Serbia
Transparency Serbia (TS) conducted this national integrity system (NIS) assessment in 2022 and 2023 to identify strengths, weaknesses and areas of progress, stagnation and backslide in comparison to previous rounds of the research implemented in 2011 (with a 2014/15 update). Serbia has not had a National Anti-Corruption Strategy since 31 December 2018, although the drafting of a new one was scheduled for 2023, to which this research can contribute. The NIS provides valuable insights into areas that a new anti-corruption strategy is expected to cover, plus goes beyond that into areas that are not currently in focus. By actively participating in the strategy drafting process in parallel with the NIS research, and through numerous advocacy initiatives submitted in the context of legislative public debates, TS has already contributed to the identification of problems and possible solutions among stakeholders even before publishing this report.
As in the previous NIS research reports, by far the greatest concern is the gap between relatively good laws, rules and institutional set-ups and actually implementing such rules and the effectiveness of the institutions.
Among the various components of the NIS, the highest average score (58.9 out of 100) is recorded in the governance section, which is mostly the result of developed standards in related areas. Capacities are ranked on average 57.7, on the basis of legislative provisions to ensure institutions have the necessary resources. However, in practice, the capacities are insufficient throughout the system, with chronic discrepancies between the number of resources planned and those effectively provided to the institutions. This also includes a shortage of staff and, to a much lesser extent, equipment and training. However, it is evident that even with the current level of available resources, the effectiveness of institutions could be significantly better if all opportunities were used. Furthermore, an element that increasingly undermines the integrity system of the country is the widespread practice of appointing temporary heads of institutions, in particular to public administration and state-owned enterprises, but also to the judiciary, public prosecution and police. Fulfilment of the institutions’ role in the national integrity system to fight corruption proved to be the biggest problem. Even those pillars with the best scores (such as the State Audit Institution, civil society and the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption), the research shows that they do not achieve the highest standards of performance, which, in turn, adversely influences the effectiveness of the overall system.
On a positive note, the greatest asset of the Serbian national integrity system is its institutional set-up. Over time, Serbia has established all institutions that an NIS should have, except for an independent electoral management body. However, the institutional framework proved to be fragile. Constitutional and legal guarantees of institutional independence and principles of checks and balances are diverted in practice by the division of real political power. The ability and willingness of most institutions to fulfil their role in curbing or preventing corruption ultimately rely on parliament. However, parliament shows little will to protect and improve the independent work of watchdog institutions, with ruling parties’ MPs subordinated to their political leaders positioned in the executive branch.
The legal framework is relatively well developed, which is another good starting point for building a more functional NIS. Still, significant improvements are needed in almost all areas. Even in cases where legislation fulfils good international standards, reforms are still necessary. In the long term, the main concern for the NIS is the fact that legislative reforms are not sufficiently driven by national stakeholders. While there is an active civil society that identifies problems in legislation and proposes solutions as well as investigative media exposing consequences of loopholes and tailor-made laws, the responsiveness of public sector stakeholders is at a rather low level. Interaction between pillars does not function smoothly either – even if weaknesses in legislation are recognised by law enforcement, the judiciary, the Agency for Prevention of Corruption or other bodies, typically it takes years for the government to propose improvements. As a result, most of the legislative reforms are driven by the recommendations and criticism from the relevant international organisations, such as GRECO, ODIHR, Venice Commission and SIGMA or by EU bodies. Even then, the reforms are implemented with significant delays and only to fulfil minimal requirements that would ensure positive opinions.
Greater effectiveness could be achieved by improved inter-institutional cooperation, more open channels of communication with the civil sector, business and media, wider use of electronic communication and publishing data in an open format. Similarly, existing resources could be better used, in particular when it comes to public prosecution, by focusing on the most prominent high-level cases of suspected corruption.
National Integrity System
- Capacity
- Governance
- Role
-
45
634625Legislature
-
50
585438Executive
-
58
637933Judiciary
-
51
505450Public Prosecutor
-
45
505431Public Sector
-
53
505850Law Enforcement Agencies
-
47
675025Electoral Management Body
-
54
506350Ombudsperson
-
75
758367Supreme Audit Institutions
-
60
565867Anti-corruption Agency
-
55
636338Political Parties
-
52
565842Media
-
62
696750Civil Society
-
46
565825Business
-
34
2542State-owned Enterprises
Overview recommendations (73)
-
Fully implemented4Recommendations
-
Partly implemented19Recommendations
-
Not implemented46Recommendations
-
No data4Recommendations
NIS Pillars
- 0Fully implemented
- 0Partly implemented
- 4Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
The National Assembly is Serbia’s highest representative body and the bearer of constitutional and legislative power. It adopts and amends the constitution, laws and other general acts, state budget and financial plans and ratifies international agreements. It elects and scrutinises the government, decides on its dismissal, and elects and dismisses the heads of the other state bodies.
The Assembly has 250 MPs elected according to the proportional model with a 3 per cent electoral threshold. Legislation ensures the representation of genders and national minorities. The current convocation of the parliament was constituted on 1 August 2022, with 16 parliamentary groups. However, the president of Serbia, Aleksandar Vučić, dissolved the parliament and called snap elections for 17 December 2023.
Parliament’s work is regulated to provide sufficient resources to carry out its duties effectively. Parliament independently determines and disposes of its budget, which is an integral part of the national budget. However, even though legal provisions provide a proper framework, in practice, parliament’s work is influenced mainly by the interests of the parliamentary majority. Parliamentary professionals face long working hours, poor working conditions, and salaries that are so much below the national average. The parliamentary service is burdened by a high turnover of employees, which is reflected in the work of MPs who are provided with insufficient assistance.
Even though parliament is the supreme legislative authority and an independent institution in line with the constitution, in practice, the legislature is strongly influenced by the president of the republic and the executive. The opposition in parliament is mistreated by the speaker and the ruling majority, often violating the rules of procedure.
The work of parliament is somewhat transparent. Rules of procedure do not impose obligations but rather suggestions on what should be disclosed; therefore, the public is deprived of some important documents from the work of committees, amendments, government opinions, and so on. However, plenary sessions are on the national public broadcast channel, and committee sessions are on the parliamentary website. Recently, parliament narrowed the space for the media and the public to monitor its work. The media are subjected to quarterly renewals of credentials, and the information booklet is not regularly updated.
Accountability mechanisms for the legislature are limited. The work of parliament can be scrutinised through the constitutional review that has only had limited results; in the final instance, parliament decides whether it will discuss the opinions of the constitutional court. In addition to weak provisions that allow the constitutional court only limited review of the alignment of legislation with the constitution, the legislature and its members cannot be held accountable for their actions in practice, as they enjoy immunity as per the constitution that can be terminated only by parliamentarians. Public hearings, which have been increasing in recent years, should be organised for issues of the utmost public interest and host all relevant stakeholders.
Parliament has a code of conduct for MPs; however, the ruling majority ignores it, plus it has significant loopholes and was adopted in an urgent procedure without public consultation. The authorised committee does not act upon complaints from citizens. The code of conduct should be amended to better regulate conflicts of interest and complaint procedures. MPs do not report contacts with lobbyists.
Scrutiny of the government’s work is regulated, but in practice, the parliamentary majority attempts to avoid these mechanisms. Questioning the work of the minister of finance – interpellation – contrary to regulation, remains on hold before the relevant committee. Parliamentary questions were avoided in the first six months of convocation (2022–2023) because the speaker, from the ruling majority, scheduled sessions to avoid holding them on the last Thursday of the month when parliamentary questions should occur. The ministries should submit quarterly reports on their work to the relevant committees; however, this obligation is not fully respected in practice, and some reports that reach the parliament are never included in the committees’ agendas.
Gender representation is ensured by quotas on electoral lists; however, in practice, the number of female MPs decreases once they are confirmed with mandates, as some resign or remain inactive in parliament, respecting this provision only formally.
The fight against corruption is low on the list of parliament’s priorities. It only adopts anti-corruption laws initiated and prepared by the government without proper discussion or proposing amendments. This issue is in no way systemically dealt with in parliament. In the past decade, parliament has ratified a single international convention or protocol related to anti-corruption.
-
Not implemented
Parliament should be more engaged in reviewing the compliance of draft regulations with the constitution and strategic documents, discussing potential corruption risks with emphasis on interstate agreements and verifying the funds envisaged for implementing specific regulations. Concerning this, parliament should stop adopting authentic interpretations that cause instability in the legal system by amending the Law on the National Assembly and the rules of procedure.
No action has been taken to implement this recommendation. The National Assembly continued to adopt laws and other acts without adequate discussion of the draft texts, both in plenary sessions and in committee meetings. Laws are being adopted in the exact form in which they were proposed by the Government. The practice of adopting authentic interpretations of laws has also continued. On July 31, 2024, the Parliament adopted an authentic opinion on the provision of Article 2 of the Law on the Confirmation of the Framework Protocol on Financial and Technical Cooperation between the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Government of the Kingdom of Spain in the Field of Infrastructure Projects. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/archive/files/cir/pdf/ostala_akta/14_saziv/RS14-24.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should endorse civil society inclusion by: organising more public hearings on the topics of the utmost public interest, discussing corruption risks and implementing recommendations of international organisations (such as ODIHR, GRECO); inviting civil society representatives and experts to participate in relevant committee sittings and establish more inquiry committees; reviewing and including civic initiatives in the agenda.
No action has been taken to implement this recommendation. Civil society representatives were not invited to the sessions of parliamentary working bodies, nor were civic initiatives considered. The Committee for Finances and Budgetary Issues in the Serbian Parliament scheduled a public hearing on the Budget Proposal for 2025 in the Serbian Parliament, to which representatives of the civil sector were not invited, for Sunday, November 24, 2024, at five o'clock in the afternoon, just one day before the start of the parliamentary session whose agenda was the budget. Through the efforts of TS and NKEU, the Board enabled the presence of several CSO representatives, and two of them were given the floor at the end of the session, around 7 o'clock in the afternoon. The Committee on Constitutional Affairs and Legislation organized, on January 27, 2025, a public hearing on draft laws on the revision of the voter register, which was organized contrary to the rules and at which proposals were presented that were not considered during the previous consultations. CSO representatives left this session. During February and March, the Committee continued to organize public hearings on the same topic in various cities in Serbia, but due to violations of the rules for holding public hearings, civil society representatives were not present at these events. https://www.nin.rs/politika/vesti/67197/predstavnici-opozicionih-stranaka-napustili-javno-slusanje-odbora-skupstine-srbije
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should improve the transparency of its work by timely publishing amendments, the government’s opinions on amendments, documents considered and adopted in committee sessions, budget execution documents (currently available only to MPs) and information on lobbying. Parliament should also organise public calls and interviews with candidates for all posts to be elected by parliament.
No action has been taken to implement this recommendation. Amendments to laws are not published on the parliament’s website. There is also no dedicated page on lobbying available on the website. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/акти.44.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should improve the integrity of its work by: improving the regulation of conflict of interest by amending the Law on the National Assembly and Code of Conduct to ensure tailor-made rules and clear jurisdiction between the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption and the self-regulation of the National Assembly; amending the code of conduct to align with practice and presenting the code to citizens; publishing a report on the implementation of the code of conduct and timely reviewing all reported violations of the code.
No action has been taken to implement this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 0Partly implemented
- 3Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
The executive is independent, according to the constitution and laws. In practice, the decision-making process depends on the structure of the ruling coalition and the individual strength of parties, leaders and cabinet members. Real political power is in the hands of the ruling party’s leaders. There is one highly dominant party whose leader has also been the president of the republic since 2017. Therefore, regardless of constitutional powers, the government does not take important policy decisions without the approval of the president. Furthermore, the president shapes and frequently even presents government policies, with the prime minister and cabinet members seconding to him.
The executive is constituted of the prime minister’s office, 25 departmental ministries and 3 ministers without portfolio. This composition is regulated by the Law on Ministries, which is amended with each new parliamentary convocation to adapt the number of ministries according to coalition agreements. The current government (October 2022–October 2023), in its second mandate, is led by the prime minister, who is a member of the Serbian Progressive Party (SPP), which won 48 per cent of mandates in the National Assembly. Out of 28 ministers, 11 are directly related to Serbian Progressive Party (either members or on the election list), 8 are non-partisan professionals, but proposed by and highly affiliated with the SPP, 5 from the ranks of the coalition partners Socialist Party of Serbia – Unified Serbia, one from the coalition partner, Party of United Pensioners of Serbia, and 3 from the minority parties that are also members of the ruling coalition.
While other state institutions have a low level of influence on the work of the executive, the level of influence of external actors is insufficiently known due to the lack of transparency in decision-making and failure to implement lobbying legislation. The government publishes some of its acts and decisions. Members of the government regularly report their assets and income, thus fulfilling formal obligations described by the law, but suspicions about their integrity and self-reporting have not been investigated. However, in practice, a significant portion of the government’s activities are insufficiently transparent.
There is insufficient oversight over the executive’s activities in practice, with the weakest links being the parliament and the ineffective administrative court. The government’s commitment to public sector professionalisation is only declarative, with relevant legal provisions being ignored and violated. The government’s publicly declared commitments to fighting corruption are not yet articulated sufficiently in policy documents, and results are limited even when plans and recommendations of international organisations are fulfilled, often with significant delays.
-
Not implemented
The government needs to develop a new anti-corruption strategy for 2023-2028 in consultation with all relevant stakeholders and implement the current strategic anti-corruption documents without further delay.
The Government adopted the National Anti-Corruption Strategy for the period 2023-2028 in July 2024. The accompanying Action plan for implementing the Strategy for 2024 is in the process of adoption, and representatives of civil society have been included in the working group for its adoption.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should enable the public to influence the budget process and provide explanations on the influence of planned budget expenditures on the fulfilment of legal obligations of state bodies and the implementation of defined priorities.
The process of the adoption of the national budget still goes on without the participation of the public or even the possibility of a citizen influencing it.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government needs to implement further international recommendations, including those from the GRECO evaluation and the European Commission’s reports. Most pressing in this regard are the following actions: regulating conflicts of interest among advisers to the president, prime minister and ministers and strengthening the system for controlling the reports of executive power officials; regulation on informal lobbying; enabling citizens to file a complaint with the commissioner when the government or president refuse or ignore the request for access to information; obligation to hold public hearings on all laws; limiting the immunity of members of the government for corrupt crimes, expanding the jurisdiction of the Prosecutor’s Office for Organised Crime and strengthening the government’s council for the fight against corruption; further improve its track record on investigations, prosecutions and final court decisions in high-level corruption cases, in particular the seizure and confiscation of criminal assets.
Although some effort has been made to implement certain GRECO recommendations, no progress has been made.
Last update 28 March 2025
- 3Fully implemented
- 1Partly implemented
- 4Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
Judicial power in Serbia belongs to courts of general and special jurisdiction. Courts of general jurisdiction include basic (66), higher (25), appellate (4) courts and the supreme court. Courts of special jurisdiction include commercial (16), commercial appellate, misdemeanour (44), misdemeanour appellate and administrative courts. The high judicial council (HJC) is an independent state body that ensures and guarantees the independence of the court, the judges, the president of the court and the jury judges. Some of its most important powers are to elect judges; decide on the termination of the office of judge; elect the president and vice-president of the council; appoint acting presidents of the supreme court and presidents of other courts; elect the president of the supreme court and presidents of other courts; decide on the termination of the office of the president of the supreme court and the president of other courts; decides on the permanent transfer, temporary assignment or assignment of a judge, among others.
The judiciary acts under legal preconditions with an adequate judicial budget. However, judges’ salaries are inadequate considering the importance, responsibility and complexity of their work; they are far lower than the highest paid jobs and slightly higher than the lowest paid jobs. Also, judges’ salaries are not protected from inflation. The judiciary continues to operate with vacant positions and insufficient judicial assistants, thus leading to longer proceedings, despite data showing that the budget funds have not all been spent.
The constitutional amendments introduced in 2022 reduce some of the mechanisms for exercising direct political influence, but the risks still linger due to the too broadly prescribed immunity of HJC members. There are still attempts to influence and interfere in the work of the judiciary from the president of the republic, the government, MPs and politicians.
Because of this influence, the judiciary is not independent enough to exercise control over the executive branch and request its accountability. The public has access to the most relevant court information via the Serbian justice portal, information booklets or press releases, but this lacks complete information on the selection process for judges or (non)existence of external influences. Furthermore, the scarcity of press conferences, especially those addressing cases of public interest, is the rule and not the exception. In addition, the opacity in the work of the courts is further underscored by limited information about major corruption cases, details of which are rarely disclosed to the public and require submitting freedom of information requests.
Extensive accountability provisions are in place, including requirements for judges to explain their decisions and complaint procedures with disciplinary sanctions and disciplinary procedures, and sanctions are regularly applied; however, this is done with questionable results when it comes to systemic improvement.
Gender equality among judiciary employees has been achieved, but the judiciary does not have any gender-sensitive protocols for its work and lacks gender-sensitive statistical data on the work of the judiciary and their analysis.
Court decisions in cases of grand corruption are still missing, and there is no proactive investigation of suspicions of corruption raised by the public.
-
Not implemented
Parliament should improve the independence and responsibility of the HCJ through the selection process of so-called prominent lawyers in such a way that they should be elected by the MPs directly, and prevent, due to MPs’ failure to exercise their powers, the election of these lawyers from being done by the commission.
The National Assembly did not adopt a law to regulate the procedure for electing prominent lawyers to the HCJ. Given that the Commission selected the prominent lawyers – members of the HCJ – in early May 2023, MPs were neither given the opportunity nor the possibility to directly elect these members during the reporting period. https://europeanwesternbalkans.rs/komisija-izabrala-istaknute-pravnike-za-visoke-savete-sudstva-i-tuzilastva/
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Fully implemented
The HJC should adopt rules/by-laws on the independence of the judicial budget, build capacities for implementing the budget for the judiciary and create mechanisms for its effective application.
The HCJ adopted the Rulebook on the work of its Budget Commission. In order to strengthen its capacities and establish mechanisms for the effective exercise of its competences, the HCJ has implemented an application-based software for monitoring court performance. Among other features, the software enables the electronic submission, processing, and consolidation of financial plans prepared independently by the courts as indirect budget beneficiaries, as well as analysis of budget execution and court backlogs. In addition, the HCJ has taken all measures and activities prescribed by law in a timely manner to ensure an adequate volume and structure of budgetary resources for the work of the courts. https://vst.jt.rs/pravilnik-o-radu-budzetske-komisije-visokog-saveta-tuzilastva/
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The HJC should conduct a new systematisation analysis to determine the number of judges in accordance with the judicial system's needs so that all cases, including current delays, can be resolved within a reasonable timeframe.
The analysis has not been published. The HCJ continues to announce public competitions for the selection of judges and adopts decisions on their appointment and on the required number of judges – without basing these decisions on the findings or data from the mentioned analysis.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Fully implemented
The HJC should, following public consultation, pass a by-law on the criteria for election to the position of judge and president of the court.
At its session on 17 April 2024, the HCJ adopted the Rulebook on the procedure for electing judges and court presidents. https://vss.sud.rs/api/documents/preview/Правилник о поступку за избор судије и председника суда - Објављен у службеном гласнику РС 34-2024 од 19.04.2024..pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
Courts should ensure a greater degree of transparency of work through holding regular press conferences and publishing data on the status of proceedings for which there is a public interest, as well as through timely and complete processing of requests for access to information in accordance with the legal framework.
The official websites of the courts (such as the Higher Court in Belgrade, the Higher Court in Niš, and the Higher Court in Novi Sad) do not contain information about regular or extraordinary press conferences. Similarly, no publicly available media reports indicate that any press conferences were held during the reporting period. At the same time, the official websites of these courts, as well as the basic courts in the same cities, do publish depersonalised information on criminal proceedings under dedicated banners titled‘ News’ or ‘Announcements’ or on their homepages.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The HJC and the courts should conduct an analysis of the proceedings in cases involving criminal acts related to corruption, which last an extremely long time or end with symbolic sanctions, and present to the public the reasons for such a situation.
The HCJ's official website does not contain any publicly available analysis, as referenced, or any information indicating that such an analysis is in preparation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The ministry and the government should ensure the right to compensation for victims of corruption, in accordance with the Council of Europe’s civil law convention, which Serbia ratified.
There is no publicly available information indicating that any activity foreseen by the Action Plan for the Implementation of the National Strategy for the realisation of the rights of victims and witnesses of criminal offences in the Republic of Serbia for the period 2020-2025 was undertaken during the reporting period (2023-2025), specifically regarding activities scheduled for the second quarter of 2024. At the same time, the analysed period does not include the timeframe for activities planned for the fourth quarter of 2024.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Fully implemented
The judicial academy should improve the quality of continuous training for judges in corruption, especially regarding the prosecution of corrupt criminal acts based on publicly expressed suspicions.
From the beginning of 2024, the Judicial Academy, in cooperation with various international and domestic organisations, conducted 18 training sessions for more than 350 participants – including judges, prosecutors, and judicial and prosecutorial assistants. The trainings covered topics such as ’Criminal Procedure, Combating corruption, Financial investigation’ and ’Criminal procedure, Public procurement and corruption, Prevention of money laundering, Confiscation of criminal assets’. Among these subjects addressed were fraud and irregularities in handling EU financial investigations, and the assessment of evidence in criminal proceedings related to abuses in public procurement, among others. https://www.pars.rs/sr/стална-обука
Last update 28 March 2025
- 1Fully implemented
- 2Partly implemented
- 2Not implemented
- 1No data
Last update 28 March 2025
The public prosecution system of the Republic of Serbia consists of the Supreme public prosecutor’s office, appellate prosecutor’s offices (4), higher prosecutor’s offices (25), basic public prosecutor’s offices (58) and prosecutor’s offices with special jurisdiction: the prosecutor’s office for organised crime and the prosecutor’s office for war crimes.
In contrast to the old law, which stipulated that the function of the public prosecution is performed by the republic’s public prosecutor and other public prosecutors, the 2023 law states that the function of public prosecution is performed by the supreme public prosecutor, the chief public prosecutor and public prosecutors. The new law renamed all positions in public prosecution: the republic’s public prosecutor, who is still at the head of public prosecution, became the supreme public prosecutor; the previous public prosecutor became the chief public prosecutor; and, in an effort to strengthen and highlight their independence, deputy public prosecutors became public prosecutors.
The new Law on Public Prosecution, adopted in February 2023, within the scope of harmonisation with the constitutional amendments that were supposed to increase judicial independence, brings two very important positive changes for the independence of the public prosecutor’s office, but their scope in practice cannot be assessed at this time, considering that they depend on the efficiency of its implementation.
The most important change is that the function of public prosecutor is now performed by fully fledged public prosecutors (until recently designated as deputy public prosecutors) and not only by the supreme and chief public prosecutors.
The increase in their independence is undoubtedly represented through the new title and the fact that they are no longer deputies. This represents a framework on the basis of which, if the public prosecutors do not understand it only as a linguistic change, a system can be developed in which they would be more accountable for their (in)action. Therefore, this change could provide more opportunities for public prosecutors to demonstrate their independence and proactivity in practice by investigating corruption cases; nevertheless, it significantly reduces the possibility for the illegal, irregular and ineffective work of public prosecutors.
-
Partly implemented
The judicial academy should improve the quality of continuous training for judges in corruption, especially regarding the prosecution of corrupt criminal acts based on publicly expressed suspicions.
From the beginning of 2024, the Judicial Academy, in cooperation with various international and domestic organisations, conducted 18 for more than 350 participants – including judges, prosecutors, and judicial and prosecutorial assistants. The trainings covered topics such as ’Criminal Procedure, Combating corruption, Financial investigation’ and ’Criminal procedure, Public procurement and corruption, Prevention of money laundering, Confiscation of criminal assets’. Among these subjects addressed were fraud and irregularities in handling EU financial investigations, and the assessment of evidence in criminal proceedings related to abuses in public procurement, among others.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should amend the legislation that regulates the work of the HCP to provide more independence and responsibility for the HCP by including that the selection process of so-called prominent lawyers happens in such a way that they are elected directly by MPs and not by the special commission after MPs fail to exercise their powers.
The parliament has not adopted a law regulating the procedure for the election of prominent lawyers to the HCP.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The government and the HPC should provide the public prosecution with the necessary conditions for work: human resources, office space and equipment. Additionally, they should provide conditions for more financial forensic experts, including possible changes of the legal framework which would enable their employment under market conditions and not for the salaries of civil servants.
During November and December 2024, the High Council of Prosecutions made decisions on the selection of the chief public prosecutor and public prosecutor in the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Zrenjanin, several public prosecutors in the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, on the selection of public prosecutors in the Public Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime and the Public Prosecutor's Office for War Crimes, as well as the selection of public prosecutors in appellate public prosecutor's offices, i.e. the decision on the selection of public prosecutors in the public prosecutor's office in about 30 basic public prosecutor's offices. In March 2025, 24 public prosecutors were sworn in. Also, the schedules of conducting interviews with registered candidates for the selection of public prosecutors of the Public Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime and higher public prosecutor's offices have been published. https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Dnevni-red-1-1.pdf; https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Dnevni-red-5.pdf; https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Obavestenje-o-datumu-polaganja-zakletve.pdf; https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Raspored-za-21.3.2025.pdf; https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Raspored-za-12.3.2025-1.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The HPC should improve the system of accountability of prosecutors by providing a transparent system of decision-making on citizens’ complaints, decision-making on prosecutors’ reports due to illegal influence and evaluation of public prosecutors.
The annual activity report contains data on handling citizens’ complaints, decisions on prosecutors’ reports of unlawful influence, and evaluation of public prosecutors. As of 30 September 2024, the most recently published activity report is for 2022 and is still titled ’Activity Report of the State Prosecutorial Council’. Similarly, the most recent publicly available activity report of the State Prosecutorial Council's disciplinary prosecutor is the ’Activity Report for 2017’.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Fully implemented
The HPC and all prosecution offices should increase the number of prosecutors who exclusively investigate corruption cases in order to conduct proactive investigations based on publicly available data on corrupt behaviour.
Since 1 January 2024, 54 public prosecutors have been assigned to the special departments for combating corruption. However, this does not necessarily mean that the newly assigned prosecutors will proactively initiate investigations based on publicly available data on corrupt behaviour, considering past practices.
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 0Partly implemented
- 3Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
The structure of the public sector institutions and allocation of budget funds depends not only on the availability of resources but also to a certain extent political power of the head of a public body, rather than on objectively determined needs, criteria and priorities. The Law on Ministries is changed after each election, that is, the number and structure of ministries are changed, in order to redistribute political power between the coalition partners.695,696 The 2021-2030 public administration reform (PAR) strategy continues on the PAR strategy from 2014, which, among other things, aims to improve the management of human resources and capacities in the public sector. The Law on Civil Servants envisages political neutrality and procedures that should prevent political influence in their employment and promotion. However, regulations on the professionalisation of state administration have been violated with the majority of high-ranking civil servants employed in an “acting” status. Also, there are informal political influences on civil servants’ employment in lower positions.
Many job positions in the public sector are not filled according to the existing acts on the systematisation of jobs. Along with this, the hiring of employees for a fixed period, based on other contract types or transfers, is widespread and can be conducted without competition.
The legal basis for public sector transparency exists. In practice, the level of transparency is uneven among different public authorities. It depends more on the readiness of the head of public authority to be open to the public than on legal obligations.
Mechanisms of accountability in the public sector exist. However, in practice, they have not proven to be effective. The Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers' implementation did not lead to widespread use of this mechanism.
Rules for preventing conflicts of interest for civil servants and training on their implementation exist. However, compliance with these rules is not subject to systemic monitoring. In general, the public does not receive enough information about the handling of complaints for violations of the law and the code of conduct.
Institutional supervision over state-owned enterprises is ineffective and not transparent. The strategic documents and the new law envisage improvements in monitoring these enterprises.
The Public Procurement Law is aligned with EU policies and standards. However, there is a practice of contracting the most valuable projects through interstate agreements or by special laws, thus avoiding public procurement regulation.
Some state bodies have programmes to inform citizens about corruption and its reporting, but the promotion of these mechanisms is insufficient.
Legal protection of gender equality exists. The implementation of a new legal framework in this field recently started, and it is too early to assess the results.
According to a survey of citizens carried out on a national sample in 2021, two-thirds of citizens think that there is a lot or very much corruption in Serbia (65 per cent), and a large number of citizens (43%) think that the state is little or hardly effective in the fight against corruption. In 2022, Serbia achieved the worst result in the most important global ranking of countries, according to the perception of corruption in the public sector.
-
Not implemented
All prosecution offices should provide a greater degree of proactive transparency, without requiring requests for free access to information; in particular, increase the amount of information on their websites for which there is public interest or about cases for which suspicions of corruption were publicly expressed in the media available and publish clear instructions (on their websites and premises) for persons who want to report corruption: what they should do, what to expect during the procedure, when they can expect information about the course of the procedure, and so on.
All public prosecution offices, from the largest – such as the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Belgrade – to the smallest, such as the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office in Negotin, use standardised websites that contain identical sections with different specific data on the work of each office. Among the analysed websites, there has been an increase in the number of press releases informing the public about activities undertaken by the prosecution to combat crime. However, in most cases, these press releases concern actions taken against suspects of so-called conventional criminal offences – such as crimes against life and limb, property offences etc. Only one press release, published by the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Niš, addressed a so-called corruption-related offence – abuse of official position in the context of public procurement. Likewise, the abovementioned standardized websites do not contain a dedicated section with information or guidance for individuals who want to report corruption – such as what steps to take, what to expect during the procedure, and when to expect updates on the case.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The Government should abandon the practice of concluding interstate agreements or proposing special laws aimed at circumventing public procurement regulations.
The Government of Serbia has continued with the practice of adopting special laws which hinder the public procurement system. In late 2023, the National Assembly adopted the Law for EXPO 2027, which repeals the Law on Public Procurement, as well as certain provisions of other regulations (on expropriation, planning and construction). This law envisages the establishment of several state-owned companies, which will have the status of investors and which do not apply the provisions of the law governing public procurement. The works for the construction of the exhibition space for EXPO 2027, facilities for the accommodation of participants and visitors, the National Stadium and supporting infrastructure will be contracted without the application of the Law on Public Procurement, which creates a great risk that the costs will be higher than they would have been under conditions that would exist with the full competition.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The Law on Whistleblower Protection should be amended in order to appropriately penalize all forms of retaliation towards whistleblowers and to place one body in charge of general and comprehensive oversight of the law’s implementation. Additionally, the Ministry of Justice should analyse the effectiveness of law enforcement and the transparency of other bodies in this area. The monitoring shouldn’t focus only on the protection granted to the whistleblowers, but also on the follow-up actions on information provided by them.
There has been no information that the Ministry of Justice is working on amending the Law on Whistleblower Protection or monitoring the effectiveness of law enforcement and transparency of other state bodies in this area.
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 2Partly implemented
- 3Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
The police is the main body responsible for law enforcement in Serbia. The Law on Police in Serbia delineates three categories of employees within the Ministry of Interior: police officers, civil servants and state employees. Of the 31,608 individuals involved in police tasks and exercising police powers, those engaged in administrative, financial and human resources roles within the ministry do not require police powers as these functions fall outside the scope of their duties. It consists of almost 42,000 uniformed and plainclothes officers, of which more than 31,000 have police powers like the use of force. The general police directorate within the ministry is organisationally and administratively responsible for policing. Its competencies and powers are regulated by the Law on Police, which was adopted in 2016 and amended twice in 2018. The draft Law on Internal Affairs, intended to replace existing legislation, was withdrawn from the adoption procedure twice in 2022 due to negative public and international organisations’ reaction. They raised concerns about proposals weakening police autonomy, bolstering interior ministerial power and undermining the police’s subordination to the prosecution in criminal investigations. The police director leads the general police directorate, but the position has been vacant since December 2021.
Operational independence of the police from the Ministry of Interior is not guaranteed by law or practice, as political parties secure loyalty through economic privileges like housing solutions and salary increases. Despite legislative improvements in transparency, accountability, and integrity with the 2016 Law on Police, concerns persist regarding transparency, with the 2022 annual report not being available online and difficulty accessing older reports.
The interior ministry receives the most complaints in Serbia for non-responsiveness to information requests. Parliamentary oversight, internal control and the police complaint system are weak; integrity mechanisms, including asset declarations, lack full impact; assessing the effectiveness of new anti-corruption measures is challenging due to a lack of research on police officers’ actual experiences and perceptions of measures like integrity testing, asset declarations and risk analysis.
Outcomes of criminal charges for police corruption remain unknown due to bureaucratic challenges between the police and the courts.
-
Not implemented
The Government should abandon the practice of appointing civil servants to positions, and the Administrative Court should annul the previous illegal decisions in this regard.
The Government still has a widespread practice of appointing civil servants in acting positions. https://www.srbija.gov.rs/dokument/780202/kadrovska-resenja-za-vreme-mandata-vlade-republike-srbije-izabrane-2-maja-2024-godine.php
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The State Audit Institution should conduct comprehensive audits and evaluations of budget use within the Ministry of Interior. In parallel, prosecutors must actively monitor and closely follow civil society initiatives and investigative journalism reports that shed light on potential instances of budget misuse within the police service. This proactive approach will ensure that any irregularities are promptly identified and addressed.
In 2024, the State Audit Institution conducted an audit of the financial reports of the Ministry of Interior, as well as follow-up audit reports on the correction of identified irregularities. On the other hand, prosecution offices still do not act proactively and fail to respond to initiatives from civil society or to published investigative journalism reports pointing to potential abuses. The conduct of the prosecution does not reflect a proactive approach. https://www.dri.rs/izvestaji?search=унутрашњих послова&date=DESC&year=&topics=&subjects=&types=§ors=&tags=&crosstypes=&search_subject=
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The police should take proactive measures to prevent information leaks and respond swiftly when their integrity is questioned by the media to safeguard the integrity of the police service and maintain public trust. This includes strengthening information security (safeguarding servers, rooms, and entrances and controlling access to ensure the protection of sensitive information from unauthorised access or damage) and conducting swift and thorough investigations when allegations arise in the media. And the police should always provide clear and factual information to address any doubts or concerns raised.
No information indicates that the police have taken any normative steps to implement this recommendation. In practice, tabloids continue to publish police data and information from ongoing investigations. http://mup.gov.rs/wps/portal/sr/aktuelno/saopstenja
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The police should provide clear and comprehensive guidance to individuals who want to report such incidents to encourage reporting of corruption and ensure transparency in the process. This includes clear instructions on websites and premises, a clear explanation of what individuals can expect during the reporting and investigation process, and the police should commit to providing regular updates and notices to individuals who have reported corruption.
The Internal Control Sector provides instructions on its website for citizens on how to report corruption, but such information is not available on the Ministry of Interior's homepage. Moreover, apart from stating what should be included in a report, the instructions do not mention whether and when citizens can expect feedback on their reports or how the case will proceed. There is also no information on the number of characteristics of previously reported corruption cases. Additionally, anonymous reporting is not enabled. http://prezentacije.mup.gov.rs/sukp/zalbe.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The internal control sector should assess in an annual report the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures, such as asset declarations and integrity tests, in enhancing police integrity.
The annual report does not include assessments of the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures, nor does it contain data on the assets of Ministry of Interior personnel or the results of integrity tests. http://prezentacije.mup.gov.rs/sukp/rezultati/Izvestaj_2023_SUK.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 4Partly implemented
- 0Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
In compliance with the Law on the Election of Members of the Parliament, the Republic Election Commission: enables legality of the election process;, drafts instructions for conducting election activities; publishes the timetable; monitors the implementation and provides opinions regarding the implementation of this law; prescribes unique standards for election material; provides electoral material for conducting elections; decides on the submitted election lists; decides on complaints; determines the results of the elections; and submits a report on the conducted elections to the National Assembly. The permanent composition of the Republic Election Commission consists of the president, 16 members, a representative of the republic institution for statistics and the secretary. The president and members of the commission are appointed by the National Assembly, for a four-year mandate, on the proposal of parliamentary groups in the Assembly. The secretary of the commission is appointed by the Assembly from the ranks of the Assembly servants. The secretary participates in the work of the commission without the right to participate in the decision-making. During the conduct of an election, the commission works in an extended composition and, in addition to the permanent composition, consists of one representative of each submitted electoral list.
The law defines the Republic Electoral Commission (REC) as an autonomous and independent state organ. However, in practice, the REC is composed of the representatives of the parliamentary groups, mirroring the political power relationship of parliament. The REC has sufficient resources for effective organisation and election process management. Nevertheless, the voting majority in the REC persistently exercises an unduly formal approach, especially when rejecting complaints that might not be favourable for the ruling coalition. The funds for the REC operation are secured from the state budget. Parliament accommodates the REC on its premises and provides them with the necessary administrative and technical support. Overall, the REC work concerning election conduct is well-organised and transparent. However, available financial documents do not explain why its budget increased significantly since 2021. The REC website is also missing information on procurements for the last four years. Taking into account that the REC determines its financial plan, including the amount of monthly fees for the members and administrative staff of the REC, more has to be done to improve financial transparency. Election observers’ reports note that disabled voters’ participation should be improved and that the REC should initiate changes that would lead to higher participation for this group of voters.
-
Partly implemented
The government should propose, and parliament should adopt a new law which would establish the state election commission as a professional and independent state body. The starting point for discussion on the best model for the election of its officials and their independence from political parties should be the draft law on the state electoral committee from 2009. This independent body should dispose of its own budget and should employ its own administration.
A Decision amending the Decision on the organisation and work of the National Assembly Service was adopted at the first extraordinary session of parliament on 23 July 2024, which, among other things, aims to strengthen the service available to the Republic Electoral Commission (REC). However, there is no information indicating that RIK’s service has since been strengthened to a sufficient capacity. Furthermore, no law has been adopted to establish REC as a professional and independent state body. https://otvoreniparlament.rs/uploads/akta/Predlog odluke o izmenama Odluke o organizaciji i radu Slu%C5%BEbe Narodne skup%C5%A1tine.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The REC should publish annual procurement plans in accordance with the law (it has not been published since 2019), plus annual reports on expenditures and reports on election expenditures (not published since 2020) on its website at the latest one month after elections.
REC still does not publish annual public procurement plans. However, it published the reports on expenditures up until September 2024, both for regular work and for elections. https://www.rik.parlament.gov.rs/tekst/sr/583/javne-nabavke.php
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The REC should initiate changes to improve the participation of voters with disabilities, including providing easier access to polling stations, enabling easier movement within polling stations adapted to persons with disabilities, and enabling proper informing and communication with blind and deaf persons by introducing audio, visual and tactile instructions.
The ODIHR report (p. 11) notes that, prior to the elections, the REC amended ten existing instructions and adopted two new ones. „While these amendments partially addressed previous ODIHR recommendations, including those aimed at improving access for persons with disabilities, reducing overcrowding at polling stations, ensuring the secrecy of the vote, and the timely publication of results by polling station, the impact of these regulatory changes remained limited on election day (see Election day)“, the report states. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/c/2/565117_0.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The REC should proactively publish turnout data, data on the composition of polling boards and aggregated voting results received from the LECs on its website immediately upon their reception from the LECs in an open data format.
The REC publishes the composition of polling boards in a searchable PDF format. Once the REC adopts the final election results, aggregated voting results are published and accompanied by an Excel file containing data for each polling station in Serbia. However, the aggregated results submitted by local electoral commissions are not published in a machine-readable format. Turnout data is announced periodically throughout election day during REC press conferences. https://www.rik.parlament.gov.rs/
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 2Partly implemented
- 4Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
The ombudsperson is an independent and autonomous body, appointed and dismissed by the National Assembly to which it reports. Its role, defined by the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia and the Law on the Protector of Citizens, is to continuously promote respect for human liberties and rights by personal and institutional authority. Citizens can file complaints to the ombudsperson, who then assesses whether state administration bodies, the Public Prosecutor of the Republic of Serbia, or any other bodies or organisations exercising public authority, treat the citizens of Serbia in accordance with the laws and other regulations of the country or in compliance with the principles of good administration.
The ombudsperson continues to work on premises that have been temporarily assigned and which are inadequate. In addition, due to the continuous outflow of personnel, there is a noticeable decrease in human resource capacities, both in management positions and within the professional service. The election of the ombudsperson is still heavily influenced by politics, since only political parties can propose candidates from the total number of registered persons. In the last two years, the transparency in the work of the ombudsperson has been noticeably reduced, especially in cases where there is a stronger public interest. Also, the trend of reducing the activities of the ombudsperson continued, in terms of the number of received complaints and control procedures initiated on its own initiative, and in the number of recommendations sent to the public authorities. When it comes to recommendations, they are, for the most part, conceived pro futuro and do not contain mechanisms for sanctioning the violation of citizens’ rights. Finally, a consistent mechanism for monitoring the implementation of the ombudsperson’s recommendations has not yet been established.
-
Not implemented
The government should provide a permanent and adequate space for the ombudsperson by executing the existing decision or making a new decision on the allocation of space for permanent use.
The Ombudsperson continues to operate from temporarily allocated premises at Deligradska 16 in Belgrade. Moreover, no decision has been published on the official website of the Government of the Republic of Serbia allocating new premises for permanent use. https://www.ombudsman.rs/index.php/kontakt
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The ombudsperson should undertake all necessary measures and activities to improve its human resources by filling vacant positions in the professional service.
The situation has worsened and there are now three fewer employees compared to the April-September period (70). As of December 31, 2024, there are a total of 67 civil servants and deputies employed in the Professional Service of the Protector of Citizens, which is three civil servants less compared to the previous breakdown, namely: two civil servants in position, five acting civil servants in position, 57 civil servants in executive positions and three deputies. Out of the mentioned number, five civil servants are employed for a certain period of time. There are 56 civil servants with higher education, 11 civil servants and officials with secondary education, 54 employees are women and 13 are men. https://www.ombudsman.rs/attachments/article/8177/Редован Годишњи извештај Заштитника грађана за 2024. годину љ.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should provide an effective and publicly available mechanism for monitoring the implementation of the ombudsperson’s recommendations and the recommendations of the parliamentary committee in connection with the ombudsperson’s annual report. That mechanism should ensure the prescription of sanctions for non-reporting on the implementation of recommendations and for unjustified non-implementation of recommendations.
Parliament has not provided an effective mechanism to monitor whether and how the Ombudsperson’s recommendations are being implemented. Moreover, as of that date, the parliament had not yet considered the Ombudsperson’s 2023 annual report, which is available on the Ombudsperson’s official website under the section ’Reports’ but not on the parliament's official website.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should prepare and parliament should adopt amendments to the Law on the Ombudsperson to abolish the monopoly of political parties nominating candidates, give full transparency to the election process that enables all candidates to present their work programmes, ensure equal participation of CSOs in the election process, and select the best candidates based on clear, well-known and measurable criteria.
The parliament has not adopted a law regulating the election procedure of the Ombudsperson in accordance with the recommendation, nor is such draft law currently under parliamentary procedure. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/akti/zakoni-u-proceduri/zakoni-u-proceduri.10.1037.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The ombudsperson should always, when there is increased public interest, initiate proceedings by official duty, especially according to legislative competence.
In 2024 and 2025, the Ombudsperson continued of ex officio investigations to initiate a number of by official duty in cases where there was public interest. Most of these concerned the protection of environmental rights and the rights to life and physical integrity threatened by domestic violence – issues that sparked significant public interest and concern. https://www.ombudsman.rs/index.php/2012-02-07-14-03-33
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The ombudsperson should make information about his work available to the public in a timely and complete manner, especially information about control procedures and recommendations made, especially in cases where there is an expressed public interest.
On the official website of the Ombudsperson, the the 'Control procedures' section provides publicly available information on control procedures. However, the limitation lies in the fact that only those procedures that resulted in recommendations or opinions are made publicly available. Information about other control procedures becomes accessible to the public only upon publication of the annual report for a given calendar year. Even then, the data is minimal, presented in statistical tables without further explanation. Additionally, the information is published with a delay – for example, some reports on control procedures and recommendations from July were published in that section at the end of August 2024. https://www.ombudsman.rs/index.php/2012-02-07-14-03-33
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 5Partly implemented
- 0Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
The State Audit Institution (SAI) is an independent institution established by the 2005 Law on SAI. It is accountable to parliament. Members of the council are elected for a five-year term upon the proposal of the parliament’s finance committee. Parliament elected the current council in April 2023.
There are six sectors within the SAI. Besides the Belgrade head office, the SAI has offices in three other cities. The SAI’s budget is provided from the overall budget of Serbia based on the SAI’s financial plan, with the parliamentary committee for finances’ consent. Since its founding, the SAI has had problems with inadequate premises and insufficient human resources for a comprehensive audit of all budget users. The situation has improved over the past seven years, but it is still unsatisfactory.
The legal framework sets the basis for the independence of the SAI. SAI representatives claim they do not face any pressure from the government or politicians in general; however, most SAI council members have been proposed by the ruling party. No members of the council have been removed from office since the SAI was established.
The SAI’s transparency has increased in the last few years: annual reports and the information booklet are published, and all audit reports are available to the public. However, the criteria for selecting audit subjects are still not published. Relevant parliamentary committees and the parliament in the plenum discuss SAI reports on the audit of the state budget, but do not provide concrete recommendations based on them. So far, parliament has never requested an independent audit of the SAI’s accounts.
Since its establishment, the SAI has struggled with insufficient office space, leading to inadequate working space and a lack of human resources. The SAI regularly files criminal and misdemeanour charges for violations revealed during audits; however, the prosecution fails to act upon them. The prosecution also fails to publish a report about the results of its actions.
-
Partly implemented
The state prosecution office should act upon the SAI’s submissions and report about the results of its actions during the year.
The state prosecution office acts upon the SAI’s submissions but does not publish its decisions on its website. Likewise, the state prosecution office informs the SAI of its decisions, but the SAI does not publish them either on its website or in its annual reports. https://www.dri.rs/storage/newaudits/Izvestaj o radu DRI za 2023 god.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The SAI should increase the number of auditors to fill the systematised positions and especially strengthen its performance audit sector to expand the scope and volume of the work.
The systematisation provides for 426 employees, and as of 31 December 2023, 320 were employed, of whom 282 were in auditing departments.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The SAI should enforce cooperation with CSOs and citizens to promote channels for reporting irregularities.
The SAI has not established adequate cooperation with civil society, meaning it does not hold meetings with interested CSOs. On the other hand, it regularly holds press conferences to inform the public about its results and publishes summaries of its audits, suitable for media use, on the "media" section of its website. https://www.dri.rs/sazeci-izvestaja
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The SAI needs to publish on its website the criteria by which it makes its annual auditing plan.
The SAI still has not established the practice of publishing the criteria on its website based on which it plans its annual audits. It only publishes its strategic four-year plans, which also do not include these criteria. This recommendation is particularly important to ensure transparency in the selection of entities to be audited. https://www.dri.rs/strateski-plan
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The finance committee should follow up quarterly on the fulfilment of the SAI’s recommendations in audited institutions, for example, through public hearings on the most strategic issues raised by the SAI in its report.
The parliamentary finance committee reviews the reports of the SAI, but so far, no public hearing has been held in response to the SAI’s findings. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/narodna-skupstina-/sastav/radna-tela/odbori.146.895.html
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 2Partly implemented
- 7Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
The Agency for Prevention of Corruption (APC) is an independent body in charge of conflict-of-interest prevention among public officials, control of party and campaign financing, enforcing lobbying legislation, identification of corruption risks in legislation, monitoring anti-corruption strategic documents and implementing various other measures to prevent corruption.
The agency is managed by a director who makes all decisions, pronounces measures and gives opinions and instructions for law enforcement. The director also appoints assistant directors, although the deputy is chosen in a public competition. The council of the agency is the second-level authority that decides on appeals filed against the director’s decisions.
The impact of the agency’s efforts in preventing corruption is limited due to a lack of follow-ups by parliament and the government, and insufficient promotion of such activities by the agency itself. The agency’s position is weakened through an unclear division of roles between the agency and the government’s coordinated body for monitoring the implementation of the action plan for Chapter 23 and the absence of a National Anti-Corruption Strategy since 2018.
Some of the agency’s tasks are still not sufficiently defined, thus limiting the accountability of this body in terms of its results and the accountability of public officials and political entities that the agency oversees for potential wrongdoing. Furthermore, the agency does not have adequate resources (staff, in particular) to achieve all envisaged goals, even if there is a slightly higher level of guarantees for the appropriate budget in the law than other budget beneficiaries.
Legal guarantees for the agency’s independence are comparatively high, but some problems identified in practice were not addressed through the latest law amendments. The agency’s independence and the integrity of its officials were challenged based on their handling of some prominent cases related to the ruling party and its high-level officials.
The agency is accountable to parliament and submits comprehensive annual reports regularly. However, it does not sufficiently communicate the results of its work and, for years, did not discuss its decisions in individual cases with the public.
Despite changes in the legal framework aimed to improve the accountability mechanism and professionalisation of the agency through the new selection system of its council (previously board) and director, there is no evidence of substantial progress.
Even if the agency publishes a lot of information about its work on its website, thus complying with the law, important information is still missing, and existing databases (registries) are not user-friendly. During the mandate of the previous director, the agency did not organise any press conferences.
The agency is rather active in fulfilling its role in preventing corruption (integrity plans, methodological documents, and so on) and providing education on corruption (public officials, civil servants, and others).
-
Not implemented
The government should amend its rules of procedure and other relevant acts to oblige legislators to seek the agency’s opinion on norms that could impact corruption or anti-corruption efforts, and to provide a comprehensive analysis of potential risks in the explanatory note. This should increase the number of acts on which the agency gives an opinion on the risks of corruption.
There is no indication that the Government plans to amend its rules of procedure and other relevant acts to oblige legislators to seek the agency’s opinion. Furthermore, there are no indicators showing that the Agency has increased the number of acts on which it provides an opinion regarding the risks of corruption. https://acas.rs/cyr/opinions/all
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliamentary committees should be obliged by parliamentary rules of procedure to consider the agency’s analyses of draft legislation and should proactively seek the agency’s support in drafting amendments.
There is no indication that the Parliament plans to amend its rules of procedure to fulfil this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament needs to amend the ACA Law to require the agency to publish its opinions and explain how the regulations' proponents acted according to the agency’s opinion within a legally mandated deadline.
There is no indication that the Parliament plans to amend the Law on the ACA to make it mandatory for the agency to publish its opinions. The Law on the ACA does not forbid ACA to publish its opinion, so, the agency can publish all of the opinions, but there is no will.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The agency should proactively publish on its website opinions given to officials regarding the performance of other functions or jobs and other matters without revealing personal data.
The Law on the ACA does not forbid ACA to publish its opinions, so, the agency can publish all of the opinions, but there is no will.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The FPA laws should be amended to clearly define the agency's role in overseeing party and campaign financing. This would include setting control deadlines based on reports submitted during the election campaign period, defining a minimal set of actions that should be performed when checking the completeness and truthfulness of campaign finance reports, and so on.
The Laws on FPA adopted in 2022 established deadlines for the Agency’s actions, including the deadline for completing the review of submitted campaign finance reports. This deadline is set at 120 days from the expiration of the reporting deadline. Additionally, in accordance with the Law on Financing Political Activities, the ACA adopts a Control Plan that sets out the criteria for reviewing individual financial reports of political entities.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The agency should make all its registers more user-friendly (for example, with the possibility to sort data from asset declarations) and clarify to what extent they are accurate. The agency should also link all public records, or their parts, managed by the agency for an easier search of data.
There are no indications that the agency plans to technically improve the registers it maintains to facilitate user searches or include links.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament needs to amend the Law on the Prevention of Corruption: to make it mandatory for public officials to share in their published asset declarations the assets of public officials’ firms such as shares in another company and real estate and information about income from allowed private resources; to set a legally prescribed minimum number of controls and minimum content for the control of asset declarations that the agency has to perform and provide sufficient powers and resources for such controls (for example, every official to be checked within four years, or the development of methodologies for risk assessment).
There are no indications that amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption are being prepared in order to meet this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should promptly discuss the agency’s reports and call for responsible elected officials when problems identified in previous year’s reports from the agency are still unresolved.
Parliament does not discuss the agency’s reports and recommendations. The reports appear on the parliamentary agenda months after being submitted and are usually only acknowledged through the adoption of a Conclusion. So far, there has been no parliamentary practice of analysing or monitoring the implementation of the agency’s recommendations.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The government and the agency should collaborate in formulating and presenting a comprehensive National Anti-Corruption Strategy by March 2024, which will be subsequently endorsed by parliament.
The agency was involved in drafting the National Anti-Corruption Strategy but did not participate in its promotion. The most recent post in the "Activities" section of its website dates back to March 2023. https://acas.rs/cyr/page_with_sidebar/mediji
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 0Partly implemented
- 5Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
There are 129 active political parties listed in the register of political parties, half of which are minority political parties.[1] There are three blocks of political affiliations that traditionally form coalitions. The block with largest support, which holds the power since 2012, consists of the largest political party –Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), that is self-labelled as a “catch all” party – with an estimated 39.2 per cent support. This party traditionally exercises power in a coalition with the Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS) (a successor to the communist party that was in power during the 1990s) with an estimated 8.1 per cent support. These parties form a ruling coalition with minority parties. The largest opposition block represents a consortium of liberal, left-wing and centre parties with around 25.8 per cent of support. The largest opposition party from this block is the Party of Freedom and Justice with 8.6 per cent support (derived from Democratic Party that was in power from 2000-2012), the newly established National Movement of Serbia with 7.7 per cent, the newly established Serbia Centre with 4.5 per cent and green parties with around 3 to 4 per cent each. A third block consists of right-wing parties that were never in power: Movement Dveri with around 3.9 per cent support, Party Zavetnici and New Democratic Party of Serbia with around 3 per cent support.[2] One of the most important lines of ideological division between the blocks is whether they have pro-EU or pro-Russian sentiments. While the ruling coalition attempts to maintain relations with both international entities, liberal opposition advocates for EU integration, and the right-wing opposition is openly against the EU and for building stronger relations with Russia.
The free foundation of political parties and their role in shaping the political will of citizens is guaranteed by the constitution. Although the constitutional court has the competence to decide to ban political parties, none of the competent institutions has ever initiated such a procedure. Political parties and other political entities with representatives in the assemblies receive significant public funding, and they may use these funds to finance their election campaign activities. Raising funds from private sources is also permitted but less common. The existing legal framework and political climate keep many opposition parties in an unfavourable position, making it difficult to generate sufficient funds to run a competitive election campaign.
While the legislative framework provides sufficient safeguards for political parties, several physical assaults on opposition leaders intensified political conflicts and overall mistrust between political competitors in the 2022 elections. The state institutions reacted promptly in these incidents, yet the opposition parties argue that the police are not equally diligent in protecting and investigating reported assaults on lower-ranked party officials and activists.
Through the 2022 legislative amendments, an effort has been made to improve the transparency of campaign financing and introduce an obligation for political entities to submit to the Agency for Prevention of Corruption (APC) a preliminary report on expenditure. However, in practice, these interim reports are not very informative. Regarding the control of political financing, the APC publishes one report on campaign financing control and one annual report. Although the APC’s reporting has improved, it still lacks information on the legal outcomes of initiated proceedings. The APC has continued to play a passive role and has imposed inadequate sanctions, especially in the election campaign, which undermines the effectiveness of the accountability mechanism.
Most political parties have powerful and irreplaceable leaders who are not accountable to the membership and are largely independent in making decisions on behalf of the party.
Following the 2022 elections, the representation of political platforms in parliament was enriched. Currently, parliament hosts a broad spectrum of political parties, from left-wing environmentalism and social democracy over the political centre to national populism and right-wing ethnocentrism.
---
[1] Ministry of State Administration and Local Self Governance. Register of political parties, https://mduls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/Izvod-iz-Registra-politickih-stranaka-22.11.2023..pdf
[2] N1. 2023. “Stata” survey: SNS at 36.6 percent, followed by SSP and Aleksić's National Movement of Serbia, https://n1info.rs/vesti/istrazivanje-stata-izbori-rejting/
-
Not implemented
The government should propose, and parliament should adopt amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities to remove identified weaknesses in the system, and clearly set out the responsibilities of the Agency for Prevention of Corruption and other authorities in the process of control of political activities and political entities, and to precisely determine obligations and mechanisms for transparent financing of political entities, at least one year prior to next election. The law should establish thresholds for the cost of the election campaign per one electoral list/presidential candidate; the law should redefine the purpose of budget subsidies and their distribution in a way that funds for campaigns are distributed before elections, while the funds for regular party financing may not be used to finance election campaigns; the law should stipulate the obligation of the Agency for Prevention of Corruption in the control of political parties, related to deadlines, transparency and content of the control reports; the law should more precisely regulate the purpose of tax administration control of party’s donors, in order to prevent abuse; transparency of financing during the campaign should be regulated by introducing a system of transparent accounts that would enable the timely publishing of political parties’ incomes and expenditures; the law should strengthen regulation of third-party campaigning and financing of activities by candidates and explicitly prohibit all forms of abuse of public assets for the campaign purposes.
Although a Working Group for the improvement of electoral conditions, formed in April 2024, consisting of members of Parliament representing parliamentary groups, representatives of national minority political parties without parliamentary groups, and representatives of three civil society organisations, with the aim of improving electoral conditions in line with the ODIHR recommendations, met several times and was actively engaged in proposing amendments to the Law, no results were achieved due to the obstruction of group members representing the authorities, which led to a complete standstill in the working group's activities. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/Prvi_sastanak__Radne_grupe_za_unapre%C4%91enje_izbornog_procesa.48936.941.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should propose and parliament should adopt amendments to other laws to restrict opportunities for the abuse of public office and resources to promote parties in election campaigns. These amendments could include a ban on the distribution of extraordinary social benefits during the campaign, restrictions on new employment in the public sector during the campaign, and restrictions on public officials’ promotional activities during the campaign.
There are no indications that the Government is preparing a draft to amend the law in order to implement this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and parliament should amend the criminal offence set in the Law on Financing of Political Activities to criminalise threats to political party service providers and adequately punish all types of retribution towards both party donors and service providers.
Although a Working Group for the improvement of electoral conditions, formed in April 2024, consisting of members of Parliament representing parliamentary groups, representatives of national minority political parties without parliamentary groups, and representatives of three civil society organisations, with the aim of improving electoral conditions in line with the ODIHR recommendations, met several times and was actively engaged in proposing amendments to the Law, no results were achieved due to the obstruction of group members representing the authorities, which led to a complete standstill in the working group's activities. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/Prvi_sastanak__Radne_grupe_za_unapre%C4%91enje_izbornog_procesa.48936.941.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The Agency for Prevention of Corruption shall enforce adequate sanctions instead of issuing warning measures when a political party repeats a law violation.
Following reports by civil society organizations regarding violations of electoral legislation, the Agency generally issues warnings and cautionary measures. However, there is no available data indicating that the Agency initiated misdemeanour proceedings against entities that violated the law. The Agency’s practice suggests a lack of willingness to implement this recommendation. https://www.acas.rs/storage/page_files/Izve%C5%A1taj o radu za 2023. godinu Agencije za spre%C4%8Davanje korupcije.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The Agency for Prevention of Corruption shall publish the outcomes of initiated proceedings (decision of public prosecutor, criminal or misdemeanour court).
The Agency only publishes statistics in its annual reports. It does not publish on its website the decisions of misdemeanour courts in cases initiated by the Agency, nor does it provide information about the actions taken by public prosecutors based on reports or notifications submitted by the Agency
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 0Partly implemented
- 3Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
Newly adopted, long-awaited changes to the media laws in 2023 brought some improvement to the legal framework for the media’s functioning – such as a more transparent and accessible process of public co-funding, a promise to create a single information platform for co-financing public information projects, a certain degree of independence in the functioning of the Regulatory Body for Electronic Media (REM) and on the journalists’ working rights, but at the same time, the gap deepened in the already polarised media scene in Serbia, and above all, marked the return of the state to media by opening possibilities to become a media owner. While the authorities praise the new laws, claiming that they are aligned with the constitution and the media strategy, media experts, civil society groups, national media associations, political opposition and global NGOs keep warning that new legal solutions will increase the already robust state control over access to news and information against the media strategy, which distinctly communicated that the state must get out of media ownership, and lay the foundation for the shutdown of the remaining independent media and the suppression of freedom of speech and objective information. The European Commission, in its latest report, concludes that the legal process for passing media decrees is not entirely in line with European standards.
The initial action plan for implementing the media strategy expired at the end of 2022, and a new action plan for 2023-2025 has not yet been adopted.
With almost 2,600 registered media outlets, Serbia has two parallel informative media scenes: one supported by or otherwise aligned with the government and the other made up of media that apply a critical lens to the government’s actions. Some of the most influential media outlets from the first group frequently violate standards of professionalism and regulations. The latter’s reach is limited, but despite external pressure, threats and lawsuits, they engage in investigative journalism and reveal corruption at the highest level.
Media concentration (including cable TV providers) is more pronounced, with the state-owned Telekom Srbija and the private United Group company competing for the market share. Informative TV channels affiliated with one cable provider are not accessible on another’s cable network, thus limiting access to news. There are currently five television channels with national coverage, four of them with the regulator licence, accessible on terrestrial and cable networks. These are selected at competition by the Regulatory Body for Electronic Media (REM), an independent authority according to the law, although it is biased in practice. REM has been composed mainly of individuals appointed by the government. According to the new law, independent experts will propose REM council members, but parliament will still elect them. Serbian journalist associations and some international media NGOs are concerned that the new law will block much-needed REM reforms.
There are two major journalist associations – the Journalists Association of Serbia (JAS) and the Independent Journalists Association of Serbia (IJAS) – and several electronic, print, and local media associations. The Serbian journalists’ code of ethics states that journalists must respect all ethical and professional standards.
According to the law, the establishment of the media is simple: there are no legal obstacles to their work, and censorship is prohibited. In practice, however, both censorship and self-censorship are increasingly present.
The state was required to withdraw entirely from media ownership in 2015. It only formally did so, but the new law now opens the way to legalisation of state control over the media, which already exists in Serbia, says the president of the European Federation of Journalists, Maja Sever, and added that the legalisation of that control is just one step further.
Most media outlets today generate income from advertisements and public subsidies distributed for projects, often based on dubious selection procedures.
As the International Press Institute noted in 2023, Serbia exhibits a unique situation in which insults and attempts to discredit watchdog journalism stem overwhelmingly from leading politicians, including the president, prime minister and ruling party MPs.
-
Not implemented
The government and parliament should respect media strategy and complete the legislative process by amending newly adopted laws, especially regarding media ownership and mechanisms for protecting pluralism by: respecting media freedom and establishing legal guarantees for it; ensuring that state ownership will not jeopardise the diversity of media content and removing provisions that allow state-owned companies like Telekom Srbija to own media; enabling the visibility of all TV channels to all citizens starting at least with awarding the fifth media service licence with national frequency to one of the independent broadcasters; securing a completely independent functioning of the regulatory body, including: provisions that enable judicial and civil control of REM’s actions following complaints from citizens and organisations; introducing provisions that prescribe the criteria and methodology on the basis of which REM monitors media reporting during election campaigns in order to avoid abuse of state institutions and functions; removing all forms of “covert control” through the biased use of budget money in project financing.
The media strategy is not being implemented. Two years after the public call was announced, the fifth national television frequency has still not been awarded (according to Serbian law, there should be five national frequencies). REM did not publish a report on the monitoring of programs during the election campaign for the December 2023 elections, even though the report was adopted at a REM Council session in July 2024, seven months after the elections took place. After amendments to the laws on public information and electronic media were passed in October 2023, despite strong objections from media experts, Telekom was given the possibility to become a media owner. According to media reports, Telekom is acquiring Kurir and other media outlets under the Mondo INC group. (Telekom Srbija a.d. is a Serbian telecommunications operator, which already owns various media operations ranging from entertainment and sports to Euronews Serbia and Bloomberg Adria. The legal changes have enabled it to purchase additional specialized and informational channels. Even though the newly adopted (October 2023). The law on Electronic Media stipulated the election of the new REM Council by November 2024; this process was stalled by the representatives of the authorities and was initiated only after the expiration of the mandate of the last Council. The process was marked by controversies, pressure on independent candidates, and the withdrawal of a large number of candidates, which has left REM functioning without a Council for the past five months. https://n1info.rs/vesti/podsecanje-na-zamrznuti-konkurs-saveta-rem-a-peta-frekvencija-nedosanjani-san/; https://www.raskrikavanje.rs/page.php?id=Vazni-medijski-trenuci-2023--iz-perspektive-Raskrikavanja-1272; https://www.cenzolovka.rs/trziste/telekom-i-dalje-cuti-o-kupovini-kurira-a-zezelj-kaze-greska-je-sto-pitate-nas-ne-znamo-sta-oni-planiraju/; https://n1info.rs/vesti/koliko-telekom-ima-televizija/
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and parliament should finally adopt the Law on Public Media Services, in line with the media strategy, and not only periodically change the provisions that continuously extend the payment of the subscription.
At the first extraordinary session of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia in its 14th convocation, held on 23 July 2024, the Assembly adopted the law on Amendments to the Law on the Temporary Regulation of the Method of Collecting the Public Media Service Fee. These amendments did not fulfil the provisions of the Media Strategy, nor did they include other changes to the Law. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/archive/files/cir/pdf/zakoni/14_saziv/1618-24.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should enforce the independence and efficiency of judicial institutions in line with the media strategy and with the adoption of the action plan for 2023-2025, in the protection of journalists and media freedom (attacks, lawsuits, court proceedings or indictments) by: adopting binding rules for prosecutors to take immediate measures in cases of violence against journalists; ensuring the conditions for the fast and regular implementation of these measures.
Attacks and lawsuits against journalists show a worsening trend. The latest decision of the prosecutor was to dismiss the criminal complaint, in spite of a video recording clearly showing the journalist being punched in the face, after nearly 11 months of a preliminary investigation. From 12 June to 2 July 2024, a public debate was held on the 2024-2025 Action Plan for the Media Strategy, but the document was not adopted. The work on this Action plan is still in progress. https://www.bazenuns.rs/srpski/napadi-na-novinare; https://nuns.rs/nuns-udaranje-novinara-nije-incident-vec-ozbiljno-krivicno-delo-i-napad-na-slobodu-medija/; https://mit.gov.rs/vest/6072/javna-rasprava-o-nacrtu-akcionog-plana-za-pracenje-sprovodjenja-strategije-razvoja-sistema-javnog-informisanja-u-republici-srbiji-za-period-2020-2025-godina-u-periodu-2024-2025-godina.php
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 1Partly implemented
- 3Not implemented
- 0No data
Last update 28 March 2025
Newly adopted, long-awaited changes to the media laws in 2023 brought some improvement to the legal framework for the media’s functioning – such as a more transparent and accessible process of public co-funding, a promise to create a single information platform for co-financing public information projects, a certain degree of independence in the functioning of the Regulatory Body for Electronic Media (REM) and on the journalists’ working rights, but at the same time, the gap deepened in the already polarised media scene in Serbia, and above all, marked the return of the state to media by opening possibilities to become a media owner. While the authorities praise the new laws, claiming that they are aligned with the constitution and the media strategy, media experts, civil society groups, national media associations, political opposition and global NGOs keep warning that new legal solutions will increase the already robust state control over access to news and information against the media strategy, which distinctly communicated that the state must get out of media ownership, and lay the foundation for the shutdown of the remaining independent media and the suppression of freedom of speech and objective information. The European Commission, in its latest report, concludes that the legal process for passing media decrees is not entirely in line with European standards.
The initial action plan for implementing the media strategy expired at the end of 2022, and a new action plan for 2023-2025 has not yet been adopted.
With almost 2,600 registered media outlets, Serbia has two parallel informative media scenes: one supported by or otherwise aligned with the government and the other made up of media that apply a critical lens to the government’s actions. Some of the most influential media outlets from the first group frequently violate standards of professionalism and regulations. The latter’s reach is limited, but despite external pressure, threats and lawsuits, they engage in investigative journalism and reveal corruption at the highest level.
Media concentration (including cable TV providers) is more pronounced, with the state-owned Telekom Srbija and the private United Group company competing for the market share. Informative TV channels affiliated with one cable provider are not accessible on another’s cable network , thus limiting access to news. There are currently five television channels with national coverage, four of them with the regulator licence, accessible on terrestrial and cable networks. These are selected at competition by the Regulatory Body for Electronic Media (REM), an independent authority according to the law, although it is biased in practice. REM has been composed mainly of individuals appointed by the government. According to the new law, independent experts will propose REM council members, but parliament will still elect them. Serbian journalist associations and some international media NGOs are concerned that the new law will block much-needed REM reforms.
There are two major journalist associations – the Journalists Association of Serbia (JAS) and the Independent Journalists Association of Serbia (IJAS) – and several electronic, print, and local media associations. The Serbian journalists’ code of ethics states that journalists must respect all ethical and professional standards.
According to the law, the establishment of the media is simple: there are no legal obstacles to their work, and censorship is prohibited. In practice, however, both censorship and self-censorship are increasingly present.
The state was required to withdraw entirely from media ownership in 2015. It only formally did so, but the new law now opens the way to legalisation of state control over the media, which already exists in Serbia, says the president of the European Federation of Journalists, Maja Sever, and added that the legalisation of that control is just one step further,.
Most media outlets today generate income from advertisements and public subsidies distributed for projects, often based on dubious selection procedures.
As the International Press Institute noted in 2023, Serbia exhibits a unique situation in which insults and attempts to discredit watchdog journalism stem overwhelmingly from leading politicians, including the president, prime minister and ruling party MPs.
-
Partly implemented
The government needs to improve and systematize the legal framework that regulates its cooperation with CSOs and ensures the implementation of the existing consultative mechanisms, including the Law on the Planning System and by-laws so that public consultations are held on all important acts, that all relevant information is presented to the participants, that all proposals are discussed and the responses are explained, and ensure responsibility for all the above; establishing clear rules in the Law on the Budgetary System or one of the aforementioned acts that would refer to consultations with budgetary priorities; ensure compliance with procedures in preparation of legislation as regulated in the Law on State Administration and Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly.
Existing consultative mechanisms with CSOs are implemented to a certain extent, which is evident in the process of adopting the Anti-Corruption Strategy, the Media Strategy, and others. However, they are not implemented sufficiently and with limited results, which stem from the non-compliance with or misuse of the prescribed procedures for carrying out these processes, such as failing to publish reports from public debates, scheduling public debates during the summer period, short deadlines for submission of proposals, and other similar issues. Additionally, the Government fails to enact public consultations in most of the legally binding situations and organizes public debate on the budget just a day prior to its consideration in the Parliament, inviting only representatives of legislative and executive authority.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
CSOs should expand their activity in fighting corruption to regional, national and local levels and initiate and strengthen cooperation with interested parties from CSOs whose primary areas of interest are not anti-corruption, the business sector and state bodies.
In the past several years, there has been no emergence of new coalitions or programmes related to anti-corruption efforts within the scope of CSOs’ work.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should ensure a more transparent distribution of budget funds for CSO programmes of public interest and more effective supervision over implementing such programmes.
According to BIRN’s research, the practice of non-transparent allocation of state funds to CSOs has continued. There is no available information indicating that any form of oversight exists over the implementation of programmes by ministries allocating funds to civil society organisations. Additionally, reports on the implementation of such calls for proposals are not publicly available in the ministries distributing the funds. Furthermore, one of the organizations that are financed solely from public funds made payments to volunteers in the call centre of the ruling political party during 2023. election campaign. https://birn.rs/nastavlja-se-dodeljivanje-miliona-fantomskim-organizacijama/; https://koms.rs/2024/08/novi-milioni-za-nevidljive-aktivnosti-cerob-a/
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and parliament should amend tax regulations to enable more significant resources for CSOs for policy-making, advocacy, and oversight of public authorities, and to stimulate corporate philanthropy for CSOs dealing with these issues.
There is no indication that the government and parliament plan to amend tax regulations to enable more significant resources for CSOs for policy-making advocacy and oversight of public authorities and to stimulate corporate philanthropy for CSOs dealing with these issues.
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 0Partly implemented
- 0Not implemented
- 2No data
Last update 28 March 2025
Serbia has slowly improved its business environment as several heavy bureaucratic procedures have been simplified and costs reduced, but the business environment is still considered weak. There is a considerable discrepancy between legislation and practice in the business sector in Serbia.
The implementation of the action plan for the simplification of administrative procedures further advanced through digitalisation and the establishment of a single public register. However, regulatory uncertainty for individuals and businesses remains due to persistent delays in aligning sector based legislation with the law on general administrative procedures. The law introduced the e-fiscal system, enabling the tax administration to better monitor and counter tax evasion.
The Law on Companies determines the types of enterprises or business associations. Companies in Serbia are private or state-owned. At the end of 2022, there were 528 large, 2,092 medium, 13,172 small and 93,062 micro-companies. The Serbian Business Register Agency (SBRA) is responsible for registering the companies. As of the end of September, over 136,600 companies and 325,000 entrepreneurs were registered at SBRA.
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) form the backbone of the economy. They account for about 60 per cent (€ 14 billion) of the business sector, excluding agriculture. SMEs create 60 per cent of added value and 66 per cent of employment and account for 45 per cent of total exports. Although the government adopted regulations to support this sector in January 2022, and there is a solid institutional infrastructure to support the development of SMEs and entrepreneurs, the SME sector does not enjoy the same attention and support as large enterprises. A new 2023-2027 strategy for developing SMEs and entrepreneurs, was expected by the end of 2022 and then postponed at the end of 2023, has been left for the following year.
State presence in the economy is significant. Although the private sector contributes more to GDP generation and employment (according to the 2022 statistical yearbook, 2.1 million people work in private companies, representing 73.4 per cent of total employees in Serbia), the state has a prominent role in the economy, with numerous state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in strategic sectors, such as energy, machinery, mining and agriculture. At the same time, the private sector is underdeveloped and hampered by weaknesses in the rule of law, particularly corruption and judicial inefficiency, and deficiencies in enforcing fair competition.
Numerous mechanisms and legal frameworks for ensuring integrity in the business sector exist but are not fully applied. The business sector is not active in initiating actions to fight corruption, and its support for civil society anti-corruption efforts is practically non-existent.
-
No data
The government and the National Assembly need to change the entire legal framework related to the business in order to promote integrity in the sector by: introducing transparent supervision over its implementation, starting with prescribing obligatory values and a code of conduct, introducing integrity policies, resources and systems, integrity risk management; ensuring the promotion of integrity in the private sector while preventing, detecting and managing fraud and corruption, starting with strengthening the laws that regulate public procurement by “closing” the legal loopholes that the government uses to rig the tenders; in other words, the government should cease the practice of using an exception based on interstate agreements for all big jobs; discontinuing the dependence of businesses on their connections with those in power, in particular when it comes to small enterprises at the local level and tenders by: a) selecting projects based on identified needs and public interest; b) estimating costs and benefits based on evidence; c) having the SAI audit regularly.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
No data
The chamber of commerce and other company associations should strengthen the role of the private sector in preventing corruption by: introducing incentives and supporting companies in the sector’s anti-corruption activities and their relations with CSOs and state bodies; promoting the principles of good governance, particularly the rule of law, transparency, accountability and integrity through training provided by experts and using practical examples of good practices; designing the proper conduct of a risk assessment that companies could apply.
Last update 28 March 2025
- 0Fully implemented
- 0Partly implemented
- 5Not implemented
- 1No data
Last update 28 March 2025
There are several types of the SOEs in Serbia, depending to their legal status. Public enterprises (PE), whose work is regulated through the Law on Public Enterprises (2016) may be established by the state, province, city or municipality to perform activity of public interest. In most of the cases, public enterprises are utilities (such as garbage management, city public transportation, electricity company, water supply company), but may be active in other areas as well (for example, Official Gazette, Serbian Posts, Serbia Roads). PEs are controlled by the government or a provincial or local assembly. Those institutions should appoint supervisory board members (three or five) and directors (upon public competition), approve work programmes and receive reports.
The 2023 data from the Ministry of Economy state that there are 59 such enterprises in the process of privatisation.
According to preliminary data from the strategy on state ownership and management of enterprises from 2021 to 2027, the Republic of Serbia has 270 active business entities in its portfolio, of which: limited liability companies (DOO) - 157; joint-stock companies (AD) - 82; public enterprises (PE) - 26; other – five. Serbian Agency for Business Registers also keeps track of all the companies in which the state has ownership (264 active companies as of 31 March 2023), but it does not include indirectly state-owned companies). A total of 569 public companies were obliged to submit a regular annual financial report for 2022 to the business register agency.
Data from the statistical office for the second trimester of 2023 show that 143,148 persons were employed in PEs – 83,026 in state PE and 60,122 in local PEs.
When it comes to profitability, business register agency data show that in 2022, public companies achieved total revenues of RSD988.227 million (€8.5 million), with an annual growth of 18.2 per cent. On the other hand, they record total expenditures of RSD 1,063.453 million (€9 million), 26.3 per cent more. Although public companies make up only 0.5 per cent of the total number of companies, they participated with 8.6 per cent of the total number of employees and realised 5.5 per cent of business revenues. However, they have the most pronounced share in the net loss from the economy ‒ 24.2 per cent (previous year 9.5 per cent), while their participation in the net profit of the economy was only 1.3 per cent (2.0 per cent in the previous year). As for financial capacities, 13.8 per cent of business assets and 17.0 per cent of the economy’s capital refers to public companies, which at the same time generated 14.8 per cent of the loss. The total fiscal deficit of Serbia in 2022 was €1.9 billion, 3.1 per cent of GDP; almost the entire deficit is the result of the losses from EPS and Srbijagas. Without these costs, the deficit would be only around 0.4 per cent of GDP.
State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are not exempt from any general rules and regulations which apply to private sector companies, while some special rules are also in place. According to the legal framework, the government does not interfere with the day-to-day operation of the SOEs. In practice, however, the supervisory boards and directors of SOEs in most cases operate under the direct control of political parties or individual ministries. The knowledge and skills of board members could be brought into question. In most public enterprises at the republic level, mechanisms which are expected to reduce political influence and to lead to the professionalisation of management, including open recruitment procedures for the appointment of directors, as stipulated by the law, have not been applied.
The majority of the SOEs are managed by discretionally appointed “acting directors” or persons appointed politically. Furthermore, they are managing companies illegally by continuing after the expiration of their mandate, which is tolerated by the government and judiciary.
Regulations envisage relatively high standards of transparency for companies. Practice, however, does not match these standards. Documents and information stipulated by law are not published on the SOEs’ websites. SOEs frequently violate other rules as well (such as public procurement and accounting).
There is no central government unit to publish information about the SOEs or about the government’s strategic policy regarding SOEs. Supervisory boards’ work proves that the system of accountability, set by the legal framework, does not function fully in practice.
Integrity of the SOEs is not ensured in practice as they are indirectly controlled by political parties. There has even been backsliding in the legal framework with the adoption of an authentic interpretation of the definition of public official, thereby exempting representatives of the state of Serbia in the assembly of shareholders, presidents and members of supervisory boards, directors and acting directors from the obligation to submit an asset report and the obligation to report potential conflicts of interest.
-
No data
Companies must provide secure and accessible channels for whistleblowers by setting up precise, safe and diversified reporting mechanisms on suspected corruption, including reporting in person, by designated email address, by an online platform such as an intranet or external channel if no internal one is available or safe; the possibility of anonymous reporting; » ensuring the reporting process’s confidentiality (of the content and the whistleblower) and defining what “confidentiality” means; supporting and protecting reporting persons and preventing retaliation against them.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Тhe government should establish a centralised coordination unit to monitor, control and supervise state-owned enterprises, and the data from that system should be available to the public.
The Law on the Management of State-Owned Enterprises, adopted in 2023, stipulates that a Coordination Body should be established by a by-law to monitor, control, and supervise state-owned enterprises and that the decisions of this body should be publicly available. A review of the website of the Ministry of Economy, which is responsible for adopting this by-law, shows that the Coordination Body has not been established. Furthermore, there are no media reports mentioning this body, which is required by law. https://pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/eli/rep/sgrs/skupstina/zakon/2023/76/2/reg
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should ensure greater independence in business operations, especially from political influence, by ending the practice of appointing acting directors and announcing competitions for the selection of directors of public companies for all companies managed by legal or illegal (expired mandate) acting directors. After the start of the implementation of the Law on the Management of Companies Owned by the Republic of Serbia, legality should be ensured by the representative state supervisory boards and state representatives in shareholders’ assemblies.
There is no information that the Government announced any public competitions for the selection of directors during the observed period. On the contrary, it continued appointing acting directors. Although the law stipulates that this status may last no longer than one year, the directors of three public enterprises in Niš and one institution have remained in acting status for significantly longer. Transparency Serbia regularly publishes reviews of the situation in public companies regarding the status of directors. https://transparentnost.org.rs/images/dokumenti_uz_vesti/Konkursi_vd_stanje_izbordirektora-_republička_JP_i_preduzeća_u_državnom_vlasništvu_17._maj_2024.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and the assembly should prepare and adopt amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption to invalidate the authentic interpretation of the definition of the term public functionary and ensure that directors, acting directors, supervisory board members and shareholder meetings of state-owned enterprises have the status of public officials and are subject to asset and income verification and conflict of interest regulation.
There are no indications that the Government and the National Assembly are preparing or planning to adopt amendments to the Law on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and the assembly should prepare and adopt amendments to the Law on Public Enterprises and the Law on the Management of Companies Owned by the Republic of Serbia to reduce the possibility of abusing these companies' resources for political promotion or goals unrelated to the company’s field of work.
There are no indications that the Government and the National Assembly are preparing or planning to adopt amendments to the Law on Public Enterprises and the Law on the Management of Companies Owned by the Republic of Serbia.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should specify, to the extent possible, the criteria for determining whether directors performed their duties unprofessionally and negligently and whether there was a (significant) deviation from the achievement of the basic goals of work for the public company, that is, from its business plan.
There are no indications that the Government is preparing to take any steps towards fulfilling this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
All recommendations
-
Fully implemented
The HJC should adopt rules/by-laws on the independence of the judicial budget, build capacities for implementing the budget for the judiciary and create mechanisms for its effective application.
The HCJ adopted the Rulebook on the work of its Budget Commission. In order to strengthen its capacities and establish mechanisms for the effective exercise of its competences, the HCJ has implemented an application-based software for monitoring court performance. Among other features, the software enables the electronic submission, processing, and consolidation of financial plans prepared independently by the courts as indirect budget beneficiaries, as well as analysis of budget execution and court backlogs. In addition, the HCJ has taken all measures and activities prescribed by law in a timely manner to ensure an adequate volume and structure of budgetary resources for the work of the courts. https://vst.jt.rs/pravilnik-o-radu-budzetske-komisije-visokog-saveta-tuzilastva/
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Fully implemented
The HJC should, following public consultation, pass a by-law on the criteria for election to the position of judge and president of the court.
At its session on 17 April 2024, the HCJ adopted the Rulebook on the procedure for electing judges and court presidents. https://vss.sud.rs/api/documents/preview/Правилник о поступку за избор судије и председника суда - Објављен у службеном гласнику РС 34-2024 од 19.04.2024..pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Fully implemented
The judicial academy should improve the quality of continuous training for judges in corruption, especially regarding the prosecution of corrupt criminal acts based on publicly expressed suspicions.
From the beginning of 2024, the Judicial Academy, in cooperation with various international and domestic organisations, conducted 18 training sessions for more than 350 participants – including judges, prosecutors, and judicial and prosecutorial assistants. The trainings covered topics such as ’Criminal Procedure, Combating corruption, Financial investigation’ and ’Criminal procedure, Public procurement and corruption, Prevention of money laundering, Confiscation of criminal assets’. Among these subjects addressed were fraud and irregularities in handling EU financial investigations, and the assessment of evidence in criminal proceedings related to abuses in public procurement, among others. https://www.pars.rs/sr/стална-обука
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Fully implemented
The HPC and all prosecution offices should increase the number of prosecutors who exclusively investigate corruption cases in order to conduct proactive investigations based on publicly available data on corrupt behaviour.
Since 1 January 2024, 54 public prosecutors have been assigned to the special departments for combating corruption. However, this does not necessarily mean that the newly assigned prosecutors will proactively initiate investigations based on publicly available data on corrupt behaviour, considering past practices.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
Courts should ensure a greater degree of transparency of work through holding regular press conferences and publishing data on the status of proceedings for which there is a public interest, as well as through timely and complete processing of requests for access to information in accordance with the legal framework.
The official websites of the courts (such as the Higher Court in Belgrade, the Higher Court in Niš, and the Higher Court in Novi Sad) do not contain information about regular or extraordinary press conferences. Similarly, no publicly available media reports indicate that any press conferences were held during the reporting period. At the same time, the official websites of these courts, as well as the basic courts in the same cities, do publish depersonalised information on criminal proceedings under dedicated banners titled‘ News’ or ‘Announcements’ or on their homepages.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The judicial academy should improve the quality of continuous training for judges in corruption, especially regarding the prosecution of corrupt criminal acts based on publicly expressed suspicions.
From the beginning of 2024, the Judicial Academy, in cooperation with various international and domestic organisations, conducted 18 for more than 350 participants – including judges, prosecutors, and judicial and prosecutorial assistants. The trainings covered topics such as ’Criminal Procedure, Combating corruption, Financial investigation’ and ’Criminal procedure, Public procurement and corruption, Prevention of money laundering, Confiscation of criminal assets’. Among these subjects addressed were fraud and irregularities in handling EU financial investigations, and the assessment of evidence in criminal proceedings related to abuses in public procurement, among others.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The government and the HPC should provide the public prosecution with the necessary conditions for work: human resources, office space and equipment. Additionally, they should provide conditions for more financial forensic experts, including possible changes of the legal framework which would enable their employment under market conditions and not for the salaries of civil servants.
During November and December 2024, the High Council of Prosecutions made decisions on the selection of the chief public prosecutor and public prosecutor in the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Zrenjanin, several public prosecutors in the Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office, on the selection of public prosecutors in the Public Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime and the Public Prosecutor's Office for War Crimes, as well as the selection of public prosecutors in appellate public prosecutor's offices, i.e. the decision on the selection of public prosecutors in the public prosecutor's office in about 30 basic public prosecutor's offices. In March 2025, 24 public prosecutors were sworn in. Also, the schedules of conducting interviews with registered candidates for the selection of public prosecutors of the Public Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime and higher public prosecutor's offices have been published. https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Dnevni-red-1-1.pdf; https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Dnevni-red-5.pdf; https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Obavestenje-o-datumu-polaganja-zakletve.pdf; https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Raspored-za-21.3.2025.pdf; https://vst.jt.rs/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Raspored-za-12.3.2025-1.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The State Audit Institution should conduct comprehensive audits and evaluations of budget use within the Ministry of Interior. In parallel, prosecutors must actively monitor and closely follow civil society initiatives and investigative journalism reports that shed light on potential instances of budget misuse within the police service. This proactive approach will ensure that any irregularities are promptly identified and addressed.
In 2024, the State Audit Institution conducted an audit of the financial reports of the Ministry of Interior, as well as follow-up audit reports on the correction of identified irregularities. On the other hand, prosecution offices still do not act proactively and fail to respond to initiatives from civil society or to published investigative journalism reports pointing to potential abuses. The conduct of the prosecution does not reflect a proactive approach. https://www.dri.rs/izvestaji?search=унутрашњих послова&date=DESC&year=&topics=&subjects=&types=§ors=&tags=&crosstypes=&search_subject=
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The police should provide clear and comprehensive guidance to individuals who want to report such incidents to encourage reporting of corruption and ensure transparency in the process. This includes clear instructions on websites and premises, a clear explanation of what individuals can expect during the reporting and investigation process, and the police should commit to providing regular updates and notices to individuals who have reported corruption.
The Internal Control Sector provides instructions on its website for citizens on how to report corruption, but such information is not available on the Ministry of Interior's homepage. Moreover, apart from stating what should be included in a report, the instructions do not mention whether and when citizens can expect feedback on their reports or how the case will proceed. There is also no information on the number of characteristics of previously reported corruption cases. Additionally, anonymous reporting is not enabled. http://prezentacije.mup.gov.rs/sukp/zalbe.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The government should propose, and parliament should adopt a new law which would establish the state election commission as a professional and independent state body. The starting point for discussion on the best model for the election of its officials and their independence from political parties should be the draft law on the state electoral committee from 2009. This independent body should dispose of its own budget and should employ its own administration.
A Decision amending the Decision on the organisation and work of the National Assembly Service was adopted at the first extraordinary session of parliament on 23 July 2024, which, among other things, aims to strengthen the service available to the Republic Electoral Commission (REC). However, there is no information indicating that RIK’s service has since been strengthened to a sufficient capacity. Furthermore, no law has been adopted to establish REC as a professional and independent state body. https://otvoreniparlament.rs/uploads/akta/Predlog odluke o izmenama Odluke o organizaciji i radu Slu%C5%BEbe Narodne skup%C5%A1tine.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The REC should publish annual procurement plans in accordance with the law (it has not been published since 2019), plus annual reports on expenditures and reports on election expenditures (not published since 2020) on its website at the latest one month after elections.
REC still does not publish annual public procurement plans. However, it published the reports on expenditures up until September 2024, both for regular work and for elections. https://www.rik.parlament.gov.rs/tekst/sr/583/javne-nabavke.php
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The REC should initiate changes to improve the participation of voters with disabilities, including providing easier access to polling stations, enabling easier movement within polling stations adapted to persons with disabilities, and enabling proper informing and communication with blind and deaf persons by introducing audio, visual and tactile instructions.
The ODIHR report (p. 11) notes that, prior to the elections, the REC amended ten existing instructions and adopted two new ones. „While these amendments partially addressed previous ODIHR recommendations, including those aimed at improving access for persons with disabilities, reducing overcrowding at polling stations, ensuring the secrecy of the vote, and the timely publication of results by polling station, the impact of these regulatory changes remained limited on election day (see Election day)“, the report states. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/c/2/565117_0.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The REC should proactively publish turnout data, data on the composition of polling boards and aggregated voting results received from the LECs on its website immediately upon their reception from the LECs in an open data format.
The REC publishes the composition of polling boards in a searchable PDF format. Once the REC adopts the final election results, aggregated voting results are published and accompanied by an Excel file containing data for each polling station in Serbia. However, the aggregated results submitted by local electoral commissions are not published in a machine-readable format. Turnout data is announced periodically throughout election day during REC press conferences. https://www.rik.parlament.gov.rs/
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The ombudsperson should always, when there is increased public interest, initiate proceedings by official duty, especially according to legislative competence.
In 2024 and 2025, the Ombudsperson continued of ex officio investigations to initiate a number of by official duty in cases where there was public interest. Most of these concerned the protection of environmental rights and the rights to life and physical integrity threatened by domestic violence – issues that sparked significant public interest and concern. https://www.ombudsman.rs/index.php/2012-02-07-14-03-33
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The ombudsperson should make information about his work available to the public in a timely and complete manner, especially information about control procedures and recommendations made, especially in cases where there is an expressed public interest.
On the official website of the Ombudsperson, the the 'Control procedures' section provides publicly available information on control procedures. However, the limitation lies in the fact that only those procedures that resulted in recommendations or opinions are made publicly available. Information about other control procedures becomes accessible to the public only upon publication of the annual report for a given calendar year. Even then, the data is minimal, presented in statistical tables without further explanation. Additionally, the information is published with a delay – for example, some reports on control procedures and recommendations from July were published in that section at the end of August 2024. https://www.ombudsman.rs/index.php/2012-02-07-14-03-33
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The state prosecution office should act upon the SAI’s submissions and report about the results of its actions during the year.
The state prosecution office acts upon the SAI’s submissions but does not publish its decisions on its website. Likewise, the state prosecution office informs the SAI of its decisions, but the SAI does not publish them either on its website or in its annual reports. https://www.dri.rs/storage/newaudits/Izvestaj o radu DRI za 2023 god.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The SAI should increase the number of auditors to fill the systematised positions and especially strengthen its performance audit sector to expand the scope and volume of the work.
The systematisation provides for 426 employees, and as of 31 December 2023, 320 were employed, of whom 282 were in auditing departments.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The SAI should enforce cooperation with CSOs and citizens to promote channels for reporting irregularities.
The SAI has not established adequate cooperation with civil society, meaning it does not hold meetings with interested CSOs. On the other hand, it regularly holds press conferences to inform the public about its results and publishes summaries of its audits, suitable for media use, on the "media" section of its website. https://www.dri.rs/sazeci-izvestaja
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The SAI needs to publish on its website the criteria by which it makes its annual auditing plan.
The SAI still has not established the practice of publishing the criteria on its website based on which it plans its annual audits. It only publishes its strategic four-year plans, which also do not include these criteria. This recommendation is particularly important to ensure transparency in the selection of entities to be audited. https://www.dri.rs/strateski-plan
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The finance committee should follow up quarterly on the fulfilment of the SAI’s recommendations in audited institutions, for example, through public hearings on the most strategic issues raised by the SAI in its report.
The parliamentary finance committee reviews the reports of the SAI, but so far, no public hearing has been held in response to the SAI’s findings. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/narodna-skupstina-/sastav/radna-tela/odbori.146.895.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The FPA laws should be amended to clearly define the agency's role in overseeing party and campaign financing. This would include setting control deadlines based on reports submitted during the election campaign period, defining a minimal set of actions that should be performed when checking the completeness and truthfulness of campaign finance reports, and so on.
The Laws on FPA adopted in 2022 established deadlines for the Agency’s actions, including the deadline for completing the review of submitted campaign finance reports. This deadline is set at 120 days from the expiration of the reporting deadline. Additionally, in accordance with the Law on Financing Political Activities, the ACA adopts a Control Plan that sets out the criteria for reviewing individual financial reports of political entities.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The government and the agency should collaborate in formulating and presenting a comprehensive National Anti-Corruption Strategy by March 2024, which will be subsequently endorsed by parliament.
The agency was involved in drafting the National Anti-Corruption Strategy but did not participate in its promotion. The most recent post in the "Activities" section of its website dates back to March 2023. https://acas.rs/cyr/page_with_sidebar/mediji
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Partly implemented
The government needs to improve and systematize the legal framework that regulates its cooperation with CSOs and ensures the implementation of the existing consultative mechanisms, including the Law on the Planning System and by-laws so that public consultations are held on all important acts, that all relevant information is presented to the participants, that all proposals are discussed and the responses are explained, and ensure responsibility for all the above; establishing clear rules in the Law on the Budgetary System or one of the aforementioned acts that would refer to consultations with budgetary priorities; ensure compliance with procedures in preparation of legislation as regulated in the Law on State Administration and Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly.
Existing consultative mechanisms with CSOs are implemented to a certain extent, which is evident in the process of adopting the Anti-Corruption Strategy, the Media Strategy, and others. However, they are not implemented sufficiently and with limited results, which stem from the non-compliance with or misuse of the prescribed procedures for carrying out these processes, such as failing to publish reports from public debates, scheduling public debates during the summer period, short deadlines for submission of proposals, and other similar issues. Additionally, the Government fails to enact public consultations in most of the legally binding situations and organizes public debate on the budget just a day prior to its consideration in the Parliament, inviting only representatives of legislative and executive authority.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should be more engaged in reviewing the compliance of draft regulations with the constitution and strategic documents, discussing potential corruption risks with emphasis on interstate agreements and verifying the funds envisaged for implementing specific regulations. Concerning this, parliament should stop adopting authentic interpretations that cause instability in the legal system by amending the Law on the National Assembly and the rules of procedure.
No action has been taken to implement this recommendation. The National Assembly continued to adopt laws and other acts without adequate discussion of the draft texts, both in plenary sessions and in committee meetings. Laws are being adopted in the exact form in which they were proposed by the Government. The practice of adopting authentic interpretations of laws has also continued. On July 31, 2024, the Parliament adopted an authentic opinion on the provision of Article 2 of the Law on the Confirmation of the Framework Protocol on Financial and Technical Cooperation between the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Government of the Kingdom of Spain in the Field of Infrastructure Projects. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/archive/files/cir/pdf/ostala_akta/14_saziv/RS14-24.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should endorse civil society inclusion by: organising more public hearings on the topics of the utmost public interest, discussing corruption risks and implementing recommendations of international organisations (such as ODIHR, GRECO); inviting civil society representatives and experts to participate in relevant committee sittings and establish more inquiry committees; reviewing and including civic initiatives in the agenda.
No action has been taken to implement this recommendation. Civil society representatives were not invited to the sessions of parliamentary working bodies, nor were civic initiatives considered. The Committee for Finances and Budgetary Issues in the Serbian Parliament scheduled a public hearing on the Budget Proposal for 2025 in the Serbian Parliament, to which representatives of the civil sector were not invited, for Sunday, November 24, 2024, at five o'clock in the afternoon, just one day before the start of the parliamentary session whose agenda was the budget. Through the efforts of TS and NKEU, the Board enabled the presence of several CSO representatives, and two of them were given the floor at the end of the session, around 7 o'clock in the afternoon. The Committee on Constitutional Affairs and Legislation organized, on January 27, 2025, a public hearing on draft laws on the revision of the voter register, which was organized contrary to the rules and at which proposals were presented that were not considered during the previous consultations. CSO representatives left this session. During February and March, the Committee continued to organize public hearings on the same topic in various cities in Serbia, but due to violations of the rules for holding public hearings, civil society representatives were not present at these events. https://www.nin.rs/politika/vesti/67197/predstavnici-opozicionih-stranaka-napustili-javno-slusanje-odbora-skupstine-srbije
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should improve the transparency of its work by timely publishing amendments, the government’s opinions on amendments, documents considered and adopted in committee sessions, budget execution documents (currently available only to MPs) and information on lobbying. Parliament should also organise public calls and interviews with candidates for all posts to be elected by parliament.
No action has been taken to implement this recommendation. Amendments to laws are not published on the parliament’s website. There is also no dedicated page on lobbying available on the website. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/акти.44.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should improve the integrity of its work by: improving the regulation of conflict of interest by amending the Law on the National Assembly and Code of Conduct to ensure tailor-made rules and clear jurisdiction between the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption and the self-regulation of the National Assembly; amending the code of conduct to align with practice and presenting the code to citizens; publishing a report on the implementation of the code of conduct and timely reviewing all reported violations of the code.
No action has been taken to implement this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government needs to develop a new anti-corruption strategy for 2023-2028 in consultation with all relevant stakeholders and implement the current strategic anti-corruption documents without further delay.
The Government adopted the National Anti-Corruption Strategy for the period 2023-2028 in July 2024. The accompanying Action plan for implementing the Strategy for 2024 is in the process of adoption, and representatives of civil society have been included in the working group for its adoption.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should enable the public to influence the budget process and provide explanations on the influence of planned budget expenditures on the fulfilment of legal obligations of state bodies and the implementation of defined priorities.
The process of the adoption of the national budget still goes on without the participation of the public or even the possibility of a citizen influencing it.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government needs to implement further international recommendations, including those from the GRECO evaluation and the European Commission’s reports. Most pressing in this regard are the following actions: regulating conflicts of interest among advisers to the president, prime minister and ministers and strengthening the system for controlling the reports of executive power officials; regulation on informal lobbying; enabling citizens to file a complaint with the commissioner when the government or president refuse or ignore the request for access to information; obligation to hold public hearings on all laws; limiting the immunity of members of the government for corrupt crimes, expanding the jurisdiction of the Prosecutor’s Office for Organised Crime and strengthening the government’s council for the fight against corruption; further improve its track record on investigations, prosecutions and final court decisions in high-level corruption cases, in particular the seizure and confiscation of criminal assets.
Although some effort has been made to implement certain GRECO recommendations, no progress has been made.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should improve the independence and responsibility of the HCJ through the selection process of so-called prominent lawyers in such a way that they should be elected by the MPs directly, and prevent, due to MPs’ failure to exercise their powers, the election of these lawyers from being done by the commission.
The National Assembly did not adopt a law to regulate the procedure for electing prominent lawyers to the HCJ. Given that the Commission selected the prominent lawyers – members of the HCJ – in early May 2023, MPs were neither given the opportunity nor the possibility to directly elect these members during the reporting period. https://europeanwesternbalkans.rs/komisija-izabrala-istaknute-pravnike-za-visoke-savete-sudstva-i-tuzilastva/
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The HJC should conduct a new systematisation analysis to determine the number of judges in accordance with the judicial system's needs so that all cases, including current delays, can be resolved within a reasonable timeframe.
The analysis has not been published. The HCJ continues to announce public competitions for the selection of judges and adopts decisions on their appointment and on the required number of judges – without basing these decisions on the findings or data from the mentioned analysis.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The HJC and the courts should conduct an analysis of the proceedings in cases involving criminal acts related to corruption, which last an extremely long time or end with symbolic sanctions, and present to the public the reasons for such a situation.
The HCJ's official website does not contain any publicly available analysis, as referenced, or any information indicating that such an analysis is in preparation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The ministry and the government should ensure the right to compensation for victims of corruption, in accordance with the Council of Europe’s civil law convention, which Serbia ratified.
There is no publicly available information indicating that any activity foreseen by the Action Plan for the Implementation of the National Strategy for the realisation of the rights of victims and witnesses of criminal offences in the Republic of Serbia for the period 2020-2025 was undertaken during the reporting period (2023-2025), specifically regarding activities scheduled for the second quarter of 2024. At the same time, the analysed period does not include the timeframe for activities planned for the fourth quarter of 2024.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should amend the legislation that regulates the work of the HCP to provide more independence and responsibility for the HCP by including that the selection process of so-called prominent lawyers happens in such a way that they are elected directly by MPs and not by the special commission after MPs fail to exercise their powers.
The parliament has not adopted a law regulating the procedure for the election of prominent lawyers to the HCP.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The HPC should improve the system of accountability of prosecutors by providing a transparent system of decision-making on citizens’ complaints, decision-making on prosecutors’ reports due to illegal influence and evaluation of public prosecutors.
The annual activity report contains data on handling citizens’ complaints, decisions on prosecutors’ reports of unlawful influence, and evaluation of public prosecutors. As of 30 September 2024, the most recently published activity report is for 2022 and is still titled ’Activity Report of the State Prosecutorial Council’. Similarly, the most recent publicly available activity report of the State Prosecutorial Council's disciplinary prosecutor is the ’Activity Report for 2017’.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
All prosecution offices should provide a greater degree of proactive transparency, without requiring requests for free access to information; in particular, increase the amount of information on their websites for which there is public interest or about cases for which suspicions of corruption were publicly expressed in the media available and publish clear instructions (on their websites and premises) for persons who want to report corruption: what they should do, what to expect during the procedure, when they can expect information about the course of the procedure, and so on.
All public prosecution offices, from the largest – such as the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Belgrade – to the smallest, such as the Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office in Negotin, use standardised websites that contain identical sections with different specific data on the work of each office. Among the analysed websites, there has been an increase in the number of press releases informing the public about activities undertaken by the prosecution to combat crime. However, in most cases, these press releases concern actions taken against suspects of so-called conventional criminal offences – such as crimes against life and limb, property offences etc. Only one press release, published by the Higher Public Prosecutor’s Office in Niš, addressed a so-called corruption-related offence – abuse of official position in the context of public procurement. Likewise, the abovementioned standardized websites do not contain a dedicated section with information or guidance for individuals who want to report corruption – such as what steps to take, what to expect during the procedure, and when to expect updates on the case.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The Government should abandon the practice of concluding interstate agreements or proposing special laws aimed at circumventing public procurement regulations.
The Government of Serbia has continued with the practice of adopting special laws which hinder the public procurement system. In late 2023, the National Assembly adopted the Law for EXPO 2027, which repeals the Law on Public Procurement, as well as certain provisions of other regulations (on expropriation, planning and construction). This law envisages the establishment of several state-owned companies, which will have the status of investors and which do not apply the provisions of the law governing public procurement. The works for the construction of the exhibition space for EXPO 2027, facilities for the accommodation of participants and visitors, the National Stadium and supporting infrastructure will be contracted without the application of the Law on Public Procurement, which creates a great risk that the costs will be higher than they would have been under conditions that would exist with the full competition.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The Law on Whistleblower Protection should be amended in order to appropriately penalize all forms of retaliation towards whistleblowers and to place one body in charge of general and comprehensive oversight of the law’s implementation. Additionally, the Ministry of Justice should analyse the effectiveness of law enforcement and the transparency of other bodies in this area. The monitoring shouldn’t focus only on the protection granted to the whistleblowers, but also on the follow-up actions on information provided by them.
There has been no information that the Ministry of Justice is working on amending the Law on Whistleblower Protection or monitoring the effectiveness of law enforcement and transparency of other state bodies in this area.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The Government should abandon the practice of appointing civil servants to positions, and the Administrative Court should annul the previous illegal decisions in this regard.
The Government still has a widespread practice of appointing civil servants in acting positions. https://www.srbija.gov.rs/dokument/780202/kadrovska-resenja-za-vreme-mandata-vlade-republike-srbije-izabrane-2-maja-2024-godine.php
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The police should take proactive measures to prevent information leaks and respond swiftly when their integrity is questioned by the media to safeguard the integrity of the police service and maintain public trust. This includes strengthening information security (safeguarding servers, rooms, and entrances and controlling access to ensure the protection of sensitive information from unauthorised access or damage) and conducting swift and thorough investigations when allegations arise in the media. And the police should always provide clear and factual information to address any doubts or concerns raised.
No information indicates that the police have taken any normative steps to implement this recommendation. In practice, tabloids continue to publish police data and information from ongoing investigations. http://mup.gov.rs/wps/portal/sr/aktuelno/saopstenja
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The internal control sector should assess in an annual report the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures, such as asset declarations and integrity tests, in enhancing police integrity.
The annual report does not include assessments of the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures, nor does it contain data on the assets of Ministry of Interior personnel or the results of integrity tests. http://prezentacije.mup.gov.rs/sukp/rezultati/Izvestaj_2023_SUK.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should provide a permanent and adequate space for the ombudsperson by executing the existing decision or making a new decision on the allocation of space for permanent use.
The Ombudsperson continues to operate from temporarily allocated premises at Deligradska 16 in Belgrade. Moreover, no decision has been published on the official website of the Government of the Republic of Serbia allocating new premises for permanent use. https://www.ombudsman.rs/index.php/kontakt
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The ombudsperson should undertake all necessary measures and activities to improve its human resources by filling vacant positions in the professional service.
The situation has worsened and there are now three fewer employees compared to the April-September period (70). As of December 31, 2024, there are a total of 67 civil servants and deputies employed in the Professional Service of the Protector of Citizens, which is three civil servants less compared to the previous breakdown, namely: two civil servants in position, five acting civil servants in position, 57 civil servants in executive positions and three deputies. Out of the mentioned number, five civil servants are employed for a certain period of time. There are 56 civil servants with higher education, 11 civil servants and officials with secondary education, 54 employees are women and 13 are men. https://www.ombudsman.rs/attachments/article/8177/Редован Годишњи извештај Заштитника грађана за 2024. годину љ.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should provide an effective and publicly available mechanism for monitoring the implementation of the ombudsperson’s recommendations and the recommendations of the parliamentary committee in connection with the ombudsperson’s annual report. That mechanism should ensure the prescription of sanctions for non-reporting on the implementation of recommendations and for unjustified non-implementation of recommendations.
Parliament has not provided an effective mechanism to monitor whether and how the Ombudsperson’s recommendations are being implemented. Moreover, as of that date, the parliament had not yet considered the Ombudsperson’s 2023 annual report, which is available on the Ombudsperson’s official website under the section ’Reports’ but not on the parliament's official website.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should prepare and parliament should adopt amendments to the Law on the Ombudsperson to abolish the monopoly of political parties nominating candidates, give full transparency to the election process that enables all candidates to present their work programmes, ensure equal participation of CSOs in the election process, and select the best candidates based on clear, well-known and measurable criteria.
The parliament has not adopted a law regulating the election procedure of the Ombudsperson in accordance with the recommendation, nor is such draft law currently under parliamentary procedure. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/akti/zakoni-u-proceduri/zakoni-u-proceduri.10.1037.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should amend its rules of procedure and other relevant acts to oblige legislators to seek the agency’s opinion on norms that could impact corruption or anti-corruption efforts, and to provide a comprehensive analysis of potential risks in the explanatory note. This should increase the number of acts on which the agency gives an opinion on the risks of corruption.
There is no indication that the Government plans to amend its rules of procedure and other relevant acts to oblige legislators to seek the agency’s opinion. Furthermore, there are no indicators showing that the Agency has increased the number of acts on which it provides an opinion regarding the risks of corruption. https://acas.rs/cyr/opinions/all
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliamentary committees should be obliged by parliamentary rules of procedure to consider the agency’s analyses of draft legislation and should proactively seek the agency’s support in drafting amendments.
There is no indication that the Parliament plans to amend its rules of procedure to fulfil this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament needs to amend the ACA Law to require the agency to publish its opinions and explain how the regulations' proponents acted according to the agency’s opinion within a legally mandated deadline.
There is no indication that the Parliament plans to amend the Law on the ACA to make it mandatory for the agency to publish its opinions. The Law on the ACA does not forbid ACA to publish its opinion, so, the agency can publish all of the opinions, but there is no will.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The agency should proactively publish on its website opinions given to officials regarding the performance of other functions or jobs and other matters without revealing personal data.
The Law on the ACA does not forbid ACA to publish its opinions, so, the agency can publish all of the opinions, but there is no will.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The agency should make all its registers more user-friendly (for example, with the possibility to sort data from asset declarations) and clarify to what extent they are accurate. The agency should also link all public records, or their parts, managed by the agency for an easier search of data.
There are no indications that the agency plans to technically improve the registers it maintains to facilitate user searches or include links.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament needs to amend the Law on the Prevention of Corruption: to make it mandatory for public officials to share in their published asset declarations the assets of public officials’ firms such as shares in another company and real estate and information about income from allowed private resources; to set a legally prescribed minimum number of controls and minimum content for the control of asset declarations that the agency has to perform and provide sufficient powers and resources for such controls (for example, every official to be checked within four years, or the development of methodologies for risk assessment).
There are no indications that amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption are being prepared in order to meet this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Parliament should promptly discuss the agency’s reports and call for responsible elected officials when problems identified in previous year’s reports from the agency are still unresolved.
Parliament does not discuss the agency’s reports and recommendations. The reports appear on the parliamentary agenda months after being submitted and are usually only acknowledged through the adoption of a Conclusion. So far, there has been no parliamentary practice of analysing or monitoring the implementation of the agency’s recommendations.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should propose, and parliament should adopt amendments to the Law on Financing Political Activities to remove identified weaknesses in the system, and clearly set out the responsibilities of the Agency for Prevention of Corruption and other authorities in the process of control of political activities and political entities, and to precisely determine obligations and mechanisms for transparent financing of political entities, at least one year prior to next election. The law should establish thresholds for the cost of the election campaign per one electoral list/presidential candidate; the law should redefine the purpose of budget subsidies and their distribution in a way that funds for campaigns are distributed before elections, while the funds for regular party financing may not be used to finance election campaigns; the law should stipulate the obligation of the Agency for Prevention of Corruption in the control of political parties, related to deadlines, transparency and content of the control reports; the law should more precisely regulate the purpose of tax administration control of party’s donors, in order to prevent abuse; transparency of financing during the campaign should be regulated by introducing a system of transparent accounts that would enable the timely publishing of political parties’ incomes and expenditures; the law should strengthen regulation of third-party campaigning and financing of activities by candidates and explicitly prohibit all forms of abuse of public assets for the campaign purposes.
Although a Working Group for the improvement of electoral conditions, formed in April 2024, consisting of members of Parliament representing parliamentary groups, representatives of national minority political parties without parliamentary groups, and representatives of three civil society organisations, with the aim of improving electoral conditions in line with the ODIHR recommendations, met several times and was actively engaged in proposing amendments to the Law, no results were achieved due to the obstruction of group members representing the authorities, which led to a complete standstill in the working group's activities. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/Prvi_sastanak__Radne_grupe_za_unapre%C4%91enje_izbornog_procesa.48936.941.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should propose and parliament should adopt amendments to other laws to restrict opportunities for the abuse of public office and resources to promote parties in election campaigns. These amendments could include a ban on the distribution of extraordinary social benefits during the campaign, restrictions on new employment in the public sector during the campaign, and restrictions on public officials’ promotional activities during the campaign.
There are no indications that the Government is preparing a draft to amend the law in order to implement this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and parliament should amend the criminal offence set in the Law on Financing of Political Activities to criminalise threats to political party service providers and adequately punish all types of retribution towards both party donors and service providers.
Although a Working Group for the improvement of electoral conditions, formed in April 2024, consisting of members of Parliament representing parliamentary groups, representatives of national minority political parties without parliamentary groups, and representatives of three civil society organisations, with the aim of improving electoral conditions in line with the ODIHR recommendations, met several times and was actively engaged in proposing amendments to the Law, no results were achieved due to the obstruction of group members representing the authorities, which led to a complete standstill in the working group's activities. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/Prvi_sastanak__Radne_grupe_za_unapre%C4%91enje_izbornog_procesa.48936.941.html
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The Agency for Prevention of Corruption shall enforce adequate sanctions instead of issuing warning measures when a political party repeats a law violation.
Following reports by civil society organizations regarding violations of electoral legislation, the Agency generally issues warnings and cautionary measures. However, there is no available data indicating that the Agency initiated misdemeanour proceedings against entities that violated the law. The Agency’s practice suggests a lack of willingness to implement this recommendation. https://www.acas.rs/storage/page_files/Izve%C5%A1taj o radu za 2023. godinu Agencije za spre%C4%8Davanje korupcije.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The Agency for Prevention of Corruption shall publish the outcomes of initiated proceedings (decision of public prosecutor, criminal or misdemeanour court).
The Agency only publishes statistics in its annual reports. It does not publish on its website the decisions of misdemeanour courts in cases initiated by the Agency, nor does it provide information about the actions taken by public prosecutors based on reports or notifications submitted by the Agency
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and parliament should respect media strategy and complete the legislative process by amending newly adopted laws, especially regarding media ownership and mechanisms for protecting pluralism by: respecting media freedom and establishing legal guarantees for it; ensuring that state ownership will not jeopardise the diversity of media content and removing provisions that allow state-owned companies like Telekom Srbija to own media; enabling the visibility of all TV channels to all citizens starting at least with awarding the fifth media service licence with national frequency to one of the independent broadcasters; securing a completely independent functioning of the regulatory body, including: provisions that enable judicial and civil control of REM’s actions following complaints from citizens and organisations; introducing provisions that prescribe the criteria and methodology on the basis of which REM monitors media reporting during election campaigns in order to avoid abuse of state institutions and functions; removing all forms of “covert control” through the biased use of budget money in project financing.
The media strategy is not being implemented. Two years after the public call was announced, the fifth national television frequency has still not been awarded (according to Serbian law, there should be five national frequencies). REM did not publish a report on the monitoring of programs during the election campaign for the December 2023 elections, even though the report was adopted at a REM Council session in July 2024, seven months after the elections took place. After amendments to the laws on public information and electronic media were passed in October 2023, despite strong objections from media experts, Telekom was given the possibility to become a media owner. According to media reports, Telekom is acquiring Kurir and other media outlets under the Mondo INC group. (Telekom Srbija a.d. is a Serbian telecommunications operator, which already owns various media operations ranging from entertainment and sports to Euronews Serbia and Bloomberg Adria. The legal changes have enabled it to purchase additional specialized and informational channels. Even though the newly adopted (October 2023). The law on Electronic Media stipulated the election of the new REM Council by November 2024; this process was stalled by the representatives of the authorities and was initiated only after the expiration of the mandate of the last Council. The process was marked by controversies, pressure on independent candidates, and the withdrawal of a large number of candidates, which has left REM functioning without a Council for the past five months. https://n1info.rs/vesti/podsecanje-na-zamrznuti-konkurs-saveta-rem-a-peta-frekvencija-nedosanjani-san/; https://www.raskrikavanje.rs/page.php?id=Vazni-medijski-trenuci-2023--iz-perspektive-Raskrikavanja-1272; https://www.cenzolovka.rs/trziste/telekom-i-dalje-cuti-o-kupovini-kurira-a-zezelj-kaze-greska-je-sto-pitate-nas-ne-znamo-sta-oni-planiraju/; https://n1info.rs/vesti/koliko-telekom-ima-televizija/
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and parliament should finally adopt the Law on Public Media Services, in line with the media strategy, and not only periodically change the provisions that continuously extend the payment of the subscription.
At the first extraordinary session of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia in its 14th convocation, held on 23 July 2024, the Assembly adopted the law on Amendments to the Law on the Temporary Regulation of the Method of Collecting the Public Media Service Fee. These amendments did not fulfil the provisions of the Media Strategy, nor did they include other changes to the Law. http://www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/archive/files/cir/pdf/zakoni/14_saziv/1618-24.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should enforce the independence and efficiency of judicial institutions in line with the media strategy and with the adoption of the action plan for 2023-2025, in the protection of journalists and media freedom (attacks, lawsuits, court proceedings or indictments) by: adopting binding rules for prosecutors to take immediate measures in cases of violence against journalists; ensuring the conditions for the fast and regular implementation of these measures.
Attacks and lawsuits against journalists show a worsening trend. The latest decision of the prosecutor was to dismiss the criminal complaint, in spite of a video recording clearly showing the journalist being punched in the face, after nearly 11 months of a preliminary investigation. From 12 June to 2 July 2024, a public debate was held on the 2024-2025 Action Plan for the Media Strategy, but the document was not adopted. The work on this Action plan is still in progress. https://www.bazenuns.rs/srpski/napadi-na-novinare; https://nuns.rs/nuns-udaranje-novinara-nije-incident-vec-ozbiljno-krivicno-delo-i-napad-na-slobodu-medija/; https://mit.gov.rs/vest/6072/javna-rasprava-o-nacrtu-akcionog-plana-za-pracenje-sprovodjenja-strategije-razvoja-sistema-javnog-informisanja-u-republici-srbiji-za-period-2020-2025-godina-u-periodu-2024-2025-godina.php
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
CSOs should expand their activity in fighting corruption to regional, national and local levels and initiate and strengthen cooperation with interested parties from CSOs whose primary areas of interest are not anti-corruption, the business sector and state bodies.
In the past several years, there has been no emergence of new coalitions or programmes related to anti-corruption efforts within the scope of CSOs’ work.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should ensure a more transparent distribution of budget funds for CSO programmes of public interest and more effective supervision over implementing such programmes.
According to BIRN’s research, the practice of non-transparent allocation of state funds to CSOs has continued. There is no available information indicating that any form of oversight exists over the implementation of programmes by ministries allocating funds to civil society organisations. Additionally, reports on the implementation of such calls for proposals are not publicly available in the ministries distributing the funds. Furthermore, one of the organizations that are financed solely from public funds made payments to volunteers in the call centre of the ruling political party during 2023. election campaign. https://birn.rs/nastavlja-se-dodeljivanje-miliona-fantomskim-organizacijama/; https://koms.rs/2024/08/novi-milioni-za-nevidljive-aktivnosti-cerob-a/
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and parliament should amend tax regulations to enable more significant resources for CSOs for policy-making, advocacy, and oversight of public authorities, and to stimulate corporate philanthropy for CSOs dealing with these issues.
There is no indication that the government and parliament plan to amend tax regulations to enable more significant resources for CSOs for policy-making advocacy and oversight of public authorities and to stimulate corporate philanthropy for CSOs dealing with these issues.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
Тhe government should establish a centralised coordination unit to monitor, control and supervise state-owned enterprises, and the data from that system should be available to the public.
The Law on the Management of State-Owned Enterprises, adopted in 2023, stipulates that a Coordination Body should be established by a by-law to monitor, control, and supervise state-owned enterprises and that the decisions of this body should be publicly available. A review of the website of the Ministry of Economy, which is responsible for adopting this by-law, shows that the Coordination Body has not been established. Furthermore, there are no media reports mentioning this body, which is required by law. https://pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/eli/rep/sgrs/skupstina/zakon/2023/76/2/reg
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should ensure greater independence in business operations, especially from political influence, by ending the practice of appointing acting directors and announcing competitions for the selection of directors of public companies for all companies managed by legal or illegal (expired mandate) acting directors. After the start of the implementation of the Law on the Management of Companies Owned by the Republic of Serbia, legality should be ensured by the representative state supervisory boards and state representatives in shareholders’ assemblies.
There is no information that the Government announced any public competitions for the selection of directors during the observed period. On the contrary, it continued appointing acting directors. Although the law stipulates that this status may last no longer than one year, the directors of three public enterprises in Niš and one institution have remained in acting status for significantly longer. Transparency Serbia regularly publishes reviews of the situation in public companies regarding the status of directors. https://transparentnost.org.rs/images/dokumenti_uz_vesti/Konkursi_vd_stanje_izbordirektora-_republička_JP_i_preduzeća_u_državnom_vlasništvu_17._maj_2024.pdf
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and the assembly should prepare and adopt amendments to the Law on the Prevention of Corruption to invalidate the authentic interpretation of the definition of the term public functionary and ensure that directors, acting directors, supervisory board members and shareholder meetings of state-owned enterprises have the status of public officials and are subject to asset and income verification and conflict of interest regulation.
There are no indications that the Government and the National Assembly are preparing or planning to adopt amendments to the Law on the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government and the assembly should prepare and adopt amendments to the Law on Public Enterprises and the Law on the Management of Companies Owned by the Republic of Serbia to reduce the possibility of abusing these companies' resources for political promotion or goals unrelated to the company’s field of work.
There are no indications that the Government and the National Assembly are preparing or planning to adopt amendments to the Law on Public Enterprises and the Law on the Management of Companies Owned by the Republic of Serbia.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
Not implemented
The government should specify, to the extent possible, the criteria for determining whether directors performed their duties unprofessionally and negligently and whether there was a (significant) deviation from the achievement of the basic goals of work for the public company, that is, from its business plan.
There are no indications that the Government is preparing to take any steps towards fulfilling this recommendation.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
No data
The government and the National Assembly need to change the entire legal framework related to the business in order to promote integrity in the sector by: introducing transparent supervision over its implementation, starting with prescribing obligatory values and a code of conduct, introducing integrity policies, resources and systems, integrity risk management; ensuring the promotion of integrity in the private sector while preventing, detecting and managing fraud and corruption, starting with strengthening the laws that regulate public procurement by “closing” the legal loopholes that the government uses to rig the tenders; in other words, the government should cease the practice of using an exception based on interstate agreements for all big jobs; discontinuing the dependence of businesses on their connections with those in power, in particular when it comes to small enterprises at the local level and tenders by: a) selecting projects based on identified needs and public interest; b) estimating costs and benefits based on evidence; c) having the SAI audit regularly.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
No data
The chamber of commerce and other company associations should strengthen the role of the private sector in preventing corruption by: introducing incentives and supporting companies in the sector’s anti-corruption activities and their relations with CSOs and state bodies; promoting the principles of good governance, particularly the rule of law, transparency, accountability and integrity through training provided by experts and using practical examples of good practices; designing the proper conduct of a risk assessment that companies could apply.
Last update 28 March 2025
-
No data
Companies must provide secure and accessible channels for whistleblowers by setting up precise, safe and diversified reporting mechanisms on suspected corruption, including reporting in person, by designated email address, by an online platform such as an intranet or external channel if no internal one is available or safe; the possibility of anonymous reporting; » ensuring the reporting process’s confidentiality (of the content and the whistleblower) and defining what “confidentiality” means; supporting and protecting reporting persons and preventing retaliation against them.
Last update 28 March 2025