Overview of corruption and anti-corruption in Mozambique

Filed under:
Published on 5 March 2012 as a U4 Helpdesk Q&A

Query

What is the status of corruption and anti-corruption in Mozambique?

Purpose


Our agency is refocusing and strengthening its development cooperation strategy towards natural resource management and energy. This document will be used in the planning of cooperation in order to identify any risks and ways to mitigate these.


Content


1. 1. Overview of corruption in Mozambique
2. 2. Anti-corruption efforts in Mozambique
3. 3. References


Summary


In Mozambique prevalence of corruption remains an area of concern for both the public as well as donors, who support almost half of the state’s budget. Corruption manifests itself through various forms, including political, petty and grand corruption, embezzlement of public funds, and a deeply embedded patronage system. Checks and balances are weak, as the executive exercises strong influence over the legislative and the judiciary.


Corruption also affects several sectors in the country, such as the police, public administration, judiciary, and public financial management. The recent gas and oil discoveries and the potential of mining industries in increasing state revenues have raised discussions around the importance of establishing mechanisms ensuring more transparency and accountability in the extractive industries.


The government has introduced important reforms in recent years, such as the public administration reform. It has also called for a crackdown on corruption, adopting an anti-corruption strategy in 2006. Nevertheless, Mozambique’s legal and institutional framework remains inadequate. Anti-corruption institutions - particularly the Central Office for Combating Corruption - lack technical expertise, financial resources, and are subject to political interference. Freedom of association and of expression is guaranteed by the constitution and civil society organisations and the media play a growing role in the fight against corruption in the country. However, their potential as effective watchdog institutions is hampered by the lack of a more detailed law on access to information.

Author(s): Maira Martini, Transparency International, mmartini@hotmail.com
Reviewed by: Marie ChĂȘne, Transparency International, mchene@transparency.org Robin Hodess Ph.D, Transparency International, rhodess@transparency.org
Publication date: 5 March 2012
Number: 322

Download full answer

Tags:

Contact the TI Helpdesk

TI Helpdesk
Submit your query to the TI Helpdesk:
tihelpdesk@transparency.org

More corruption Q&As

1
Nov
2010

Mobilising broad anti-corruption coalitions

Please provide examples of successful efforts to advance anti-corruption reforms through the mobilisation of broad coalitions across civil society, ... See the answer

15
Jul
2010

Technical assistance in the field of integrity of carbon reduction incentives mechanisms

Please provide an overview of actors and institutions with technical expertise in the field of integrity of carbon reduction incentive mechanism ... See the answer