Leading NGOs warn against withholding aid from high-risk countries

Filed under:
Posted 20 October 2011 by Transparency International UK

Two leading NGOs are calling for the aid and development community to manage corruption risks, not avoid countries where aid is needed most, as a parliamentary committee warns against DFID’s decision to focus aid on high-risk countries.

Mango and Transparency International UK have responded to a report released by the Public Accounts Committee, which has suggested that DFID’s decision to focus humanitarian aid on high-risk countries will result in more money being lost through corruption.

Chandrashekhar Krishnan, Executive Director of Transparency International UK, said “The poorest of the poor already suffer disproportionally from the bribery and corruption which is often entrenched in the high-risk countries identified by DFID. To withhold aid altogether would only inflict a double taxation on those who already suffer most from corruption.”

NGOs are often operating in the highest-risk countries for corruption. The work being undertaken by NGOs to prevent bribery has been given increased emphasis with the commencement of the UK Bribery Act, which acted as a spur to a group of leading NGOs developing and publishing Anti-bribery Principles and Guidance for NGOs. The group was led by Mango and Transparency International UK under the auspices of Bond, the UK membership body for NGOs working in international development.

Tim Boyes-Watson, Director of Mango, said “Field experience suggests that it is possible to operate even in high-risk areas without paying bribes, but it requires good local understanding, project design that takes account of bribery risk, training and support for staff – and above all, a clear tone from the top of NGOs that they will not be complicit in corruption. We are calling on the development community to manage the corruption risks well and ensure that aid reaches those who desperately need it.”

Notes

Mango’s mission is to strengthen the financial management and accountability of development and humanitarian NGOs and their partners. www.mango.org.uk

Transparency International UK is the UK Chapter of the global movement against corruption www.transparency.org.uk

The publication, ‘Anti-Bribery Principles and Guidance for NGOs’, was developed by the Bond Anti-Bribery NGO Working Group. Participating NGOs were Mango and Transparency International UK (co-chairs), Bond, CAFOD, Christian Aid, CFDG, Global Witness, Muslim Aid, Oxfam, Tearfund, Water Aid and WWF. It can be downloaded from http://www.bond.org.uk/pages/anti-bribery-principles-and-guidelines-for-ngos.html

Press contact(s):

Tim Boyes-Watson at Mango
T:+44 7976 406682

Rachel Davies at Transparency International UK
T: +44 07411 347754.

Tags:

Stay informed

Related news

19
Dec
2012

La Fondation Heritage pour Haiti (LFHH), Haiti chapter of Transparency International (TI), announces the launch of its new “anti-corruption hotline” initiative for the programes and projects funded by USAID in Haiti

This «Anti-corruption Hotline» will enable victims or witnesses of corrupt and fraudulent practices within USAID-funded programs and projects to ...

Aid robbed in Uganda: what can be done?

International donors have pulled funds from Uganda in the wake of corruption allegations. What can be done to better ensure aid?

Transparency and accountability in development: where do we stand?

Last year in Busan, world leaders agreed that transparency and accountability are critical to improving aid effectiveness. Have aid donors stuck to ...

Related publications

Publication cover image

Real lives, true stories

When we talk about corruption in terms of statistics, it’s easy to forget the human cost of abused power. Behind every fact or figure are real ...

Annual Report published – Jul 2012

Publication cover image

Policy Position 06/2011: Making aid effective: An anti-corruption agenda

While aid flows topped US$ 128 billion in 2010, they have not always been good at achieving results due to corruption and mismanagement that arise ...

Policy position published – Nov 2011