TI Ukraine opposes creation of anti-corruption chambers instead of independent anti-corruption court

Issued by Transparency International Ukraine (Трансперенсі Інтернешнл Україна)



Transparency International Ukraine strongly opposes the creation of anti-corruption chambers under existing courts. Ukraine is in need of an independent anti-corruption court. The chapter of the global network is certain that there are no good alternatives to the High Anti-Corruption Court and the system of independent anti- corruption courts in Ukraine.

Today, the President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, said that he agrees "to create anti- corruption chamber as a part of the Supreme Court", and the Commission has already informed President Poroshenko that " we created an interim solution to the problem."

TI Ukraine is really surprised by the statement of Jean-Claude Juncker. The organization is certain that the Ukrainian authorities misled the European partners by convincing them that the creation of anti-corruption chambers instead of independent judicial institutions is a quick and effective solution to the problem of judicial system in Ukraine.

"Chambers in existing courts will be dependent and subject to the external control. They will not only fail to guarantee fair punishment in corruption cases, but will also become effective instruments in the hands of bribe-takers. It is expected that the chambers will be formed, actually, by judges currently delaying and obstructing legal cases submitted by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti- Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAP)," explained the executive director of TI Ukraine Yaroslav Yurchyshyn.

In addition, Ukraine has already developed a strong legal framework for the independent anti-corruption judicial system. Namely, the updated law "On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges" already envisages the launch of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine. Therefore, the law that has already been adopted should be implemented instead of finding ways to avoid it.

The key elements of the anti-corruption judicial system should be:

Transparency International Ukraine calls on the Ukrainian authorities to stop playing an intricate game with the European partners and to focus on the launch of the anti-corruption court, as stipulated by law, taking into account the proposed key elements. Also, the organization urges the European partners to be consistent in their demands and not to make any concessions. After all, the consequences of such actions would not be the expected reforms but imitation and imitation only.


For any press enquiries please contact

Olha Tymchenko, Head of Communication Department,
Transparency International Ukraine
Phone: + 38 050-352-96-18,
E-mail: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Latest

Support Transparency International

No hay cambios en las percepciones pese a los avances en América

En los últimos años, América Latina y el Caribe lograron adelantos significativos en la lucha contra la corrupción. En muchos países de la región existen ahora leyes y mecanismos para contrarrestar este fenómeno, las investigaciones legales están avanzando y los movimientos ciudadanos anticorrupción han incrementado. Sin embargo, de acuerdo con el Índice de Percepción de la Corrupción (IPC) 2017, la región continúa con bajos puntajes.

A redefining moment for Africa

The newly released Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) provides a good baseline for the African Union (AU) anti-corruption efforts in 2018. This year’s theme for the AU is “Winning the Fight against Corruption: A Sustainable Path to Africa’s Transformation.” As the AU rolls out its plan, this is an important moment for Africa to take stock of the current situation.

Perceptions remain unchanged despite progress in the Americas

In the last few years, Latin America and the Carribbean made great strides in the fight against corruption. Laws and mechanisms exist to curb corruption, while legal investigations are advancing and citizen anti-corruption movements are growing in many countries across the region. However, according to the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2017, the region continues to score poorly for corruption. How can we explain this contradiction?

Slow, Imperfect Progress across Asia Pacific

While no country in the Asia Pacific region scores a perfect 100, not even New Zealand or Singapore, which both experienced their share of scandals in the last year, our analysis reveals little progress across the region.

Europe and Central Asia: more civil engagement needed

In 2017, authoritarianism rose across Eastern and South East Europe, hindering anti-corruption efforts and threatening civil liberties. Across the region, civil society organisations and independent media experienced challenges in their ability to monitor and criticise decision-makers

Rampant Corruption in Arab States

In a region stricken by violent conflicts and dictatorships, corruption remains endemic in the Arab states while assaults on freedom of expression, press freedoms and civil society continue to escalate.

Digging deeper into corruption, violence against journalists and active civil society

To mark the release of the Corruption Perceptions Index 2017, we analysed corruption levels around the world and looked at how they relate to civil liberties – specifically, the ability of citizens to speak out in defence of their interests and the wider public good.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media

Would you like to know more?

Sign up to stay informed about corruption news and our work around the world