Russia: the perils of selective justice

Russia: the perils of selective justice

The guilty verdict in the trial of Russian anti-corruption activist Aleksey Navalny and his five year prison sentence for alleged embezzlement is a troubling example of selective justice. It calls into question the independence of the judiciary and shows the difficulties faced by those who are vocal in their criticism of the authorities.

Navalny, who declared himself a candidate in September’s election for mayor of Moscow, is a vocal critic of the government, active blogger and leader of an anti-corruption non-governmental organisation.

Irrespective of the merits of the case, which legal experts have called into question, neither the process nor the punishment fit the crime. Russians took to the streets of Moscow on hearing the verdict to protest. Simultaneously, the court where Navalny was tried, released him on bail, pending his appeal.

Maintaining equality before the law

The judiciary is one of the most important pillars of a state and its independence and integrity are the foundations for maintaining the rule of law. Only if all are equal before the law and receive a fair trial, can justice be done. A compromised justice system, one that is used for political purposes, seriously damages the rule of law and also diminishes a state’s ability to fight corruption.

Despite Navlany’s release on bail, the trial and its result raise many questions. Navalny was tried in a criminal court for a civil offense and the severity of his sentence is not consistent with similar cases. Navalny, was convicted of embezzling about US$500,000, a charge he denies. He was given a five year sentence and fined US$15,000. The previous week the former deputy prefect of northern district of Moscow, Joseph Reyhanov, received a five year suspended sentence for embezzling US$9.6 million and no fine.

Such a different outcome in the prosecution of similar cases highlights the problems in the system of rule of law.

Judicial and political corruption can reinforce each other, which is why it is important that not only are the courts seen as independent but that they are consistent in their sentencing, something that appears not to be the case in the Navalny trial.

For any press enquiries please contact press@transparency.org

Latest

Support Transparency International

Who doesn’t know the Cayman Islands is a great place to hide money? The Cayman Islands

In May, the Cayman Islands government quietly released a report that just about acknowledges the country's deficiencies at thwarting money laundering.

Your ideas welcome: help us set higher standards in state-owned companies

We need your help to draw up principles for fighting corruption in state-owned enterprises. Please share your ideas!

Brazil: Open data just made investigating corruption easier

All of the official documentation of from Brazil’s biggest corruption scandal – Operation Car Wash or Lava Jato – is now available to search easily online.

Unexplained Wealth Orders: How to catch the corrupt and corrupt money in the UK

UK parliament passed an important provision that introduces a powerful new weapon into the anti-corruption arsenal: Unexplained Wealth Orders.

Land rights in Georgia: the stench of corruption

This is the story of how Transparency International’s Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre in Georgia helped a group of villagers win a legal battle against local authorities who had stolen their land.

How corruption affects climate change

Corruption and climate change are closely intertwined.

The secret is out: US$2.7 billion of São Paulo property linked to offshore companies

Our investigation into the real estate market in São Paulo shows how easy it is to hide more than US$2.7 billion worth of property behind shell companies.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media

Would you like to know more?

Sign up to stay informed about corruption news and our work around the world