fully implemented
  • 0
    Partly implemented
  • 5
    Not implemented
  • 0
    No data

Last update 28 March 2025

The common term for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the Republic of North Macedonia is public enterprises (PEs). PEs are legal entities established by the state, municipalities or the City of Skopje. There are 155 PEs in the country, of which 113 are public utility enterprises, 8 are for agriculture and forestry, 16 are for transport, 2 for informative character, 1 is an information society enterprise, and 15 are for other activities (sport, urban planning, energy, treatment of stray animals and others). Only 13 were established by the government, 3 by the Assembly, and the others by the City of Skopje and the municipalities.[1]

A total of 17,240 people are employed in PEs, divided into three categories: administrative (public) officials, public service providers and technical support people. Most are employees in communal works, followed by transport, agriculture and forestry, information, and information society.[2] PEs employ 2.5 per cent of the total number of workers in the country.

The functioning of the PEs is regulated by the Law on State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs law). However, the law contains loopholes that allow for the political appointment of directors and nepotism in the hiring of staff.

The lack of transparency and accountability further compromises the independence of PEs. Although there has been an improvement in the information available on the webpages of the PEs, data is missing, especially on the governing structures and public procurements. Also, many PEs have not published the contact points for access to information of public interest or details for internal whistleblowing channels. There is also no centralised unit for consistent and aggregate reporting on PEs and no single official database for state and local government ownership, hindering transparency and supervision.

The State Audit Office conducts audits, and PEs are subject to accounting and auditing standards similar to private companies. However, there is a lack of information on accountability measures for SAO reports that show inefficiency in PEs or bad financial management.

A small number of PEs developed their own anti-corruption policies and strategies, as well as a code of ethics, but there is no sector-wide code of corporate governance for PEs. There is also a lack of cooperation with the SCPC for the development and implementation of anti-corruption and integrity actions.

---

[1] MIOA. 2023. Report on the registry of employees in the public sector for 2022: https://portal.mioa.gov.mk/sit..., p.13.

[2] Ibid, p.30

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to establish a centralised coordination unit with the role of coordinating the work of the PEs.

    No action was undertaken for this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to create a centralised platform to publish information on the work of the PEs (governing structure, number of employees, financial reports, and so on), to improve the transparency of PEs.

    No action was undertaken for this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to amend the law on PEs, introducing sanctions and measures in cases when financial irregularities and misconduct are detected.

    No action was undertaken for this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to establish a corporate code for all PEs and a centralised coordination unit needs to oversee its implementation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The financial accountability of PEs should be improved by a more transparent reporting mechanism established by the MoF. This mechanism should include annual reports on the activities of PEs to be submitted to the competent authorities and publicly available on the PEs’ webpages.

    The Ministry of Economy and Labor reported that the Government plans a corporate code, amendments to the Law on Public Enterprises, a unit for coordination with enterprises, publication of internal documents and a body for supervision of the work of public enterprises, and the introduction of a state aid registry.

    Last update 28 March 2025

All recommendations

  • Fully implemented

    The Supreme Court and Judicial Council need to 1. publish consolidated information on the judicial budget 2. ensure that decisions and annual reports published on the judicial council’s website are in a user-friendly format

    The Supreme Court regularly reports on decisions and publishes them on its official website. Consolidated information about the judicial budget, as well as decisions and annual reports, are published on the Judicial Council's website in a format accessible to users. http://www.vsrm.mk/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    An independent disciplinary commission needs to be established to create an independent body to investigate complaints against public prosecutors and to ensure accountability. The government needs adopt regulatory provisions to protect a person who files a complaint against a public prosecutor.

    The Public Prosecutor's Office has informed that an Ethics Council has been established and is functioning within its jurisdiction. This council deals with cases where public prosecutors fail to adhere to specific ethical principles outlined in the Ethics Code, both in their relationships with other authorities, parties, and citizens, in the public eye, and in their internal relations. In cases provided by the Law on the Public Prosecutor's Office for disciplinary violations, the Commission for Determining the Disciplinary Responsibility of Public Prosecutors takes action. Additionally, the Council of Public Prosecutors handles complaints and grievances from citizens and legal entities regarding the work of public prosecutors. Citizens can file a complaint about the behaviour of public prosecutors, which can be reviewed by the Ethics Council, an oversight body for ensuring compliance with the Ethics Code of Public Prosecutors in North Macedonia.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The public prosecutor’s office needs to provide a protected reporting channel for whistleblowers based on the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers.

    The Public Prosecutor's Office is one of the institutions where protected whistleblowing can be carried out under the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers. In this case, the submitted report is treated as a criminal report. The right to procedural protection of whistleblowers is regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code. All obligations related to the protection of whistleblower data and identity are fully respected, as failure to do so is subject to criminal, not misdemeanour, responsibility, as provided in the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers. However, information about the protected whistleblowing channel cannot yet be found on the official website of the Prosecutor's Office.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The SEC and SCPC need to ensure the proper implementation of the SEC’s integrity plan.

    In 2023, the SEC adopted the Integrity Policy and several by-laws were adopted and activities were carried out for its implementation. According to the SCPC report on the monitoring of the implementation of the integrity system for 2023, the SEC received a "good" rating according to the level of fulfilment of obligations. In December 2024, the Questionnaire for Monitoring the Implementation of the Integrity System posted on the SCPC e-portal was completed. The following steps were taken to improve the integrity system: amendments to the regulation, implementation of survey questionnaires for officials regarding knowledge of the integrity system, holding a training/workshop for SEC officials on the integrity system. During the vote counting in 2024, the SEC did not face any technical problems and the voting results were announced in a timely and accurate manner.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The SEC needs to amend the existing code of ethics for the SEC’s members and the electoral administration with specific reprimand provisions in the case of established unethical behaviour of staff and members of the central and local electoral bodies.

    During the 2024 Parliamentary and Presidential elections, after the adoption of the Code of Ethics for Election Administration, the provisions of the Guidelines for the work of municipal election commissions were amended, which provided for ethical standards and rules of conduct for members of the Municipal Election Commission, a section was introduced in the SEC manuals intended for election bodies that referred to ethical standards and rules of conduct for election administration, and mandatory education on ethical conduct of election bodies was carried out during the trainings held for elected bodies (MECs and EBs). The Code of Ethics, as well as the Guidelines, contain provisions for punishment in case of non-compliance with the prescribed rules of ethical conduct. In order to comply with the Code of Ethics for members of the SEC, an Ethics Commission for Monitoring and Compliance with the EC was established, which is obliged to monitor the implementation and compliance with the provisions of the code. The EC contains a sanction in the form of a warning that can be pronounced orally or in writing. The members of the SEC signed statements that they will comply with the provisions of the code. The process for acting on reports from whistleblowers is also being continuously regulated and the necessary reports are submitted to the SCPC. In the second half of 2024, the SEC began preparing and adopting a new . Strategic priority number 10 is “Strengthening the integrity of the election administration, building a culture of intolerance towards corruption, assessing and recognizing corruption risks”, which will be achieved through the following strategic objectives: improving the system for strengthening the integrity of elections and election administration and establishing a system for managing corruption risks and developing a plan with measures for dealing with risks. https://www.sec.mk/upatstvo-za-rabota-na-opshtinskite-izborni-komisii-i-izbornata-komisija-na-grad-skopje/; https://www.sec.mk/drzhavnata-izborna-komisija-ja-odrzha-117-ta-sednica/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    SCPC should improve the capacity for research and analysis of asset and interest declarations, as well as other corruption risk assessments

    The State Commission for prevention of corruption reports that it is continuously working to improve the capacity for research and analysis of declarations of assets and interests, as well as other areas with a risk of corruption. In the last quarter of 2024, two management positions were filled in the Secretariat of the State Commission through a promotion procedure, namely: Head of the Department for Monitoring Assets and Interests and Head of the Sector for Preventing Conflicts of Interest, Monitoring Assets and Interests and Lobbying. However, there remains a need to increase the number of systematized positions and then fill them, in order to achieve full operational capacity in the listed areas. The working group, with expert support from the USAID Partnership Against Corruption project, developed a proposal for a functional analysis. The working group determined the structure of the organizational units that should be covered by the new acts on internal organization and systematisation of positions in the Secretariat. The State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption conducts annual monitoring of the level of implementation of the integrity system in public sector institutions that have signed an Integrity Policy. Regarding the implementation of the integrity system in the State Election Commission, according to the report for 2023. Additionally, a new system for the register of elected and appointed persons, declaration of assets and interests and their monitoring has been developed and established, which, among other things, allows for the electronic submission of a declaration of assets and interests, as a functionality that began to be applied from 01.01.2024. The State Commission continuously processes and updates newly submitted questionnaires on its website. In 2024, 3,620 declarations of assets and interests were submitted through the new electronic system on the website. https://dksk.mk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Извештај-за-имплементација-на-интегритет-2023-година.pdf

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    SCPC should implement missing mechanisms to handle risks of conflict of interest identified in the SCPC’s internal assessment

    To overcome the above risks, two mechanisms have been envisaged, namely: adopting an internal act on conflict of interest and organizing training to inform employees about the content and purpose of the internal act, i.e. the existing regulation, the manner of operation and conduct and its essence. Both mechanisms have been implemented. On 13.02.2023, the State Commission adopted the Rulebook on Conflict of Interest Management and Reporting of Additional Engagement for Officials in the SCPC, thus fulfilling one of the two control mechanisms. Regarding the second control mechanism, i.e. training for employees in the Secretariat, it is planned to be implemented continuously. After adopting the Rulebook on Conflict of Interest Management and Reporting of Additional Engagement for Officials in the SCPC, on 13.04.2023, the State Commission conducted internal training on the implementation of the integrity system for all employees in the Secretariat.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    SCPC should establish a mechanism for citizens to file a complaint against the SCPC and introduce citizen oversight committees for greater accountability of the institution.

    The SCPC considers that a mechanism for citizens to file complaints already exists, as individuals can submit complaints about the Commission’s work to the Parliament of the Republic of North Macedonia, the State Administrative Inspectorate, or the competent courts (such as the Administrative Court, Higher Administrative Court, or Basic Civil Court).

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    SCPC should implement gender-sensitive protocols and guidelines for internal and external complaints mechanisms and produce gender-disaggregated data on such complaints

    The State Commission appointed a coordinator and a deputy coordinator for equal opportunities and, with the support of the OSCE Mission in Skopje, provided equal opportunities training for them. Within the framework of the aforementioned support, the State Commission conducted an assessment of its work from a work perspective, which focuses on the gender perspective in the work and functioning of the State Commission in terms of organizational structures, workplace policies, technical capacity, as well as the gender perspective in the programs and activities of the Commission. A report entitled "Performance Assessment of the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption" was prepared for the conducted assessment. The final version of the report will be published on the State Commission's website. https://dksk.mk/mk/извештај-за-проценка-на-работењето-н/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    Public prosecutor’s office should establish working relations with the SCPC to increase understanding of their procedures when working on corruption related cases and to develop capacity for supporting the investigations.

    The State Commission and the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia concluded a Memorandum of Cooperation for a period of two years on 20.02.2023 (https://dksk.mk/mk/потпишан-меморандум-за-соработка-со-ј/). According to the memorandum, both institutions appointed persons to establish efficient and effective communication and established cooperation and exchange of information with full respect for the constitutional and legal status of the Public Prosecutor's Office as a sole and independent state body that prosecutes perpetrators of criminal offenses and other offenses punishable by law, as well as the legal competencies of the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia and the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption. According to Article 8 of the Memorandum, both parties, upon the expiration of its validity, have an obligation to assess its effects on strengthening cooperation and, if necessary, to extend its validity. In order to ensure enhanced cooperation between the SCPC and the Public Prosecutor's Office, the EU IPA 2020 Rule of Law (RoL) project, Component 1, focused its activities on drafting a new Memorandum of Cooperation. As part of this process, an analysis of the current Memorandum was conducted, gathering conclusions from workshops organized by the USAID Anti-Corruption Partnership Project and meetings were held with focal points from both institutions to explore ways to advance cooperation in the upcoming period. In October 2024, the first draft of the new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia and the State Commission was completed and shared first with the contact persons of both institutions, and after its approval with the institutions themselves. The signing process is currently in its final phase. Following the signing of the new memorandum, standard operating procedures for both institutions will be developed.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    Journalists should use more sources of information about corruption and not rely only on state institutions’ sources. Moreover, they can research the systemic problems uncovered by their findings, which allow for corruption.

    The media are also financed by international funds, and professionalism is being strengthened among many media outlets. Investigative journalism is showing a positive trend, and an increase in the preparation of quality articles that will contribute to the fight against corruption is expected in the future. The investigative media were strengthened in the previous period.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The chambers of commerce (all existing chambers) should insist on dialogue with the government in the area of transparency and anti-corruption activities, and the government should put this dialogue on its agenda.

    The Chamber of Commerce of the Republic of Macedonia fulfils the recommendation that they should insist on a dialogue with the Government in the area of transparency and anti-corruption activities It is quite active in organizing lectures and trainings, and TI Macedonia has continuous cooperation on the topic of anti-corruption with the Chamber. https://transparency.mk/2024/11/14/stopanskata-komora-i-transparensi-interneshnl-potpishaa-dogovor-za-sorabotka-koj-predviduva-zaednichka-borba-za-namaluvanje-na-korupcijata/; https://transparency.mk/2024/12/13/partnerstvoto-pomegju-biznis-sektorot-instituciite-i-gragjanskite-organizacii-vo-borbata-protiv-korupcijata/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Fully implemented

    The business sector should establish cooperation with the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption, via the chambers of commerce, to increase transparency, prevent of corruption and encourage the business sector to report the involvement of officials in cases of corruption, through organising annual meetings.

    The business sector should establish cooperation with the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption through the Chamber of Commerce is a recommendation that has been implemented and a memorandum of cooperation has been concluded between the Chamber of Commerce of the Republic of Macedonia and the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption and Conflict of Interest.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The Assembly should conduct debates on and scrutinize public expenditure through public contracting at least once a year.

    The Assembly conducts debates on public expenditures while reviewing the Proposal for the Budget of the Republic of North Macedonia, the Proposal for amendments and additions to the Budget, the Proposal for a decision on the redistribution of funds between the budget users of the central government and between the funds, and the Proposal for the Final Account of the Budget of the Republic of North Macedonia.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The Assembly should implement all GRECO recommendations regarding integrity as well as the integrity policy developed by the SCPC, such as the adoption of new code of ethics for MPs and of related new guidelines.

    Progress has been made regarding the recommendation to undertake activities for the implementation of GRECO recommendations. The Committee for Rules of Procedure and Mandate-Immunity Issues held a coordination meeting on 18.02.2025 in the Assembly to organize a session for the establishment of a working group for an Ethical Code. The General Secretary of the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia on 29 January 2025 adopted the Ethical Code for the Assembly Service of the Republic of North Macedonia. This Code defines the basic ethical rules and behaviour standards for employees in the Assembly Service of the Republic of North Macedonia. The State Commission for Preventing Corruption on 29.01.2025 sent a letter to the President of the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, calling on the Assembly to engage in the process of introducing an integrity system by signing the Integrity Policies of the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia. In line with this, activities are ongoing to sign the Integrity Policy of the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia. https://www.sobranie.mk/eticki-kodeks-na-sluzbata-na-sobranieto.nspx

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should strengthen its transparency by publishing government decisions in a separate tab on its website, categorised by different areas, and include the reasons for each decision.

    There have been certain improvements in the area of transparency by the executive branch. The government regularly publishes decisions, programmes, and conclusions made during sessions on the Open Government section of its website. This helps increase transparency and makes the content publicly accessible. A new government website is currently under development to further improve accessibility and user experience. URL: https://vlada.mk/vladini-sednici

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should publish, in one place and in a timely manner, all reports for which it is responsible. This should include updates on the reports submitted by the State Audit Office (SAO), information on actions taken following audit findings, and the consequences of not acting on those findings. This obligation should apply to both the government and the SAO.

    The national programme for the government’s work for 2024–2028 includes strengthening internal audit processes and forming an Audit Committee as a central body to monitor the implementation of SAO recommendations. The programme also foresees systematic collaboration with the Public Prosecutor’s Office, which will review SAO reports. These steps are aimed at improving follow-up on audit findings and increasing accountability. URL: https://vlada.mk/revizija

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should publish all reports on the work of ministries in one centralised location on its website.

    There have been improvements in publishing government reports, with efforts to consolidate and regularly update documents, decisions, and information. A new website is underway to enhance the transparency and organisation of content from all ministries.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should publish state data related to measures taken to prevent corruption and strengthen integrity. This should include data on decisions, training, inter-institutional cooperation, adopted plans and programmes, sanctioned irregularities, and implemented activities, along with their achieved effects.

    A Coordinating Body for the Fight Against Corruption is being established to unify anti-corruption efforts across institutions. The government is also committed to increasing the transparency of integrity-related activities, and shares project implementation details and decisions via ministry websites.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should publish information on court decisions related to disputed government decisions.

    Although not explicitly detailed in the current initiatives, transparency in court-related outcomes is implied under broader transparency reforms. This is an area for further development within the context of Open Government and inter-institutional cooperation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should regularly publish information on the execution of government projects, including status updates and outcomes, to ensure full transparency on implementation.

    The government provides updates on completed projects, including those linked to capital grants for municipal investment. These updates are published, for example, on the website of the Ministry of Local Self-Government, enhancing transparency around public spending and local development outcomes.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The Supreme Court needs to revise the code of ethics to include a sustainable and permanent body for its implementation.

    The Supreme Court of the Republic of North Macedonia, during its General Session in September 2019, adopted the Code of Ethics for Judges and Lay Judges. "In accordance with the Code of Ethics for Judges and Lay Judges, for the consistent application of the Judicial Ethics Code, the Association of Judges of the Republic of North Macedonia establishes an Advisory Body, which, upon request from a judge, lay judge, president of a court, a court session, or the Association of Judges of the Republic of North Macedonia, provides advisory opinions and advice on one or more issues related to the ethical behaviour of judges/lay judges, the proper execution of judicial duties, and avoiding conflicts of interest in the private lives of judges and lay judges in relation to their judicial functions. These opinions and advice have a preventive and advisory significance. They highlight behaviours that violate the principles of the Judicial Code.”http://www.vsrm.mk/wps/wcm/connect/vsrm/10ae444c-09fd-4cbd-9fa6-ed45ae4ad13b/Кодекс+за+етика+на+судиите+и+судиите+поротници.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=mSBbAAH

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The Supreme Court needs to strengthen the mechanism for its implementation and accountability, and ensure more effective monitoring of the implementation of the code of ethics

    For unethical behaviour of judges and the consistent application of the Judicial Ethics Code, the Association of Judges of the Republic of North Macedonia has established an advisory body. Upon request from judges or the Association of Judges, the body provides advisory opinions to judges in North Macedonia regarding one or more issues related to ethical behaviour, the advisory execution of judicial duties, and avoiding conflicts of interest between judges' private lives and their judicial functions. If there are such complaints, the Judicial Council forwards them to the Association of Judges and the State Commission for Preventing Corruption (SCPC).

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The judicial council needs to adopt new procedures for receiving citizen reports related to conflicts of interest and other inappropriate and unethical behaviour in judges, and to establish a whistleblower’s protection and reporting channel to enable judges with integrity or other interested parties to report on cases of influence over the judges and their decisions

    The Judicial Council has implemented the recommendation for establishing a channel for receiving reports from whistleblowers and has developed a procedure for receiving, separating, and processing data from whistleblower reports.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The BPPOOCC and the SCPC need to establish everyday communication and cooperation on corruption related offences by signing a memorandum.

    The State Commission and the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia concluded a Memorandum of Cooperation for a period of two years on 20.02.2023. According to the memorandum, both institutions appointed persons to establish efficient and effective communication and established cooperation and exchange of information with full respect for the constitutional and legal status of the Public Prosecutor's Office as a sole and independent state body that prosecutes perpetrators of criminal offenses and other offenses punishable by law, as well as the legal competencies of the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia and the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption. According to Article 8 of the Memorandum, both parties, upon the expiration of its validity, have an obligation to assess its effects on strengthening cooperation and, if necessary, to extend its validity. In order to ensure enhanced cooperation between the SCPC and the Public Prosecutor's Office, the EU IPA 2020 Rule of Law (RoL) project, Component 1, focused its activities on drafting a new Memorandum of Cooperation. As part of this process, an analysis of the current Memorandum was conducted, gathering conclusions from workshops organized by the USAID Anti-Corruption Partnership Project and meetings were held with focal points from both institutions to explore ways to advance cooperation in the upcoming period. In October 2024, the first draft of the new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of North Macedonia and the State Commission was completed and shared first with the contact persons of both institutions, and after its approval with the institutions themselves. The signing process is currently in its final phase. Following the signing of the new memorandum, standard operating procedures for both institutions will be developed. https://dksk.mk/mk/потпишан-меморандум-за-соработка-со-ј/; https://dksk.mk/mk/работилница-за-користење-на-платформ/; https://dksk.mk/mk/тркалезна-маса-соработка-на-институ/; https://dksk.mk/mk/работилница-на-дкск-и-јавното-обвинит/; https://dksk.mk/mk/одржана-работна-средба-на-претседате/

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The MoI needs to establish effective implementation of the adopted code of ethics by establishing effective vetting of reported cases of conflict of interest and asset declaration, as well as regular reporting of the gifts and hospitality for police officials.

    The Ministry of Interior has adopted a Code of Ethics, and revised according to GRECO guidelines in 2021. It has appointed a person for integrity, receiving gifts and conflict of interest in the Ministry and has adopted an Integrity Plan 2023-2025. A new Law on Interior is in the preparation phase, where the Department for Internal Control, Criminal Investigations and Professional Standards has proposed an amendment that will provide for the submission of a statement of assets and interests. https://mvr.gov.mk/Upload/Editor_Upload/ETICKI KODEKS.pdf https://mvr.gov.mk/page/integritet?fbclid=IwAR0z_Ra6a458jgr3v5zksHR2WX8qiRn-917pNSBuhaMMr0pa_cLi2SoOd5w; https://mvr.gov.mk/Upload/Editor_Upload/Plan za integritet 2023-2025/Plan za integritet MVR 2023-25_04_06_2023_MKD_web.pdf; https://ener.gov.mk/Default.aspx?item=pub_regulation&subitem=view_reg_detail&itemid=88217

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The MoI needs to publish information on the number of cases and results related to integrity tests of police officials.

    Every three months, the Department for Internal Control, Criminal Investigations and Professional Standards publishes on its website a Report on implemented measures and activities within its scope of work, which also includes investigations conducted into information received about committed corruption crimes. Due to the lack of technical and personnel capacities, special equipment, appropriate training of the workers who are supposed to implement it, etc., a test to check the professional integrity of workers in the Ministry of Interior has not been conducted so far. https://mvr.gov.mk/page/sektor-za-vnatreshna-kontrola

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The MoI needs to establish cooperation with the SCPC for proactive investigations of corruption related cases. As a result, the MoI and SCPC need to publish separate statistical data for corruption related cases on their websites.

    In 2024 was signed a Memorandum between SCPC and MoI: https://dksk.mk/mk/потпишан-меморандум-за-соработка-пом/. However there is still needed information on the cases that they have worked on together and information on the results of their cooperation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The SEC should publish an annual report, with details on financial and human resources as well as a comprehensive overview of its activities and statistics on previous elections as well as complaints received.

    The SEC, in accordance with the Electoral Code, publishes a Report on the conducted elections and submits it to the Parliament within the legally established deadline.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government should follow the request of the SAO to include the independence of the SAO in the constitution.

    A new law on state audit is currently being drafted, which plans to improve the institutional and financial independence of the State Audit Office. https://ener.gov.mk/default.aspx?item=pub_regulation&subitem=view_reg_detail&itemid=78583

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The SAO should make publicly available the follow-up mechanism for the implementation of the recommendations given by the SAO.

    The new software is in preparation process.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    SCPC should hire more staff to fill the current human resource gaps.

    Although throughout the years the number of employees is increasing there is still need of hiring professional staff for execution of the competences of the commission.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    Media owners need to give full legal protection to their journalists in court processes conducted against them after publishing articles on corruption. That way, journalists will feel encouraged to investigate and report on corruption in the knowledge that the media is behind them.

    Mainly, the journalist are supported by their media when they publish investigative stories. Also the Council of ethics in the media and the Association of journalists are providing protection, however additional mechanisms for protection should be established in place.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government needs to increase state funding for CSOs in 2024 to MKD 2 million (approx. €32,500), so it can meet its goals in the strategy for cooperation with and development of CSOs of providing 30 per cent of CSOs’ total revenue. The CRNM should provide capacity support to CSOs to comply with the Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism and the Law on Protection of Personal Data before issuing fines, such as training and educational materials.

    Civil organizations with the Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, i.e. the section on their obligation to register in the register of beneficial owners: According to the latest report on the Civil Organization Sustainability Index from 2021, the Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism has increased the administrative burden for civil organizations, including high fines for untimely registration of the "beneficial owner". Also, the Law on Protection of Personal Data potentially leads to disproportionate costs, especially for smaller civil organizations. The amendments to the law of 2022 provided for the extension of the deadline for registration in the register, from the existing 8 days from the date of registration of the entity in the trade register and the register of other legal entities, i.e. from the change of the beneficial owner, the deadline was increased to 15 days from the date of registration of the entity in the trade register and the register of other legal entities, i.e. from the change of the beneficial owner. However, the obligation to register within the given deadline remains for all entities, regardless of the organizational form and size of the entity. Citizen associations and foundations are informed of this obligation, as well as all other entities, when submitting an application for registration in the register, as well as through various media since the establishment of the register. The fee is activated only in the case when the entity fails to fulfil the legal obligation within the deadline, and it increases proportionally with the number of days of delay and has a preventive role - to exert pressure for timely fulfilment of legal obligations.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The government and public institutions need to involve CSOs more in consultative processes and working groups for legislation changes and other policy-making processes.

    In accordance with the recommendation that the Government should include civil society organizations in consultative processes, a Council for Cooperation between the Government and Civil Society has been established, which is expected to start operating in the coming period. The CSOs are actively involved in working groups and other consultation processes related to developing and improvement of the legislative framework. However what is lacking is real inclusion of their opinions, recommendations and other support they are giving.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    CSOs that have overlapping functions between executive and oversight structures need to restructure their functions so accountability and oversight through independent bodies can be ensured.

    A good basis for strengthening civil society organizations that have functions that overlap between executive and control structures should restructure their functions in a way that ensures accountability and control through independent bodies is the signing of the Code of Ethics for Civil Society Organizations, to which we as an organization are also signatories. https://mcms.mk/mk/kodeks-za-go

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Partly implemented

    The parliament needs to adopt the draft legislation on accounting in consultation with the relevant chamber of commerce and association of accountants and establish a national certification system for internal auditors.

    This recommendation that the Parliament should adopt the draft legislation on accounting in consultation with the relevant chamber and association of accountants and establish a national certification system for internal auditors has also been fulfilled. Amendments were made to the Law on Accounting in February 2025.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Assembly should review and debate the findings and recommendations of the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption, state auditor and other specialized agencies’ reports. The Assembly should establish deadlines for adopting the annual reports submitted by the institutions that are accountable to the Assembly, such as the SCPC, PPO, and SAO (for example, within three months of the submission of the report).

    No actions were carry out in order to enable implementation of the given recommendation. According to the Law on State Audit and the Law on Preventing Corruption and Conflict of Interest, deadlines are prescribed for the State Audit Office and the State Commission for Preventing Corruption to submit their annual reports as stipulated in both laws, but no deadlines are established for the determination of the reports. From this, it can be concluded that due to the lack of obligation, there is a legal gap that allows the postponement of the adoption of the annual reports.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to ensure sufficient financial and human resources for the judiciary

    The state budget for 2025 is not in line with the foreseen percentage that the judiciary should receive in accordance with the laws.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to provide financial resources for additional human resources to the public prosecutor’s office and investigative centres in charge of investigating corruption.

    Regarding the financial aspect, the Public Prosecutor's Office still faces obstacles, as only 0.2% of the legally required 0.4% of the budget has been approved. No new hires have been approved for 2025.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The chief prosecutor of the BPPOOCC needs to regularly report to the Assembly on the implementation of accountability mechanisms, such as disciplinary cases, citizen complaints and dismissals due to the violation of official duties.

    The Public Prosecutor does not inform the Assembly about accountability mechanisms, such as disciplinary cases, citizen complaints, and dismissals due to violations of official duties.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Data on the execution of control mechanisms (imposed measures, recommendations, decisions, judgements, and soon on) should be published in the annual reports of public sector institutions. Namely, all annual reports from public bodies should contain data on their actions and the execution of their decisions in order to ensure the effective application of the control mechanisms. For example, how many of their decisions have been implemented, how many were contested by appeal or lawsuit, and what was the decision of the second-instance authority or court?

    The Agency for Administration has noted for several years in a row that it has not been able to conduct a qualitative analysis of the decisions made on the appeals/complaints of administrative officials who have initiated proceedings before the competent courts for the protection of their employment rights, because the State Attorney's Office of the Republic of Macedonia does not regularly submit the final decisions of the competent courts on the filed court cases against the aforementioned decisions, with a recommendation that they be submitted regularly.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    MISA and AA should publish an annual report on imposed measures for disciplinary and material responsibility in all institutions, including data on the type of violation for which the measure was imposed, whether the measure was implemented, against how many decisions legal protection has been requested, the type of decisions from the second-level authority and how that decision was implemented.

    The Agency does not have a legally established control mechanism to check how and in what manner the first-instance authorities act on the decisions of the Commission for Deciding on Appeals and Complaints of Administrative Officials in Second Instance, nor to conduct an analysis of the decisions on appeals/complaints of administrative officials who initiated proceedings before the competent courts for the protection of their employment rights. This is because the State Attorney's Office does not regularly submit the final decisions of the competent courts on the filed court cases.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Public Institutions should make their functional analysis publicly available on their website and the website of the Ministry of Information Society and Administration, to allow for the analysis of the data and, based on that, to take measures that lead to a more efficient public administration.

    The Ministry of Public Administration does not publish data from those described in point 1 because there is no legal obligation. Institutions are obliged to submit to the MPA an annual report on the measures imposed for determining disciplinary and material liability of administrative officials, and accordingly, it follows that the ministry will be able to summarize, process and publish data on the measures imposed for disciplinary and material liability. The recommendation will be considered within the framework of the working group for the preparation of the new Law on Administrative Officials. The ministry does not publish the functional analyses of other ministries except for their own.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to increase the budget of the SEC to enable it to carry out its regular activities in non-election years properly.

    The State Election Commission (SEC) adopted the budget for 2025 at a public session, and despite the fact that more funds were foreseen, less were approved by the Ministry of Finance.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The SEC needs to conduct a functional analysis of staff and skill needs for the functioning of the SEC.

    In the upcoming period, given the needs for new employment and additional equipment of the SEC, which was also noted in the reports of the OSCE and ODIHR, it is undertaking activities to secure consent for new employment or takeover of administrative officials from other institutions.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Assembly needs to amend the electoral code to reduce the number of signatures from 10,000 to 5,000 signatures for independent candidates for president of the country; and the number of signatures from 1,000 to 500 to submit to the list of independent candidates for members of the parliament; and decrease by 50 per cent the necessary signatures for independent candidates for mayors to enable more independent candidates to meet the threshold.

    With the changes of the Electoral Code in 2024 additionally contributed towards decreasing of the possibility for more independent candidates to meet the threshold.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ombudsperson institution The Ombudsperson needs to draft and adopt a code of ethics and integrity policy in accordance with the directions from the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption.

    The Office of the Ombudsperson reported that it is preparing a Code of Ethics and Integrity Policy in accordance with the guidelines of the SCPC.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ombudsperson's office needs to hire more staff to be able to implement sub-programmes properly.

    When preparing the state budget for 2025, for the first time, the procedure provided for in Article 48 of the Law on the Ombudsman was not respected, neither by the Ministry of Finance nor by the Government. Specifically, in the budget proposal that was under parliamentary debate, the Ombudsperson was not invited and was approved for fewer funds than requested. Thus, the approved budget for 2025 is almost 25,000,000 denars less than the proposed one.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ombudsperson needs to increase visibility by developing and implementing a communication strategy that will also promote the ombudsperson’s competences as a point for external disclosure and the protection of whistleblowers.

    No action was undertaken related to these recommendations.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The ombudsperson needs to provide the possibility for integrity and whistleblowing training for staff.

    Due to lack of funds in 2024, trainings for staff on integrity and whistleblowing were not conducted.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ombudsperson should actively promote the implementation of the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers by preparing campaigns, conducting training with the people responsible for external and internal disclosure and closer communication with the other institutions responsible for external disclosure: SCPC, public prosecutor’s office and the Ministry of Interior. Their representatives were part of the working group for the Law on protection of whistleblowers and part of the events organized by TI-Macedonia related to protection of whistleblowers.

    No visible events, campaigns or other activities were conducted in this period which increased the visibility of the Ombudsperson as an external channel for receiving reports of whistleblowers. For the government

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government should provide additional budget for the ombudsperson office to better implement sub-programmes, and hire more staff and deliver integrity and whistleblowing training.

    When preparing the state budget for 2025, for the first time, the procedure provided for in Article 48 of the Law on the Ombudsman was not respected, neither by the Ministry of Finance nor by the Government. Specifically, in the budget proposal that was under parliamentary debate, the Ombudsperson was not invited and was approved for less funds than requested. Thus, the approved budget for 2025 is almost 25,000,000 denars less than the proposed one. In the professional service, the National Preventive Mechanism Team, the special departments of the offices of the Ombudsman, new employments are planned for 2025.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Amend the Law on the Ombudsperson, other legal acts and internal procedures in line with the Paris Principle, so the institution can receive the statutes as a national human rights institution.

    On 7.02.2025, a new proposal for amending and supplementing the law was submitted to the Parliament by a group of MPs through an abbreviated procedure. This proposal was placed on the agenda of the 34th session of the Parliament and the discussion on it has been completed in the meantime.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Establish effective and time-determined procedures that will ensure efficiency in the monitoring and implementation of the ombudsperson’s recommendations. Ombuds staff should be responsible for monitoring the implementation of the recommendations with a publicly available report.

    No actions was undertaken related to this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Establish a more transparent and open procedure for the election and appointment of the ombudsperson and its deputies, similar to the one for the election and appointment of the president and the members of the State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption.

    No such change was initiated.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government should introduce legal deadlines for the timely review and publication of SAO annual reports.

    No actions were undertaken related to this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The SAO should fulfil the systematised working places.

    The institution has not yet made any progress in filling systematized positions

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    Government should establish a mechanism in the general secretariat of the government to follow up on the findings and recommendations of the SCPC in cases of established conflict of interest, non-reported assets or asset declarations that were not submitted, and to call high-level officials accountable

    No action was undertaken related to this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Law for the Financing of Political Parties should establish a more balanced model of public financing of parties between the larger and smaller ones by sharing the percentages of funding more equally among participants in parliamentary elections.

    No action was undertaken for implementation of this activity.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ministry of Finance needs to establish an online platform for political parties to submit their financial reports. This platform should provide a public database with all the financial reports available in a searchable format, this would reduce the burden of reporting and make the data useful for other institutions and transparent for the media and citizens.

    No action was undertaken for the implementation of this activity.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ministry of Finance needs to improve the financial reporting template by adding a separate item on political advertisement on social media and enabling online reporting with the possibility of a comparison of the data.

    No action was undertaken for the implementation of this activity.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Ministry of Justice in cooperation with the SCPC, the SAO and the SEC, as well as other bodies related to the oversight of political financing, need to establish a mechanism for the proper application of legal obligations and apply misdemeanour provisions for violations by political parties in their political finance obligations, in particular for not submitting their financial reports.

    Regarding the establishment of a mechanism for the proper application of legal obligations and to apply the misdemeanour provisions for non-compliance by political parties with their obligations for political financing, especially failure to submit financial reports, it is taken into account to be incorporated into the analysis that will precede the process of preparing the next amendments to the Law on Financing of Political Parties. The recommendation has been submitted to be considered in the working group for the preparation of amendments and supplements to the Law on Prevention of Corruption and Conflict of Interest

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government and the Assembly need to work together with media associations to find a solution to include regulation of campaigns on social media within the electoral code.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The Academy for judges and prosecutors along with the Council of Media Ethics of Macedonia and the Agency for Audio and Audiovisual Media Services needs to provide training to judges for the correct application of the Law on Defamation and Insult in accordance with international standards and practices, guaranteeing that state and party officials refrain from lawsuits against investigative journalists and the media for revealing information of public interest.

    No action was undertaken for the implementation of this action. Agency for Audio and Audiovisual Media Services: There are no legal competencies for the implementation of the Law on Civil Liability for Insult and Defamation, as well as for conducting training for judges, i.e. the Academy for Judges and Public Prosecutors has the competence to conduct such training.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government should amend the law on defamation to impose restrictions and sanctions on government officials or political party members who engage in public defamation of CSOs.

    The Ministry has not currently undertaken any activities to amend the Law on Defamation. The Journalists' Association has submitted an analysis on the protection of journalists from so-called SLAPP lawsuits. The Ministry of Justice will consider the findings stated in the analysis and the appropriate recommendations at the first subsequent opening of amendments and supplements to the Law on Civil Liability and on Insult and Defamation and other relevant laws.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government should introduce a public state aid register on the internet to transparently show which businesses received how much state aid, when and for what.

    Regarding the recommendation that the Government should introduce a state aid registry on the Internet to transparently show which business entities receive state aid and the amount they receive, when and for what, the Government reported: It is planned that the procedure and conditions for obtaining financial support will be revised in the direction of a larger amount of support for domestic companies that export and companies with a competitive advantage. A single registry of granted state aid will also be introduced in order to prevent abuse of financial support instruments and their double use.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to establish a centralised coordination unit with the role of coordinating the work of the PEs.

    No action was undertaken for this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to create a centralised platform to publish information on the work of the PEs (governing structure, number of employees, financial reports, and so on), to improve the transparency of PEs.

    No action was undertaken for this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to amend the law on PEs, introducing sanctions and measures in cases when financial irregularities and misconduct are detected.

    No action was undertaken for this recommendation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The government needs to establish a corporate code for all PEs and a centralised coordination unit needs to oversee its implementation.

    Last update 28 March 2025

  • Not implemented

    The financial accountability of PEs should be improved by a more transparent reporting mechanism established by the MoF. This mechanism should include annual reports on the activities of PEs to be submitted to the competent authorities and publicly available on the PEs’ webpages.

    The Ministry of Economy and Labor reported that the Government plans a corporate code, amendments to the Law on Public Enterprises, a unit for coordination with enterprises, publication of internal documents and a body for supervision of the work of public enterprises, and the introduction of a state aid registry.

    Last update 28 March 2025