Next week governments can take a step to close down secrecy jurisdictions. Will they?

Next week governments can take a step to close down secrecy jurisdictions. Will they?

A joint statement by Civil Society Organisations

National financial regulators attending the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plenary in Paris 16 – 21 February have the opportunity to significantly reduce money laundering, corruption and terror financing.

They must not squander the opportunity.  

Members of the FATF will decide on proposals to review Recommendation 24, which requires countries to ensure that competent authorities have timely access to adequate, accurate and up-to-date beneficial ownership information.  

Civil society groups The B Team, Global Witness, Open Ownership, The Tax Justice Network and Transparency International urge delegates to support proposals in which Recommendation 24 mandates verified, central registers of beneficial ownership information. Such registers must be public and online in an open data format.

Open data registers enable analysis by a wider group of users, including media and civil society, which leads to improved data quality. Open registers also facilitate the development of investigative tools and techniques that can help improve enforcement of anti-money laundering regulations. Furthermore, such registers facilitate international cooperation and can be linked to other public databases.

The new edition of the Financial Secrecy Index to be published on Wednesday will once again show that secrecy jurisdictions exist in large and small economies from the Americas to Asia, Europe to Africa, and from the Pacific to Middle East. The Luanda Leaks are only the most recent investigation to show that corrupt networks will seek out and exploit jurisdictions that function as loopholes in the global anti-money laundering system. The FATF is the only entity with global jurisdiction to sanction countries that provide a haven where criminals and the corrupt can hide and launder the ill-gotten proceeds of their crimes.  

2019 study by Transparency International found that of the 83 countries assessed by FATF since 2014, only one fully complies with Recommendation 24. No country is considered to be ‘highly effective’ in this area. Recommendation 24 must become a robust and effective standard for ensuring that law enforcement can find out who owns and ultimately benefits from companies suspected of money laundering and other financial crimes. The FATF’s own country-level reports make clear that central registers of beneficial ownership information are the most effective way of obtaining this information.  

Failure to proceed with the much needed review of the Recommendation would run counter to commitments made by influential members of the FATF through other forums such as the G20 and the G7 and global platforms like the Open Government Partnership.  

The opacity of the FATF plenary – the agenda is not made public before the meetings; civil society observers are not allowed to attend; voting is not made public – must not be an excuse for governments to continue to enshrine secrecy in the global financial system.   

 

The B Team

Global Witness

Transparency International

The Tax Justice Network

Open Ownership

For any press enquiries please contact press@transparency.org

Latest

Support Transparency International

Support Us

Next week governments can take a step to close down secrecy jurisdictions. Will they?

National financial regulators attending the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plenary in Paris 16 – 21 February have the opportunity to significantly reduce money laundering, corruption and terror financing. They must not squander the opportunity.

Why don’t the victims of bribery share in the record-breaking Airbus settlement?

Last Friday, French, UK and US authorities announced that Airbus would pay record penalties for foreign bribery. Notably absent in the agreements are any plans to share the penalty payment with the countries where the company was paying bribes.

Nadie es perfecto

Los países con las puntuaciones más altas en el IPC, como Dinamarca, Suiza e Islandia, no son inmunes a la corrupción. Si bien el IPC muestra que los sectores públicos en estos países están entre los menos corruptos del mundo, la corrupción existe, especialmente en casos de lavado de dinero y otras formas de corrupción en el sector privado.

مشكلة في الأعلى

Переполох на верху

Страны с самым высоким рейтингом по ИВК, такие как Дания, Швейцария и Исландия, не защищены от коррупции. Хотя ИВК показывает, что государственный сектор в этих странах является одним из самых чистых в мире, коррупция все еще существует, особенно в случаях отмывания денег и другой коррупции в частном секторе.

Problèmes au sommet

Les pays les mieux classés sur l’IPC comme le Danemark, la Suisse et l’Islande ne sont pas à l’abri de la corruption. Bien que l’IPC montre que les secteurs publics de ces pays sont parmi les moins corrompus au monde, la corruption existe toujours, en particulier dans les cas de blanchiment d’argent et d’autres formes de corruption du secteur privé.

Индекс восприятия коррупции 2019

Индекс восприятия коррупции 2019 года выявил, что огромное число стран практически не показывает улучшения в борьбе с коррупцией. Наш анализ также показывает, что сокращение больших денег в политике и содействие инклюзивному принятию политических решений необходимы для сдерживания коррупции.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media