Rejection of freedom of information requests raises alarm in Montenegro

Issued by Transparency International Secretariat



Following a recent rejection of more than 90 freedom of information (FOI) requests in Montenegro, Transparency International denounces the actions of the government agency responsible for refusing the public access to important campaign spending information.

MANS, a non-governmental organisation and Transparency International’s chapter in Montenegro, submitted requests to the Agency for Personal Data Protection and Free Access to Information, the main FOI authority in Montenegro, in an effort to obtain financial disclosures related to the recent presidential election. Many of the rejected requests had been under consideration for more than a year. 

“Governments should be transparent about how political campaigns are funded and where the money comes from,” said Delia Ferreira Rubio, chair of Transparency International. “This includes disclosing information to the public. Freedom of information requests are a vital way for citizens and civil society to hold their governments to account.”

The rejection of the FOI requests represents an unusual step backwards for transparency in campaign financing in Montenegro, given that similar requests submitted by MANS were previously accepted.

As common practice, the agency previously fulfilled 152 requests submitted by MANS, which required political parties to publish financial information, however, this policy recently changed. The reversal came two days after a special prosecutor for corruption cases opened an investigation into donations made to the Democratic Party of Socialists, based on MANS findings. The agency’s decision was provided to MANS a day after the presidential elections in Montenegro, and as a result, to date there is very little information available to the public.

The timing of the FOI rejections in proximity to upcoming local elections across Montenegro also raises concerns that the FOI process has become politicised.

MANS has since filed legal appeals for the rejection of the FOI requests to be overturned. It is our hope that the court reaches a timely decision and considers international best practices when reviewing these appeals. However, political parties should not to wait for the decision of the court; they can be more transparent and make this information publicly available now.


For any press enquiries please contact

Jen Pollakusky/Michael Hornsby  
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
T: +49 30 3438 20 666

Latest

Support Transparency International

Support Us

Next week governments can take a step to close down secrecy jurisdictions. Will they?

National financial regulators attending the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plenary in Paris 16 – 21 February have the opportunity to significantly reduce money laundering, corruption and terror financing. They must not squander the opportunity.

Why don’t the victims of bribery share in the record-breaking Airbus settlement?

Last Friday, French, UK and US authorities announced that Airbus would pay record penalties for foreign bribery. Notably absent in the agreements are any plans to share the penalty payment with the countries where the company was paying bribes.

Nadie es perfecto

Los países con las puntuaciones más altas en el IPC, como Dinamarca, Suiza e Islandia, no son inmunes a la corrupción. Si bien el IPC muestra que los sectores públicos en estos países están entre los menos corruptos del mundo, la corrupción existe, especialmente en casos de lavado de dinero y otras formas de corrupción en el sector privado.

مشكلة في الأعلى

Переполох на верху

Страны с самым высоким рейтингом по ИВК, такие как Дания, Швейцария и Исландия, не защищены от коррупции. Хотя ИВК показывает, что государственный сектор в этих странах является одним из самых чистых в мире, коррупция все еще существует, особенно в случаях отмывания денег и другой коррупции в частном секторе.

Problèmes au sommet

Les pays les mieux classés sur l’IPC comme le Danemark, la Suisse et l’Islande ne sont pas à l’abri de la corruption. Bien que l’IPC montre que les secteurs publics de ces pays sont parmi les moins corrompus au monde, la corruption existe toujours, en particulier dans les cas de blanchiment d’argent et d’autres formes de corruption du secteur privé.

Индекс восприятия коррупции 2019

Индекс восприятия коррупции 2019 года выявил, что огромное число стран практически не показывает улучшения в борьбе с коррупцией. Наш анализ также показывает, что сокращение больших денег в политике и содействие инклюзивному принятию политических решений необходимы для сдерживания коррупции.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media