Clean Contracting: Safeguarding EU funds in Europe with Integrity Pacts

Filed under - Public procurement

article image

What’s at stake?

Five billion euros.

According to experts, that’s what corruption in ‘public procurement’ (contracts awarded by government agencies) could be costing the European Union each year.

This financial black hole has disastrous consequences: when clean and competitive companies know that a contract to build a hospital or school is rigged, why would they bother to bid?

The losers are plain to see: the country’s citizens who endure bad services, and the EU taxpayers whose money disappears.

What we’re doing about it

We're running a project that brings together the widest-possible coalition of government, private sector, civil society and citizens to monitor 17 major public contracts in 11 EU countries. Together, these contracts are worth nearly €1 billion.

Through this collaborative monitoring approach, we make sure that these high-profile public contracts are Clean Contracts – i.e., designed and implemented to the highest possible standards of transparency, accountability and efficiency, according to the public interest.

By setting precedents for clean practices throughout each country’s public contracting process we will help build confidence among the public, government agencies and the private sector that funds are being spent efficiently and as they should – and that redress is possible if corruption does occur.

Our approach

We’re pioneering ‘Clean Contracting’ across the EU based on three pillars:.

  • the Integrity Pact (IP): a legally binding commitment signed by all parties to each of the 17 public procurement processes and monitored by our local partners in the 11 EU countries
  • social accountability: participation by those most affected by a procurement process in all phases of the public procurement cycle
  • adherence to open contracting principles and data standards

Integrity Pacts + Social Accountability + Open Data = Clean Contracting

Transparency International invented Integrity Pacts (IPs) to help governments, businesses and civil society fight corruption in public contracting. The IP is both a signed document and a process implemented to ensure accountability, value-for-money and transparency in public contracting. The principle of an IP is that it commits a contracting authority and bidders to comply with best practice and maximum transparency for the duration of the contract and is legally binding. Monitoring these commitments is an independent third actor - usually a civil society organisation. Learn more about IPs here.

In addition to the IP, the project draws on international open contracting principles, and engages the communities, social groups and professional associations directly affected by specific public contract. These social accountability mechanisms are necessary for building trust in the public procurement process and ensuring that these big projects reflect the public interest, particularly the interest of those communities and groups most affected by the project. That means engaging these communities in monitoring the procurement along as many phases of the project (from pre-tender to implementation and evaluation) as possible. (Those who live near to where a flood reservoir, highway, hospital or other facility is being built, for example).

We aim to help achieve broader and deeper scrutiny of public contracts than previously possible, and to bring citizens much closer to the process, working with individuals in the public and private sector to safeguard European funds and improve trust and efficiency in public contracts.

Who’s involved

The Transparency International Secretariat and Transparency International EU coordinate the project, with the financial support of the EU's Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG Regio).

In total, 15 national partners are monitoring 17 public contracts across 11 EU member countries.

Timeline and results


For general queries contact

Zoë Reiter, Clean Contracting Advocacy

Claire Martin, Public Procurement Expert

Anne Pasquet, Project Management

Alice Chambers, Communications

Laura Milchmeyer, Programme Assistant


Country / Territory - Bulgaria   |   Czech Republic   |   Greece   |   Hungary   |   Italy   |   Latvia   |   Lithuania   |   Poland   |   Portugal   |   Romania   |   Slovenia   
Language(s) - English   
Topic - Accountability   |   Civil society   |   Politics and government   |   Public procurement   |   Public services   |   Tools   
Tags - Monitoring   |   European Union   |   Integrity Pacts   |   Public contracting   |   clean contracts   |   DG Regio   |   European Structural and Investment Funds   

Related news


Global Corruption Barometer: citizens’ voices from around the world

Transparency International believes that people’s experience and perceptions of corruption are key for understanding corruption risks around the ...


How the IMF can have real impact on fighting corruption

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is meeting in Washington DC this week. We want to send a strong message about what the multi-lateral lender can ...


No sustainable development without tackling corruption: the importance of tracking SDG 16

12 Transparency International Chapters are at the UN in New York City to share their findings measuring national progress towards Sustainable ...


Clean contracting at work: an example from Vilnius

The Neris Riverside development is part of a wider initiative to promote clean contracting across Europe – all told, we're monitoring 17 major ...

Related publications

Publication cover image

People and corruption: citizen's voices from around the world

This is a summary report of the key findings from the ninth edition of Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer series – the ...

Report published – Nov 2017

Publication cover image

People and Corruption: Latin America and the Caribbean

This new report from the Global Corruption Barometer series is based on surveys with over 22,000 citizens living in 20 countries in Latin America and ...

Report published – Oct 2017

Related blog posts


State Capture in South Africa

A recently-released report on State Capture indicates that one family could seemingly succeed in skewing the spending priorities ... [read more]

Posted on 14 Feb 2017 by Jan Hofmeyr

Young change makers using tech to solve land corruption

  Fifteen bright young minds from Malawi, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe came together late last year ... [read more]

Posted on 06 Feb 2017 by Annette Jaitner

What’s next for Ukraine?

Ukraine said it planned to confiscate $290 million of assets believed to be stolen through corruption in 2016. So far ... [read more]

Posted on 16 Dec 2016 by Chris Sanders

Cleaning up sport: conflicts of interest at the top

The tension between the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has never been greater ... [read more]

Posted on 09 Dec 2016 by Catherine Ordway

OGP: France must do more to tackle corruption

Opening up government data to fight corruption has been a stated aim for many Open Government Partnership members. When ... [read more]

Posted on 09 Dec 2016 by Robin Hodess