Anti-corruption and transparency provisions in trade agreements

Published on 13 February 2017 as a TI Helpdesk answer
What examples are there of anti-corruption, transparency or related provisions being included in trade agreements, and how successful have they been?

Content

  1. Background
  2. Transparency and anti-corruption in the WTO system
  3. Transparency and anti-corruption in regional trade agreements
  4. Enforcement mechanisms for anti-corruption provisions in trade agreements
  5. Annex 1: Transparency International recommendations on anti-corruption in trade agreements
  6. Annex 2: Acronyms
  7. References

Summary

Despite being built on the underlying principles of transparency and non-discrimination, the global trade system overseen by the World Trade Organization (WTO) regime has limited purview over so-called “deep provisions” in trade agreements, such as governance issues. In the absence of measures at WTO level to improve transparency and reduce bribery in international trade, the US has pioneered the approach of embedding anti-corruption and transparency provisions into its bilateral trade agreements over the last 15 years.

There is now some consensus around best practice anti-corruption and transparency provisions for inclusion in trade deals, such as explicit references to international anti-corruption conventions, commitments to criminalise active and passive bribery, non-criminal sanctions for firms where they are not subject to criminal liability and whistleblower protection.

Nonetheless, while headway has been made on mainstreaming anti-corruption principles into trade agreements, the effectiveness of such anti-corruption provisions remains open to question. Especially in regional trade agreements lacking an established mechanism, such as the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body, implementation and enforcement of a state’s anti-corruption obligations relies on robust measures being taken at national level, with limited influence for external players.

Author(s): Matthew Jenkins, Transparency International,
tihelpdesk@transparency.org

Reviewed by: Dieter Zinnbauer. Transparency International
Publication date: 13 February 2017
Number: 0

Download full answer

Country / Territory - Canada   |   Chile   |   Colombia   |   Georgia   |   Guatemala   |   Honduras   |   Mongolia   |   Panama   |   Peru   |   South Africa   |   South Korea   |   United States   
Region - Global   |   Europe and Central Asia   
Language(s) - English   
Topic - Financial markets   
Tags - Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA)   |   Comprehensive free trade agreements   |   Mega trade deals   |   Regional trade agreements   |   trade   |   RTAs   |   TTIP   |   TPP   |   CETA   |   Free trade   |   trade agreements   

Contact the Anti-Corruption Helpdesk

If you work for one of our supporting partner organisations, submit your query to the Helpdesk:
tihelpdesk@transparency.org

More Helpdesk answers

21
Apr
2015

Bangladesh: Corruption risks in the public financial management system

What are the corruption risks in the public financial management (PFM) system of Bangladesh?

See the answer

15
Oct
2015

Corruption and anti-corruption in Ethiopia's energy sector

Please can you provide an overview of corruption and anti-corruption in Ethiopia’s energy sector, with a focus on international aid?

See the answer