Overview of corruption and anti-corruption in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

Filed under:
Published on 8 October 2010 as a U4 Helpdesk Q&A

Query

What is the present corruption situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo? Please provide an overview of recent evolution in national anti-corruption measures and structures.

Purpose

Our agency is currently reviewing its development cooperation programme with the DRC.

Content

1. Overview of corruption in the DRC
2. Anti-corruption efforts in the DRC
3. References

Summary

As the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) emerges from a long period of violence and instability, it struggles with a legacy of entrenched corruption at all levels of society, threatening social and political institutions with failure. Repeated political crises, poor infrastructure, an underdeveloped regulatory environment, lack of institutional capacity and weak rule of law fuel the country’s persistent governance crisis.

Petty and grand forms of corruption, as well as a complex web of political patronage permeate all sectors of the economy, undermining development prospects and compromising the fragile post-conflict equilibrium. Despite being endowed with considerable mineral wealth, extraction of natural resources continues to be combined with widespread corruption, including within the armed forces, fuelling violence, insecurity and public discontent. Corruption in tax and customs administration, as well as in the management of state-run companies, undermines the state’s capacity to collect revenues and escape the trap of mismanagement, conflict and poverty.

Against this backdrop, the country has limited capacity to address the governance and corruption challenges it faces. There is neither indication of firm political will to address corruption, nor evidence of progress made in anti-corruption in the post-conflict era. While a strong legal framework to address corruption has recently been established under the pressure of the international community, it remains largely ineffective to curb corruption. The judiciary is plagued by a lack of resources and capacity, and faces major challenges of independence, political interference and corruption. Other governance institutions are weak or non-existent. The media and civil society operate in a restrictive environment, running a high risk of intimidation, arrest and harassment when denouncing public sector corruption.

Author(s): Marie ChĂȘne, Transparency International, mchene@transparency.org
Reviewed by: Dieter Zinnbauer, Ph.D., Transparency International, dzinnbauer@transparency.org
Publication date: 8 October 2010
Number: 257

Download full answer

Tags:

Contact the TI Helpdesk

TI Helpdesk
Submit your query to the TI Helpdesk:
tihelpdesk@transparency.org

More corruption Q&As

8
Feb
2013

Review of donor disclosure policies of corruption cases

Our country is currently reviewing its disclosure policy and system of corruption investigations (current, pending and resolved) related to its ... See the answer

2
Feb
2011

Anti-corruption commitments for developed countries

We are interested in measures and approaches that fall under the category of "anticorruption through the North", i.e. actions developed countries ... See the answer