Deferred prosecution agreements, plea bargaining, immunity programmes and corruption

Filed under - Judiciary

Published on 13 October 2017 as a TI Helpdesk answer
Can you provide some information on Transparency International policy and international good practice in relation to deferred prosecution agreements, immunity programmes and plea bargaining?

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Plea bargaining
  3. Deferred prosecution agreements
  4. Immunity and leniency programmes
  5. References

Summary

This brief explores the advantages and disadvantages of a number of legal tools commonly employed in cases related to the prosecution of corruption, including deferred prosecution agreements, immunity programmes and plea bargains. Whenever possible, the authors include country examples to illustrate the use of these tools, as well as best practices found in the literature.

Author(s): Roberto Martinez B. Kukutschka and Marie Chêne, tihelpdesk@transparency.org
Reviewed by: Matthew Jenkins, Transparency International
Publication date: 13 October 2017
Number: 0

Download full answer

Country / Territory - Brazil   |   Mexico   |   Nigeria   |   Turkey   |   United Kingdom   
Region - Global   
Language(s) - English   
Topic - Judiciary   |   Law enforcement   
Tags - Immunity   |   Settlements   |   Plea bargaining   

Contact the Anti-Corruption Helpdesk

If you work for one of our supporting partner organisations, submit your query to the Helpdesk:
tihelpdesk@transparency.org

More Helpdesk answers

30
Apr
2015

Anti-corruption programmes for young people in conflict and postconflict countries

Could you provide us with an overview of successful approaches, activities and best practices from youth organisations and initiatives fighting ...See the answer

1
Apr
2014

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Overview of political corruption

Can you please provide an overview of and background to recent measures taken to address political corruption in the Former Yugoslav Republic of ...See the answer