The “Target-Fortress” (Tvrdina) case: Massive illegal surveillance scandal exposed in North Macedonia
- North Macedonia
The “Target-Fortress” (Tvrdina) case: Massive illegal surveillance scandal exposed in North Macedonia
- Case Date(s)
- 06/2017
- Case Updated
- 10/2024
Case Summary
Phase
1st instance procedureOffence
- Abuse of functions
- Other
Sector
- Telecommunication, computer programming, consulting, computing infrastructure, and other information service activities
- Administrative and support service activities
- Public administration and defense; compulsory social security
Involved people
- Politically exposed
- Yes
- — Abuse of functions
- — Criminal association
- — Receiving an unlawful influence award
- Politically exposed
- Yes
- — Abuse of functions
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- — Criminal association
- — Forgery and falsification of an official document
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- — Falsification of an official document
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- — Criminal association
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- — Falsification of an official document
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- — Criminal association
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- — Criminal association
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- — Criminal association
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Abuse of functions
- — Criminal association
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Falsification of an official document
- Politically exposed
- No
- — Aiding a perpetrator after the commission of a crime
The "Target-Tvrdina" (Target-Fortress) case is the most prominent investigation undertaken by North Macedonia's Special Prosecution Office, aimed at identifying those responsible for a mass illegal wiretapping scandal. Between 2008 and 2015, over 20,000 citizens were unlawfully surveilled by high-ranking officials within the Administration for Security and Counterintelligence. The investigations and proceedings addressed both the illegal wiretapping itself and efforts to cover up the operation after the scandal broke. Although convictions were handed down in 2021, the Appellate Court annulled the initial ruling and ordered a retrial. In 2023, the statute of limitations expired on the leading charges. The retrial is ongoing, limited to charges not affected by the statute of limitations.
"Target-Tvrdina" (Target-Fortress) is arguably the most prominent case launched by North Macedonia's Special Prosecution Office (SPO). It addresses the large-scale illegal wiretapping scandal in which over 20,000 citizens were unlawfully surveilled by senior operatives of the Administration for Security and Counterintelligence (UBK). The scandal prompted two investigations — one into the wiretapping itself, and the other into the destruction of surveillance equipment to conceal the affair. In 2017, these cases were merged into one indictment. While the first-instance court convicted the defendants, the Appellate Court annulled the verdict and ordered a retrial. However, due to amendments to the Criminal Code in 2023, key charges fell within the statute of limitations, leaving justice unfulfilled.
The wiretapping scandal broke in February 2015 when the opposition Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) party began releasing covertly recorded tapes implicating officials of the government, at the time led by the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization – Democratic Party for Macedonian National Unity (VMRO-DPMNE), in mass illegal surveillance and other state abuses. The scandal produced a prolonged political crisis in North Macedonia, prompting the European Union to broker an inter-party agreement. As part of that deal, a special prosecution was established in September 2015 to investigate the claims of illegal surveillance.
On 30 March 2016, the Special Prosecution Office announced an investigation, codenamed "Fortress", into the illegal destruction of two communication surveillance systems in 2015, allegedly used for the unauthorized wiretapping. The destruction of the communications systems was intended to cover up the operation run by the counterintelligence administration.
According to the prosecution, in February 2015, Sašo Mijalkov, former director of the counterintelligence agency, ordered Goran Grujevski, then head of the administration’s fifth directorate, to destroy two surveillance systems under the pretext that they were outdated. Grujevski, alongside Toni Jakimovski, head of the counterintelligence administration’s coordination department, formed a commission to execute the destruction. This operation was approved by former interior minister Gordana Jankuloska. The systems were first compressed and then shredded, with the entire process monitored and documented by the accused. To conceal the illegality of the destruction, documents were fabricated and official records were manipulated to backdate the destruction to 2014. Measures to prevent evidence discovery included threats to whistleblowers. The destruction caused an estimated financial loss to the state budget of 87,261,058.50 denars (approximately €10 million).
On 18 November 2016, the Special Prosecution Office launched another investigation, codenamed "Target", to uncover the perpetrators, methods and motives behind the illegal wiretapping. The investigation accused ten employees of the counterintelligence agency, including former director Sašo Mijalkov who allegedly co-directed the entire operation.
Evidence revealed that between 2008 and 2015, the agency wiretapped at least 4,286 phone numbers without court authorization. An additional 1,541 numbers were monitored either before authorization was granted or after it expired. Overall, the special prosecution estimated more than 20,000 phone numbers were monitored, including those targeted for illegal surveillance and people who spoke with the monitored individuals. Key members of the operation often added phone numbers without court approval and listened to communications of politicians, businesspeople, journalists and others. Group leaders could also access the system remotely. The surveillance mostly targeted ministers and officials from the then ruling VMRO-DPMNE and Democratic Union for Integration (DUI) parties. According to the special prosecution, the illegal wiretapping continued even after the scandal was exposed.
The two investigations were eventually merged into a single case named "Target-Fortress". On 30 June 2017, the special prosecution filed an indictment against 12 individuals. The prosecution claimed that Mijalkov, the primary defendant, established a criminal organisation to conduct large-scale illegal surveillance for personal gain. Other defendants included former minister Gordana Jankuloska and former employees of the Administration for Security and Counterintelligence agency Goran Grujevski, Nikola Boskovski, Nadica Nikolić, Toni Jakimovski, Vladimir Varelov, Marijan Sumulikovski, Silvana Zlatova, Vasil Isakovski, Valentina Simonoska and Elena Dzilanova. They faced several charges including criminal association, abuse of official position and forgery of official documents.
On 18 July 2017, the Skopje Criminal Court ordered the detention of Grujevski and Boskovski, both of whom fled but were arrested in Greece in October 2017.
Meanwhile, in May 2017, separate court proceedings, codenamed "Fortress 2", were initiated to prosecute seven defendants, including Grujevski, accused of falsifying and destroying official documents pertaining to the dismantled surveillance equipment. On 8 November 2017, all defendants in the "Fortress 2" trial were found guilty of forgery. Grujevski was sentenced in absentia to 18 months, while the others received suspended sentences.
On 17 November 2017, before the main "Target-Fortress" trial began, defendant Dzilanova admitted her guilt and was sentenced to a six-month suspended prison term in a separate criminal procedure.
The main "Target-Fortress" trial, scheduled for December 2017, was delayed pending a ruling from the Greek Supreme Court on North Macedonia's extradition request for Grujevski and Boskovski. In May 2018, Greece rejected the request. Meanwhile, on 10 April 2018, the Court of Appeals annulled Grujevski's guilty verdict in the "Fortress 2" case and ordered a retrial in absentia.
During the main "Target-Fortress" trial, which started in 2018, the defendants maintained their innocence (see here and here), while the prosecution argued that the evidence was incriminating and requested the maximum penalties for the leading defendants.
In November 2019, in the "Fortress 2" retrial, Grujevski was again sentenced in absentia to 18 months.
On 26 February 2021, the Skopje Basic Criminal Court issued a first-instance verdict in the "Target-Fortress" case, convicting 11 defendants. Mijalkov received a 12-year prison sentence, while Grujevski and Boskovski were each sentenced to 15 years. Jakimovski received six years, Nikolić three years and former minister Jankuloska received four years. The other defendants received suspended two-year sentences. Judge Vladimir Tufegdzic stated that the court was certain the mass illegal wiretapping was conducted using the counterintelligence agency’s surveillance equipment and was organized by Mijalkov.
However, on 16 December 2022, the Skopje Court of Appeals annulled the first-instance verdict and ordered a retrial in the Basic Criminal Court, citing significant procedural violations during the initial trial.
The retrial began in February 2023. Nonetheless, in September 2023, amendments to the Criminal Code reduced penalties for certain offenses, leading to the faster expiration of the statute of limitations. As a result, in October 2023, the court stopped criminal proceedings against six of the defendants (Grujevski, Mijalkov, Nikolić, Varelov, Shumulikoski and Isakovski), due to expiration of the statute of limitations on charges of criminal association and abuse of official position. Only those defendants charged with the destruction of equipment remained subject to trial.
The retrial of the case is underway at the time of writing, with court hearings in progress.
On January 13, 2025, the Basic Criminal Court delivered the following verdict: For abuse of official position and falsification of documents related to the destruction of communication monitoring systems in UBK, the court declared the accused Toni Jakimovski and Valentina Simonovska, who were present in court, guilty, as well as Goran Grujevski and Nikola Boskoski, former intelligence officers who fled to Greece, and were tried in absentia.
For abuse of official position and falsification of documents, Toni Jakimovski was sentenced to a single prison term of three years, which includes time spent in detention. Goran Grujevski was sentenced to a single prison term of 14.5 years, and Nikola Boskoski to a single prison term of 9 years and 10 months. Jakimovski and Boskoski are required to compensate for the damages within three months.
The accused Valentina Simonovska received a conditional sentence with a two-year prison term, provided she does not commit another crime within five years. Former Interior Minister Gordana Jankulovska was acquitted, as the prosecution failed to prove the charges during the trial. Previously, the case against the former head of the secret service, Sasho Mijalkov, was dismissed due to changes in the Criminal Code.
The "Target-Fortress" case exposed severe abuses within the state security system, including violations of fundamental rights. It also highlighted how top officials exploited state surveillance equipment for personal gain at the expense of public funds. Although the public remains frustrated by a perceived lack of justice, Mijalkov, the primary suspect, and former minister Jankulovska both served prison sentences for convictions in other special prosecution cases. Gruevski, however, widely believed to have orchestrated the scheme, was never charged for the illegal wiretapping. Finally, the case illustrates how amendments to the Criminal Code have hindered corruption prosecutions in North Macedonia, eroding public trust in state institutions and judicial reforms. This underscores the need for public scrutiny and action against laws that could facilitate corruption.
Further details
- JURISDICTION/COURT
Basic Criminal Court Skopje;
Special Prosecutor’s Office (SPO) of the Republic of North Macedonia;
Skopje Court of Appeals;
Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office for Prosecution of Organized Crime and Corruption.
- LAWS (ALLEGEDLY) BREACHED
Criminal Code of North Macedonia (Abuse of official position and authority, Article 353, paragraph 2 and 5, in conjunction with paragraph 1; Accepting a reward for unlawful influence, Article 359; Forgery of an official document, Article 361, paragraph 1 and 2; Aiding a perpetrator after the commission of a crime, Article 365, paragraph 2 in conjunction with paragraph 1; Criminal association, Article 394 paragraph 1; Participation in a criminal organization, Article 394, paragraph 2)
- FINAL SANCTION OR MEASURE
For abuse of official position and falsification of documents related to the destruction of communication monitoring systems in UBK, the court declared the accused Toni Jakimovski and Valentina Simonovska, who were present in court, guilty, as well as Goran Grujevski and Nikola Boskoski, former intelligence officers who fled to Greece, and were tried in absentia.
For abuse of official position and falsification of documents, Toni Jakimovski was sentenced to a single prison term of three years, which includes time spent in detention. Goran Grujevski was sentenced to a single prison term of 14.5 years, and Nikola Boskoski to a single prison term of 9 years and 10 months. Jakimovski and Boskoski are required to compensate for the damages within three months.
The accused Valentina Simonovska received a conditional sentence with a two-year prison term, provided she does not commit another crime within five years. Former Interior Minister Gordana Jankulovska was acquitted, as the prosecution failed to prove the charges during the trial. Previously, the case against the former head of the secret service, Sasho Mijalkov, was dismissed due to changes in the Criminal Code.
- UNCOVERING METHOD
Whistleblower: Zvonko Kostovski, an employee of the Administration for Security and Counterintelligence (UBK), transferred the illegally recorded conversations by the UBK to CDs and USB sticks, which he handed over to Gjorgji Lazarevski. Lazarevski, in turn, passed the intercepted communications to Zoran Verusevski, who eventually delivered them to Zoran Zaev. Then, in February 2015, Zaev began publicly releasing the incriminating tapes. On 30 December 2015, Zaev submitted the recordings to the Special Prosecutor’s Office.
- PROSECUTOR
Prosecutor Lenče Ristovska;
Prosecutor Trajche Pelivanov;
Prosecutor Artan Ajro.
- JUDGE
Judicial Council in first-instance Target-Fortress trial
Judge Dzeneta Begtović (first presiding judge)
Vladimir Tufegdzić (second presiding judge) and three jurors
Fortress 2 trial: Judge Lidija Petrovska (first trial)
Judge Elena Ilievska Josifović (retrial)
Judge Ilija Trpkov
- DEFENCE COUNSEL
Ljubomir Shvrgovski (representing Toni Jakimovski and Sašo Mijalkov),
Mile Petrovski (representing Sašo Mijalkov),
Petar Vasilev (representing Goran Grujevski, Nikola Boskoski and Sašo Mijalkov),
Vlatko Ilievski (representing Gordana Jankulovska).
SOCIAL HARM ON SDGs
16 Peace, justice and strong institutions
When the Fortress investigation began, the Special Prosecution Office estimated that the destruction of surveillance equipment in order to erase evidence of the crime resulted in a financial loss to the state budget of 87,261,058.50 denars (approximately €10 million). However, in the first-instance verdict, the court ordered defendants Jankuloska, Grujevski, Jakimovski and Boskovski to pay €1.4 million in damages for the destroyed equipment. This discrepancy raises questions about the actual quantified harm caused by the destruction of the equipment.
The special prosecution also highlighted that the prolonged criminal proceedings resulted in significant costs borne by the state. These included legal fees for the defendants, expenses related to expert examinations and other procedural costs. Additionally, compensation for citizens who were victims of the illegal wiretapping will also be a financial burden on the state.
Finally, the basic freedoms and rights of citizens were violated by the illegal wiretapping. These actions undermined trust in institutions, in the Ministry of Interior and in the government because the accused were high-ranking politicians in the then-ruling party.
Disclaimer
Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this database. All information is believed to be correct as of 10/2024. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts.
Additional Material
-
Press release Link prizma.mk/sluchajot-target-tvrdina-na-brza-pruga/The Target Fortress Case on a High-Speed Rail
-
Press release Link prizma.mk/vkupno-55-godini-zatvor-vo-target-tvrdina/A Total of 55 Years in Prison at Target Fortress
-
Press release Link www.slobodnaevropa.mk/a/afera-prislushuvanje-obvinetite-na-sloboda-drzhavata-kje-obeshtetuva-/32661925.htmlWiretapping Affair – Defendants at large, will the state indemnify?
-
Press release Link balkaninsight.com/2016/03/30/macedonia-police-suspected-of-mass-illegal-surveillance-scheme-03-30-2016/Macedonia Police ‘Destroyed Evidence of Illegal Wiretaps’
-
Press release Link balkaninsight.com/2018/01/05/greece-grants-extradition-for-macedonia-wiretapping-scandal-suspects-01-05-2018/Greece Agrees to Extradite Macedonian Wiretap Suspects
-
Press release Link balkaninsight.com/en/article/macedonia-s-prosecution-seeks-gruevski-s-arrest-06-29-2017Macedonia Prosecution Seeks Ex-PM Gruevski’s Arrest
-
Press release Link balkaninsight.com/2016/11/18/macedonia-s-sjo-says-secret-police-ran-illegal-wiretapping-11-18-2016/Macedonia’s SJO Says Secret Police Ran Illegal Wiretapping
Contribute to this case
Do you have additional information, updates or relevant insights about this case? You can help by sharing new developments or legal updates on the case, providing verified sources that offer more context or evidence or highlighting public reactions or advocacy efforts related to the case.
Do you know of a corruption case that has been reported in the media or by civil society, or is already in the judicial process but is not receiving enough attention? Help us put a spotlight on key corruption cases in your country, and we will review your suggestion and consider adding it to the corruption database.
Please only suggest cases that have already been reported by the media or civil society or cases that are in some stage of the law enforcement or judicial process. If you would like to report a new corruption case, please reach out to our Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres in your country or email us.