No matter how overt and obvious its consequences are for society, corruption is a crime that prefers to remain covert and concealed. It can take root in many areas of a society, whether in government or law enforcement, or among other actors like the media, business, political parties and so on.
Transparency International developed the National Integrity System approach as a comprehensive means of assessing a country’s anti-corruption efficacy sector by sector. It allows a nuanced analysis of national efforts to stamp out corruption.
Pillars of national integrity
The National Integrity System evaluates key ‘pillars’ in a country’s governance system, both in terms of their internal corruption risks and their contribution to fighting corruption in society at large.
When all the pillars in a National Integrity System are functioning well, corruption remains in check. If some or all of the pillars wobble, these weaknesses can allow corruption to thrive and damage a society.
The pillars analysed in a National Integrity System assessment typically include:
- Legislative branch of government
- Executive branch of government
- Public sector
- Law enforcement
- Electoral management body
- Audit institution
- Anti-corruption agencies
- Political parties
- Civil society
National Integrity System assessments
A National Integrity System assessment examines both the formal framework of each pillar and the actual institutional practice. The analysis highlights discrepancies between the formal provisions and reality on the ground, making it clear where there is room for improvement.
The analysis is undertaken via a consultative approach, involving the key anti-corruption agents in government, civil society, the business community and other sectors.
Conclusions are drawn together in a comprehensive national report to build momentum, political will and civic pressure for relevant reform initiatives.
Ultimately, strengthening the National Integrity System promotes better governance across all aspects of a society and contributes to a more just society overall.
For further information about the National Integrity Systems approach, please contact email@example.com
Surveys - The Sri Lanka NIS country report addresses 13 “pillars” or institutions believed to make up the integrity system of the country. Although key laws and regulations to ensure integrity already exist in most pillars, the main issue is the implementation or enforcement of these laws.
Surveys - Moldova’s National Integrity System assessment provides an evaluation of the legal framework and actual performance of the national governance institutions (pillars) which are responsible for preventing, detecting and fighting corruption in the country. It examines 13 pillars of public life, from ...
Surveys - The Azerbaijan National Integrity System is characterised by a strong executive branch, law enforcement and anti-corruption agencies. The other two branches of power that creates a system of checks and balances, namely, the judiciary and the legislature, are comparatively weak.
Surveys - The 2013 New Zealand National Integrity System (NIS) Assessment finds that New Zealand’s national integrity system remains fundamentally strong. Since the first NIS assessment of New Zealand in 2003, a welcome strengthening of transparency and accountability has occurred in some areas.