Skip to main content

National integrity system assessments

No matter how overt and obvious its consequences are for society, corruption is a crime that prefers to remain covert and concealed. It can take root in many areas of a society, whether in government or law enforcement, or among other actors like the media, business, political parties and so on.

Transparency International developed the National Integrity System approach as a comprehensive means of assessing a country’s anti-corruption efficacy sector by sector. It allows a nuanced analysis of national efforts to stamp out corruption.

  1. ALL COUNTRIES HAVE CORRUPTION. HOW DO WE MEASURE HOW WELL A COUNTRY TACKLES THE PROBLEM?
  2. OUR NATIONAL INTEGRITY SYSTEM APPROACH ASSESSES INSTITUTIONS AND PRACTICES THAT PREVENT CORRUPTION IN A COUNTRY.
  3. WE DIAGNOSE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES IN A COUNTRY'S INTEGRITY SYSTEM, IDENTIFYING AREAS FOR REFORM.
  4. RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE ASSESSMENTS HELP INSTITUTIONS PLAN FOR A BETTER FUTURE.
  5. WE'VE CONDUCTED OVER 100 OF THESE UNIQUE STUDIES.
    AND MORE ARE COMING SOON.

Pillars of National Integrity

The National Integrity System evaluates key ‘pillars’ in a country’s governance system, both in terms of their internal corruption risks and their contribution to fighting corruption in society at large.

When all the pillars in a National Integrity System are functioning well, corruption remains in check. If some or all of the pillars wobble, these weaknesses can allow corruption to thrive and damage a society.

The pillars analysed in a National Integrity System assessment typically include:

  • Legislative branch of government
  • Executive branch of government
  • Judiciary
  • Public sector
  • Law enforcement
  • Electoral management body
  • Ombudsman
  • Audit institution
  • Anti-corruption agencies
  • Political parties
  • Media
  • Civil society
  • Business

National Integrity Assessments

A National Integrity System assessment examines both the formal framework of each pillar and the actual institutional practice. The analysis highlights discrepancies between the formal provisions and reality on the ground, making it clear where there is room for improvement.

The analysis is undertaken via a consultative approach, involving the key anti-corruption agents in government, civil society, the business community and other sectors.

Conclusions are drawn together in a comprehensive national report to build momentum, political will and civic pressure for relevant reform initiatives.

Ultimately, strengthening the National Integrity System promotes better governance across all aspects of a society and contributes to a more just society overall.