Transparency International Kenya calls for accountability and calm after elections

Issued by Transparency International Kenya



On 8th August 2017, Kenyans exercised their sovereignty by voting for their preferred candidates for various positions. Recent allegations touching on the credibility of the electoral process especially on the tallying transmission and announcement of results have however cast doubts on the elaborate structures put in place by the electoral body to ensure a credible electoral outcome.

There is need for the concerned individuals and institutions to promptly address concerns raised by stakeholders on the possibility of the Kenya Integrated Election Management System (KIEMS) being compromised during the transmission of results.

We request both sides to present the relevant information that would enable an objective assessment and determination of the issues raised. The IEBC should live up to its responsibility of ensuring integrity of the electoral process by addressing and clarifying any concerns raised by all stakeholders in a transparent manner.

Transparency International Kenya (TI-Kenya) is appalled by the incidences of violence following the announcement of the results for the presidential election. TI-Kenya recognizes that Article 37 of the Constitution guarantees every person the freedom to assemble and demonstrate. Citizens should exercise this freedom in a peaceable manner.

The manifestation of unlawful acts by a section of members of the public and security agents has led to the loss of lives and destruction of property. It is incumbent on those who have misgivings on the electoral outcome to act within the law and ensure that their concerns are channelled to the institutions established by law to address these concerns as well as demonstrate responsibility in exercising their right of expression bearing in mind that they have a duty to tell the truth and act in accordance with the law.

Our security agencies have a responsibility to act within the laws of the land including adherence to their professional codes of conduct. They should ensure that their actions in exercising their mandate remain within the dictates of the law. Reports from oversight institutions such as the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights indicate that there have been fatalities resulting from the use of excessive force including firearms. The National Police Service has also reported the loss of lives, injuries and destruction of property in acts of violence. Additionally, TI-Kenya continues to receive a number of reports pointing to deaths and injuries sustained by civilians in the post-election violence in Kisumu and Nairobi where it had deployed election monitors.

To safeguard the integrity of the electoral process and restore security, TI-Kenya demands accountability from various actors as follows:

1. The  Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to promote the principle of free, fair and credible elections by addressing all concerns raised by stakeholders in a transparent and accountable manner.
2. All political leaders to uphold the rule of law in dealing with disputes that may /have arisen from the electoral process.
3. All politicians to exercise leadership by calling upon their supporters to exercise restraint and uphold the rule of law in responding to the outcome of the elections.
4. The security agencies to discharge their mandate in accordance with the law to avoid human rights violations.
5. The National Police Service to ensure that it holds its officers accountable in cases where excess use of force has been established.
6. The National Police Service Internal Affairs Unit and the Independent Policing Oversight Authority to investigate complaints of alleged human rights violations and take appropriate remedial action.
7. Oversight institutions to continue monitoring, investigating and reporting incidents of human rights violations and take appropriate action based on their mandates to ensure accountability
8. All citizens to exercise their rights and freedoms within the Constitution.
9. All political leaders should work together to heal the rifts that have arisen from the campaigns.

 


For any press enquiries please contact

Transparency International Kenya
Kevin Mabonga
T: +254 2727763/5,
M: +254 722296589
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Latest

Support Transparency International

The alarming message of Egypt’s constitutional amendments

Parliamentarians in Egypt look set to approve a series of constitutional amendments this week that, if passed, would consolidate power in the office of the president, while restoring the military as the ultimate authority in the country.

Восточная Европа и Центральная Азия: слабая система сдержек и противовесов

Индекс восприятия коррупции (ИВК) за этот год представляет печальную картину касательно мер по борьбе с коррупцией в Восточной Европе и Центральной Азии. За несколько лет в этом регионе был достигнут очень незначительный прогресс в борьбе с коррупцией.

الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا: انتشار الفساد في ظل ضعف المؤسسات وتراجع الحقوق السياسية

كشف مؤشر مدركات الفساد 2018 عن صورة قاتمة لواقع الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا حيث أن معظم بلدان المنطقة قد أخفقت في مكافحة الفساد على الرغم من أن قلة قليلة من البلدان قد أحرزت تقدما تدريجيا.

Afrique subsaharienne:Les régimes non démocratiques sapent les efforts de lutte contre la corruption

L’Indice de perception de la corruption (IPC) présente cette année un tableau bien sombre de l’Afrique : seuls 8 pays sur 49 obtiennent un score supérieur à 43 sur les 100 points que compte l’Indice. Malgré l’engagement pris par les dirigeants africains de faire de 2018 l’Année africaine de lutte contre la corruption, les avancées concrètes se font encore attendre.

Trouble at the top: why high-scoring countries aren’t corruption-free

For the third year running, the top seven countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2018 consist of the four Nordic nations – Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway – plus New Zealand, Singapore and Switzerland. Yet that doesn’t mean that these countries are corruption-free.

Americas: el debilitamiento de la democracia y el auge del populismo

Con una puntuación media de 44 sobre 100 durante tres años consecutivos en el Índice de Percepción de la Corrupción (IPC), las Américas continúa sin lograr avances significativos en la lucha contra la corrupción.

Conflict at the bottom

As in previous years, many of the countries near the bottom of the 2018 Corruption Perceptions Index have been severely affected by violent conflict in recent years. Why is this the case, and what does it tell us?

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media