European Parliament Committee Sets the Tone for Europe’s Debate on Multinational Transparency

Amid public outcry on tax dodging, Parliamentarians respond with concrete measures to level the playing field

Issued by Transparency International Liaison Office to the European Union



In another move that places Europe at the forefront of the financial transparency wave, the Legal Affairs (JURI) Committee of the European Parliament voted in favor of a Shareholders Rights Directive that includes a requirement for multinational corporations (MNCs) to publicly report financial information on a country by country level.

“Up until now, we’ve had to rely on leaks, whistleblowers, and secret documents to learn if a multinational is engaging in aggressive tax planning and profit shifting,” said Koen Roovers, Lead EU Advocate for the Financial Transparency Coalition. “But today’s vote brings the transparency Europe needs closer to reality.”

In the wake of the LuxLeaks scandal, which exposed hundreds of MNCs that had entered into secret tax deals with the government of Luxembourg, there has been a renewed public focus on corporate transparency and tax dodging.

Public country by country reporting (CBCR) would require MNCs to disclose things like the amount of profit made, taxes paid, revenue generated and number of employees for each country where a subsidiary operates. Right now, MNCs report on their operations in one consolidated global report, without any way of discerning country specific operations.

“This kind of detailed corporate reporting can help to flag up possible corruption by shedding a light on special arrangements between companies and governments.” said Nienke Palstra, Senior Policy Officer with Transparency International EU. “It will also improve the accountability of companies to the citizens of the countries where they make their profits.”

The vote comes as the European Commission begins an assessment of the benefits of CBCR as part of the EC’s tax transparency package. The package also called for the exchange of tax rulings between European countries, something that’s currently kept secret. Some sectors of the economy already have to report this information.

“Large European banks are already making this information available to the public and this is not having any negative impact on their competitiveness”, says Catherine Olier, Oxfam’s EU policy advisor. “If banks are opening their own books, why shouldn’t other big companies do the same at a time when European citizens are fed up with unfair corporate tax dodging?”

“Companies that are operating in one jurisdiction already report this type of information, so it’s not only a question of transparency,” said Tove Ryding, Eurodad’s tax justice advocacy manager. “It’s about creating a level playing field between small and medium enterprises and their transnational competitors,” added Ryding.

Tax authorities aren’t the only ones that want this information, either. Investors need the very same knowledge; knowing if a corporation is operating in unstable areas, using tax havens, or engaging in the type of aggressive tax planning that can ruin a reputation are vital to making sound business investments.

Notes to the Editor:

  1. The vote comes as the European Commission begins an assessment of the benefits of CBCR and in the wake of the EC’s tax transparency package, which called for the exchange of tax rulings between European countries, something that’s currently kept secret. Some sectors of the economy already have to report this information.
  2. The ALDE group invoked a rule of procedure at the end of the vote, requesting to send the report to plenary. The European Parliament’s leadership, the Conference of Presidents, will decide whether or not to put it on the agenda.
  3. The European Parliament has repeatedly called for greater transparency around the activities of multinational corporations, for instance in the 2014 Tax Report (rapporteur Kaili) that was adopted in March this year and the report on the Fight against Tax Fraud, Tax Evasion and Tax Havens (rapporteur Kleva-Kekuš) of May 2013.


For any press enquiries please contact

Koen Roovers – Financial Transparency
+32 (0) 4 9750 9871
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Nienke Palstra – Transparency International EU
+32 (0) 2 893 24 58
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Angela Corbalán – Oxfam International
+32 (0) 473 56 22 60
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Latest

Support Transparency International

The terrible consequences of police corruption in South Africa

What do we do when those mandated to protect us are serving other interests than public safety and security? In South Africa, police corruption leaves the public exposed to high rates of crime, and causes distrust of the police service while allowing crime to flourish.

Why do DRC citizens report such high levels of corruption?

People's experiences with corruption in the DRC are far worse than in most other African countries. Why is corruption so prevalent in the DRC, why is bribery so commonplace and why do two thirds of citizens feel powerless?

Is Mauritius at a tipping point in the fight against corruption?

According to the latest GCB for Africa, very few Mauritians who accessed public services, like health care and education, had to pay a bribe for those services. But given recent scandals, citizens still see certain groups and institutions as corrupt.

Countries must be more transparent when investigating transnational corruption

Supervisory and justice systems should be transparent and accountable so that the public can assess their performance.

Resilient institutions

Reducing corruption is an important component of the sustainable development agenda, and one that all state parties have an obligation to address. Although corruption is often thought of as a ‘third-world problem’, institutions in the Global North play an important role in the corruption cycle, and are therefore an essential part of the solutions.

In whose interest? Political integrity and corruption in Africa

What accounts for the wide disparity in peoples’ perceptions of the integrity of elected representatives in different countries? In this piece, we will to look at various forms of political corruption, how they manifest in African countries and what can be done to promote political integrity.

Cidadãos opinam sobre a corrupção em África

A décima edição do Barómetro Global de Corrupção (GCB) – África revela que embora a maioria das pessoas na África acreditem que os níveis de corrupção aumentaram no seu país, elas também se sentem otimistas, pois acreditam que os cidadãos podem fazer a diferença no combate à corrupção.

Les citoyens africains expriment leur opinion sur la corruption

La 10e édition du Baromètre mondial de la corruption – Afrique révèle que la plupart des Africains pensent que la corruption a augmenté dans leur pays, mais aussi que la majorité d’entre eux s’estiment capables, en tant que citoyens, de changer la donne dans la lutte contre la corruption.

Global Corruption Barometer - Africa 2019

The Global Corruption Barometer (GCB) – Africa reveals that more than half of all citizens surveyed in 35 African countries think corruption is getting worse in their country. 59 per cent of people think their government is doing badly at tackling corruption.

Citizens speak out about corruption in Africa

The Global Corruption Barometer (GCB) – Africa, reveals that while most people in Africa feel corruption increased in their country, a majority also feel optimistic that they can make a difference in the fight against corruption.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media