Amendments to North Macedonia's Criminal Code Halt Prosecution of Land Privatization Corruption Case
- North Macedonia
Amendments to North Macedonia's Criminal Code Halt Prosecution of Land Privatization Corruption Case
- Case Date(s)
- 12/2020
- Case Updated
- 09/2023
Case Summary
Phase
Statute of limitationsOffence
- Abuse of functions
Sector
- Administrative and support service activities
- Real estate activities
Involved people
Elona Çaushi
Position of Power- Politically exposed
- No
- — e.g: specific to the involved person from UNCAC offenses list
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
Zoran Teofilovski, a judge and Judicial Council member, was indicted n 2020 as the primary suspect in a corruption plot to illegally obtain state land for a tennis club in Tetovo. Along with other defendants, including municipal officials, Teofilovski allegedly manipulated the legalization and privatization processes to obtain ownership of 4,410 m² of state land at an advantageous price. However, due to changes made to North Macedonia’s Criminal Code in 2023, which reduced sanctions for abuse of office and involvement in a criminal enterprise with implications for the statute of limitations, the charges against the defendants were dropped.
In troubling case that highlights weaknesses in North Macedonia's justice system, a high-ranking judge and his associates were accused of manipulating state land privatization laws for personal gain. However, due to recent legal amendments, the case was dismissed, sparking concern about the country's ability to combat corruption effectively.
The case came to light in December 2019, when the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office for Prosecution of Organized Crime and Corruption announced an investigation into eight individuals on well-founded suspicions that they had committed the criminal offense of abuse of official position and authority to obtain ownership of a 4,410 m² plot for a tennis club in Tetovo for a fraction of its actual market value.
According to the prosecution, in 2011, the primary suspect, Judge Zoran Teofilovski, then president of the Tennis Sports Association Ljuboten in Tetovo—and not yet a member of the Judicial Council—initiated a legalization procedure with Tetovo Municipality to register a non-existent building constructed on state-owned land. To that end, he reportedly submitted falsified documents to prove the building's existence. Meanwhile, while the legalization process was still ongoing, another suspect filed a request to privatize this state-owned land, intending to acquire unlawful material benefits for the tennis association. Their actions were intended to obtain property gains for the tennis club through the ownership of construction land valued at MKD 22,050,000 (US$ 370,300).
To pull off the scheme, Teofilovski and his associates, including a municipal surveyor and local government employees, allegedly misused their positions to fast-track the legalization and privatization process. The prosecution determined that between August 2011 and December 2012, Zoran Teofilovski, acting as President of the Tennis Sports Association Ljuboten Tetovo, and Cvetko Naumovski, acting as manager of the same tennis club, intentionally incited defendants Aydin Nuredini, Djemal Abdi, Imran Kurtishi, Krenar Ibrahimi and Idriz Redzepi to misuse their official positions as public employees.
Official reports were falsified, urban planning approvals were issued illegally and decisions were manipulated to grant the club ownership rights at a shockingly low price of MKD 43 per m² (approximately US$ 0.72 per m2), far below market value. This resulted in a financial loss to the state budget, estimated at MKD 52.9 million (around US$ 887,000).
In December 2020, Zoran Teofilovski, a judge and Judicial Council member, alongside other defendants, mostly local public officials, was indicted for participating in a corruption scheme to unlawfully acquire state land.
As the case moved to court, Teofilovski invoked judicial immunity to delay detention. While the Judicial Council revoked Teofilovski’s immunity to allow criminal proceedings, it declined the prosecution's request for his detention. The Court ultimately ordered house arrest for four suspects and issued preventive measures for the rest. Despite facing criminal charges, Teofilovski remained on Judicial Council.
Specifically, Zoran Teofilovski, Aydin Nuredini, Krenar Ibrahimi, Imran Kurtishi, and Djemal Abdi enabled the tennis club to obtain ownership of a non-existent structure with an area of 122 m². On the other hand, Cvetko Naumovski, intending to acquire ownership of state-owned construction land covering an area of 4,410 m², requested to purchase the land. This was done in violation of the law, as the construction parcel was not included in the urban plan and the tennis club had no legally recognized ownership rights over any structure on the land.
Alongside the purchase request, Djemal Abdi submitted documents containing false information. Subsequently, Idriz Redzepi, acting as a public official, conducted an on-site inspection. Misusing his official position, Redzepi entered false information into the inspection report, falsely claiming that he had identified the cadastral parcel and that it conformed to the intended use. Based on this falsified report, a final decision was issued authorizing the privatization of the construction land.
The trial, which began in 2021, faced multiple delays due to postponed hearings. During the proceedings, Teofilovski pleaded not guilty and dismissed the accusations as fabricated. He also issued a statement, presenting counterarguments to the indictment, including claims that the illegal building existed and that the legalization and privatization procedures were legitimate. In July 2022, Teofilovski's mandate as a member of the Judicial Council was terminated.
After years of legal proceedings and delays, the case took a shocking turn. In September 2023, the Basic Criminal Court in Skopje dropped all charges against Zoran Teofilovski and his co- defendants. The decision stemmed from 2023 amendments to North Macedonia’s Criminal Code, which significantly reduced penalties for abuse of office and expedited the statute of limitations. The maximum penalty for this offense was reduced to five years in prison, which set the absolute statute of limitations for this case to 2021—ten years after the alleged offenses occurred.
This case illustrates the negative impact of the amendments to the Criminal Code, which have hindered the prosecution of corruption cases involving abuse of official position and authority. As a result, several cases have been dismissed or are likely to be due to statute of limitations issues, allowing defendants accused of corruption to avoid accountability. These changes raise concerns about the integrity of judicial reforms and undermine public trust in judicial and state institutions. Public scrutiny and opposition to laws that enable corruption are essential for safeguarding justice and accountability.
Further details
- JURISDICTION/COURT
Basic Criminal Court in Skopje
- LAWS (ALLEGEDLY) BREACHED
Criminal Code of North Macedonia (Abuse of official position and authority, Article 353 in connection with Articles 107, 108, and 23);
Law on the Treatment of illegally constructed buildings (Article 23);
Law on the Privatization and Lease of State-Owned Construction Land, (Article 20 and Article 14 paragraph 3)
- FINAL SANCTION OR MEASURE
text here e.g.:
1 year imprisonment, fine, debarment, etc
- PROSECUTOR
Prosecutor Milica Gavrilova
- JUDGE
Judge Vaska Nikolovska Masevska
SOCIAL HARM ON SDGs
16 Peace, justice and strong institutions
10 Reduced Inequality
9 Industry, innovation and infrastructure
It is estimated that the alleged offenses resulted in a loss of MKD 52.9 million (around €860,000/US$ 880,000) to North Macedonia's state budget. Furthermore, the dismissal of the case following amendments to the Criminal Code casts doubt on the integrity of judicial reforms and undermines public trust in judicial and state institutions.
Additionally, this case highlights past practices where the Judicial Council has very rarely authorized the detention of judges under investigation for suspected crimes.
Disclaimer
Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this database. All information is believed to be correct as of 09/2023. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts.
Additional Material
-
Press release Link meta.mk/poraneshniot-sudija-teofilovski-prv-gi-oseti-izmenite-vo-kz-zastare-deloto-za-zloupotreba-teshka-860-000-evra/Former judge Teofilovski was the first to notice the changes to the Criminal Code – an outdated case of abuse weighing 860,000 euros
-
Press release Link sdk.mk/index.php/makedonija/chlenot-na-sudskiot-sovet-teofilovski-ke-se-bara-so-poternitsa-politsijata-ne-go-najde-doma/A MEMBER OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL TEOFILOWSKI WILL BE WANTED WITH A WARRANT, POLICE HAVE NOT FOUND HIM AT HOME
-
Press release Link denesen.mk/krivichen-sud-skopje-sudenjeto-na-teofilovski-chlen-na-sudskiot-sovet-odlozeno-za-naesen/Skopje Criminal Court: Trial of Teofilovski, member of the Judicial Council, postponed to autumn
-
Press release Link www.slobodenpecat.mk/chlenot-na-sudski-sovet-zoran-teofilovski-obvinenieto-protiv-nego-go-smeta-za-montirano/Judicial Council member Zoran Teofilovski considers the accusation against him to be fabricated
-
Press release Link kanal5.com.mk/sudskiot-sovet-penzionirashe-chetiriesettina-sudii/a536741The Judicial Council Retired Forty Judges
Contribute to this case
Do you have additional information, updates or relevant insights about this case? You can help by sharing new developments or legal updates on the case, providing verified sources that offer more context or evidence or highlighting public reactions or advocacy efforts related to the case.
Do you know of a corruption case that has been reported in the media or by civil society, or is already in the judicial process but is not receiving enough attention? Help us put a spotlight on key corruption cases in your country, and we will review your suggestion and consider adding it to the corruption database.
Please only suggest cases that have already been reported by the media or civil society or cases that are in some stage of the law enforcement or judicial process. If you would like to report a new corruption case, please reach out to our Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres in your country or email us.