Skip to main content

CPI 2020: Global highlights

180 Countries. 180 Scores. How does your country measure up?

Collage showing a map of the world in yellow and red on a black background, with protest signs layered over it

(Image: © Transparency International)

This year’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) paints a grim picture of the state of corruption worldwide.

While most countries have made little to no progress in tackling corruption in almost a decade, more than two-thirds of countries score below 50.

Our research shows corruption not only undermines the global health response to COVID-19, but also contributes to a continuing crisis of democracy.

Please accept marketing cookies to view this video.

Externally hosted content may include ads. These aren't endorsed by or reflect Transparency International's views.

COVID-19 is not just a health and economic crisis. It’s a corruption crisis. And one that we’re currently failing to manage.
Delia Ferreira Rubio Chair, Transparency International

In a nutshell

The index, which ranks 180 countries and territories by their perceived levels of public sector corruption according to experts and businesspeople, uses a scale of zero to 100, where zero is highly corrupt and 100 is very clean.

Like previous years, more than two-thirds of countries score below 50 on this year’s CPI, with an average score of just 43. The data shows that despite some progress, most countries still fail to tackle corruption effectively.

The CPI uses a scale of 0 to 100

43/100 Average country score
50/100 More than 2/3 of countries score below 50


The top countries on the CPI are Denmark and New Zealand, with scores of 88, followed by Finland, Singapore, Sweden and Switzerland, with scores of 85 each.

The bottom countries are South Sudan and Somalia, with scores of 12 each, followed by Syria (14), Yemen (15) and Venezuela (15).

Since 2012, 26 countries improved their CPI scores, including Greece, Myanmar and Ecuador. In the same period, 22 countries decreased their scores, including Lebanon, Malawi and Bosnia & Herzegovina.

*In these six examples, we report the year between 2012 and 2020 from which the score change is statistically significant.

COVID-19 and corruption

Corruption undermines an equitable response to COVID-19 and other crises, highlighting the importance of transparency and anti-corruption measures in emergency situations.

Please accept marketing cookies to view this video.

Externally hosted content may include ads. These aren't endorsed by or reflect Transparency International's views.

Reports show corruption is prevalent across the COVID-19 response, from bribery for COVID-19 tests, treatment and other health services, to public procurement of medical supplies and overall emergency preparedness.

Our analysis reveals that countries that perform well on the index invest more in health care, are better able to provide universal coverage and are less likely to violate democratic norms or the rule of law when responding to a crisis. Read more.

Corruption and health spending

Countries that perform well on the CPI invest more in health care.

Each dot represents a country’s average CPI score (2012-2017) compared to average health expenditures as a percentage of GDP (2012-2017)*

Corruption and COVID-19 democratic violations

Countries that perform well on the CPI are less likely to violate democratic norms and institutions.

Each dot represents a country’s CPI 2020 score, and the circles represent the average CPI score for that category of democratic violation*

Regional results

The highest scoring region is Western Europe and the European Union with an average score of 66. The lowest scoring regions are Sub-Saharan Africa (32) and Eastern Europe and Central Asia (36).

Trouble at the Top

Even countries with higher scores on the CPI have had their share of corruption challenges, including a lack of transparency in public spending in response to COVID-19.


To fight COVID-19 and curb corruption, it is essential for countries to:

1. Strengthen oversight institutions

The COVID-19 response exposed vulnerabilities of weak oversight and inadequate transparency. To ensure resources reach those most in need and are not subject to theft by the corrupt, anti-corruption authorities and oversight institutions must have sufficient funds, resources and independence to perform their duties.

2. Ensure open and transparent contracting

Many governments have drastically relaxed procurement processes. These rushed and opaque procedures provide ample opportunity for corruption and the diversion of public resources. Contracting processes must remain open and transparent to combat wrongdoing, identify conflicts of interest and ensure fair pricing.

3. Defend democracy, promote civic space

The COVID-19 crisis exacerbated democratic decline, with some governments exploiting the pandemic to suspend parliaments, renounce public accountability mechanisms and incite violence against dissidents. To defend civic space, civil society groups and the media must have the enabling conditions to hold governments accountable.

4. Publish relevant data, guarantee access

The publication of disaggregated data on spending and distribution of resources is particularly relevant in emergency situations, to ensure fair and equitable policy responses. Governments should also ensure people receive easy, accessible, timely and meaningful information by guaranteeing their right to access information.



For any press inquiries please contact [email protected]