Cambodia and Zimbabwe: when elections are compromised

Cambodia and Zimbabwe: when elections are compromised

Recent elections in Cambodia and Zimbabwe highlight an important aspect of representational democracy: the influence of leaders who have been in power for many years who can use their resources to favour their own candidates and parties. In both countries opposition parties and national and international observers reported that electoral lists had been rigged and manipulated.

Zimbabweans went to the polls on 31 July to vote for a new president and parliament amid claims that the election could not be free and fair because the voting lists contained people who were dead, extremely old or duplicate names. On 28 July Cambodians went to the polls to find many people were not on the list although they voted in the previous elections, including the local election held last year; others found multiple names on the voter lists while many were given temporary voter cards by the local authorities and others appeared to have voted twice.

Neither election was blighted by violence or widespread intimidation at polling stations. Although that is to be welcomed, it should not be used as a reason for the people to herald these elections as fair.

In Zimbabwe the opposition Movement for Democratic Change party, led by presidential candidate Morgan Tsvangirai, condemned the elections. The African Union representatives monitoring the poll said it wanted more time to review the process but also that the incidents reported did not put “the elections in jeopardy."

In Cambodia the opposition also rejected the election. Transparency International Cambodia, which monitored the election and documented systematic and widespread irregularities, called for an independent investigation. This has not been agreed to yet and is being discussed by the disputed parties and the National Election Committee (NEC).

Resolving different opinions

Transparency International condemns the incidences of fraud and vote-rigging and calls on the election committees to review the evidence in both countries. So far this is not being discussed in Zimbabwe. In hotly contested elections that have far reaching effects on the people of a country, it is imperative that the results represent the will of the people.

The fact that the election in Zimbabwe took place before the voting lists could be fully verified will make this a difficult task. In the coming days, the government, the international observers and the members of the Zimbabwe Election Support Network must work together to deliver a result that has the public’s confidence. If this means re-running certain polls because the voter lists are flawed then this must be done.

In Cambodia if an independent investigation is undertaken, it can stop the protests that opposition parties have called for at the end of the month.

In Cambodia and Zimbabwe the ruling parties have been in power for decades: 28 years in Cambodia and 33 in Zimbabwe. They not only control the election process but the key institutions, such as the courts. This makes it even harder for opposition candidates to mount challenges to those that have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo.

For any press enquiries please contact press@transparency.org

Latest

Support Transparency International

Support Us

Next week governments can take a step to close down secrecy jurisdictions. Will they?

National financial regulators attending the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plenary in Paris 16 – 21 February have the opportunity to significantly reduce money laundering, corruption and terror financing. They must not squander the opportunity.

Why don’t the victims of bribery share in the record-breaking Airbus settlement?

Last Friday, French, UK and US authorities announced that Airbus would pay record penalties for foreign bribery. Notably absent in the agreements are any plans to share the penalty payment with the countries where the company was paying bribes.

Nadie es perfecto

Los países con las puntuaciones más altas en el IPC, como Dinamarca, Suiza e Islandia, no son inmunes a la corrupción. Si bien el IPC muestra que los sectores públicos en estos países están entre los menos corruptos del mundo, la corrupción existe, especialmente en casos de lavado de dinero y otras formas de corrupción en el sector privado.

مشكلة في الأعلى

Переполох на верху

Страны с самым высоким рейтингом по ИВК, такие как Дания, Швейцария и Исландия, не защищены от коррупции. Хотя ИВК показывает, что государственный сектор в этих странах является одним из самых чистых в мире, коррупция все еще существует, особенно в случаях отмывания денег и другой коррупции в частном секторе.

Problèmes au sommet

Les pays les mieux classés sur l’IPC comme le Danemark, la Suisse et l’Islande ne sont pas à l’abri de la corruption. Bien que l’IPC montre que les secteurs publics de ces pays sont parmi les moins corrompus au monde, la corruption existe toujours, en particulier dans les cas de blanchiment d’argent et d’autres formes de corruption du secteur privé.

Индекс восприятия коррупции 2019

Индекс восприятия коррупции 2019 года выявил, что огромное число стран практически не показывает улучшения в борьбе с коррупцией. Наш анализ также показывает, что сокращение больших денег в политике и содействие инклюзивному принятию политических решений необходимы для сдерживания коррупции.

Social Media

Follow us on Social Media