TI calls for the establishment of a robust European Public Prosecutor

Filed under:

Crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union can be efficiently confronted through the creation of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office, said Transparency International (TI), the global coalition against corruption, ahead of the next European Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting in Luxemburg.

With the entry into force of the EU Lisbon Treaty in December 2009, the EU now explicitly has the mandate to set up a European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Whether this opportunity will be seized is now largely a question of political will.

“The Lisbon Treaty offers a golden opportunity for the EU to boost actual enforcement of anti-corruption legislation” said Jana Mittermaier, Head of TI’s Liaison Office to the EU. “We are convinced that the number of corruption cases in domestic courts will increase, if EU-level investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) are systematically followed up by a European Public Prosecutor.”

At present cross-border fraud and corruption investigations are not being pursued actively enough. Domestic prosecution offices are seen as being slow, hesitant or even hampered in pursuing such complex cases. Consequently, the chances of timely convictions are currently relatively limited. “The missing link in the procedural chain is an efficient European Public Prosecutor Office that is equipped with the authority to direct and coordinate the work of domestic judicial institutions, the European network of judicial authorities (Eurojust) and OLAF”, said Mittermaier.

In the longer term, and once the European Public Prosecutor Office is established, it should be provided with a comprehensive mandate that includes not only crimes that directly affect the financial interests of the EU, but also serious cross-border crimes, such as cross-border corruption and other crimes.

A European Public Prosecutor’s Office would ultimately help to restore trust in EU institutions and their capacity to deal effectively with transnational corruption-related cases. The reputation of the institutions has suffered considerably, as was demonstrated by a recent European Commission Eurobarometer survey in which 78 per cent of EU citizens responded that the EU should do more to fight against corruption.

###

Transparency International is the global civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption

Note to Editors: There are TI chapters in almost every EU member state, accession candidate and potential candidate states. For more information on TI’s views regarding anti-corruption and the EU visit: http://www.transparencyinternational.eu

Press contact(s):

Brussels
Jana Mittermaier

T:+32 2 234 7723
E:jmittermaier@transparency.org

Berlin:
Gypsy Guillén Kaiser

T:+49 30 343820662
E:ggkaiser@transparency.org

Tags:

Stay informed

Related news

1
Apr
2013

No complacency for corruption on anniversary of 100 years of Public Service Act

Transparency International New Zealand will publish its Integrity Plus National Integrity System report later this year. It will look at twelve key ...

International Women’s Day: profiles of women fighting corruption

To celebrate International Women’s Day, we're highlighting women corruption fighters around the world.

23
Nov
2012

Transparency International warns new presidential powers in Egypt are a threat to democracy

Transparency International, the global anti-corruption organisation, warns that the constitutional declaration by Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi, ...

Related publications

Publication cover image

National Integrity System Greece

The unfolding of the Greek debt crisis has left a large number of its citizens on the margins, presenting one of the greatest socio‐economic ...

Report published – Feb 2013

Publication cover image

Evaluación del Sistema Nacional de Integridad: Paraguay 2011/12

El presente informe presenta un análisis de las principales instituciones y sectores que en lo individual, pero sobre todo en conjunto, tienen la ...

National Integrity System assessment published – Oct 2012