Skip to main content
Corruption cases with social impact in the Western Balkans and Turkey

Former Minister Dujmović Acquitted for Hiring Unqualified Advisers

Back to Case Index
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina

Former Minister Dujmović Acquitted for Hiring Unqualified Advisers

Case Date(s)
03/2022
Case Updated
10/2024

Case Summary

Phase

2nd instance verdict

Offence

  • Abuse of functions

Sector

  • Public administration and defense; compulsory social security

Involved people

Allegedly involved people Zora Dujmović Minister of the Federal Ministry of Culture and Sports in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH)
Zora Dujmović
Politically exposed
Yes
  • Abuse of functions

The former Minister of Culture and Sports in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Zora Dujmovic was indicted for abuse of position during her mandate, specifically for appointing advisers without required qualifications. The Municipal Court acquitted her of all charges in 2023, and the Cantonal Court upheld the acquittal one year later, making it final. The case raised concerns about hiring practices within state institutions and highlights the problem of deficient indictments.

A high-ranking official accused of corruption walks free - was justice served? The case of former Minister of Culture and Sports Zora Dujmovic raises serious concerns about accountability in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Zora Dujmović served as Minister of Culture and Sports in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina from 2015 until 2022, as a member of the Croatian Democratic Union of Bosnia and Herzegovina (HDZ). Additionally, she held long-standing role in the Assembly of the Herzegovina-Neretva Canton and the House of Peoples of the Federation's Parliament.

In September 2017, the TV station Federalna aired a report alleging that Minister Dujmović had illegally appointed four advisers without following legal employment procedures. She declined to comment on the accusations at the time.

Following investigations, the Sarajevo Canton Prosecutor's Office indicted her in March 2022 for abuse of official position alleging that between 2015 and 2016 she appointed advisers who did not meet the necessary criteria. Dujmović was accused of abusing her position by appointing Mate Bandur, Andrijana Katić, Ana Tolo and Goran Lulić as advisers, without conducting a formal hiring process. The prosecution argued that she signed their appointments without verifying their qualifications - a violation of public sector employment laws.

During the trial, witnesses confirmed that hiring unqualified advisers without documentation was a common practice. In line with these concerns, the 2022 The Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) Fifth Evaluation Report for Bosnia and Herzegovina also criticized the lack of transparency in government hiring, highlighting how advisers are often appointed without integrity checks, creating a risk of conflicts of interest.

The trial began in August 2022. During the closing arguments in June 2023, the Cantonal Prosecutor's Office in Sarajevo requested a guilty verdict. Prosecutor Aida Bešlija argued that Dujmović knowingly bypassed hiring procedures. The defence argued for an acquittal or dismissal of the indictment, arguing that she had no intent to break the law and that procedural flaws in the investigation compromised her rights. The defence countered that verifying employment conditions was the responsibility of the Human Resources and Legal departments, not the Minister. They also noted that Dujmović dismissed one of her advisers, Ana Tolo, upon learning she did not meet employment requirements.

In July 2023, the Municipal Court in Sarajevo acquitted Dujmović, ruling that while she had acted in her official capacity, the prosecution failed to prove intent."Judge Kurtovic stated that the indictment's wording—"deliberately failed to determine"—did not meet the legal threshold for "abuse of position or authority."

In August 2024, the Cantonal Prosecutor's Office in Sarajevo appealed the acquittal, requesting a retrial. However, in October 2024, the Cantonal Court in Sarajevo rejected the appeal and upheld the acquittal, making the verdict final.

The Dujmović case highlights a critical flaw in Bosnia and Herzegovina's legal system. Relevant reports on the monitoring of corruption cases in Bosnia and Herzegovina have emphasized these concerns (see here and here).

The impact extends beyond a single case. Public perception that officials can abuse their positions without consequences erodes public trust in government institutions. Moreover, hiring unqualified individuals in key roles wastes public funds, weakens public services, and fosters a culture of nepotism, and corruption.

Further details

JURISDICTION/COURT

Municipal Court of Sarajevo;

Cantonal Court in Sarajevo

LAWS (ALLEGEDLY) BREACHED

Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Abuse of position or authority, Article 383 paragraph 1, in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph 1)

FINAL SANCTION OR MEASURE

The accused Zora Dujmović was acquitted in a final verdict.

UNCOVERING METHOD

Media report: In September 2017, the TV station Federalna aired a report alleging that Minister Dujmović had illicitly hired four advisers since the beginning of her mandate in 2015. Dujmović declined to comment on the allegations.

PROSECUTOR

Aida Bešlija

JUDGE

Denis Kurtović

DEFENCE COUNSEL

Faruk Hadžić and Davor Martinović

SOCIAL HARM ON SDGs

16 Peace, justice and strong institutions

The social harm in this case includes a loss of public trust in institutions, inefficient use of public funds due to the employment of unqualified advisers, and a decline in service quality that can negatively affect cultural and sports projects. Additionally, the situation encourages nepotism and corruption, while creating legal uncertainty if such actions go unpunished.

Disclaimer

Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this database. All information is believed to be correct as of 10/2024. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts.

Additional Material

Contribute to this case

Do you have additional information, updates or relevant insights about this case? You can help by sharing new developments or legal updates on the case, providing verified sources that offer more context or evidence or highlighting public reactions or advocacy efforts related to the case.

Do you know of a corruption case that has been reported in the media or by civil society, or is already in the judicial process but is not receiving enough attention? Help us put a spotlight on key corruption cases in your country, and we will review your suggestion and consider adding it to the corruption database.

Please only suggest cases that have already been reported by the media or civil society or cases that are in some stage of the law enforcement or judicial process. If you would like to report a new corruption case, please reach out to our Advocacy and Legal Advice Centres in your country or email us.

Contribute