Skip to main content
Corruption cases with social impact in the Western Balkans and Turkey

Conflict of interest concerns in former Supreme Court President Vesna Medenica’s undisclosed property deal

Back to Case Index
  • Montenegro

Conflict of interest concerns in former Supreme Court President Vesna Medenica’s undisclosed property deal

Case Date(s)
09/2019
Case Updated
02/2025

Case Summary

Phase

Suspicion

Offence

  • Illicit enrichment
  • Trading in influence

Sector

  • Real estate activities

Involved people

Allegedly involved people Vesna Medenica A former president of the Supreme Court of Montenegro and former Supreme State Prosecutor
Vesna Medenica
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Trading in influence
  • Abuse of functions
  • Illicit enrichment
Allegedly involved people Zoran Ćoćo Bećirović Businessman
Zoran Ćoćo Bećirović
Politically exposed
No
  • Bribery of public officials

A MANS investigation revealed that Vesna Medenica, the former President of the Supreme Court of Montenegro, sold a plot of land for €140,000 despite official estimates valuing it at just 12,000 euros, and failed to report the transaction to the authorities. Before her tenure on the Supreme Court, as the Supreme State Prosecutor, according to the media she dismissed complaints regarding irregularities in privatization proceedings involving the buyer of that land, Zoran Bećirović.

Vesna Medenica, a prominent figure from the Montenegrin judiciary system, who served as President of the Supreme Court for more than 13 years, was involved in an undisclosed land sale that raised concerns about transparency and conflict of interests. In 2015, she sold a 28,000-square-meter plot of land near Kolašin to “Lolkan Investments Montenegro” for approximately €140,000. However, she failed to disclose the transaction to the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption, despite her legal obligation to report it as a public official.

The land sale drew further scrutiny due to the involvement of Zoran Ćoćo Bećirović, a controversial businessman linked to the Troika Laundromat, a large-scale money-laundering operation uncovered by the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP). Bećirović was the beneficiary owner of the purchasing company Lolkan Investments Montenegro, which acquired the land just ten days after Medenica inherited it from her late husband.

Despite receiving nearly €140,000 from the sale, Vesna Medenica failed to report the transaction or the income, in (an unconfirmed) violation of the then-existing Law on Conflict of Interest. Under Article 23, public officials were required to report any increase in assets exceeding €5,000. Furthermore, MANS, the Montenegrin watchdog organization that exposed the case, revealed that the land's official valuation was only €12,000. However, it was sold for more than ten times that amount, raising questions about the true nature of the deal.

Medenica's ties to Bećirović extended beyond this transaction. According to press reports, as Supreme State Prosecutor, she dismissed several complaints and reports related to the privatisation of the Avala Hotel in Budva and the sale of the Bjelasica Ski Center property in Kolašin - both cases in which Bećirović or his former company Beppler & Jacobson held significant stakes. These privatisation deals were controversial, with allegations of irregularities that were never allegedly formally investigated during Medenica's tenure.

Soon after the story unfolded, Bećirović took legal action against MANS and the newspapers that covered the story. However, the Basic court in Podgorica dismissed his lawsuit in 2022.

This case underscores broader concerns about transparency, corruption and accountability in Montenegro's judicial system. It highlights the challenges of holding influential figures responsible when institutional safeguards are weak or compromised.

Vesna Medenica resigned from her post in 2021 and was arrested in 2022 on charges of abuse of power. After spending six and half months in custody, she was released to defend herself. The trial against her is still ongoing.

Further details

LAWS (ALLEGEDLY) BREACHED

Failure to submit report on income and assets in accordance with laws on conflict prevention.

Art. 23, Law on the Conflict of Interest

Art. 108, Law on Judicial Council and Judges.

UNCOVERING METHOD

Investigative reporting

SOCIAL HARM ON SDGs

16 Peace, justice and strong institutions

Suspicions of illicit enrichment of high-powered authorities negatively impact public’s trust on institutions. Possible quid pro quo that led complaints against irregularities in privatization proceedings, with losses to the State Treasury, not to be fully investigated.

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this database. All information is believed to be correct as of 02/2025. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts.

Contribute to this case

Do you have additional information, updates or relevant insights about this case? You can help by sharing new developments or legal updates on the case, providing verified sources that offer more context or evidence or highlighting public reactions or advocacy efforts related to the case.

Do you know of a corruption case that has been reported in the media or by civil society, or is already in the judicial process but is not receiving enough attention? Help us put a spotlight on key corruption cases in your country, and we will review your suggestion and consider adding it to the corruption database.

Please only suggest cases that have already been reported by the media or civil society or cases that are in some stage of the law enforcement or judicial process. If you would like to report a new corruption case, please reach out to our Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres in your country or email us.

Contribute