Skip to main content
Corruption cases with social impact in the Western Balkans and Turkey

Falsification of documents and refusal to submit asset declaration by Judge Gjoni

Back to Case Index
  • Albania

Falsification of documents and refusal to submit asset declaration by Judge Gjoni

Case Summary

Phase

Investigation

Sector

  • Professional, scientific, and technical activities

On 2 May 2014, the Prosecutor’s Office initiated criminal proceedings no. 1098 against Gjin Gjoni, judge of the Tirana Court of Appeal, and his wife, Elona Çaushi, for falsification of documents and refusal to submit an asset declaration, on the basis of a denunciation by the High Inspectorate of Declaration and Audit of Assets and Conflict of Interests (HIDAACI) (see here).

At the time when the criminal proceedings were initiated, Gjoni held several positions: he sat on the High Council of Justice (HCJ), he sat on the board of the School of Magistrates, he was vice-chair of the National Judicial Conference and he was a member of the Electoral College (see here and here).

In the HIDAACI denunciation, Gjoni was also accused of corruption and concealing a criminal offence, but the prosecution did not file criminal charges (see here and here). Other public notaries suspected of falsifying documents were also part of the denunciation.

HIDAACI found discrepancies between the documentation submitted by the subject in the asset declaration and the official data provided by state authorities. The discrepancy pointed to an evasion of legal liability set forth by the legislation on concealment and false declaration to the amount of approximately €2.6 million. According to media reports and evidence found by HIDDACI, Judge Gjoni had been a partner in three business companies, the shares of which he transferred to his wife, Elona Caushi. At the end of 2014, his wife was the owner of six businesses, including Albanian Duty Free Distribution. The company has capital of ALL159,630,000 (€1.28 million), according to the Business Registration Centre.

The Prosecutor’s Office in Elbasan conducted investigations and sent letters rogatory to the respective French and German authorities (see here). In the meantime, the Minister for Justice submitted a request to the HCJ to suspend Gjoni as a member, but the request was rejected.

In February 2015, the Prosecutor’s Office decided to extend the time limits for the investigations on the grounds that it was awaiting the arrival of responses to letters rogatory seeking judicial assistance from Germany and France. The decision was challenged by the subject. The Elbasan District Court in its decision no. 1482 set a deadline of 12 February 2015 for the investigations. The prosecution appealed the court’s decision to the Durrës District Court of Appeal, which decided on 17 March 2015 to leave the investigation closed, arguing that "the fact does not exist" and making the case res judicata. The decision was also upheld by the Supreme Court, which Gjoni has argued nullifies any new investigations against him and his wife (see here, here and here).

On 20 April 2015, the decision of the Elbasan District Prosecutor’s Office stipulated the dismissal of the criminal case against Judge Gjoni and his wife (based on Article 328/1/f of the Criminal Procedure Code). The case remained under investigation without charges because of the need for other investigatory actions requiring judicial assistance from the competent authorities in Germany and France (see here).

Additional Material

Contribute to this case

Do you have additional information, updates or relevant insights about this case? You can help by sharing new developments or legal updates on the case, providing verified sources that offer more context or evidence or highlighting public reactions or advocacy efforts related to the case.

Do you know of a corruption case that has been reported in the media or by civil society, or is already in the judicial process but is not receiving enough attention? Help us put a spotlight on key corruption cases in your country, and we will review your suggestion and consider adding it to the corruption database.

Please only suggest cases that have already been reported by the media or civil society or cases that are in some stage of the law enforcement or judicial process. If you would like to report a new corruption case, please reach out to our Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres in your country or email us.

Contribute