Examples of anti-corruption clauses in cooperation agreements

Filed under:
Published on 25 March 2010 as a U4 Helpdesk Q&A

Query

Please provide examples of anti-corruption clauses/proposals that donors can introduce in a convention/agreement with a public partner to prevent and manage corruption risks.

Purpose

Our agency does not have a comprehensive anti-corruption/ethical framework in place yet. We are increasingly using agreements with public partner for the implementation of our programs and would like to introduce anti-corruption safeguards in addition to regular financial controls into these agreements.

Content

  1. Overview of corruption risks to be addressed in cooperation agreements
  2. Examples of risk mitigation strategies in cooperation agreements
  3. Lessons learnt from the implementation of anti-corruption clauses
  4. References

Summary

No aid modality is free from fraud and corruption risks and most donors have developed anti-corruption strategies to safeguard their funds from corruption. This includes committing to a “no bribe” policy both internally and externally.

In dealings with development partners, the key pillars of these anti-corruption strategies typically cover three major dimensions, namely prevention, detection, and a regime of appropriate sanctions.

Introducing specific anti-corruption clauses in cooperation agreements is an important means to integrate corruption into the political dialogue with partners. In addition, donors’ corruption risk management strategies also include efforts to improve the project design process with the objective to explicitly assess and address corruption risks at all stages of the programme cycle, to promote greater transparency, disclosure and civil society participation as well as to strengthen the monitoring and supervision of development projects at the implementation stage.

Ensuring that adequate strategies and resources are made available to support the implementation of these strategies is essential, particularly in countries affected by high levels of corruption, where enforcing a zero tolerance policy is a significant challenge.

Author(s): Marie Chêne, Transparency International, mchene@transparency.org
Reviewed by: Dieter Zinnbauer, Ph.D., Transparency International, dzinnbauer@transparency.org
Publication date: 25 March 2010
Number: 239

Download full answer

Tags:

Contact the TI Helpdesk

TI Helpdesk
Submit your query to the TI Helpdesk:
tihelpdesk@transparency.org

More corruption Q&As

12
Apr
2010

Integrating anti-corruption measures in the design of public law enforcement agencies

When establishing new public law enforcement agencies or regulatory bodies in Georgia – for example competition agencies, sanitary and ... See the answer

13
Jul
2012

Overview of corruption and anti-corruption in Somalia

Please provide an overview of corruption and anti-corruption efforts and actors in Somalia. See the answer