Lack of Transparency in political financing poses serious problems for countries

New study calls for monitoring campaign and party financing

Issued by Transparency International Secretariat

Translations: ES

Political party and election campaign financing is a murky field in eight Latin American countries, according to a study released today by Transparency International (TI) and The Carter Center.

The study, part of the Crinis project, shows deep flaws in the standards and practices governing transparency and accountability in party and campaign financing systems in Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay and Peru - countries covered by the study. The main problems are: a lack of oversight for private donations, scarce accountability by candidates, unreliable data delivered by parties along with the fact that information about political financing is not made public in most of the countries studied.

“Our goal is not to criticise but to help democratic governments to do better. To achieve equitable participation for voters, we must prevent wealthy candidates and parties from deriving undue advantage from their superior resources and assure that donors do not unduly influence the decisions of elected officials whose campaigns they helped fund. Political financing regulation is essential to a healthy democracy,” said Jimmy Carter, former US president and founder of The Carter Center in a statement.

Money is a necessary element for democracies and parties to run smoothly but only as long as financing is transparent, properly accounted for, with full public disclosure and subjected to effective governmental and social oversight mechanisms. This guarantees citizens’ basic right to know the financial interests supporting candidates and the chance to consider them when casting their votes. Transparency and accountability also serve to monitor irregularities such as vote-buying and the flow of ill-gotten funds.

Crinis presents measures to help governments and citizens increase transparency and accountability levels. In addition to a comparative analysis of the data collected in eight countries, the study includes a narrative report on each country with findings and detailed recommendations.

“Citizens have no way of knowing who finances candidates and political representatives. The lack of transparency in political financing poses alarming risks of corruption since private donations easily become a channel for buying favours,” said Silke Pfeiffer, Regional Director for the Americas at Transparency International during the launch of the study in Panama City.

Increased transparency would lead these countries to greater compliance with international agreements such as the Organization of American States’ Democratic Charter and the United Nations Convention against Corruption. Both have been ratified by all the countries analysed in Crinis.

Hidden political financing

Private donations without scrutiny: In most of the countries studied, reports presented by parties to the electoral control agencies mainly cover public funds, leaving private contributions, which tend to make up the most significant parts of election funding, in the dark. Electoral control bodies in the four Central American countries studied and in Paraguay, either do not receive reports of private income or only record them. There are no reviews or audits. Oversight focusses solely on the proper use of public funds.

Unreliable data: In the eight countries reviewed, experts surveyed confirm that financial reports submitted by candidates and parties to the electoral bodies regarding their income and expenditures are unreliable or incomplete. In Argentina, Paraguay, Colombia, Costa Rica and Nicaragua, experts estimate that in general less than 50 percent of funds raised are actually reported.

When politicians feel a greater commitment toward their donors than toward citizens, it is the poor who suffer most since they lack sufficient resources to pressure politicians into keeping their electoral promises. This directly diminishes citizens’ quality of life and the credibility of a democracy. According to Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer 2006, individuals surveyed in ten Latin American countries consider political parties to be one of the most corrupt segments of society, with a score of 4.2 on a scale of 1 to 5 (where 1 is least and 5 is most corrupt).


Download English brochure.

See the full report in English here.

See more information on TI's CRINIS project click here.

On 12 and 13 July 2007, Transparency International (TI), the Social Science Research Centre, Berlin (WZB) and the Ibero-American Institute, Berlin (IAI) will hold a conference on:

Benefits and Limits of Transparency in Party- and Election Funding

For more information, download the conference announcement.


For any press enquiries please contact


Marta Erquicia
T: +49-30-34 38 20-651
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Gypsy Guillén Kaiser
T: +49-30-34 38 20-662
E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Silke Pfeiffer
T: (507)67604329


Support Transparency International

Support Us

Next week governments can take a step to close down secrecy jurisdictions. Will they?

National financial regulators attending the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plenary in Paris 16 – 21 February have the opportunity to significantly reduce money laundering, corruption and terror financing. They must not squander the opportunity.

Why don’t the victims of bribery share in the record-breaking Airbus settlement?

Last Friday, French, UK and US authorities announced that Airbus would pay record penalties for foreign bribery. Notably absent in the agreements are any plans to share the penalty payment with the countries where the company was paying bribes.

Nadie es perfecto

Los países con las puntuaciones más altas en el IPC, como Dinamarca, Suiza e Islandia, no son inmunes a la corrupción. Si bien el IPC muestra que los sectores públicos en estos países están entre los menos corruptos del mundo, la corrupción existe, especialmente en casos de lavado de dinero y otras formas de corrupción en el sector privado.

مشكلة في الأعلى

Переполох на верху

Страны с самым высоким рейтингом по ИВК, такие как Дания, Швейцария и Исландия, не защищены от коррупции. Хотя ИВК показывает, что государственный сектор в этих странах является одним из самых чистых в мире, коррупция все еще существует, особенно в случаях отмывания денег и другой коррупции в частном секторе.

Problèmes au sommet

Les pays les mieux classés sur l’IPC comme le Danemark, la Suisse et l’Islande ne sont pas à l’abri de la corruption. Bien que l’IPC montre que les secteurs publics de ces pays sont parmi les moins corrompus au monde, la corruption existe toujours, en particulier dans les cas de blanchiment d’argent et d’autres formes de corruption du secteur privé.

Индекс восприятия коррупции 2019

Индекс восприятия коррупции 2019 года выявил, что огромное число стран практически не показывает улучшения в борьбе с коррупцией. Наш анализ также показывает, что сокращение больших денег в политике и содействие инклюзивному принятию политических решений необходимы для сдерживания коррупции.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media