Annual Report 2006
In 2006, corruption topped the news with allegations of fraud and bribery in the corporate world, and with charges of bribe-taking, blackmail and money laundering in political offices. But these scandals go beyond the headlines; they translate into poverty and injustice for millions of ordinary citizens.
2006 was a productive year in Transparency International’s (TI) fight against corruption. New tools were developed and existing ones refined to combat corruption in the private sector and politics, as well as in development cooperation and public contracting, and convention monitoring. These tools and examples of successful regional and international anti-corruption initiatives that are showcased in TI’s Annual Report 2006. The report also reveals how one person can make a real difference, profiling individual corruption fighters and offering a message of hope that it is possible to fight back and win.
“Throughout the year, I witnessed the extraordinary contribution that individuals make to the fight against corruption. In this report you will find portraits of just a few of these remarkable people. I hope they will inspire you.” – TI Chair Huguette Labelle
To download TI’s Annual Report 2006, please click here: or go to: http://www.transparency.org/publications/annual_report
2006 in images
Anti-corruption day 2006
Transparency International (TI) and its network of chapters around the world spread the encouraging message that corruption can be fought, with their exciting and colourful events to mark the third-annual United Nations International Anti-corruption Day on 9 December 2006.
Around the world, hundreds of people convened in seminars and discussions to debate anti-corruption issues and look for new solutions. In Nepal, discussions concentrated on the role of political parties and media figures in minimising corruption. In Sri Lanka, the focus was on the right to information to fight corruption. Other conferences dealt with implementing conventions – as was highlighted by TI Bosnia and Herzegovina activities – and discussed the links between corruption and poverty and human rights, for example TI Cambodia and TI UK. Many national chapters issued press releases to draw the attention of the media, the public and the governments to the importance of anti-corruption work.
The Coalition of Accountability and Integrity (AMAN; TI’s national chapter in the Palestinian Authority) organised the first ever “Transparency Festival” that featured a ceremonial signing of anti-corruption codes of conduct and an Integrity Awards ceremony. The festival was attended by more than 400 people in Gaza and the West Bank. In Sri Lanka, an anti-corruption slogan competition organised by TI Sri Lanka brought close to 300 people together.
TI Bangladesh organised an eight-hour concert to mark the day, which was attended by more than 25,000 of the nation’s youth. It also hosted various and creative activities such as rallies, debates and painting competitions, a human chain, street theatre shows, and a cross-country nine-hour bicycle ride to Dhaka. TI Bosnia and Herzegovina also organised a concert to mark the day. The concert, featuring a performance by the Youth Symphony Orchestra South Eastern Europe was attended by 350 people.
National Integrity Awards ceremonies carried out in the Palestinian Authorities and in Bosnia and Herzegovina honoured the countries’ anti-corruption heroes on Anti-Corruption Day to show that combating corruption requires brave and visionary people to lead the fight. In Turin, TI Italy awarded public bodies and organisations for adopted ethical measures.
The Transparency International secretariat in Berlin launched new web pages on Anti-Corruption Day to illustrate the importance of fighting corruption to a general audience and to highlight a new television advertisement that was created to raise awareness about the impact of corruption. TI’s television advertisement reminds the movement and the public why anti-corruption work remains so important: “Corruption marks children, families and societies for life”.
Integrity Awards 2006
|
|
Dr. Ana Cecilia Magallanes Cortez, an outstanding prosecutor who fought the embedded corruption ruling Peru during the terms of ex-president Alberto Fujimori, was awarded TI’s 2006 Integrity Award before an audience of over 1,000 anti-corruption practitioners, politicians and leaders from around the world, at the International Anti-Corruption Conference in Guatemala on 15 November 2006. Dr. Magallanes is one of the most respected prosecutors in Peru and the leading force in the prosecution of approximately 1,500 members of the criminal network headed by Vladimiro Montesinos. |
|
Her efforts led to the arrest of -among others- the former President of the Republic Alberto Fujimori, generals, Supreme Court justices, judges and media magnates and helped initiate the recovery of US $250 million. Proetica, TI’s chapter in Peru which nominated the winner, stated that Dr. Magallanes’s investigations brought her up against a government that used forced disappearances and murder to quell dissidents. Proetica is proud of this recognition of her work, done at the risk of her life and considers Dr. Magallanes an example of integrity, courage and professionalism who serves as an inspiration for millions of Peruvians. Now in its fifth year, the Integrity Awards have honoured anti-corruption fighters from Asia, Africa, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East. Past winners include journalists, public prosecutors, accountants, government officials and members of the military along with leaders of civil society. |
Stories of anti-corruption fighters
“I was able to experience first-hand how distortions caused by graft and other manifestations of corruption sabotage the implementation of even the best thought-out policies,” she says. “It dawned on me that more rapid progress in achieving social justice will be made by tackling corruption in its various manifestations and mutations.”
For Ms Ekeanyanwu, one of the greatest challenges is the widespread acceptance of corruption as the normal way of life. In her eyes, “an effective solution must combine both a serious commitment from government to overhaul the system, implementing sanctions for corrupt actions, and an end to the people’s tolerance of corruption.” To make this vision a reality, she raises her voice in Nigeria and campaigns tirelessly as an international spokesperson for TI.
Ms Calzadilla has fought corruption since 1999, when she joined the investigative unit of a Venezuelan daily newspaper. This was a period of “growth, of new experiences and of learning ‘on the streets’”, she recalls. “Our working hours didn’t matter; we worked with a lot of passion.” She says that through her work, she recognised the widespread nature of corruption in Venezuela, and saw that for many, it is a way of life.
The work of journalists like Ms Calzadilla is becoming more difficult every day. Her
recent investigations into the salaries of public officials proved impossible because of secrecy surrounding the figures and state documents. Against this background, she has become a champion of public access to government information.
They wouldn’t tell me where they were to take me.” Dr Panday was held captive with other political prisoners in harsh conditions for nearly 100 days.
Dr Panday later learned that he had been arrested for “spreading misinformation” and “threatening national security” – charges related to his work in promoting democracy and fighting corruption after the 2005 coup by King Gyanendra. “To me, anti-corruption and democracy are inseparable. Accountability requires structures and processes that are possible only when people can question their leaders.”
Despite the atmosphere of anxiety and apathy about corruption in Nepal, Dr Panday remains optimistic that today’s “youthful leadership... can inculcate new values and commitments.”
Optimistic about his ability to improve his financial situation, Mr Aliev followed the example of his neighbours and applied to the Baku Executive Committee for permission to undertake changes to his apartment to set up a small business. Shortly thereafter, he was visited at home by “intermediaries” who offered to facilitate the planning permission for a fee of US $10,000 that he was unable to pay. Mr
Aliev’s request was later denied. His only option was to fight for his rights.
Mr Aliev fought for five years to have the decision overturned. Finally, he turned to
the Baku Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre (ALAC) for assistance. The ALAC staff agreed that the denial of planning permission was illegal. The ALAC advised him how to pursue his case in court. Against all odds, he won.
Mr Aliev is now struggling to ensure that the court decision is implemented by the Baku Executive Committee. His courage and perseverance in standing up to corruption have led to an important legal milestone: administrative decisions are subject to the rule of law, a precedent lacking in many transition countries.
home
print this page
