Corruption Verdict Justice Index (CVJI)

Hackathon problem statement
Posted 2 October 2012 by Transparency International Indonesia
On Corruption Verdicts
This index is designed to answer questions of how the public views corruption verdicts. It is a tool to measure the public perception of corruption verdict fairness nationally, as well as for a country to country comparison. It will enable us to improve the transparency and accountability of judicial institutions.
default hackathon image

This index is designed to answer the questions ‘what is the public’s perception of corruption verdicts?’ and ‘are corruption verdicts fair?’

Judicial verdicts in corruption cases are sometimes harsh, but more often very weak. In Indonesia such punishments are often so lenient that the public's sense of justice is undermined. Anti-corruption enforcement law is also ineffective.

The target groups of this initiative are active citizens, anti-corruption activists, journalists, and business people. The main beneficiaries of this initiative would be the public in general, law enforcement agencies, anti-corruption activists, journalists, the media, academics, researchers and universities. They will benefit from having this kind of index and in turn, more accountable courts.

Tags:

Stay informed

additional hackathon problem statements

Article image

Youth Community

- Based on a 2012 study by TI Hungary young people (between 15-29) don't feel they have the tools, equipment or knowledge they can use against corruption. Given corruption is a ...

Article image

Judicial transparency

- The database represents an innovative way of easily accessing information that would otherwise be challenging to collect and categorize for the common citizen. It enhances a ...

Article image

Open Contracts

- Open data movement pushes for automatic online contract publishing, but if crowdsourcing contracts monitoring is to be successful, appropriate platforms are needed. TI Slovakia ...