Keeping aid on target

In 2010 US $128 billion was spent in development aid across the globe. This money is supposed to save lives and better the livelihoods of millions of distressed people.

Corruption and poor governance can allow aid that should go to the poor to be diverted into the pockets of the powerful, frustrating development efforts, and perpetuating systems of political, economic and social inequality. Good governance has the opposite effect. For example, a recent study by Transparency International shows that when corruption is kept in check, there is a greater chance countries can achieve the Millennium Development Goals such as improving the health of mothers and babies, ensuring boys and girls have equal access to a complete primary education, and halving the number of people who are unable to access or afford clean water by 2015.

This week the most powerful aid decision-makers from across the world meet at the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan, South Korea, to discuss the future of how money will be given. What they decide affects the destinies of the millions of people that rely on this help to survive, which is why it is important that the issue of corruption in aid  is addressed head on.

How corruption creeps in

Corruption in aid is a result of poor governance and mismanagement at the international, regional and local level. It results from a lack of transparency and accountability, allowing decision-makers to divert aid away from those for which it is intended.

Donors and the countries getting the money know this. As part of making aid more effective, aid actors have made commitments to fight corruption and make aid more transparent, predictable and accountable. They have even pledged to support the creation of key institutions for good governance and clean procurement.

The process started in Rome in 2003 and the most well-known consequence was the Paris Declaration, which set targets for developing countries and donors to meet. Principles of mutual accountability were also spelled out, making both donors and recipients responsible for ensuring aid money is used well.

The International Aid Transparency Initiative was launched following the 2008 Third High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Accra, Ghana. More than 20 signatories, including donors such as the United Kingdom and the World Bank, have worked to adopt a common method of reporting how they gave their money. All their aid information is published using the IATI standard, making it possible to see where aid money is going and how and when it is being spent.

Today these donors represent 64 per cent of official development flows. If Canada and the United States were to agree to start publishing their aid information using the same standard, this would take the total to more than 80 percent.

What's next?

One key challenge now is to ensure that new donors adopt the IATI principle too. New donors include countries, such as the rapidly growing economies of Brazil and China, as well as private foundations and investment funds.

What these actors will commit to in Busan is still unknown. China has already made it clear transparency standards do not apply to its aid programmes.

Civil society's agenda

The meetings in Busan must result in concrete commitments that ensure good aid governance prevents corruption and deliver on aid effectiveness.

Transparency International and other civil society organisations are calling on governments to make the aid process transparent, accountable, and locally-owned to ensure donor monies benefit communities rather than fuel corruption and mismanagement.

In Busan and beyond, this means that:

Less corruption, more aid

Accountability, transparency and integrity are the anti-corruption principles needed to make aid better governed. Successes from Transparency International chapters around the world underscore this:

Officials in Busan must recognise these facts. Unfortunately, many governments are pulling in different directions and are not willing to deliver on what is needed.

Although the language on transparency and accountability will be included in the final communiqué, the mechanism to ensure transparency and accountability – in effect the way to hold donors and recipients to account – may be missing. Allowing this to happen would mean a lost future for aid.


Press Release:Transparency International calls on all donors to sign up to aid transparency standard

Joint NGO Press Release: Aid donors make progress on transparency as key summit opens

Better Aid Press Release: Busan: World governments have failed to make aid work: civil society gives 3 ways to fix it

Read more about aid transparency on the Transparency International blog

Policy Position Making Aid Effective: an Anti-Corruption Agenda

The 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness

Civil Society’s Key Asks for Busan

Position of International Civil Society Organizations on Accountability for the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness

Civil Society Petition for BetterAid

Make Aid Transparent Campaign

International Aid Transparency Initiative

Open Forum for CSO Development Effectiveness

For any press enquiries please contact


Support Transparency International

Three priorities at the Open Government Partnership summit

This week, the Open Government Partnership is holding its 5th global summit in Tbilisi, Georgia. Transparency International is there in force, pushing for action in three key areas.

Civil society’s crucial role in sustainable development

Key players in the development community are meeting in New York for the main United Nations conference on sustainable development, the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF). Transparency International is there to highlight how corruption obstructs development and report on how effectively countries are tackling this issue.

Comment gagner la lutte contre la corruption en Afrique

Aujourd’hui est la Journée africaine de lutte contre la corruption – une occasion opportunité pour reconnaitre le progrès dans la lutte contre la corruption en Afrique et le travail significatif qui reste encore à accomplir.

How to win the fight against corruption in Africa

African Anti-Corruption Day is an important opportunity to recognise both the progress made in the fight against corruption in Africa and the significant work still left to do.

Increasing accountability and safeguarding billions in climate finance

In December 2015, governments from around the world came together to sign the Paris Agreement, agreeing to tackle climate change and keep global warming under two degrees centigrade. They committed to spend US$100 billion annually by 2020 to help developing countries reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and protect themselves against the potentially devastating effects of climate change.

After Gürtel, what next for Spain’s struggle with political corruption?

At the start of June, the Spanish parliament voted to oust Prime Minister Rajoy after his political party was embroiled in the biggest corruption scandal in Spain’s democratic history. At this critical juncture in Spain’s struggle with political corruption, Transparency International urges all parties to join forces against impunity and support anti-corruption efforts in public life.

Risk of impunity increases with outcome of Portuguese-Angolan corruption trial

A verdict last week by the Lisbon Court of Appeals in the trial of former Angolan vice president Manuel Vicente has disappointed hopes for a triumph of legal due process over politics and impunity. It also has worrying implications for the independence of Portugal’s judiciary.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media