European Neighbourhood East Region: National Integrity Systems

Filed under - Surveys

article image

What’s at stake?

Systemic corruption remains a major problem in the Eastern Neighbourhood, threatening development and stability as well as credibility of institutions in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Our Corruption Perceptions Index 2013 shows that these countries suffer from high levels of corruption, with all countries scoring below 50 on a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (least corrupt), and Azerbaijan on 28 and Ukraine on 25. As members of the EU’s Eastern Partnership initiative, these corruption risks present significant obstacles to adopting democratic standards and ensuring economic, political and social growth.

What we’re doing about it

While some progress has been made in adopting as well as enforcing anti-corruption laws in the European Neighbourhood East region, these efforts have not yet led to desired effects or results on the ground. They tend to target one specific area or another, rather than following a systemic approach.

To design and implement the needed reforms, it is critical to assess the situation more in detail. Transparency International’s holistic National Integrity System approach provides this information. By analysing integrity mechanisms and institutions across all sectors of society, it identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the governance institutions in the fight against corruption and provides directions for future anti-corruption reforms and strengthening of transparency, integrity and accountability.  

Who’s involved

The project National Integrity System Assessments in the European Neighbourhood East Region is implemented by our national chapters in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. The project is funded by the European Union. It runs from March 2013 to August 2015. The apportioned grant by EU for this project is in the amount of €680,517.92 (90 per cent of the total budget).

Our approach

Through in-depth research at the national level, our National Integrity System assessments show the performance and corruption risks of a full range of institutions and actors that contribute to transparency, integrity and accountability. Institutions examined include: public and private sector bodies, law enforcement agencies, civil society, media and the judiciary.

The National Integrity System methodology offers the European Neighbourhood governments and citizens a detailed assessment of their current anti-corruption systems.

During the assessment phase, hundreds of experts, decision-makers and ordinary citizens will be consulted. Their input and advice will help us identify areas requiring priority action to ensure adequate anti-corruption and integrity measures are in place.  

Based on these findings, the project partners – Transparency International chapters in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine – will develop tailor-made recommendations and solutions to address the weaknesses identified in the assessments. Regional and national activities and events will be organised to raise public awareness of how the countries’ anti-corruption systems are functioning, as well as to highlight what measures must be adopted to improve these institutions.

The research results will also allow for comparison across the region. These results will be captured in a regional report.

Timeline and results

  • May 2013: National Integrity Systems project kick-off workshop in Berlin
  • November 2013: Advocacy workshop in Berlin
  • July 2014: Publication of National Integrity Systems assessments of Azerbaijan and Moldova in Brussels
  • April - July 2015: Publication of National Integrity Systems assessments of Armenia, Georgia and Ukraine
  • 2 July 2015: Publication of regional report 'The State of Corruption: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine' and launch event in Brussels
  • June 2013 - July 2015: Public discussions, conferences, and workshops to promote NIS findings to national and international stakeholders and to advance anti-corruption reforms

More

Contact us

Giulia Sorbi, Project Coordinator
gsorbi@transparency.org

Julie Anne Miranda-Brobeck, Communications and media
jMiranda-Brobeck@transparency.org

European Union flag

This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Transparency International and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.



Country / Territory - Armenia   |   Azerbaijan   |   Georgia   |   Moldova   |   Ukraine   
Language(s) - English   
Topic - Civil society   |   Politics and government   |   Private sector   |   Public services   |   Surveys   

Related news

26
Feb
2018

Europe and Central Asia: More civil engagement needed (Part II)

As follow-up to the regional analysis of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, additional examples from Albania, Kosovo and Georgia highlight the need for ...

21
Feb
2018

A redefining moment for Africa

The newly released Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) provides a good baseline for the African Union (AU) anti-corruption efforts in 2018. This ...

21
Feb
2018

Perceptions remain unchanged despite progress in the Americas

In the last few years, Latin America and the Carribbean made great strides in the fight against corruption. Laws and mechanisms exist to curb ...

21
Feb
2018

Slow, Imperfect Progress across Asia Pacific

While no country in the Asia Pacific region scores a perfect 100, not even New Zealand or Singapore, which both experienced their share of scandals ...

Related publications

Publication cover image

Corruption Perceptions Index 2017

Based on expert opinion from around the world, the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption ...

Report published – Feb 2018

Publication cover image

People and corruption: citizen's voices from around the world

This is a summary report of the key findings from the ninth edition of Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer series – the ...

Report published – Nov 2017

Related blog posts

Giving people a voice: lessons from measuring corruption

As the world embarks on the ambitious global development agenda known as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it ... [read more]

Posted on 31 Mar 2016 by Finn Heinrich

Why did Transparency International visit Jordan?

We understand that The Middle East and North Africa finds itself in a very complex situation with major challenges to ... [read more]

Posted on 13 Nov 2015 by Lamiaa Kalawi

Ditching Integrity: US college sports in crisis

Before the American Civil War (1861-65), every state in the Confederacy had stringent laws forbidding anyone to teach ... [read more]

Posted on 15 Jun 2015 by Allen Sack

Know your contractors: transparent ownership reduces corruption

Procurement is at the heart of the work that the World Bank and other international development banks do. Countries borrow ... [read more]

Posted on 28 Apr 2015 by Daniel Dudis

Give us our daily scandal

When Transparency International announces the results of the Corruption Perceptions Index in December and Italy performs ... [read more]

Posted on 26 Mar 2015 by Davide Del Monte