Corruption risks in Eurasia: Spotlight on Azerbaijan and Moldova

Corruption risks in Eurasia: Spotlight on Azerbaijan and Moldova

In November 2013, Ukraine’s former president Yanukovych suddenly suspended preparations for the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement, leading to massive demonstrations in Kiev’s Maidan Square and, ultimately, his ouster. Now, eight months later, under new leadership with strong commitments to implement reforms and combat corruption, Ukraine has signed the agreement.

Georgia and Moldova have also signed the agreements which lower trade barriers and pave the way for future integration into the EU market. In turn, governments must implement a range of comprehensive reforms – from strengthening the rule of law to ensuring protection of human rights and fighting corruption.

And yet, systemic corruption remains a major problem across the EU’s eastern neighbours. Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index 2013 shows that these countries suffer from high levels of corruption, with Georgia ranking the highest, scoring 49 on a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (least corrupt), while Armenia scored 36, Moldova 35, Azerbaijan 28 and Ukraine 25.

To combat systemic corruption, a holistic and comprehensive approach is needed. Over the past year, Transparency International has been conducting assessments in the region, examining corruption risks in 13 institutions and key players of the governance structures in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine.

Today, Transparency International Azerbaijan and Transparency International Moldova launch their assessments in Brussels. The reports show that corruption risks undermine prospects for closer political and economic relations with the EU, but also point to promising developments and provide tailor-made recommendations for reform.

AZERBAIJAN: OIL RICH BUT LACKING INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT

In Azerbaijan, the economy is heavily dependent on oil revenues, and like many other resource rich countries, it suffers from “the resource curse” and corruption.

Transparency International Azerbaijan’s assessment highlights serious corruption risks across society. Most alarming is a general weakness of institutions and actors with watchdog functions – civil society, the media and political parties. The parliamentary watchdogs, the Ombudsman and Chamber of Accounts, both show an insufficient level of independence and do not make adequate use of their oversight powers as granted by law.

MORE THAN 1/3 OF AZERBAIJANIS THINK BUSINESSES ARE CORRUPT/EXTREMELY CORRUPT
This is according to our Global Corruption Barometer 2013. The findings from Transparency International Azerbaijan’s assessment show that regulation of the private sector is needed.

While Azerbaijan does have an anti-corruption legal framework in place, regulation of corruption in the private sector is missing and some crucial laws – including those on whistleblower protection, conflicts of interest and corporate governance – have yet to be adopted.

There are, however, some promising developments in the fight against corruption. In recent years, the government has undertaken solid reforms to eliminate petty corruption through the introduction of electronic services and establishment of one-stop public service centres, and it has improved the private sector environment through simplification of business registration.

To address these corruption risks in Azerbaijan and to ensure an effective system of checks and balances, reforms needed include:

The legislature should:

- Implement a regulatory framework which ensures criminal responsibility for failure to act on the findings of the parliamentary watchdogs, the Ombudsman and the Chamber of Accounts.

- Ensure participation of civil society representatives at the parliamentary committee meetings, with the aim of discussing new draft laws.

- Adopt laws on whistleblower protection, conflicts of interest, corporate governance and anti-corruption norms for the private sector.

The executive should:

- Establish national- and local-level public monitoring councils where civil society plays an active role.

MOLDOVA: MORE ANTI-CORRUPTION REFORM EFFORTS NEEDED

Transparency International Moldova’s assessment shows that all 13 governance institutions assessed have a high vulnerability to corruption and are lacking in transparency and integrity. Some institutions shown to be most vulnerable to corruption are political parties, the Ombudsman and the private sector.

In particular, corruption in the private sector is poorly regulated by the state, and the “shadow economy” – in which some private sector actors conduct business – poses significant corruption risks. Additionally, the ethical standards of small enterprises are low, and big enterprises usually do not implement corporate management norms.

80% OF MOLDOVANS THINK THE JUDICIARY IS CORRUPT/EXTREMELY CORRUPT.
This is according to our Global Corruption Barometer 2013. The findings from Transparency International Moldova's assessment show that judiciary reform efforts do not go far enough.

In recent years, however, Moldova has demonstrated some progress in preventing and combating corruption. The establishment of the National Integrity Commission has led to civil servants being sanctioned for violating laws on conflicts of interest and asset declaration. And a critical sector, the judiciary, has seen the initiation of reform efforts aimed at enhancing independence and integrity of judges as well as holding them accountable for corruption-related charges. The adoption of an important law on the disciplinary accountability of judges had continued to be postponed, however.

Also, many of the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) recommendations on transparency of funding of political parties and electoral campaigns have been discussed with civil society, and are on their way to becoming adopted by parliament.

To address these corruption risks in Moldova, reforms needed include:

The government should:

- Increase the transparency of its decision-making processes, particularly regarding administration of state enterprises and commercial companies (mostly in terms of privatisation and leasing out properties).

The private sector should:

- Implement higher standards of transparency, ethics and integrity in business, including actively monitoring compliance with anti-corruption policies.

The judiciary, in particular the Supreme Council of the Magistracy and the Supreme Council of Prosecutors, should:

- Take action against cases of improper behaviour of judges and prosecutors, applying appropriate sanctions.

Political parties should:

- Make funding of political parties and electoral campaigns transparent, as well as establish internal democratic principles and integrity standards for members.

European Union flag

This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Transparency International and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.

This project is funded by the European Union.

For any press enquiries please contact press@transparency.org

Latest

Support Transparency International

Civil society’s crucial role in sustainable development

Key players in the development community are meeting in New York for the main United Nations conference on sustainable development, the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF). Transparency International is there to highlight how corruption obstructs development and report on how effectively countries are tackling this issue.

Comment gagner la lutte contre la corruption en Afrique

Aujourd’hui est la Journée africaine de lutte contre la corruption – une occasion opportunité pour reconnaitre le progrès dans la lutte contre la corruption en Afrique et le travail significatif qui reste encore à accomplir.

How to win the fight against corruption in Africa

African Anti-Corruption Day is an important opportunity to recognise both the progress made in the fight against corruption in Africa and the significant work still left to do.

Increasing accountability and safeguarding billions in climate finance

In December 2015, governments from around the world came together to sign the Paris Agreement, agreeing to tackle climate change and keep global warming under two degrees centigrade. They committed to spend US$100 billion annually by 2020 to help developing countries reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and protect themselves against the potentially devastating effects of climate change.

After Gürtel, what next for Spain’s struggle with political corruption?

At the start of June, the Spanish parliament voted to oust Prime Minister Rajoy after his political party was embroiled in the biggest corruption scandal in Spain’s democratic history. At this critical juncture in Spain’s struggle with political corruption, Transparency International urges all parties to join forces against impunity and support anti-corruption efforts in public life.

Risk of impunity increases with outcome of Portuguese-Angolan corruption trial

A verdict last week by the Lisbon Court of Appeals in the trial of former Angolan vice president Manuel Vicente has disappointed hopes for a triumph of legal due process over politics and impunity. It also has worrying implications for the independence of Portugal’s judiciary.

The UK just made it harder for the corrupt to hide their wealth offshore

If counted together, the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories and Crown dependencies would rank worst in the world for financial secrecy. Fortunately, this could soon change.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media