Indonesian government must ensure anti-corruption is not undermined

Issued by Transparency International Secretariat



The re-election of Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, confirmed by the country’s Elections Commission last week, provides an excellent opportunity for the triumphant incumbent to fulfil anti-corruption promises made throughout his campaign.

Two key bills currently under discussion by Indonesia’s House of Representatives threaten the continued existence and support of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), although it has played an important role in ensuring that top officials engaged in corrupt activities are prosecuted. The commission’s existence and the high number of cases handled by it thus far, represent an important achievement.

As his next term begins the people of Indonesia and the international community have high expectations that President Yudhoyono’s anti-corruption commitments will be translated into action to guarantee the KPK’s continued existence and its ability to act as a competent, independent body fighting corruption.

Transparency International (TI) stands behind Transparency International Indonesia and other Indonesian NGOs in support of the KPK as a stable institution, in accordance with provisions of the United Nations Convention against Corruption ratified by Indonesia in 2006, and condemns recent attempts to weaken the KPK’s independence and authority by turning it into a temporary, ad-hoc institution.

Despite their undeniable achievements and widespread public support, the KPK and the special court for corruption crimes (Tipikor) have been under incessant attacks by parliament, the attorney general’s office and the police, among others. It is time for such attacks to stop detracting from the problems at hand which affect the daily lives of the Indonesian people. President Yudhoyono has a decisive role to play in ensuring that such a vital institution has the necessary powers and resources to fully investigate and prosecute corrupt acts.

TI’s 2009 Global Corruption Barometer shows increasing public confidence in the KPK’s and Tipikor’s ability to handle corruption. More than 70 per cent of respondents feel the government has been effective in addressing corruption. On the other hand, the House of Representatives and the judiciary are perceived to be the most corrupt institutions.

These contrasting results indicate that Indonesians do not attribute recent anti-corruption achievements to those institutions - which should be key for eradicating corruption when functioning properly- but to independent institutions such as the KPK, the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK), and Tipikor.

Failure by the government to shield the KPK and the Tipikor court, will not only hinder all efforts to eradicate corruption, but will certainly impact on the political and economic credibility of Indonesia. Most importantly, it will dent Indonesian’s belief that their government is serious about establishing and maintaining solid mechanisms to hold the corrupt to account.

###

Transparency International is the civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption


For any press enquiries please contact

Berlin:
Gypsy Guillén Kaiser
T: +49 30 34 38 20 662
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Jakarta:
Teten Masduki, Secretary General TI Indonesia
T: +62-21 720 8515

Latest

Support Transparency International

Support Us

What people think: corruption in the Middle East & North Africa

Momentum has been building against corruption for years in the Middle East and North Africa. From Lebanon and Sudan, where millions of people took to the streets earlier this year to speak out against their governments, to the Arab revolutions that toppled corrupt leaders nearly a decade ago, people are fed up with rampant corruption across the region.

Wasta: How personal connections are denying citizens opportunities and basic services

In many Arab countries the use of personal connections, or “wasta” in Arabic, is a common practice and a social norm. People use their family or social contacts to skip the line and gain quicker and better access to basic goods and services. How much you can increase the speed and quality of your service often depends on who you know – the higher the better, of course.

Sextortion: Middle East and North Africa

Sextortion is one of the most significant forms of gendered corruption and although women’s rights have advanced unevenly across the Middle East and North Africa, positive momentum has been building in the region over the last decade.

Lack of political integrity is undermining trust in democracy in Middle East and North Africa

The Global Corruption Barometer – Middle East and North Africa 2019 reveals that leaders in the region are perceived as acting in their own self-interest at the expense of the citizens they are meant to serve. This has serious consequences for trust in democratic institutions.

آراء المواطنين:  الفساد في منطقة الشرق الأوسط وشمال أفريقيا

لقد تزايد زخم التنديد بالفساد خلال السنوات الماضية في منطقة الشرق الأوسط وشمال إفريقيا. وضاق الناس ذرعا بالفساد المستشري في مختلف أنحاء المنطقة، من لبنان والسودان، حيث خرج ملايين الناس إلى الشوارع في مطلع هذا العام للتنديد بصوت عال بممارسات حكوماتهم، إلى الثورات العربية التي أطاحت بالزعماء الفاسدين منذ زهاء عشر سنوات.

الرشوة الجنسية: منطقة الشرق الأوسط وشمال إفريقيا

على الرغم من تفاوت التقدم المُحرز على مستوى حقوق المرأة في مختلف أنحاء الشرق الأوسط وشمال إفريقيا، شهدت المنطقة زخما إيجابيا تنامى تدريجيا خلال العقد الماضي. إذ أصبح عدد أكبر من النساء يُعبّرن عن أنفسهن داعيات إلى تعزيز تمثيل المرأة في الحكومة وتجريم العنف المنزلي وتحقيق المساواة في الحقوق للنساء والفتيات، إلى جانب عدد من المسائل الأخرى التي تهم المرأة. وتُناضل النساء في مختلف دول المنطقة من أجل إعلاء كلمتهن.

حرمان المواطنين من مختلف الفرص والخدمات الأساسية  بسبب استغلال آخرين لعلاقاتهم الشخصية

يُعتبر استغلال العلاقات الشخصية في البلدان العربية، أو ما يُعبّر عنه بالواسطة، مُمارسة منتشرة ومُتعارف عليها اجتماعيا. إذ يستغل مختلف الأشخاص علاقاتهم الأسرية أو الاجتماعية لعدم الوقوف في الصف وللوصول على نحو أسرع وأفضل إلى المدارس أو الجامعات أو المستشفيات أو الوظائف، و"لتعجيل" الإجراءات الإدارية في المؤسسات الحكومية مثل تجديد وثائق الهوية أو شهادات الميلاد. وتعتمد عادة سرعة حصولك على الخدمة وجودتها على الشخص الذي تعرفه؛ فبطبيعة الحال، كلما كان في منصب أعلى كان ذلك أفضل لك.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media