Corruption Verdict Justice Index (CVJI)

Hackathon problem statement
Posted 2 October 2012 by Transparency International Indonesia
On Corruption Verdicts
This index is designed to answer questions of how the public views corruption verdicts. It is a tool to measure the public perception of corruption verdict fairness nationally, as well as for a country to country comparison. It will enable us to improve the transparency and accountability of judicial institutions.
default hackathon image

This index is designed to answer the questions ‘what is the public’s perception of corruption verdicts?’ and ‘are corruption verdicts fair?’

Judicial verdicts in corruption cases are sometimes harsh, but more often very weak. In Indonesia such punishments are often so lenient that the public's sense of justice is undermined. Anti-corruption enforcement law is also ineffective.

The target groups of this initiative are active citizens, anti-corruption activists, journalists, and business people. The main beneficiaries of this initiative would be the public in general, law enforcement agencies, anti-corruption activists, journalists, the media, academics, researchers and universities. They will benefit from having this kind of index and in turn, more accountable courts.

Tags:

Stay informed

additional hackathon problem statements

Article image

Monitoring public budgets

- Citizen oversight of public funds and investment projects could increase qualitatively if given access to existing databases on finance and procurement. However, understanding ...

Article image

Climate management

- The management of Climate Finance, forests and other natural resources in Kenya have been plagued with a lack of transparency and accountability. This has been due to a lack of ...

Article image

Tracking ALAC Cases

- ALAC Cases are often referred to institutions and officials like the Attorney General and the Supreme Electoral Tribunal. However, once there, cases stagnate. We would like to ...