Keeping aid on target

In 2010 US $128 billion was spent in development aid across the globe. This money is supposed to save lives and better the livelihoods of millions of distressed people.

Corruption and poor governance can allow aid that should go to the poor to be diverted into the pockets of the powerful, frustrating development efforts, and perpetuating systems of political, economic and social inequality. Good governance has the opposite effect. For example, a recent study by Transparency International shows that when corruption is kept in check, there is a greater chance countries can achieve the Millennium Development Goals such as improving the health of mothers and babies, ensuring boys and girls have equal access to a complete primary education, and halving the number of people who are unable to access or afford clean water by 2015.

This week the most powerful aid decision-makers from across the world meet at the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan, South Korea, to discuss the future of how money will be given. What they decide affects the destinies of the millions of people that rely on this help to survive, which is why it is important that the issue of corruption in aid  is addressed head on.

How corruption creeps in

Corruption in aid is a result of poor governance and mismanagement at the international, regional and local level. It results from a lack of transparency and accountability, allowing decision-makers to divert aid away from those for which it is intended.

Donors and the countries getting the money know this. As part of making aid more effective, aid actors have made commitments to fight corruption and make aid more transparent, predictable and accountable. They have even pledged to support the creation of key institutions for good governance and clean procurement.

The process started in Rome in 2003 and the most well-known consequence was the Paris Declaration, which set targets for developing countries and donors to meet. Principles of mutual accountability were also spelled out, making both donors and recipients responsible for ensuring aid money is used well.

The International Aid Transparency Initiative was launched following the 2008 Third High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Accra, Ghana. More than 20 signatories, including donors such as the United Kingdom and the World Bank, have worked to adopt a common method of reporting how they gave their money. All their aid information is published using the IATI standard, making it possible to see where aid money is going and how and when it is being spent.

Today these donors represent 64 per cent of official development flows. If Canada and the United States were to agree to start publishing their aid information using the same standard, this would take the total to more than 80 percent.

What's next?

One key challenge now is to ensure that new donors adopt the IATI principle too. New donors include countries, such as the rapidly growing economies of Brazil and China, as well as private foundations and investment funds.

What these actors will commit to in Busan is still unknown. China has already made it clear transparency standards do not apply to its aid programmes.

Civil society's agenda

The meetings in Busan must result in concrete commitments that ensure good aid governance prevents corruption and deliver on aid effectiveness.

Transparency International and other civil society organisations are calling on governments to make the aid process transparent, accountable, and locally-owned to ensure donor monies benefit communities rather than fuel corruption and mismanagement.

In Busan and beyond, this means that:

Less corruption, more aid

Accountability, transparency and integrity are the anti-corruption principles needed to make aid better governed. Successes from Transparency International chapters around the world underscore this:

Officials in Busan must recognise these facts. Unfortunately, many governments are pulling in different directions and are not willing to deliver on what is needed.

Although the language on transparency and accountability will be included in the final communiqué, the mechanism to ensure transparency and accountability – in effect the way to hold donors and recipients to account – may be missing. Allowing this to happen would mean a lost future for aid.


Press Release:Transparency International calls on all donors to sign up to aid transparency standard

Joint NGO Press Release: Aid donors make progress on transparency as key summit opens

Better Aid Press Release: Busan: World governments have failed to make aid work: civil society gives 3 ways to fix it

Read more about aid transparency on the Transparency International blog

Policy Position Making Aid Effective: an Anti-Corruption Agenda

The 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness

Civil Society’s Key Asks for Busan

Position of International Civil Society Organizations on Accountability for the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness

Civil Society Petition for BetterAid

Make Aid Transparent Campaign

International Aid Transparency Initiative

Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness

For any press enquiries please contact


Support Transparency International

The theme for the 18th edition of the International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC) is announced

Building on the priorities set out in the Panama Declaration, the 18th IACC in Denmark from 22 to 24 October 2018 will move the pledge of acting together now to concrete action.

A new home for our corruption research

Transparency International is excited to announce the launch of the Knowledge Hub, a dedicated online space for our research.

Pardon me? Presidential clemency and impunity for grand corruption

Recent events in Brazil and Peru have shone a spotlight on the issue of presidential pardons in cases of grand corruption. Read more to find out the best practices that legislators can use to ensure that pardons are not abused for political purposes.

Stopping Dirty Money: the Global Effective-O-Meter

As of December 2017, global effectiveness at stopping money laundering stands at 32% effectiveness.

Corruption in the USA: The difference a year makes

A new survey by Transparency International shows that the US government has a long way to go to win back citizens’ trust.

Anti-Corruption Day 2017: Empowering citizens’ fight against corruption

The 9 December, is Anti-corruption Day. A key part of Transparency International’s work is to help people hold their governments to account. Have a look at what we've been doing around the world!

Digital Award for Transparency: Honouring digital initiatives to fight corruption

The Digital Award for Transparency awards individuals and civil society organisations who have developed digital technology tools used to fight corruption. The award aims at strengthening and promoting existing initiatives that promote good governance through three categories: Open Data, Citizen Engagement and Anti-Corruption Tools.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media

Would you like to know more?

Sign up to stay informed about corruption news and our work around the world