Programmatic approaches to address corruption in the construction sector

Filed under:
Published on 4 August 2010 as a U4 Helpdesk Q&A

Query

What programmatic approaches have been used to address or prevent corruption in the construction sector? What measures can be used to prevent the award of government contracts to individuals linked to criminal activities? What oversight is required to ensure transparency and accountability in this area?

Purpose

To inform design of an anti-corruption and governance programme in the construction sector.

Content

1. Brief overview of corruption risks in the construction sector
2. Programmatic approaches to prevent corruption
3. The role of public accountability in preventing corruption
4. References

Summary

The construction sector plays a vital role in supporting social and economic development. Construction is a USD 1.7 trillion industry worldwide, much of which is linked to publicly financed projects. The nature of the projects and their organisation make the sector very vulnerable to corruption, a challenge that is also reflected in comparative analyses.

The 2008 Transparency International Bribe Payers’ Survey, for example, ranked public works and construction as the most corrupt sector (Transparency International 2008).

This expert answer briefly examines the various entry points in the construction project cycle when corruption is most likely to occur. It then describes some programmatic approaches to preventing corruption in construction / infrastructure projects. It is found that implementing codes of conduct, inclusion of contractual provisions that specifically guard against corruption, disclosure of contractual information, raising awareness of corruption issues among all stakeholders, ensuring compliance and effective reporting mechanisms are among the essential components for corruption prevention. Thorough due diligence measures are necessary in order to prevent contracts from being awarded to individuals linked to criminal activities.

An interesting approach to collectively raise the transparency standards across the sector is pursued by a new multi-stakeholder initiative which develops specific guidelines for information disclosure that can help to ensure better accountability and reduced corruption in public construction projects.

Author(s): Farzana Nawaz, Transparency International, fnawaz@transparency.org
Reviewed by: Dieter Zinnbauer, Ph.D., Transparency International, dzinnbauer@transparency.org
Publication date: 4 August 2010
Number: 254

Download full answer

Tags:

Contact the TI Helpdesk

TI Helpdesk
Submit your query to the TI Helpdesk:
tihelpdesk@transparency.org

More corruption Q&As

23
Aug
2012

Overview of integrity assessment tools

Can you provide an overview of public sector integrity assessment tools aimed at assessing the integrity of public officials? See the answer

6
Jul
2011

Anti-corruption progress in Georgia, Liberia, Rwanda

Please summarise what the existing literature has to say about why Georgia, Liberia and Rwanda are perceived to have made more progress than most ... See the answer