Civil society’s seat at the G20 table

Filed under - Intergovernmental bodies

Posted 22 February 2013
lead image

Civil society is playing its biggest role yet at the Group of 20 leading economies, known as the G20. For the first time there is now a Civil 20 – or C20 – which brings together non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to contribute to the G20 process with policy recommendations, act as a watchdog and monitor G20 commitments.

After long-standing informal and constructive cooperation with the G20 Anti-Corruption Working Group through joint civil society submissions, the C20 is now for the first time formally invited to address the G20 Anti-Corruption Working Group in Moscow as part of a series of meetings leading up to the G20 summit of world leaders in St. Petersburg in September.

Transparency International is acting as the co-chair for the Civil 20 Working Group on Anti-Corruption. There are seven thematic C20 working groups in total.

Though the G20 has committed to tackling corruption in its Anti-Corruption Action Plans – such as adopting and enforcing laws to tackle bribery, protecting whistleblowers, and combating money laundering – more pressure is needed to fulfil its pledge to “close the implementation and enforcement gap.”

G20 in numbers

11: the number of G20 members who score less than 50 out of 100 on Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index 2012

56 per cent of citizens in G20 countries think corruption has increased in their country in the last three years, according to Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer (Saudi Arabia was not covered by the survey). Only 29 per cent assess their government’s actions in the fight against corruption as effective.

US$4.8 trillion: the proceeds of financial crimes such as bribery and tax evasion that have flowed out of the G20’s ten emerging economies from 2000-2009, according to Global Financial Integrity

451: the number of anti-bribery cases completed in G20 countries signed up to OECD anti-bribery convention by the end of 2010, but the US and Germany together account for 80 per cent of this.

2: the number of G20 countries that have yet to ratify the UN Convention against Corruption (Germany and Japan)

What we can achieve

The legitimacy of the G20 as a forum for discussing economic stability and growth relies on the full participation of and engagement with civil society. As the wider public stands to be most impacted by decisions made by G20 members, civil society must have access to information, and have the opportunity to meaningfully contribute to the decision-making process.

As part of this process, Transparency International has recommendations to tackle corruption which include:

  • Genuine and concerted efforts by G20 members to tackle illegal financial transactions, through cross-border information-sharing, and better due diligence
  • Swifter facilitation of asset recovery processes.
  • Ratification and enforcement of the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) and foreign bribery legislation. (Two G20 countries – Germany  and Japan – have yet to ratify the UNCAC; all G20 countries should join the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention).
  • Strong and harmonised legislation that protects whistleblowers across G20 states
  • Promotion of public sector integrity, e.g. through mandatory asset declarations by public officials.
  • Enhanced transparency in the extractive industries through mandatory country-by-country and project-by-project reporting of multinational companies on their incomes and losses.

Transparency International welcomes the establishment of a formal mechanism through which civil society can engage with G20 members. However we must not stop at this step. The inclusion of all civil society, including both national and international NGOs, is needed to ensure ordinary people everywhere are represented. This way, we can continue toward meaningful collaboration and fruitful outcomes – both prior to and following – the G20 summit in September 2013.

Press contact(s):

Chris Sanders
Manager, Media and Public Relations
press@transparency.org
+49 30 3438 20 666

Country / Territory - International   |   Germany   |   Japan   |   Russia   |   Saudi Arabia   |   United States   
Region - Global   |   Middle East and North Africa   |   Americas   |   Asia Pacific   |   Europe and Central Asia   
Language(s) - English   
Topic - Asset recovery   |   Civil society   |   Conventions   |   Financial markets   |   Intergovernmental bodies   |   Politics and government   
Tags - OECD Anti-Bribery Convention   |   G20   |   UN Convention against Corruption   |   G20 Anti-Corruption Working Group   |   G20 Summit   |   C20   

By leaving a comment, you acknowledge the terms of use for our comments board.

Stay informed

Related news

Six things to know: new G20 Beneficial Ownership Principles

This weekend G20 leaders adopted new principles on beneficial ownership. But how good are they?

16
Nov
2014

Transparency International Australia welcomes G20 pledge to clamp down on secret companies

G20 leaders have taken a concrete step to make it harder for the worlds corrupt to hide, with the adoption in Brisbane of new G20 High Level ...

Denial of entry: to catch a bribe taker

Visa bans help prevent the corrupt from enjoying their ill-gotten gains abroad. Here's how we can strengthen this tool.

Related publications

Publication cover image

Curbing Corruption in Public Procurement: A Practical Guide

This guide provides government officials, businesses and civil society with a practical introduction to the risks of corruption in public ...

Report published – Jul 2014

Publication cover image

Policy brief 03/2014: Leaving the corrupt at the door: from denial of entry to passport sales

For some people national borders constitute an insurmountable barrier. For others, they represent a comfortable way to hide ill-gotten wealth and to ...

Policy position published – Jun 2014