Separate powers of Attorney General and Public Prosecutor to restore trust in Malaysian judiciary

The A-G needs to come clean and be transparent to explain why and what is the justification and the basis for not proceeding with recommendation of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC)

Issued by The Malaysian Society for Transparency and Integrity (TI Malaysia)



Transparency International Malaysia is calling for greater independence of the judiciary in Malaysia by separating the power of the attorney general (A-G) and the public prosecutor (PP). Today the same person holds both posts and is accountable mainly to the prime minister. This is why there have not been serious investigations into the corruption allegations surrounding the prime minister.

 

Transparency International Malaysia’s (TI-M) understanding on the appointment of the Attorney General (A-G) is under Article 145 of the Federal Constitution whereby the A-G is appointed by The Yang di-Pertuan Agong, on the advice of the Prime Minister.

As in Article 145(3) of the Constitution, the A-G is also the highest ranking public prosecutor in the country and is also known as the Public Prosecutor (PP). Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution states that the attorney-general shall have power, exercisable at his discretion, to institute, conduct or discontinue any proceedings for an offence, other than proceedings before a Shariah court, a native court, or a court martial. Since the PP is also the A-G, greater concern of his independence and integrity is demanded by the public to ensure that criminal justice is enforced fairly and impartially.

TI-M notes that based on the current situation, the candidate for the post as an A-G does not require the confidence of the judiciary or the public as to his capabilities and integrity.

The current justice system merely requires the candidate for the A-G to gain confidence from his appointer, who is the Prime Minister. This has made it easier for unchecked and inappropriate decisions to be made in relation to cases involving high profile individuals.

This erosion of the A-G’s independence has led to weaker accountability by the prosecution system for his decisions.  This can be contrasted with the situation in the United Kingdom where generally speaking the Attorney General of the UK does not interfere in the day to day functions of the Crown Prosecution Services which decides on the prosecution of cases as an independent branch of the government.

In our Malaysian situation therefore it is necessary for the A-G not only to act independently but to be seen to be acting independently in his decisions on whether to prosecute or not especially when high profile cases are involved. In this regard there have been many questions asked from various quarters on the A-G’s decision not to proceed with the three investigation papers submitted by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) on the RM2.6 billion donation and also SRC International with the MACC. 

Very clearly the A-G needs to come clean and be transparent to explain why and what is the justification and the basis for not proceeding with recommendation of the MACC and for instructing MACC to close their files.

Even though the A-G has discretionary power, the exercise of this discretion should be in accordance with law and his duty to uphold the rule of law and including the principle that everyone is equal before the law.  This discretion therefore should be exercised for the public good and to prosecute and punish those who break the law.  Any such exercise to the contrary would be considered an abuse of discretionary power and deemed unconstitutional.

In view of the above TI-M is of the opinion that other functions of the A-G should be separated from the position of PP to ensure the independence of the criminal prosecution branch of the government. This separation of powers as a method of checks and balance will ensure that prosecution decisions can be made without any fear or favour and protected from political interference. 

The position of PP should also be made answerable to Parliament and not to the Executive arm of the Government. Meanwhile since the A-G is a public servant, any decisions made by him should not only be independent, transparent, impartial and fair but also must be seen to be so. His role should be apolitical and no one should be able to doubt his decision when made in the interest of nation and that should be paramount.

There should never be an accumulation of power by a single person or body of government – from time immemorial this has always been the greatest threat to liberty and the life of a nation.


For any press enquiries please contact

Dato’ Akhbar Satar
President, Transparency International-Malaysia
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Dr KM Loi
Deputy President, Transparency International-Malaysia
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Dr Muhammad Mohan
Secretary General, Transparency International-Malaysia
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Latest

Support Transparency International

Three priorities at the Open Government Partnership summit

This week, the Open Government Partnership is holding its 5th global summit in Tbilisi, Georgia. Transparency International is there in force, pushing for action in three key areas.

Civil society’s crucial role in sustainable development

Key players in the development community are meeting in New York for the main United Nations conference on sustainable development, the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF). Transparency International is there to highlight how corruption obstructs development and report on how effectively countries are tackling this issue.

Comment gagner la lutte contre la corruption en Afrique

Aujourd’hui est la Journée africaine de lutte contre la corruption – une occasion opportunité pour reconnaitre le progrès dans la lutte contre la corruption en Afrique et le travail significatif qui reste encore à accomplir.

How to win the fight against corruption in Africa

African Anti-Corruption Day is an important opportunity to recognise both the progress made in the fight against corruption in Africa and the significant work still left to do.

Increasing accountability and safeguarding billions in climate finance

In December 2015, governments from around the world came together to sign the Paris Agreement, agreeing to tackle climate change and keep global warming under two degrees centigrade. They committed to spend US$100 billion annually by 2020 to help developing countries reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and protect themselves against the potentially devastating effects of climate change.

After Gürtel, what next for Spain’s struggle with political corruption?

At the start of June, the Spanish parliament voted to oust Prime Minister Rajoy after his political party was embroiled in the biggest corruption scandal in Spain’s democratic history. At this critical juncture in Spain’s struggle with political corruption, Transparency International urges all parties to join forces against impunity and support anti-corruption efforts in public life.

Risk of impunity increases with outcome of Portuguese-Angolan corruption trial

A verdict last week by the Lisbon Court of Appeals in the trial of former Angolan vice president Manuel Vicente has disappointed hopes for a triumph of legal due process over politics and impunity. It also has worrying implications for the independence of Portugal’s judiciary.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media