MCA loans case: National bank governor suspected of negligence in high-interest loan recovery scheme
- Albania
MCA loans case: National bank governor suspected of negligence in high-interest loan recovery scheme
- Case Date(s)
- 12/2022
- Case Updated
- 03/2025
Case Summary
Phase
Prelim. investigationOffence
- Abuse of functions
Sector
- Financial and insurance activities
- Real estate activities
Institution
- Bank of Albania
- Ministry of Justice
Involved people
- Politically exposed
- Yes
- — Abuse of functions
In April 2024, the Tirana Prosecution asked the special prosecution to investigate the governor of the Bank of Albania, Gent Sejko, as he is suspected to have taken late and inadequate measures to curb an alleged fraud scheme by the microcredit company MCA. Thousands of citizens that had bad debt in banks allegedly had their incomes frozen by MCA (a debt collection company and also a financial institution) to be obliged to take lines of credit with high interest rates and to accept to pay double the amount of their liabilities.
In 2014, a major problem in Albania was the high number of non-preforming loans. After a major reform to write off a large portion of the loans and restructure some corporate loans, the preparation of legislation for licensed businesses to collect debts began.
Micro Credit Albania (MCA) was founded in May 2014 by Elda Ibro, and was subsequently licensed by the Bank of Albania to carry out debt collection activities. Over the years, citizens' complaints about abuses by this company increased, especially after MCA gained a licence to grant loans as a financial institution. The scheme implemented by MCA in cooperation with some private bailiffs was to increase the value of the debt that citizens had in banks by adding fees and interest and starting to collect them by force. The company blocked any income the families had, obliging them to sign new loan contracts with high interest, plunging them into a spiral of debt.
After numerous complaints from citizens, the supervision department at the Bank of Albania launched a thematic examination of MCA in July 2020, where four assessment elements came showed the highest risk level.
According to the supervision department’s report, MCA operated in cooperation with another licensed company named Final, the legal office ADCA and the bailiffs services ZIG, Flash and Star.
The group of inspectors also found that in five years of operation, MCA had never filed audited financial statements, and two international audit firms had refused to give an opinion. By July 2020, MCA had bought €85 million of non-preforming loans from ten different banks and financial institutions. According to the report, MCA had paid about €5.2 million for the loan portfolio of €85 million and had recovered about €10.7 million from borrowers.
The inspection found that MCA followed a strategy to collect the full amount of debts, without offering discounts, while imposing very high penalty rates on bad loan restructuring packages of 2% per day or 730% per annum. After the findings of the supervision department in 2020, the Bank of Albania changed the regulation on consumer and mortgage credit, determining that the amount of penalties should not exceed 30% of the contractual obligation; but even after this decision the violations continued.
The investigations carried out by the prosecutor's office of Tirana and an administrative investigation by the Ministry of Justice showed that, after buying bad loans for up to 10% of their value, MCA demanded 100% repayment, imposing penalties, interest and enforcement fees. Creditors whose income was blocked were forced to sign loan contracts with interest rates of up to 25%.
In December 2022, after continuing complaints, the governor of the Bank of Albania decided to suspend MCA's lending licence, but allowed it to continue debt collection for the purchased loan portfolios. After this decision, the company implemented a scheme where thousands of apartments, houses and properties were auctioned without informing the owners and sold at low prices where the buyer was in some cases MCA itself or a circle of people and companies connected with it.
The prosecutor's office of Tirana estimates that the bank governor's decision was not only delayed but was also inappropriate in relation to the violations found. The investigation raises suspicions that the licence suspension was preceded by a correspondence between the owner of MCA and the Bank of Albania governor, where MCA’s partner asked him to consider alternative measures and not to revoke the licence. In March 2016, the Bank of Albania approved a regulation that enabled the sale of bad bank loans, but according to the investigation, MCA is suspected of previously performing this activity and in May 2016 was provided with a licence, which, according to the prosecutor's office, raises doubts that the legal infrastructure was adapted ‘in function of the activity of this company’.
The prosecutor's office of Tirana sent the file for further investigation to the special prosecutor's office as an authority with the responsibility to investigate high-level officials, including the governor of Bank of Albania. In a parallel investigation, led by a group of prosecutors, the Tirana prosecutor's office sent the investigation of the administrator of the company, Elda Ibro, Arben Meskuti and a dozen of private bailiffs who were part of the blackmail scheme that affected thousands of citizens to the special prosecutor's office too.
It is suspected that this group has embezzled €36.8 million by charging abusive fees and following illegal practices for approximately 30,000 citizens. The report was first filed in the general prosecutor's office in 2020 by the minister of justice, after the investigation, the prosecutor's office of Tirana sent it for jurisdiction in 2021 to the special prosecutor's office, which returned it to the prosecutor's office of Tirana. In November 2024, the prosecutor's office of Tirana sent the file again to the special prosecutor's office to investigate the suspects of the scheme with the charge of a structured criminal group, a criminal offence under the jurisdiction of special prosecution. Currently, the special prosecution is independently investigating the case of the Tirana prosecutor's office has against the governor of the Bank of Albania, Gent Sejko, and the file on the suspected criminal group for the fraud scheme. This all reached the public's attention in the summer of 2024 when one of the victims of the fraud scheme killed himself in front of the special prosecution to protest the delayed investigation.
Further details
- JURISDICTION/COURT
General prosecutor's office of the Tirana judicial district
Special court against crime and corruptions
- LAWS (ALLEGEDLY) BREACHED
Criminal code, Article 248, Abuse of functions
- UNCOVERING METHOD
Investigative media reports
The National Chamber of Private Bailiffs
Administrative investigation of the Ministry of Justice
Audit report from the supervision department of the Bank of Albania
- PROSECUTOR
Prosecutor of general prosecutor's office of the Tirana:
Leonard Filopati
Prosecutor of the special prosecution against crime and corruptions:
Dorina Bejko
- DEFENCE COUNSEL
name here
SOCIAL HARM ON SDGs
1 No Poverty
16 Peace, justice and strong institutions
The freezing of bank accounts and any income, including wages without respecting the minimum living standard to force thousands of families to pay the debt, has plunged them into poverty for a long time. Some of them remain homeless after their homes were confiscated, even though the amount of debt was several times smaller than the value of their home. In addition to the principle of no poverty, the principle of peace, justice and strong institutions is also affected since a chain of institutions from the Bank of Albania, the Ministry of Justice, the state cadastre agency and the justice institutions, tolerated this situation for years.
Disclaimer
Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this database. All information is believed to be correct as of <CASE UPDATED>. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts.
Additional Material
Civil society groups and affected families have protested in front of justice institutions.
The National Chamber of Private Bailiffs for years has denounced the actions taking place with this scheme by some of its members.
-
Press release Link www.reporter.al/2025/01/19/pas-skandalit-me-mikrokredite-nje-nisme-ligjore-depozitohet-ne-kuvend/After the microcredit scandal, a legal initiative is filed in the Assembly
-
Press release Link shqiptarja.com/index.php/lajm/skandali-me-mikrokredite-sejko-ska-lidhje-me-firmat-piramidale-bsh-ka-respektuar-ligjin-kredite-e-keqija-ishin-rrezik-kombetarThe microcredit scandal, Sejko: BoA has respected the law! Non-performing loans were a national risk
-
Press release Link gazeta-shqip.com/aktualiteti/begaj-kerkoi-hetim-te-thelluar-per-skandalin-e-mikrokredive-reagon-sejko-na-rrezikohet-reputacioni/Begaj asked for an in-depth investigation into the microcredit scandal/ Sejko reacts: Our reputation is at risk...
-
Press release Link shqiptarja.com/lajm/skandali-me-microcreditet-prokuroria-totali-i-trojeve-te-sekuestruara-minimalisht-sa-500-fishi-i-detyrimitFile/ Microcredit pyramid scheme! 17 thousand citizens in the trap! They blocked properties worth up to 500 times the obligation
Contribute to this case
Do you have additional information, updates or relevant insights about this case? You can help by sharing new developments or legal updates on the case, providing verified sources that offer more context or evidence or highlighting public reactions or advocacy efforts related to the case.
Do you know of a corruption case that has been reported in the media or by civil society, or is already in the judicial process but is not receiving enough attention? Help us put a spotlight on key corruption cases in your country, and we will review your suggestion and consider adding it to the corruption database.
Please only suggest cases that have already been reported by the media or civil society or cases that are in some stage of the law enforcement or judicial process. If you would like to report a new corruption case, please reach out to our Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres in your country or email us.