Skip to main content
Corruption cases with social impact in the Western Balkans and Turkey

Hüseyin Beyoğlu case: Mayor convicted of bribery

Back to Case Index
  • Turkey

Hüseyin Beyoğlu case: Mayor convicted of bribery

Case Date(s)
10/2023
Case Updated
12/2024

Case Summary

Phase

Enforcement

Offence

  • Bribery of public officials
  • Abuse of functions

Sector

  • Construction

Institution

  • Diyarbakır Bağlar Municipality: The central local government entity where the bribery operation occurred.
  • Financial crimes investigation board: Investigated financial irregularities committed by the former mayor.

Involved people

Allegedly involved people Hüseyin Beyoğlu Former mayor of Bağlar Municipality affiliated with the AKP
Hüseyin Beyoğlu
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Abuse of functions
  • Bribery of public officials
Allegedly involved people Siddik Aycil Former deputy mayor for urban planning and private secretary to the mayor of Bağlar Municipality with various positions in the municipality
Siddik Aycil
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Abuse of functions
Allegedly involved people Fırat Kılıç Former, municipal staff member, and served as the zoning director
Fırat Kılıç
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Abuse of functions
  • Bribery of public officials

A bribery scheme in the Diyarbakir Bağlar Municipality in Turkiye unfolded when a businessperson reported to the police that he was asked for a bribe in exchange for a positive construction application decision. The investigation revealed a bribery network, resulting in an indictment implicating some high-ranking local government officials. The court sentenced the former mayor, Beyoğlu, and the zooning director, Kılıç, to three years and nine months in prison for the crime of extortion through coercion, while former deputy mayor, Aycıl, was acquitted due to the lack of evidence supporting the charges.

The zoning director in the Diyarbakir Bağlar Municipality, Fırat Kılıç was caught red-handed while taking a bribe of TRY1 million (app. €29,000) in November 2023. A bribery scheme started to unfold when a businessperson, the contractor Nusret Bekiranlı, reported to the police that he had been asked for a bribe by an employee in the directorate of urban planning in exchange for deciding on his construction application. He reported that the employee of the municipality asked him for TRY50,000 per flat and TRY5 million for the houses he would build. Following this report, the investigation was launched in October 2023, and law enforcement conducted a sting operation, resulting in the arrest of Fırat Kılıç and the deputy mayor Sıddık Aycıl in November 2023. Previously, following the request of the Diyarbakır chief public prosecutor’s office, the Diyarbakır 1st Criminal Court of peace decided in October 2023 to allow the monitoring of activities of the three suspects for three weeks, including the mayor Hüseyin Beyoğlu, Sıddık Aycıl and Fırat Kılıç.

The resulting audio and video surveillance materials were included in the indictment, such as the bribe negotiations in Fırat Kılıç’s office with Nusret Bekiranlı, which also implicates Mayor Beyoğlu. The indictment states that the bribe payment was delivered to Fırat Kılıç and, on the same day, the documents that had not previously been processed for four and a half months, were processed by Sıddık Aycıl and referred to the relevant committee. Diyarbakır chief public prosecutor's office prepared the indictment regarding this case, requesting a prison sentence from five to ten years for Hüseyin Beyoğlu, Sıddık Aycıl and Fırat Kılıç, based on the provisions of the Turkish penal code, which regulates extortion. The 10th high criminal court accepted the indictment in January 2024. On 8 May, during the first hearing at the 10th high criminal court, the court panel decided to release the detained deputy mayor, Sıddık Aycıl, under judicial control, and to continue the detention of Fırat Kılıç and to maintain the judicial control and foreign travel ban for former mayor Hüseyin Beyoğlu. The last hearing, which took place on 25 October, former mayor Hüseyin Beyoğlu and Fırat Kılıç, who worked in the planning and urbanism department of Bağlar Municipality, were sentenced to three years and nine months in prison for the crime of extortion through coercion in the bribery investigation they were being tried for.

Media reports state that Sıddık Aycıl held multiple positions within the municipality, including in the zoning and urbanisation, building control, inspection board and culture and social affairs directorates. Additionally, he also served as the private secretary to the mayor, Hüseyin Beyoğlu, a position to which he was appointed following the election of Beyoğlu as Mayor.

The investigation suggests the existence of a network of corruption within the municipality, implicating high-ranking officials and shedding light on systemic corruption issues in Turkiye. Cases like this may further erode public trust in government institutions and they emphasise the need for accountability and transparency in the local governance.

Further details

JURISDICTION/COURT

Diyarbakır 10th High Criminal Court

LAWS (ALLEGEDLY) BREACHED

The indictment asked for a 5 to 10 years in prison, according to the provisions in the Article 250 of the Turkish penal code, which regulates the crime of extortion

FINAL SANCTION OR MEASURE

3 years and 9 months imprisonment for the former mayor of Bağlar Municipality, Hüseyin Beyoğlu and former director of zoning and urbanisation, Firat Kiliç

UNCOVERING METHOD

Whistleblower

SOCIAL HARM ON SDGs

16 Peace, justice and strong institutions

9 Industry, innovation and infrastructure

8 Decent work and economic growth

The social harm in this case is multifaceted and profound. Firstly, corruption within Bağlar Municipality undermines public trust in government institutions, particularly in a municipality already under trustee administration due to the dismissal of elected officials, eroding the foundation of democracy and civic engagement. When public officials engage in bribery, they prioritise personal gain over serving the community needs, leading to a loss of confidence in the fairness and integrity of governance. The discovery of illicit assets such as gold, foreign currency and unlicensed firearms in his home underscores the exploitation of public office for personal gain, a practice that directly undermines democratic principles and governance integrity. Secondly, the misuse of public funds through bribery diverts resources away from essential services and projects, such as infrastructure development, healthcare and education, crucial for improving living standards and fostering social cohesion. This misallocation exacerbates socio-economic inequalities and hampers the municipality’s ability to address pressing issues facing its residents.

Moreover, this case underscores institutional weakness, showing the inability of local institutions to prevent corruption without external oversight, further impacting local governance standards. In fact, the normalisation of corruption perpetuates a culture of impunity, where unethical behaviour goes unchecked and becomes ingrained in societal norms. This not only perpetuates systemic injustices but also discourages honest citizens from participating in public service or reporting wrongdoing, further entrenching the cycle of corruption. Overall, the social harm caused by corruption in this case extends beyond financial losses, deeply affecting public welfare, democratic values and the community’s overall well-being.

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this database. All information is believed to be correct as of 12/2024 Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts.

Contribute to this case

Do you have additional information, updates or relevant insights about this case? You can help by sharing new developments or legal updates on the case, providing verified sources that offer more context or evidence or highlighting public reactions or advocacy efforts related to the case.

Do you know of a corruption case that has been reported in the media or by civil society, or is already in the judicial process but is not receiving enough attention? Help us put a spotlight on key corruption cases in your country, and we will review your suggestion and consider adding it to the corruption database.

Please only suggest cases that have already been reported by the media or civil society or cases that are in some stage of the law enforcement or judicial process. If you would like to report a new corruption case, please reach out to our Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres in your country or email us.

Contribute