Scandals show urgent need for bank reform

Filed under - Financial markets

Posted 6 August 2012
lead image

Corruption and the financial sector

From manipulating rates to mis-selling products and lax enforcement of money-laundering controls, the scandals in the financial sector show the urgent need not only for reform of the regulatory system, but also for an overhaul of how these institutions operate.

So far, a handful of banks – including Barclays, HSBC and Coutts – have been fined more than US$500 million in the past 12 months for misconduct. This sounds impressive until it’s compared to the US$8.5 trillion in assets that just five leading banks held at the end of 2011, or the half-year profits reported this year. Although banks under scrutiny are putting aside funds to take care of fines and possible law suits, Barclays Bank and HSBC alone reported more than US$17 billion in pre-tax profits for the first six months of this year. 

Corruption and a tolerance for unethical behaviour are at the root of the illegal activities that have damaged the livelihoods of millions of people and the reputation of the financial industry as a whole. This has to change.

In our history of fighting corruption in government and the private sector over nearly two decades, Transparency International has established key guidelines for building a strong anti-corruption ethos. Zero tolerance for corruption; transparency; and appropriate incentives and sanctions form the cornerstones of good governance.

Zero tolerance for corruption

When the New York Times published its exposé on Wal-Mart’s alleged bribery practices in Mexico, our managing director Cobus de Swardt wrote about the need for top management to lead by example.

If those in charge try to cover up corruption, as was alleged at Wal-Mart, what message does that send to the rest of the organisation?

Transparency and accountability

Country-by-country reporting in financial sector table, from the report Transparency in Corporate Reporting

See how several banking giants fared in the special Financial Sector section of our recent report, Transparency in Corporate Reporting.

Corruption is always a risk for multinationals operating in many jurisdictions. But by adopting greater corporate transparency – that is, by publicly reporting on activities and operations and anti-corruption programmes – companies not only provide third parties with a way to hold them to account but also send a message to their employees and supply chains that they do not tolerate corruption.

In July 2012 Transparency International published Transparency in Corporate Reporting. The report assessed 105 of the world’s largest companies on three areas of transparency: reporting on anti-corruption programmes, organisational transparency and country-by-country reporting. Good reporting is an indication of a commitment to fighting corruption and makes wrongdoing easier to uncover.

Financial institutions scored badly overall and particularly badly on their country-by-country reporting, which, given the news in the past five years should not come as a great shock. Financial firms scored an average 56 per cent on how they report on anti-corruption programmes, well below the 68 per cent average. And among the financial companies scoring in the top ten for organisational transparency, there was not a single US firm.

Incentives and sanctions

Regulations need to be strong and unambiguous. There need to be incentives for sticking to the rules and sanctions for violating them. And there should be clear policies to avoid conflict of interest, including measures to slow down the revolving door whereby industry insiders become regulators and vice-versa, and to monitor scenarios where they do.

When Barclays Bank was fined for manipulating a key interest rate, Transparency International chair Huguette Labelle argued that strong leadership is a prerequisite for building back trust in institutions, and that regulators should take this opportunity to institute tough reforms in banking to stop the rot

Less than a week later the US Senate’s permanent subcommittee on investigations released a 340-page report detailing the lapses in the compliance procedures at HSBC – one of the world’s biggest banks – in its Mexican operations, which allegedly made laundering money from drug cartels a serious likelihood.

HSBC had bought the Mexican bank in 2002 to increase its presence in the market, a legitimate business decision. However, the report found “HSBC Group was fully aware of the years-long … compliance problems at HBMX [the Mexican operation] …. The evidence also indicates that HSBC Group executives and compliance personnel worked to build a compliance culture, but repeatedly faced a workforce in Mexico that disregarded the Group’s AML [anti-money laundering] policies and procedures, delayed obtaining required KYC [know your customer] data, delayed closing suspect accounts, and delayed reporting suspicious activity to regulators.”

Eight years on HSBC faces substantial reputational risk and US$27.5 million in fines in Mexico with the US Justice Department still deliberating what sanctions to impose. This follows fines totalling more than US$11 million in December 2011 for mis-selling financial products. 

In our work to push for rapid enforcement of the G20 Anti-Corruption Action Plan we hammer home the need for better regulations and more independent regulators. How many more scandals affecting people’s livelihoods will it take for governments to fully embrace this agenda?

Resources

Press contact(s):

Chris Sanders
Manager, Media and Public Relations
press@transparency.org
+49 30 3438 20 666

Country / Territory - International   |   Mexico   |   United States   
Region - Global   |   Americas   
Language(s) - English   
Topic - Accountability   |   Financial markets   |   Politics and government   |   Private sector   
Tags - Financial crisis   |   Corporate transparency   |   Money laundering   |   Corporate Governance   |   Regulatory agencies   |   Wal-Mart   |   banking   |   Bank secrecy   |   Barclays   |   Libor   |   Regulatory reform   |   HSBC   |   Coutts   

By leaving a comment, you acknowledge the terms of use for our comments board.

Stay informed

Related news

3
Sep
2014

Transparency International France suspends BNP Paribas membership

In a deal with American authorities on 30 June, BNP Paribas accepted that its oil and gas commodity-trading business willingly concealed illegal ...

G20: Time for an anti-corruption plan with sharp teeth

The G20 countries need a stronger, sharper anti-corruption plan. Here's how to build it.

Corruption Perceptions Index 2013: Now is the time for action

The results of the 2013 Corruption Perceptions Index show that no government has room for complacency when it comes to fighting graft.

Related publications

Publication cover image

Financial transparency glossary

Transparency International believes that it is essential to promote greater transparency, integrity and accountability of financial institutions to ...

Report published – Jan 2014

Publication cover image

Business Principles for Countering Bribery

The Business Principles for Countering Bribery provide a framework for companies to develop comprehensive anti-bribery programmes. Whilst many large ...

Report published – Dec 2013