Tanzania’s anti-corruption agency in an international perspective

Published on 14 August 2017 as a U4 Helpdesk answer
Please provide an assessment of the legal powers and structure of the anti-corruption agency (ACA) in Tanzania (including cooperation with national law enforcement and prosecution agencies) and contrast them with the models encountered in other countries with a similar legal tradition.

Purpose


There are currently discussions in Tanzania on whether to have the Prevention and Combatting of Corruption Bureau (PCCB) take on the powers to prosecute serious cases of corruption. At the moment, the PCCB only has authority to prosecute small-scale bribery, while the prosecution function sits with the director for public prosecutions. The purpose of this query is to obtain further evidence and inform our position towards these discussions.

Content

  1. The role of anti-corruption agencies in tackling corruption: from high hopes to pragmatism
  2. Designing ACAs to have an impact
  3. The role and impact of the anti-corruption agency in Tanzania
  4. Concluding notes
  5. References

Summary


The decision of whether to equip specialised anti-corruption agencies with prosecutorial powers requires the consideration of an expansive list of potential advantages and disadvantages. The empirical evidence is limited and inconclusive, yet strongly suggests considering the appropriate designs on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the current state of the ACA, its relations with and relative efficacy in relation to other institutions in the broader justice system, as well as the broader political dynamics that shape current performance and prospects for reform or co-optation. Whether to expand the remit of Tanzania’s ACA to include stronger prosecutorial powers will thus require a careful and detailed assessment of a wide range of influencing factors that are beyond the scope of this answer. The limited information base available for this secondary desk research exercise suggests a number of pros and cons that merit further on-site unpacking and examination.

Author(s): Dieter Zinnbauer and Roberto Martinez B. Kukutschka, Transparency International
tihelpdesk@transparency.org
Reviewed by: Paul Banoba, Transparency International
Publication date: 14 August 2017
Number: 0

Download full answer

Country / Territory - Tanzania   
Region - Sub-Saharan Africa   
Language(s) - English   
Topic - Judiciary   |   Law enforcement   |   Politics and government   
Tags - anti-corruption agencies   |   Tanzania   |   procescution   |   prosecutorial powers   

Contact the Anti-Corruption Helpdesk

If you work for one of our supporting partner organisations, submit your query to the Helpdesk:
tihelpdesk@transparency.org

More Helpdesk answers

06
Apr
2010

Fiduciary safeguards for minimising corruption risks

What are the lessons on use of fiduciary safeguards for minimising risk in budget support and, in this context, how do bilateral and multilateral ...

See the answer

10
May
2013

Iraq: overview of corruption and anti-corruption

Can you please provide an overview of corruption and anti-corruption efforts in Iraq?

See the answer