Human rights and free press groups call for charges against Rafael Marques de Morais to be dropped

Issued by Transparency International Secretariat



Journalist Rafael Marques de Morais wrote a book, and for that, he could go to jail. His book, published in Portugal in 2011, alleges serious human rights violations committed by army generals and companies in diamond fields in Angola. Those army generals and companies are taking him to court March 24th in Angola for criminal defamation, punishable under current Angolan law by both a prison term and a monetary penalty.

Mr. Marques has a long history of holding the Angolan government to account for human rights abuses and corruption through his insightful, thoughtful and well regarded journalistic investigations. Mr. Marques is the recipient of numerous prestigious international awards for his work. He is an equal opportunity human rights defender, working to expose violations no matter who is the accused or accuser. For his effort, he has been arrested and detained multiple times in Angola. The United Nations Human Rights Committee determined his prior conviction for defamation violated his rights to liberty and security of the person, freedom of movement and freedom of expression.

The book for which he is on trial, “Blood Diamonds: Corruption and Torture in Angola,” asserts damning accusations of egregious human rights violations committed against people residing in the Lundas region in the course of diamond excavations, including death, torture and forced evictions. The military officials and diamond mining companies and private security contractors implicated first attempted to sue Mr. Marques for defamation in Portugal but the case was dismissed. They then shifted venue and pursued legal action against Mr. Marques at home.

There have already been irregularities in the legal process of Mr. Marques’ case including questioning without his legal counsel present, improper notice and summons, and the fundamental contradiction of the apparent intent of the government to call Rafael as a witness, resulting in his serving as both defendant and state witness in his own trial. The below signatory organizations and individuals are concerned about Mr. Marques’ ability to receive a fair trial as well as the repeated efforts by the Angolan government to stifle Rafael’s freedom of expression as well as that of other journalists and citizens in the country. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, The Media Legal Defence Initiative, The Southern Africa Litigation Centre, The Committee to Protect Journalists, Reporters Without Borders, Freedom House and many others have expressed concerns of documented deaths, disappearances, intimidation and violence toward journalists and citizens exercising their freedom of expression.

We urge the Angola legal system to recognize the December 2014 decision by the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in a defamation case against a fellow journalist from Burkina Faso that prison sentences as penalties for defamation violate the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The criminal defamation law under which he is being tried should be found in violation of the Angolan constitution and Angola’s obligations under international law.

Amnesty International-Deprose Muchena, Director Southern Africa Regional Office
Media Legal Defence Initiative-Peter Noorlander-Chief Executive Officer
The Southern Africa Litigation Centre-Kaajal Ramjathan-Keogh, Executive Director
Amnesty International USA-Steven Hawkins, Executive Director
Reporters Sans Frontieres – Christophe Deloire, Secretary General
Committee to Protect Journalists – Susan Valentine, Africa Program Coordinator
Transparency International – Cobus de Swardt, Managing Director
Global Witness – Simon Tayor, Director
Freedom House – Mark Lagon, President
Front Line Defenders – Mary Lawlor, Executive Director
PEN American Center – Suzanne Nossel, Executive Director
Newseum – Peter S. Prichard, CEO and Chairman
World Association of Newspapers and New Publishers – Alison Meston, Director of Global Campaigns
Amnesty International Portugal-Teresa Pina, Executive Director
Amnesty International Brazil-Átila Roque, Executive Director
Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights – Jeffrey Smith, Advocacy Officer
Associação Justiça Paz e Democracia (AJPD) - Maria Lúcia da Silveira, President
Open Society Foundation Angola - Elias Isaac, Country Director
Publish What You Pay – Marinke van Riet, International Director
International Commission of Jurists – Arnold Tsunga, Director, Africa Programme
Transparency International Portugal - João Paulo Batalha, Executive Director
East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project – Hassan Shire, Executive Director
Pan-African Human Rights Defenders Network – Hassan Shire, Chairperson
ARTICLE 19 – Henry Omusundi Maina, Regional Director, Eastern Africa
Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights – Irene Petras, Director
Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa – Gaye Sowe, Director of Programs
Human Rights Institute of South Africa – Corlett Letlojane, Executive Director
Action des Chrétiens Pour l’Abolition de la Torture (ACAT) - Jean-Etienne de Linares, Executive Director
OMUNGA - José Patrocínio, General Coordinator
Pan African Lawyers Union (PALU) – Donald Deya, Chief Executive Officer
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) -Tchérina Jerolon, Africa Desk Deputy Director
DITSWANELO - Alice Mogwe, Executive Director
Foundation for Human Rights Initiatives (FHRI) - Sheila Nabachwa, Deputy Director
Equal Rights Trust - Dimitrina Petrova, Executive Director
WLSA Mozambique -Calista Terezinha da Silva, National Coordinator
SADC Lawyers Association -Gilberto Caldeirra Correia, President
 


For any press enquiries please contact

Chris Sanders
T: 0049 30 34 38 20 666
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Latest

Support Transparency International

Blog: Gender and corruption: where do we go from here?

While corruption and gender have become increasingly prominent on the global agenda, and it’s increasingly recognized that anti-corruption measures are central to reducing the gender gap, the pace of change has so far been glacial. Urgent action is needed, but is sorely lacking.

Blog: Verifying the beneficial owner of companies. Why and how.

While existing rules emphasise the need for accurate, reliable and up-to-date beneficial ownership information, verification of information provided by companies is often minimal, when it happens at all.

Troika Laundromat signals a different kind of financial crisis

The Troika Laundromat investigation shines a spotlight on a cast of new and familiar characters in the ongoing saga surrounding flows of dirty money through the world’s financial system.

الأبعاد الخطيرة للتعديلات الدستورية المقترحة في مصر

يتأهب نواب البرلمان المصري للمصادقة على سلسلة من التعديلات الدستورية، التي ستؤدي في حال تمريرها إلى ترسيخ مزيد من السلطة بيد الرئيس، وتنصيب الجيش مجددا كأعلى سلطة في البلاد.

The alarming message of Egypt’s constitutional amendments

Parliamentarians in Egypt look set to approve a series of constitutional amendments this week that, if passed, would consolidate power in the office of the president, while restoring the military as the ultimate authority in the country.

Восточная Европа и Центральная Азия: слабая система сдержек и противовесов

Индекс восприятия коррупции (ИВК) за этот год представляет печальную картину касательно мер по борьбе с коррупцией в Восточной Европе и Центральной Азии. За несколько лет в этом регионе был достигнут очень незначительный прогресс в борьбе с коррупцией.

الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا: انتشار الفساد في ظل ضعف المؤسسات وتراجع الحقوق السياسية

كشف مؤشر مدركات الفساد 2018 عن صورة قاتمة لواقع الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا حيث أن معظم بلدان المنطقة قد أخفقت في مكافحة الفساد على الرغم من أن قلة قليلة من البلدان قد أحرزت تقدما تدريجيا.

Afrique subsaharienne:Les régimes non démocratiques sapent les efforts de lutte contre la corruption

L’Indice de perception de la corruption (IPC) présente cette année un tableau bien sombre de l’Afrique : seuls 8 pays sur 49 obtiennent un score supérieur à 43 sur les 100 points que compte l’Indice. Malgré l’engagement pris par les dirigeants africains de faire de 2018 l’Année africaine de lutte contre la corruption, les avancées concrètes se font encore attendre.

Trouble at the top: why high-scoring countries aren’t corruption-free

For the third year running, the top seven countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2018 consist of the four Nordic nations – Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway – plus New Zealand, Singapore and Switzerland. Yet that doesn’t mean that these countries are corruption-free.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media