Dodgy diplomacy

Dodgy diplomacy

Corruption, like the global financial system, knows no boundaries. Illicit financial flows end up laundered into luxury goods and properties around the world, their ownership often hidden behind shell companies. The corrupt hop on a plane in one country, and enjoy their wealth in another. They also travel extensively to meet business partners and discuss secret deals. Often, for their businesses to survive and expand, corrupt people need to remain discreetly mobile.

That is why Transparency International is focussing on ways the corrupt both move illicit funds through the global financial system, travel to enjoy the proceeds and use this travel to engage in corruption.

Transparency International welcomes the United Kingdom’s recognition that corrupt money is coming unchecked into London to buy property and must be stopped. But we believe more can still be done to focus the spotlight on the individuals who are trying to take advantage of the system.

We are calling for governments to focus on two key areas:

Transparency International wants tighter international regulations and inspections to monitor and stop criminals from using passports, golden visas and even diplomatic cover to facilitate corrupt business.

Rich pickings in paradise

Selling passports, golden visas and even enabling diplomatic appointments can be big business in some parts of the world. In small island states, for example, passport sales contribute significant amounts to government coffers.

A recent article in The Economist listed passport revenues for St Kitts & Nevis, Antiqua & Barbuda, Dominica and Grenada. In St Kitts, passports made up 13 per cent of gross domestic product in 2013.

Diplomatic postings are another income source. According to one of several websites offering to link clients with countries, money is the main issue. To get the process going you have to prove you have US$500,000 in your bank account.

But people are willing and Transparency International is concerned that there are not enough checks on the reasons why people seek these appointments.  

For example, Le Matin Dimanche, a Swiss newspaper, reported on two businessmen who were appointed diplomats to United Nations offices in Geneva for Grenada and St Lucia respectively. The status was accorded by Swiss authorities in a process that appeared to be in violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which outlines rules regarding diplomatic appointment as well as the privileges and the immunities given to diplomats.

The Convention also clearly states that diplomats should not practise commercial activity and that diplomatic status does not provide immunity from the civil and administrative jurisdiction of the receiving state for such activity.  It also gives receiving states the right to declare a diplomat persona non grata or that any member of the staff of the mission in not acceptable.

Transparency International calls for diligent enforcement of these provisions by states and international organisations.

Dishonoured consuls

There are no registers that list how many non-nationals are appointed ambassadors and honorary consuls for countries where they are not citizens. History shows, however, that strict due diligence is not always carried out.

For example, in October 2011, the then President of Zambia was forced to revoke the appointment of Nicole Buzaianu, a Swiss national, as ambassador to UNESCO, for alleged involvement in a gold scam.

Grenada came under fire in 2007 for appointing a convicted fraudster from the Bahamas and the US, Eric Reinsteiner, as an ambassador.

Switzerland also fought the appointment of Romain Luschkin, a Russian, as Dominca’s representative to the World Trade Organisation.  On the other hand, France has not spoken up about Gilbert Chagoury, who is St Lucia’s representative at UNESCO and has recently  been criticised for allegedly buying his position.

Unmask the Corrupt

As part of our Unmask the Corrupt campaign, Transparency International is calling for an international agreement on the criteria for issuing and publicising denial of entry notices. This will make it easier for countries to track who is on which persona non grata list.

Transparency International is asking the Group of 20 biggest economies to define criteria that countries could use to ban corrupt individuals from travelling. Civil society can work with law-enforcement and government officials to develop these criteria.

When foreign ministries issue visa bans, they know that their decision is not always respected by international organisations, notably UN agencies. However, these agencies seem to argue that multilateral diplomacy needs to maintain dialogue with representatives of all states and can therefore reserve the right to issue facilities similar to laissez-passers under the provisions of Article VII of the 1946 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations.

Editor's note: On 31 July 2015 we amended the article to clarify certain details.

For any press enquiries please contact


Support Transparency International

Support Us

Legally sanctioned lying: A moment of truth for the Czech Republic?

A court in Prague struck a blow to civil society in the Czech Republic on Friday, ruling in favour of Prime Minister Andrej Babiš in a libel suit brought by TI Czech Republic.

Next week governments can take a step to close down secrecy jurisdictions. Will they?

National financial regulators attending the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plenary in Paris 16 – 21 February have the opportunity to significantly reduce money laundering, corruption and terror financing. They must not squander the opportunity.

Why don’t the victims of bribery share in the record-breaking Airbus settlement?

Last Friday, French, UK and US authorities announced that Airbus would pay record penalties for foreign bribery. Notably absent in the agreements are any plans to share the penalty payment with the countries where the company was paying bribes.

Nadie es perfecto

Los países con las puntuaciones más altas en el IPC, como Dinamarca, Suiza e Islandia, no son inmunes a la corrupción. Si bien el IPC muestra que los sectores públicos en estos países están entre los menos corruptos del mundo, la corrupción existe, especialmente en casos de lavado de dinero y otras formas de corrupción en el sector privado.

مشكلة في الأعلى

Переполох на верху

Страны с самым высоким рейтингом по ИВК, такие как Дания, Швейцария и Исландия, не защищены от коррупции. Хотя ИВК показывает, что государственный сектор в этих странах является одним из самых чистых в мире, коррупция все еще существует, особенно в случаях отмывания денег и другой коррупции в частном секторе.

Problèmes au sommet

Les pays les mieux classés sur l’IPC comme le Danemark, la Suisse et l’Islande ne sont pas à l’abri de la corruption. Bien que l’IPC montre que les secteurs publics de ces pays sont parmi les moins corrompus au monde, la corruption existe toujours, en particulier dans les cas de blanchiment d’argent et d’autres formes de corruption du secteur privé.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media