Transparency International Ireland publishes Speak Up Report 2017

Issued by Transparency International Ireland



Download the Full Report here

Anti-corruption organisation, Transparency International (TI) Ireland has published its second Speak Up report based on data collected from over 850 callers to its Speak Up helpline from 2011 to beginning of 2017. The helpline has offered free support to witnesses of wrongdoing and whistleblowers since 2011.

Most reported sectors

The Speak Up report notes a significant increase in complaints from the public about the Gardaí to the helpline. The largest number of Garda-related complaints related to the alleged failure to investigate crimes reported to them. The Health sector generated the second largest number of calls to the helpline during the same period. The most common concern raised by callers from the sector was whistleblower reprisal. The Banking and Finance sector appears in the top three most complained about sectors for the first time. The largest number of complaints to the Speak Up helpline were made about retail bank lending practices and the conduct of ‘vulture funds’.

‘It’s important to note that the Speak Up report does not suggest that any one sector is more corrupt than any other. However, the helpline data as well as the findings of our Integrity at Work survey will be helpful to policy makers, regulators and employers in supporting witnesses and whistleblowers and inform their approach to addressing future wrongdoing’, said John Devitt, Chief Executive of TI Ireland.

Integrity at Work Survey

The report also includes the findings from the Integrity at Work Survey 2016 which, for the first time, measured the attitudes and experiences of Irish private-sector employees and employers to whistleblowing. The Integrity at Work Survey found that of those that witnessed wrongdoing (the equivalent of over 250,000 people) during the course of their career, 63% (the equivalent of 160,000 people) shared their concerns with a responsible person. Of those who witnessed wrongdoing 69% of women said they reported their concerns, while 58% of men did.

However, only 21% of those that say they reported wrongdoing suffered as a result and 28% of those that reported said they benefitted. Despite the relatively low percentage of reported reprisal, the Integrity at Work’s Survey’s findings suggest that an estimated 33,000 workers claim they have suffered as a result of speaking up at work.

‘Some of the survey’s findings might be surprising given we only hear about the negative experiences of whistleblowers in the media. It appears that whistleblowing is far more common than is generally recognised because not every 'whistleblower' thinks of themselves as such. It’s more likely that people will be identified or self-identify as whistleblowers if their employer or the authorities take retaliatory action or attempt to cover-up the wrongdoing. Employees need to understand that blowing the whistle on wrongdoing doesn't always have to end badly. But employers also need to meet their responsibilities to act on their employees’ concerns and ensure they don’t suffer as a result of speaking up’, added Mr Devitt.

The stereotype of the whistleblower as someone who is disloyal to their employer or who goes straight to the press is also not supported by the findings of the survey with only 2% of employees saying that they would report to the media. This is in contrast to a combined total of 95% of respondents who said that they would bring information to someone inside their organisation.

The survey also points to more positive attitudes to whistleblowing among employers than employees with 91% of employers and 77% of employees saying that they believed whistleblowers should be supported, even if it meant revealing confidential information.

Employers were also more likely to use positive or neutral language to describe whistleblowers. For example, 47% of employers associated the word whistleblower with ‘hero’, compared to 17% of employees, although slightly more employers (12%) than employees (9%) associated the term whistleblower with traitor.

Disparate views among employers and employees on whistleblowing are reflected in the finding that 91% of employers are confident that whistleblowers will be supported in their organisations, while only 51% of employees say that they believe they would be supported if they spoke up.

Support for Speaking Up

In addition, the survey suggests that the three most common reasons Irish workers do not speak up are: 1) out of fear that they could lose their jobs (33%), 2) a concern that their reports will make no difference (22%) and 3) a concern that their colleagues could lose their jobs.

Barriers to Speaking Up

The Integrity at Work survey also points to the low number of employers from the private and non-profit sectors that have whistleblowing procedures in place. Only 34% of private-sector employers have whistleblowing policies or procedures in place in contrast to the estimated 94% of public bodies that do so.

‘Employers need to make sure their staff are informed of their rights and responsibilities under the Protected Disclosures Act. It’s also vital that business and not-for-profit employers put whistleblowing procedures in place, but it’s unlikely that they will make the effort unless they are incentivised or are compelled to do so. The Act obliges public-sector employers to have whistleblowing procedures in place. We recommend that Ireland follows the lead of the French and Dutch governments and extends these requirements to all employers’, Mr Devitt added. 

Recommendations to strengthen the Protected Disclosures Act

TI Ireland has noted that the Protected Disclosures Act is considered to be one of the strongest whistleblower-protection laws in the world. However, it points out that the Act needs to be strengthened to make sure it is fit for purpose. Among the recommendations TI Ireland make include the  extension of whistleblowing protections to volunteers and students; the removal of caps on compensation for awards to workers who are found by the Workplace Relations Commission to have suffered a detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure; and the reversal of the burden of proof to employers to show they were not responsible for the penalisation of a whistleblower. The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform are currently undertaking a review of the first three years’ implementation of the Act and TI Ireland will lobby to see the legislation strengthened and clarified further.

Integrity at Work and Transparency Legal Advice Centre

Eighteen Irish employers, including An Garda Síochána and the Department of Justice and Equality  have joined TI Ireland’s Integrity at Work programme during 2017. Membership of the programme requires employers to sign the Integrity at Work Pledge which commits them to sign-post their staff to the Speak Up helpline or other supports, protect workers who report wrongdoing, and take action in response to those reports. Member organisations also allow their workers to report concerns they have about their treatment or lack of action taken by their employers in response to disclosures. TI Ireland can make recommendations to the member organisation based on those reports.

Irish workers are also able to avail of free legal advice from the Transparency Legal Advice Centre which was launched by TI Ireland in 2016. The law centre specialises in providing advice to whistleblowers and gave free legal advice worth an estimated €260,000 in its first year (it has provided an estimated €400,000 in free legal advice to date). The Speak Up helpline can refer callers on to the law centre after an initial assessment to determine whether the client is seeking to make or has made a protected disclosure. Access to the helpline and legal advice centre is not dependent on whether a worker’s employer is a member of the Integrity at Work programme. Seed-funding for Integrity at Work and the Transparency Legal Advice Centre has been provided by the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform and the Department of Justice and Equality.


For any press enquiries please contact

E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
T: +353 1 554 3938

Latest

Support Transparency International

Risky business: Europe’s golden visa programmes

Are EU Member States accepting too much risk in their investor migration schemes?

Future Against Corruption Award 2018

TI is calling on young people across the globe to join the anti-corruption movement. People between the age of 18 and 35 are invited to submit a short video clip presenting their idea on new ways to fight corruption. Three finalists will be invited to Berlin during the International Anti-Corruption Day festivities to be awarded with the Future Against Corruption Award. Apply today!

The Azerbaijani Laundromat one year on: has justice been served?

In September last year, a massive leak of bank records from 2012 to 2014 showed that the ruling elite of Azerbaijan ran a $3 billion slush fund and an international money laundering scheme. One year on, has enough been done to hold those involved to account?

Right to information: knowledge is power

The right to information is vital for preventing corruption. When citizens can access key facts and data from governments, it is more difficult to hide abuses of power and other illegal activities - governments can be held accountable.

Paradise lost among Maldives dodgy land deals

Should tourists run for cover as a storm of corruption allegations sweeps across the Maldives?

Foreign bribery rages unchecked in over half of global trade

There are many losers and few winners when companies bribe foreign public officials to win lucrative overseas contracts. In prioritising profits over principles, governments in most major exporting countries fail to prosecute companies flouting laws criminalising foreign bribery.

Ensuring that climate funds reach those in need

As climate change creates huge ecological and economic damage, more and more money is being given to at-risk countries to help them prevent it and adapt to its effects. But poorly governed climate finance can be diverted into private bank accounts and vanity projects, often leading to damaging effects.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media